- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,154
- 32,272
- 2,300
I do.
Nope. you use words like that to make yourself look smart, just like trying to use arguments over the concept of time and physics to ignore biology and the IMPACTS of medical treatment.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I do.
1. I am smart.Nope. you use words like that to make yourself look smart, just like trying to use arguments over the concept of time and physics to ignore biology and the IMPACTS of medical treatment.
Again, refer back to Yale School of Medicine.
Who do you think the vast majority considered an authority on the matter? You, rando internet guy, or Yale School of Medicine?
No one is "non-binary," because there are two sexes. Binary.
As I expertly explained using your own previous example, you're eyes are limited in what they are able to see. They can't see large swaths of the electromagnetic spectrum nor can they see microscopic molecules and atoms and yet we know these things exist.Any “authority” that tells me to believe what my own eyes, ears, and brain allow me to clearly see to be insane bullshit, is no authority at all.
You would know because you can add two plus two and come to your own conclusion. You have presented no countervailing trans research to support your conclusions.If someone claiming to be a mathematician insists that two plus two equals ten, then I know not to believe anything that he tells me.
I don't actually care if you trust the educators at Yale, the medical community itself does.Likewise, if someone who claims to be a “medical professional” tells me that a man can be a woman, then I know that he's full of shit.
Can't discuss the topic rationally? Is that why you're focusing on me?Dunning–Kruger effect - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Or strapping gay people to chairs and forcing them to watch hetero porn as "conversion therapy"....Ironically enough, both sides of the trans argument believe the same thing, there is something wrong with the person who wants to pretend to be something they are not.
One side says, "Let's help this person reconcile what their mind and body are saying that is so disparate" while the other side says, "Don't anyone dare to even think that anything's wrong with the person's mind. Obviously, the body is wrong so let's mutilate it and pump drugs into it until it resembles what it is not". Let's face reality here, mental and emotional health science is still in its infancy, and I predict that in the relatively near future people will look back at us and shutter at how barbaric we were. "Can you believe they used to actually cut off body parts just to make someone look like a man or a woman? It's too horrible to even contemplate".
I mean, it really wasn't that long ago that we killed an American president by draining his blood out of him, thinking we were curing him, and more recently shoved a sharp metal object into a person's brain to settle them down.
Science does not support the wokke left's ideas about genderYou shouldn't deny science. Where do you imagine I've suggested you should?
You know what would be a great way to prove that? With a rational counter argument supported by countervailing science.Science does not support the wokke left's ideas about gender
you know a better way?You know what would be a great way to prove that? With a rational counter argument supported by countervailing science.
I have but I'll happily do it again, and again and again if for nothing but to amuse myself at reading your replies.you know a better way?
Support your silly claim with science whichy ou have not done
Like I said, it's in its infancy. At least that doesn't leave a young teenager with irreversible damage done to their bodies that they can't undo when they finally mature and realize they should never have done it.Or strapping gay people to chairs and forcing them to watch hetero porn as "conversion therapy"....
Hormone therapy doesn't leave any lasting irreversible damage, or any damage and reassignment surgery isn't recommended for anyone under 18 or 16 with the consent of their parents and physicians.Like I said, it's in its infancy. At least that doesn't leave a young teenager with irreversible damage done to their bodies that they can't undo when they finally mature and realize they should never have done it.
Any time you mess with the normal growth and maturation of a person, you introduce unnecessary risk, and surgery should be treated like tattoos, almost impossible for minors to have done to them, and for the same reasons. They are not considered mature enough to make a permanent choice like that about their bodies.Hormone therapy doesn't leave any lasting irreversible damage, or any damage and reassignment surgery isn't recommended for anyone under 18 or 16 with the consent of their parents and physicians.
It is treated more seriously than tattoos. You need to be seeing a therapist for at least a year who will sign off on your surgery.Any time you mess with the normal growth and maturation of a person, you introduce unnecessary risk, and surgery should be treated like tattoos, almost impossible for minors to have done to them, and for the same reasons. They are not considered mature enough to make a permanent choice like that about their bodies.
Good, and it should stay that way. Now, who is betting that it will with the current pressures?It is treated more seriously than tattoos. You need to be seeing a therapist for at least a year who will sign off on your surgery.
You're talking political pressure, not counter prevailing medical opinions.Good, and it should stay that way. Now, who is betting that it will with the current pressures?
Of course I am. Politics will remove barriers science puts in place.You're talking political pressure, not counter prevailing medical opinions.
So to be clear you want politics to influence science. I'm glad you at least admitted it.Of course I am. Politics will remove barriers science puts in place.