Dems want Laws changed after Rittenhouse shootings. Are vigilantes the answer? (Poll)

[DBA]

You should stay out of things you can't understand.

I fully understand. Thug Democrats riot and loot when things don't go their way. Passive Democrats sit idly by and support their behavior because they are beholden to the Party.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

That's why we have law enforcement instead of vigilantes.

I agree that properly-functioning law-enforcement is far preferable to vigilantism.

It's why we created governments, in the first place, and it is the most basic and essential of all purposes of government, to protect the rights of all, in a standardize, orderly manner. The right to have our safety and our property protected belongs to every individual, but to exercise this right directly results in disorder and inconsistency; with too much revenge and too little actual justice and order. It is for this reason that instead of retaining the exercise of this right directly to ourselves as individuals, we collectively delegate it to government.

When government fails to perform this duty, the rights and responsibility reverts back to us. Vigilantism is the inevitable result of this. Those who no most loudly decry this vigilantism are, for the most part, the same who are responsible for causing government to fail to perform its duty, making vigilantism necessary and unavoidable.

 

[maybelooking]

You should stay out of things you can't understand.

pot.....kettle

you're probably one of the commies I was talking about. Pissed that you cant form a mob, chase down a child, and murder him because you now know he can, and will FIGHT BACK and you WILL LOSE.

 

[2aguy]

I agree that properly-functioning law-enforcement is far preferable to vigilantism.

It's why we created governments, in the first place, and it is the most basic and essential of all purposes of government, to protect the rights of all, in a standardize, orderly manner. The right to have our safety and our property protected belongs to every individual, but to exercise this right directly results in disorder and inconsistency; with too much revenge and too little actual justice and order. It is for this reason that instead of retaining the exercise of this right directly to ourselves as individuals, we collectively delegate it to government.

When government fails to perform this duty, the rights and responsibility reverts back to us. Vigilantism is the inevitable result of this. Those who no most loudly decry this vigilantism are, for the most part, the same who are responsible for causing government to fail to perform its duty, making vigilantism necessary and unavoidable.

The democrats want the fighting on the street.....which is one of the reasons they keep ordering the police to stand down in the face of blm/antifa brownshirts.............when innocent people have to use their own guns to save their own lives, it allows the democrats to push gun control.......and justify using the police, FBI and other agencies to attack those normal people......

 

[surada]

I agree that properly-functioning law-enforcement is far preferable to vigilantism.

It's why we created governments, in the first place, and it is the most basic and essential of all purposes of government, to protect the rights of all, in a standardize, orderly manner. The right to have our safety and our property protected belongs to every individual, but to exercise this right directly results in disorder and inconsistency; with too much revenge and too little actual justice and order. It is for this reason that instead of retaining the exercise of this right directly to ourselves as individuals, we collectively delegate it to government.

When government fails to perform this duty, the rights and responsibility reverts back to us. Vigilantism is the inevitable result of this. Those who no most loudly decry this vigilantism are, for the most part, the same who are responsible for causing government to fail to perform its duty, making vigilantism necessary and unavoidable.

In Kenosha they couldn't even enforce a curfew... Somebody was burning black businesses.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Gee, video I saw, was an active shooter shooting into a crowd, but okay.



Rosenbaum was only convicted of having sex with one child, ten years earlier, when he was barely a child himself. Not that this mattered, because Rittenhouse shot him IN THE BACK when he was on the ground. That kind of nullifies any "self-defense" argument.


Racist white jury acquits racist... We haven't made much progress since the 60's, have we?



Except we didn't have an honest jury, we had a jury where anyone who might have found him guilty was excluded.



Actually, the ONLY people shot that night were shot by Active Shooter Rittenhouse. If he stayed home, it would have been a footnote in the riots of 2020.

There is no video of an active shooter firing into a crowd. He did not shoot Rosenbaum in the back as he was on the ground.

There is no evidence of racism in the jury or from Rittenhouse which is irrelevant anyways as even racists have the right to self defense.

Rittenhouse was not an active shooter he fired selecetively and only in self defense which is proven fact.\

As always you are posting outright lies.

 

[2aguy]

In Kenosha they couldn't even enforce a curfew... Somebody was burning black businesses.

Yes.....democrat party supporters and brown shirts, antifa and blm, were burning and looting black businesses.....after the democrat mayor told the police and national guard to back off..........

The democrat party has been sending blm and antifa brown shirts into black and minority neighborhoods to burn, loot, maim and kill because they have control over the police, and through their gun control laws, have disarmed the blacks and other minorities in those neighborhoods....except for the actual criminals who have guns....and then get released back into the community by democrat party judges, prosecutors and politicians.......

The democrats can't send in antifa and blm into the suburbs yet because the people in the suburbs have lots of guns.......and can defend themselves...and the democrats can't control those police the way they can control the police in the cities they control....

 

[2aguy]

There is no video of an active shooter firing into a crowd. He did not shoot Rosenbaum in the back as he was on the ground.

There is no evidence of racism in gthe jury or from Rittenhouse which is irrelevant anyways as even racists have the right to self defense.

Rittenhouse was not an active shooter he fired selecetively and only in self defense which is proven fact.\

As always you are posting outright lies.

Yep...the "active shooter," lie was the prosecution grasping at straws to fool the jury.....too bad the video was so obvious...

 

[occupied]

I fully understand. Thug Democrats riot and loot when things don't go their way. Passive Democrats sit idly by and support their behavior because they are beholden to the Party.

You understand nothing. You're just another useful ignoramus with murder in their heart.

 

[j-mac]

You understand nothing. You're just another useful ignoramus with murder in their heart.

LOL! Much like the 4 year old that doesn't get their way, your response here is laughable.

 

[DBA]

You understand nothing. You're just another useful ignoramus with murder in their heart.

And you are just another useful idiot the Democrats are using to promote their Marxist agenda.

 

[maybelooking]

You understand nothing. You're just another useful ignoramus with murder in their heart.

admit it.....youre the same Chinese spy swalwell slept with aren't you?

 

[occupied]

And you are just another useful idiot the Democrats are using to promote their Marxist agenda.

You people sound so much alike it's sad. Never has so many "individuals" been so boringly alike.

 

[DBA]

You people sound so much alike it's sad. Never has so many "individuals" been so boringly alike.

Yeah, ok. So says a supporter of the Party of lemmings who will believe literally anything they hear from the MSM and social media.

 

[JoeB131]

Your favorite left wing riot group disagrees. There are many on the left who have decided that our traditions are evil, but you already knew that.

Everything you just posted has zero basis in fact, truth, reality or what was actually presented in court……

he didn’t shoot the rapist when he was on the ground, there was a black man on the jury, and part of the jury selection in Wisconsin is a random pick of juror numbers….6 in total…..that were removed from the pool……


Nothing you posted is even remotely true or accurate…..you are still a vile, disgusting piece of filth….

One of the bullets hit Rosenbaum in the back when he was already down.
There was a mostly white jury.
Rittenhouse is a murdering piece of shit.

1. Post the video of Kyle shooting into a crowd. You can't LIAR.

2. Trying to defend a "sociopath pedophile"? Sickening. Here is the article again. I notice you never post links backing-up your lies.

Again, what was he ACTUALLY convicted of? One count. 18 years ago. Big whupp..

Have you seen the news about so many major chains closing their stores in the Than Fwanthithco area? Than Fwanthithco used to be a thriving, beautiful community, but LIbEralism has all but destroyed it. It should serve as an example and a warning as to what LIbEralism threatens to do to the entire country, if it isn't stopped.

Wow, Mormon Bob showing his homophobia again... Maybe we should call him "Closeted Mormon Bob", given that most really homophobic people are getting some on the downlow.

 

[JoeB131]

It's very telling that @Incel Joe denies the humanity of the most innocent and defenseless human victim of this terrible crime, and yet he insists that subhuman criminal pieces of shit that riot and loot and destroy should be treated as if they were human, when, by their behavior, they make it very clear that they are not human at all.

But then, none of this is to be unexpected from a foul creature that, by the company that it chooses to keep, clearly reveals itself to be a subhuman criminal piece of shit.

Fetuses aren't people, and until you guys stop trying to take food out of the mouths of actual babies, I'll take your concern about fetuses with a grain of salt.

What a joke. So we are now to allow the "he shouldn't have been there in the first place" defense for all criminals who attack people. No wonder you are a Democrat...no common sense.

He shouldn't have inserted himself into a riot...

The problem here is that anyone who instigates a fight can now claim 'Self defense" even if they instigated the fatal confrontation.

If the 3 "victims" didn't want to be shot, there was a simple solution to that.

Don't attack a guy with a gun that is running AWAY FROM THEM.

Two of them were attempting to take someone into custody who had just shot a man. That's kind of what good citizens are supposed to do.

You mean except when the democrat party mayors and governors tell the police to stand down....so that the democrat party brown shirts, blm and antifa, can burn, loot, maim and kill without police stopping them........

Except for that...right?

Uh, the only one who killed anyone that night was Kyle McShooty. If he hadn't been there, no one would have died.

 

[JoeB131]

I agree that properly-functioning law-enforcement is far preferable to vigilantism.

It's why we created governments, in the first place, and it is the most basic and essential of all purposes of government, to protect the rights of all, in a standardize, orderly manner. The right to have our safety and our property protected belongs to every individual, but to exercise this right directly results in disorder and inconsistency; with too much revenge and too little actual justice and order. It is for this reason that instead of retaining the exercise of this right directly to ourselves as individuals, we collectively delegate it to government.

When government fails to perform this duty, the rights and responsibility reverts back to us. Vigilantism is the inevitable result of this. Those who no most loudly decry this vigilantism are, for the most part, the same who are responsible for causing government to fail to perform its duty, making vigilantism necessary and unavoidable.

The first problem here is that you care more about property than lives..

The second one is, white people only seem to want to fix things when their stuff is threatened.

You are right on one point. Government has failed in solving the underlying problems that cause crime. The europeans don't have these kinds of problems because they have.

 

[JoeB131]

I fully understand. Thug Democrats riot and loot when things don't go their way. Passive Democrats sit idly by and support their behavior because they are beholden to the Party.

Uh, sorry, who riots and loots when things don't go their way?

 

[2aguy]

One of the bullets hit Rosenbaum in the back when he was already down.
There was a mostly white jury.
Rittenhouse is a murdering piece of shit.



Again, what was he ACTUALLY convicted of? One count. 18 years ago. Big whupp..



Wow, Mormon Bob showing his homophobia again... Maybe we should call him "Closeted Mormon Bob", given that most really homophobic people are getting some on the downlow.

Your schtick has grown old........

 

[Indeependent]

Democrats on the Sunday morning shows, as well as many others want laws changed so that law abiding citizens can't defend themselves from criminals.
In SF gangs of looters emptied Louis Vitton and other high-end stores. What if Louis hired a few armed vigilantes?
In Philadelphia, a mom and baby were killed coming home from a baby shower,
WHERE IS THE DEMOCRAT'S OUTRAGE???????????????.

Pregnant Woman Shot, Killed Returning Home From Her Baby Shower, Philadelphia Police Say

A pregnant woman is dead after a shooting in the Crescentville section of Philadelphia.

philadelphia.cbslocal.com

NYC Mayor DeBlasio said the Rittenhouse verdict "sends a horrible message"...
De Blasio joins NY’s left in raging over Kyle Rittenhouse — as NYPD on alert for potential unrest
“This verdict is disgusting and it sends a horrible message to this country. Where is the justice in this,” de Blasio tweeted after the 18-year-old defendant was cleared of all charges in the deaths of two men and the wounding of a third during racially charged violence in Kenosha, Wisconsin, in 2020."

Biden, Adams, Sharpton and others weigh in on Rittenhouse verdict

The acquittal of Kyle Rittenhouse in a Kenosha, Wis., courtroom sparked plenty of opinions on Friday — divided in the same way the country is. The baby-faced gunman, who killed two men and wounded a third at a Black Lives Matter protest last year, was hailed as a hero in right-wing circles...

news.yahoo.com

"Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) tweeted, “It’s time to dismantle systemic racism & fundamentally transform our broken justice system.”

California Gov. Gavin Newsom worried about the precedent set by the Rittenhouse case.
“America today: you can break the law, carry around weapons built for a military, shoot and kill people, and get away with it,” the Democrat tweeted. “That’s the message we’ve just sent to armed vigilantes across the nation.”


What if neighborhoods organized vigilantes to shoot criminals in their neighborhoods, today's version of a "well regulated militia"? Would urban gang shootings stop?

Lets take a poll on what should happen when pols and DAs stop police from arresting and prosecuting violent criminals.

Should vigilantes fill the gap and protect neighborhoods from criminals?

[The OP and thread title are now better aligned, sorry for the closure of the first thread discussion]

I thought the criminal code was already eliminated from every Blue state.