Dems want Laws changed after Rittenhouse shootings. Are vigilantes the answer? (Poll)

[DBA]

The Judge let Rittenhouse choose the jurors who would deliberate. He said it was because it gave the accused more control and made them feel good

Let me guess, social media and the MSM stated that Rittenhouse selected the jurors, which is technically true, but they just left out the part that it was a TOTALLY RANDOM selection process. This is how you lemmings are lied to on a daily basis.

 

[2aguy]

So you like vigilantes? The protesters had gone home because of the curfew.

You mean except for the people burning and looting….except for them…in particular the 3 felons who tried to cripple or murder Kyle?

 

[2aguy]

He picked numbers out of a bag. It was totally random. Were you not told?

Yep, apparently it is a practice that is used in Wisconsin court rooms.

 

[surada]

You mean except for the people burning and looting….except for them…in particular the 3 felons who tried to cripple or murder Kyle?

Who was left on the street after curfew? Militias, cops and crazies. ..and 32 Boogaloo Bois.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

It's very telling that Incel Joe denies the humanity of the most innocent and defenseless human victim of this terrible crime, and yet he insists that subhuman criminal pieces of shit that riot and loot and destroy should be treated as if they were human, when, by their behavior, they make it very clear that they are not human at all.

But then, none of this is to be unexpected from a foul creature that, by the company that it chooses to keep, clearly reveals itself to be a subhuman criminal piece of shit.

A pregnant woman (not a mom and a baby) were shot.

 

[occupied]

yes once the dem strong hold was broken in the south due to the GOP finally getting strong laws passed to break the Klan, and they were enforced, the dems lost power. It took awhile. Most folks now don’t support the dems…the party moved on and continued its reign in places like Detroit, Baltimore, Portland, Cali, cities in Wisconsin etc

You are so ignorant of recent history you should refrain from talking about it in the future.

 

[DBA]

Kyle's acquittal should scare the hell out of anyone. It essentially sets a precedent that you can claim self defense in any situation, even a situation you instigated.

What a joke. So we are now to allow the "he shouldn't have been there in the first place" defense for all criminals who attack people. No wonder you are a Democrat...no common sense.

Kyle's acquittal should scare the hell out of anyone. It essentially sets a precedent that you can claim self defense in any situation, even a situation you instigated.

Imagine if you are in a bar, and someone says something rude about your mother... you go to confront the guy, and he pulls out a gun and shoots you. Hey, self defense, I reasonably feared for my life.

If Kyle didn't want to be a victim of a mob, there was a simple solution to that.

Stay the fuck home in Antioch.

If the 3 "victims" didn't want to be shot, there was a simple solution to that.

Don't attack a guy with a gun that is running AWAY FROM THEM.

 

[DBA]

You are so ignorant of recent history you should refrain from talking about it in the future.

Yeah we know, you Democrats are just too smart for us poor Republicans. You just need our money to live on.

 

[occupied]

Nobody here is advocating or otherwise discussing murdering anyone for their beliefs.

What is under discussion is human beings putting down violent, destructive, subhuman animals to stop their violence and destruction.

Yes Nazis often refer to their intended victims as subhumans. makes it easier to justify murder.

 

[DBA]

Who was left on the street after curfew? Militias, cops and crazies. ..and 32 Boogaloo Bois.

You severely underestimate the number of crazies and their political affiliation. When they do vote, criminals vote heavily Democratic. Keep that in mind.

 

[DBA]

Yes Nazis often refer to their intended victims as subhumans. makes it easier to justify murder.

Nazis? So we should just allow lefties to throw temper tantrums and burn and loot cities?

 

[2aguy]

Yes Nazis often refer to their intended victims as subhumans. makes it easier to justify murder.

Yes Nazis often refer to their intended victims as subhumans. makes it easier to justify murder

And that is why the democrats do it……so when they send out their brown shirts, BLM and antifa, and those thugs burn, loot and murder innocent people, the democrat party leadership can justify their support for those criminal acts………

 

[DBA]

Yes Nazis often refer to their intended victims as subhumans. makes it easier to justify murder

And that is why the democrats do it……so when they send out their brown shirts, BLM and antifa, and those thugs burn, loot and murder innocent people, the democrat party leadership can justify their support for those criminal acts………

And even law abiding Democrats buy it. It is like they are hypnotized or something.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

What star witness perjured himself? You can't make statements without proving them.

What rock have you been hiding under?

Incel Joe does exactly that, all the time. It rarely, if ever, does otherwise.

 

[occupied]

Nazis? So we should just allow lefties to throw temper tantrums and burn and loot cities?

You should stay out of things you can't understand.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

6. Even the "preponderance" of the "evidence" needs a crime. Kyle committed no crimes, zero, nada, nil, zilch, nought, nothing, none. So WTF "evidence" do you think will help when there is no crime involved?

Something occurred to me, with regard to the strained attempt to draw a parallel between Kyle Rittenhouse and OJ Simpson.

In OJ Simpson's case, I do not think there was any doubt that a crime had been committed. Two people were savagely killed, and I don't think any indication had been raised that any justification could have existed for those killings.

Mr. Simpson's criminal trial failed to establish to the necessary degree of certainty, that he had committed the crimes, but did nothing to dispel the premise that crimes had, in fact, been committed. In a subsequent civil trial, with a lower standard of proof, Mr. Simpson was found liable for the crimes.

In Kyle Rittenhouse's case, three subhuman animals were shot, two were killed, and no doubt is left that it was Mr. Rittenhouse who shot them. But his criminal trial established as a legal fact, that cannot now be overturned, that he committed no crime in doing so, that his actions in shooting these subhuman pieces of shit were entirely justified as self-defense. Since it is established that Mr. Rittenhouse did not act illegally, it seems that there is little basis on which to bring a civil case against him.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Just remember, everyone, Vichy Mac is the sole arbiter in what is right and just in the world.

I don't think anyone claims that, but it stands to reason that any rational human being would, if given the choice, look to him for such judgement long before one would look to a subhuman piece of shit such as yourself, who openly takes the side of violent, destructive criminals against that of actual human beings.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

"Loathsome" may be a little harsh. Coward would be more accurate. Since he'd never take the risk he can't imagine anyone else doing it. These Lefties are clueless about the repercussions of their behavior. They hate corporate America so much that they practically cheer the destruction done by their welfare goons in the cities.

What they aren't smart enough to grasp is that eventually, real vigilantism will become the norm. Rittenhouse wasn't a vigilante. REAL vigilantes would have been summarily executing everyone they saw setting fires or otherwise destroying property. Come to think of it, that would quickly solve the out of control violence in the cities.

If we continue to restrain the police from doing their jobs, then this may indeed be where things will have no choice but to go. Decent people will not forever put up with increasingly violent and destructive gangs of subhuman shit, doing what such gang of subhuman shit do; while the police and the courts stand by and do nothing at all about it.

If the police will not do their job, then eventually, the people will have to do it themselves. And those who object to the police doing what the police are supposed to do will not like the results.

 

[surada]

Nobody here is advocating or otherwise discussing murdering anyone for their beliefs.

What is under discussion is human beings putting down violent, destructive, subhuman animals to stop their violence and destruction.

That's why we have law enforcement instead of vigilantes.

 

[2aguy]

That's why we have law enforcement instead of vigilantes.

You mean except when the democrat party mayors and governors tell the police to stand down....so that the democrat party brown shirts, blm and antifa, can burn, loot, maim and kill without police stopping them........

Except for that...right?