Democrats: You're not there yet.

[progressive hunter]

THOUGHTS FROM AN INDEPENDENT

Democrats: In order to defeat Donald Trump, you need 2 things: 1. To expose Trump's weaknesses, and make a case that he is unfit for office, and 2. Make a good case for why your candidate is better. Well....you've made some progress with item 1. No so, with item 2. Joe Biden may be pretty smart and reasonably qualified, but he, like Al Gore in 2000 is about as interesting as a sack of lawn fertilizer. You're not there yet Democrats. Joe Biden is going to have to do something to ignite the Democratic base, or Donald Trump will waltz into a 2nd term.

I haven’t heard nearly enough about how important trump not get to replace rbg on the Supreme Court. Do we want that conservative of a court?

the SC isnt supposed to be liberal or conservative , its supposed to be constitutional,,,

 

[sealybobo]

THOUGHTS FROM AN INDEPENDENT

Democrats: In order to defeat Donald Trump, you need 2 things: 1. To expose Trump's weaknesses, and make a case that he is unfit for office, and 2. Make a good case for why your candidate is better. Well....you've made some progress with item 1. No so, with item 2. Joe Biden may be pretty smart and reasonably qualified, but he, like Al Gore in 2000 is about as interesting as a sack of lawn fertilizer. You're not there yet Democrats. Joe Biden is going to have to do something to ignite the Democratic base, or Donald Trump will waltz into a 2nd term.

I haven’t heard nearly enough about how important trump not get to replace rbg on the Supreme Court. Do we want that conservative of a court?

the SC isnt supposed to be liberal or conservative , its supposed to be constitutional,,,

Then you should have nominated garland

 

[progressive hunter]

THOUGHTS FROM AN INDEPENDENT

Democrats: In order to defeat Donald Trump, you need 2 things: 1. To expose Trump's weaknesses, and make a case that he is unfit for office, and 2. Make a good case for why your candidate is better. Well....you've made some progress with item 1. No so, with item 2. Joe Biden may be pretty smart and reasonably qualified, but he, like Al Gore in 2000 is about as interesting as a sack of lawn fertilizer. You're not there yet Democrats. Joe Biden is going to have to do something to ignite the Democratic base, or Donald Trump will waltz into a 2nd term.

I haven’t heard nearly enough about how important trump not get to replace rbg on the Supreme Court. Do we want that conservative of a court?

the SC isnt supposed to be liberal or conservative , its supposed to be constitutional,,,

Then you should have nominated garland

HUH???

 

[Missourian]

The Democratic response to Trump's victory was, essentially, to lose its ******* mind.

This is how they end up with someone like Biden - he clearly doesn't belong in this situation, but the other candidates are a mess.

What a fucked up choice this is.

Wow... Vichy Mac has his theory, and he won't let pesky things like facts get in his way.

If the Democrats had TRULY lost their mind as a party, Commie Bernie would be the nominee right now. And he'd have just as good a chance of beating Trump. Maybe better because his followers are motivated.

Instead, they played it safe with Biden (as they should have) and went with the guy who wasn't exciting, wasn't particularly bold on policy, but could win and get things done.

So it's true that crazy people don't know they're crazy.

 

[sealybobo]

THOUGHTS FROM AN INDEPENDENT

Democrats: In order to defeat Donald Trump, you need 2 things: 1. To expose Trump's weaknesses, and make a case that he is unfit for office, and 2. Make a good case for why your candidate is better. Well....you've made some progress with item 1. No so, with item 2. Joe Biden may be pretty smart and reasonably qualified, but he, like Al Gore in 2000 is about as interesting as a sack of lawn fertilizer. You're not there yet Democrats. Joe Biden is going to have to do something to ignite the Democratic base, or Donald Trump will waltz into a 2nd term.

I haven’t heard nearly enough about how important trump not get to replace rbg on the Supreme Court. Do we want that conservative of a court?

the SC isnt supposed to be liberal or conservative , its supposed to be constitutional,,,

Then you should have nominated garland

HUH???

He’s not constitutional?

 

[progressive hunter]

THOUGHTS FROM AN INDEPENDENT

Democrats: In order to defeat Donald Trump, you need 2 things: 1. To expose Trump's weaknesses, and make a case that he is unfit for office, and 2. Make a good case for why your candidate is better. Well....you've made some progress with item 1. No so, with item 2. Joe Biden may be pretty smart and reasonably qualified, but he, like Al Gore in 2000 is about as interesting as a sack of lawn fertilizer. You're not there yet Democrats. Joe Biden is going to have to do something to ignite the Democratic base, or Donald Trump will waltz into a 2nd term.

I haven’t heard nearly enough about how important trump not get to replace rbg on the Supreme Court. Do we want that conservative of a court?

the SC isnt supposed to be liberal or conservative , its supposed to be constitutional,,,

Then you should have nominated garland

HUH???

He’s not constitutional?

then why would I nominate him???

 

[CrusaderFrank]

THOUGHTS FROM AN INDEPENDENT

Democrats: In order to defeat Donald Trump, you need 2 things: 1. To expose Trump's weaknesses, and make a case that he is unfit for office, and 2. Make a good case for why your candidate is better. Well....you've made some progress with item 1. No so, with item 2. Joe Biden may be pretty smart and reasonably qualified, but he, like Al Gore in 2000 is about as interesting as a sack of lawn fertilizer. You're not there yet Democrats. Joe Biden is going to have to do something to ignite the Democratic base, or Donald Trump will waltz into a 2nd term.

I haven’t heard nearly enough about how important trump not get to replace rbg on the Supreme Court. Do we want that conservative of a court?

You mean RBG body double, right

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

THOUGHTS FROM AN INDEPENDENT

Democrats: In order to defeat Donald Trump, you need 2 things: 1. To expose Trump's weaknesses, and make a case that he is unfit for office, and 2. Make a good case for why your candidate is better. Well....you've made some progress with item 1. No so, with item 2. Joe Biden may be pretty smart and reasonably qualified, but he, like Al Gore in 2000 is about as interesting as a sack of lawn fertilizer. You're not there yet Democrats. Joe Biden is going to have to do something to ignite the Democratic base, or Donald Trump will waltz into a 2nd term.

I haven’t heard nearly enough about how important trump not get to replace rbg on the Supreme Court. Do we want that conservative of a court?

the SC isnt supposed to be liberal or conservative , its supposed to be constitutional,,,

Which it is now. How many times have Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and especially Roberts disappointed Republican voters?

 

[progressive hunter]

THOUGHTS FROM AN INDEPENDENT

Democrats: In order to defeat Donald Trump, you need 2 things: 1. To expose Trump's weaknesses, and make a case that he is unfit for office, and 2. Make a good case for why your candidate is better. Well....you've made some progress with item 1. No so, with item 2. Joe Biden may be pretty smart and reasonably qualified, but he, like Al Gore in 2000 is about as interesting as a sack of lawn fertilizer. You're not there yet Democrats. Joe Biden is going to have to do something to ignite the Democratic base, or Donald Trump will waltz into a 2nd term.

I haven’t heard nearly enough about how important trump not get to replace rbg on the Supreme Court. Do we want that conservative of a court?

the SC isnt supposed to be liberal or conservative , its supposed to be constitutional,,,

Which it is now. How many times have Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and especially Roberts disappointed Republican voters?

I'm not a republican,,,

 

[Brain357]

THOUGHTS FROM AN INDEPENDENT

Democrats: In order to defeat Donald Trump, you need 2 things: 1. To expose Trump's weaknesses, and make a case that he is unfit for office, and 2. Make a good case for why your candidate is better. Well....you've made some progress with item 1. No so, with item 2. Joe Biden may be pretty smart and reasonably qualified, but he, like Al Gore in 2000 is about as interesting as a sack of lawn fertilizer. You're not there yet Democrats. Joe Biden is going to have to do something to ignite the Democratic base, or Donald Trump will waltz into a 2nd term.

It sure would be an easy win if dems had a better candidate. I think trump policy failures have doomed him however.

 

[Brain357]

THOUGHTS FROM AN INDEPENDENT

Democrats: In order to defeat Donald Trump, you need 2 things: 1. To expose Trump's weaknesses, and make a case that he is unfit for office, and 2. Make a good case for why your candidate is better. Well....you've made some progress with item 1. No so, with item 2. Joe Biden may be pretty smart and reasonably qualified, but he, like Al Gore in 2000 is about as interesting as a sack of lawn fertilizer. You're not there yet Democrats. Joe Biden is going to have to do something to ignite the Democratic base, or Donald Trump will waltz into a 2nd term.

I haven’t heard nearly enough about how important trump not get to replace rbg on the Supreme Court. Do we want that conservative of a court?

the SC isnt supposed to be liberal or conservative , its supposed to be constitutional,,,

Which it is now. How many times have Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and especially Roberts disappointed Republican voters?

Its been fine so far, but that doesn't stop the repubs from trying to ruin the court. Stealing obamas pick was quite immoral.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

THOUGHTS FROM AN INDEPENDENT

Democrats: In order to defeat Donald Trump, you need 2 things: 1. To expose Trump's weaknesses, and make a case that he is unfit for office, and 2. Make a good case for why your candidate is better. Well....you've made some progress with item 1. No so, with item 2. Joe Biden may be pretty smart and reasonably qualified, but he, like Al Gore in 2000 is about as interesting as a sack of lawn fertilizer. You're not there yet Democrats. Joe Biden is going to have to do something to ignite the Democratic base, or Donald Trump will waltz into a 2nd term.

I haven’t heard nearly enough about how important trump not get to replace rbg on the Supreme Court. Do we want that conservative of a court?

the SC isnt supposed to be liberal or conservative , its supposed to be constitutional,,,

Which it is now. How many times have Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and especially Roberts disappointed Republican voters?

I'm not a republican,,,

I didn't say you were. What I was pointing out is that Republican President choices for the SC did not result in a Republican court. Many times it shifts the liberal way. I disagree with their decisions, but having Trump elect more judges are no threat to the left in any way or from as we have seen.

 

[progressive hunter]

THOUGHTS FROM AN INDEPENDENT

Democrats: In order to defeat Donald Trump, you need 2 things: 1. To expose Trump's weaknesses, and make a case that he is unfit for office, and 2. Make a good case for why your candidate is better. Well....you've made some progress with item 1. No so, with item 2. Joe Biden may be pretty smart and reasonably qualified, but he, like Al Gore in 2000 is about as interesting as a sack of lawn fertilizer. You're not there yet Democrats. Joe Biden is going to have to do something to ignite the Democratic base, or Donald Trump will waltz into a 2nd term.

I haven’t heard nearly enough about how important trump not get to replace rbg on the Supreme Court. Do we want that conservative of a court?

the SC isnt supposed to be liberal or conservative , its supposed to be constitutional,,,

Which it is now. How many times have Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and especially Roberts disappointed Republican voters?

I'm not a republican,,,

I didn't say you were. What I was pointing out is that Republican President choices for the SC did not result in a Republican court. Many times it shifts the liberal way. I disagree with their decisions, but having Trump elect more judges are no threat to the left in any way or from as we have seen.

since you put it that way,,,I couldnt agree more,,,
the republicans have never given us anything other than democrat light policies and solutions,,

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

THOUGHTS FROM AN INDEPENDENT

Democrats: In order to defeat Donald Trump, you need 2 things: 1. To expose Trump's weaknesses, and make a case that he is unfit for office, and 2. Make a good case for why your candidate is better. Well....you've made some progress with item 1. No so, with item 2. Joe Biden may be pretty smart and reasonably qualified, but he, like Al Gore in 2000 is about as interesting as a sack of lawn fertilizer. You're not there yet Democrats. Joe Biden is going to have to do something to ignite the Democratic base, or Donald Trump will waltz into a 2nd term.

I haven’t heard nearly enough about how important trump not get to replace rbg on the Supreme Court. Do we want that conservative of a court?

the SC isnt supposed to be liberal or conservative , its supposed to be constitutional,,,

Which it is now. How many times have Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and especially Roberts disappointed Republican voters?

I'm not a republican,,,

I didn't say you were. What I was pointing out is that Republican President choices for the SC did not result in a Republican court. Many times it shifts the liberal way. I disagree with their decisions, but having Trump elect more judges are no threat to the left in any way or from as we have seen.

since you put it that way,,,I couldnt agree more,,,
the republicans have never given us anything other than democrat light policies and solutions,,

Well I think when it comes to judges, these people put on an act to get the nomination portraying themselves as real conservatives. Roberts? He was nominated by Bush who was never really considered a conservative. It's my understanding that President Trump confided in the Heritage Foundation for their advice on who he should consider.

 

[bendog]

Roberts will compromise any position to avoid having the dems pack the Court after McConnell not allowing Garland a hearing, except for the right of corporations to control capital … and speech.

Justice Roberts plays the long game

His recent votes show that he will defend the institution.

thehill.com

Consider the decision in the Seila Law case, released the same day as the Louisiana abortion ruling. Roberts wrote for the majority in striking down the configuration of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the brainchild of Elizabeth Warren that was enacted as law under President Obama. Congress created the institution to be led by a single director who could be removed by the executive branch only for cause, that is, if he or she engaged in some kind of malfeasance or negligence.
This kind of protection for agency heads has been imposed by Congress and accepted by the Supreme Court. However, it has never been popular with the advocates of limited government, who view complete executive branch control as a means to curb the growth of these federal agencies and the bureaucracy in Washington

 

[sealybobo]

THOUGHTS FROM AN INDEPENDENT

Democrats: In order to defeat Donald Trump, you need 2 things: 1. To expose Trump's weaknesses, and make a case that he is unfit for office, and 2. Make a good case for why your candidate is better. Well....you've made some progress with item 1. No so, with item 2. Joe Biden may be pretty smart and reasonably qualified, but he, like Al Gore in 2000 is about as interesting as a sack of lawn fertilizer. You're not there yet Democrats. Joe Biden is going to have to do something to ignite the Democratic base, or Donald Trump will waltz into a 2nd term.

I haven’t heard nearly enough about how important trump not get to replace rbg on the Supreme Court. Do we want that conservative of a court?

the SC isnt supposed to be liberal or conservative , its supposed to be constitutional,,,

Which it is now. How many times have Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and especially Roberts disappointed Republican voters?

On social issues sure. They love these wedge issues that divide us and don’t matter. How many times has the court sided with corporations vs we the people? Every time. **** guns, god, gays and racism. They only use these wedge issues to sucker poor white socially conservatives into voting for the party for the rich

 

[sealybobo]

THOUGHTS FROM AN INDEPENDENT

Democrats: In order to defeat Donald Trump, you need 2 things: 1. To expose Trump's weaknesses, and make a case that he is unfit for office, and 2. Make a good case for why your candidate is better. Well....you've made some progress with item 1. No so, with item 2. Joe Biden may be pretty smart and reasonably qualified, but he, like Al Gore in 2000 is about as interesting as a sack of lawn fertilizer. You're not there yet Democrats. Joe Biden is going to have to do something to ignite the Democratic base, or Donald Trump will waltz into a 2nd term.

I haven’t heard nearly enough about how important trump not get to replace rbg on the Supreme Court. Do we want that conservative of a court?

the SC isnt supposed to be liberal or conservative , its supposed to be constitutional,,,

Which it is now. How many times have Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and especially Roberts disappointed Republican voters?

Its been fine so far, but that doesn't stop the repubs from trying to ruin the court. Stealing obamas pick was quite immoral.

Even before trumps two picks the court tilted right and sided with corporations 100% of the time.

For example, there was this oil spill. Maybe the exxon Valdez and the judgement was exxxon owed the people in the area a billion dollars. It got challenged all the way up to the Supreme Court and they lowered the fine to what amounted to a slap on the wrist.

 

[sealybobo]

THOUGHTS FROM AN INDEPENDENT

Democrats: In order to defeat Donald Trump, you need 2 things: 1. To expose Trump's weaknesses, and make a case that he is unfit for office, and 2. Make a good case for why your candidate is better. Well....you've made some progress with item 1. No so, with item 2. Joe Biden may be pretty smart and reasonably qualified, but he, like Al Gore in 2000 is about as interesting as a sack of lawn fertilizer. You're not there yet Democrats. Joe Biden is going to have to do something to ignite the Democratic base, or Donald Trump will waltz into a 2nd term.

I haven’t heard nearly enough about how important trump not get to replace rbg on the Supreme Court. Do we want that conservative of a court?

the SC isnt supposed to be liberal or conservative , its supposed to be constitutional,,,

Which it is now. How many times have Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and especially Roberts disappointed Republican voters?

I'm not a republican,,,

I didn't say you were. What I was pointing out is that Republican President choices for the SC did not result in a Republican court. Many times it shifts the liberal way. I disagree with their decisions, but having Trump elect more judges are no threat to the left in any way or from as we have seen.

since you put it that way,,,I couldnt agree more,,,
the republicans have never given us anything other than democrat light policies and solutions,,

Oh they aren’t conservative enough for you?

Youre a republican don’t deny. You vote gop right? You voted for trump and bush?

Or maybe you live in a really red state that affords you the luxury of voting libertarian?

pfft

 

[progressive hunter]

THOUGHTS FROM AN INDEPENDENT

Democrats: In order to defeat Donald Trump, you need 2 things: 1. To expose Trump's weaknesses, and make a case that he is unfit for office, and 2. Make a good case for why your candidate is better. Well....you've made some progress with item 1. No so, with item 2. Joe Biden may be pretty smart and reasonably qualified, but he, like Al Gore in 2000 is about as interesting as a sack of lawn fertilizer. You're not there yet Democrats. Joe Biden is going to have to do something to ignite the Democratic base, or Donald Trump will waltz into a 2nd term.

I haven’t heard nearly enough about how important trump not get to replace rbg on the Supreme Court. Do we want that conservative of a court?

the SC isnt supposed to be liberal or conservative , its supposed to be constitutional,,,

Which it is now. How many times have Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and especially Roberts disappointed Republican voters?

I'm not a republican,,,

I didn't say you were. What I was pointing out is that Republican President choices for the SC did not result in a Republican court. Many times it shifts the liberal way. I disagree with their decisions, but having Trump elect more judges are no threat to the left in any way or from as we have seen.

since you put it that way,,,I couldnt agree more,,,
the republicans have never given us anything other than democrat light policies and solutions,,

Oh they aren’t conservative enough for you?

Youre a republican don’t deny. You vote gop right? You voted for trump and bush?

Or maybe you live in a really red state that affords you the luxury of voting libertarian?

pfft

I'm a rational anarchist that has compromised and accepted the constitution,,,
and after 35 yrs of voting never voted for a dem or repube at the fed level,,,

 

[sealybobo]

THOUGHTS FROM AN INDEPENDENT

Democrats: In order to defeat Donald Trump, you need 2 things: 1. To expose Trump's weaknesses, and make a case that he is unfit for office, and 2. Make a good case for why your candidate is better. Well....you've made some progress with item 1. No so, with item 2. Joe Biden may be pretty smart and reasonably qualified, but he, like Al Gore in 2000 is about as interesting as a sack of lawn fertilizer. You're not there yet Democrats. Joe Biden is going to have to do something to ignite the Democratic base, or Donald Trump will waltz into a 2nd term.

I haven’t heard nearly enough about how important trump not get to replace rbg on the Supreme Court. Do we want that conservative of a court?

the SC isnt supposed to be liberal or conservative , its supposed to be constitutional,,,

Which it is now. How many times have Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and especially Roberts disappointed Republican voters?

I'm not a republican,,,

I didn't say you were. What I was pointing out is that Republican President choices for the SC did not result in a Republican court. Many times it shifts the liberal way. I disagree with their decisions, but having Trump elect more judges are no threat to the left in any way or from as we have seen.

since you put it that way,,,I couldnt agree more,,,
the republicans have never given us anything other than democrat light policies and solutions,,

Oh they aren’t conservative enough for you?

Youre a republican don’t deny. You vote gop right? You voted for trump and bush?

Or maybe you live in a really red state that affords you the luxury of voting libertarian?

pfft

I'm a rational anarchist that has compromised and accepted the constitution,,,
and after 35 yrs of voting never voted for a dem or repube at the fed level,,,

What state do you live in?