Democrats willing to ignore the courts if they don't get their way! So much for Law and Order

[meaner gene]

So, I guess that Trump should have just keep those families in cages when the 9th circuit put an injunction against him. He should have just rounded up the DACA and deported them, regardless of what the Court ruled.

All that rings hollow when republicans are famous for violating the court ruling in Roe v Wade. And why those laws have been struck down for the last 50 years of lawbreaking.

 

[Darkwind]

When a state makes a law in violation of a court ruling, they are violating that court ruling.

It's simple law. Roe v Wade drew the line, and they states keep making laws that cross that line. That's why they got struck down. Yet the states keep violating the courts ruling, again and again and again and again.

'

Wow, you really aren't very bright.

What the states are NOT doing is just ignoring Roe v Wade, are they? You can't even distinguish between the two.

 

[Darkwind]

All that rings hollow when republicans are famous for violating the court ruling in Roe v Wade. And why those laws have been struck down for the last 50 years of lawbreaking.

You cannot provide a single credible source for Republicans ignoring a court ruling. Not one.

 

[meaner gene]

Wow, you really aren't very bright.

What the states are NOT doing is just ignoring Roe v Wade, are they?

Many state lawmakers continue to consider and enact abortion bans that fly in the face of constitutional standards and Roe’s precedent

Some bans prohibit abortion under all or nearly all circumstances, a tactic widely viewed as an attempt to provoke a legal challenge to Roe. Several of this type of ban that were passed by states have been blocked by court orders

9 states have unconstitutional post-Roe restrictions that are currently blocked by courts

Abortion Policy in the Absence of Roe

www.guttmacher.org

 

[meaner gene]

You cannot provide a single credible source for Republicans ignoring a court ruling. Not one.

You're right, I can't provide a single one, since there are 9 states currently violating Roe v Wade, and dozens if not hundreds of laws overturned from their ignoring the courts ruling.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Texas Supreme Court upholds Abbott’s ban on local mask mandates

The Texas Supreme Court on Sunday ruled in favor of upholding Gov. Greg Abbott’s (R) order prohibiting mask mandates, a win for the governor after local entities across the state attempted to…

thehill.com

It appears that the Texas Supreme Court has once again sided with liberty and freedom against the fascist tactics of the left. Perhaps to no avail, however.

The Texas Supreme court has halted the restraining order that several Texas counties and school boards had filed in order to ensure that they can mask your child, even though children are not at significant risk. In addition, several school districts had sued so that they could shackle your child with masks.

Of course, just like the Democrats in the State Legislature, who run awsay when they can't have their way, these school districts are pushing back, saying;



If you leftists want to support defying the courts, do NOT be surprised when Conservatives just blow off any court rulings against them.

Revenge and chaos are what the demmunists want even if they don’t know it.
Just apply the law and throw the violators in jail.

 

[Darkwind]

Many state lawmakers continue to consider and enact abortion bans that fly in the face of constitutional standards and Roe’s precedent

Some bans prohibit abortion under all or nearly all circumstances, a tactic widely viewed as an attempt to provoke a legal challenge to Roe. Several of this type of ban that were passed by states have been blocked by court orders

9 states have unconstitutional post-Roe restrictions that are currently blocked by courts

Abortion Policy in the Absence of Roe

www.guttmacher.org

They pass laws. A legitimate function of a State government.

That is NOT outright defiance of a court ruling.

You'll continue to lie about this so time to make good on My statement regarding you.

/meaner gene

 

[Independentthinker]

Bwahahahahahaha!!!!

How many times did Trump ignore court orders and did what he wanted, and you were silent?

So, you're trying to say that we should always live in lawless society?

 

[meaner gene]

They pass laws. A legitimate function of a State government.

Not when those laws are in violation of the constitution and supreme court rulings.

There are 9 states that are currently violating Roe v Wade, with courts enjoining them from enforcing them.

 

[meaner gene]

They pass laws. A legitimate function of a State government.

That is NOT outright defiance of a court ruling.

Passing a law in direct defiance of a court ruling.

 

[Papageorgio]

\

Should people have the right to chose the speed they drive at? Or whether or not to signal when they change lanes? That sort of freedom?

You mean the state should have speeding limits? I thought you want local authorities to set speeding limits or is that just mask mandates?

 

[Papageorgio]

Not when those laws are in violation of the constitution and supreme court rulings.

There are 9 states that are currently violating Roe v Wade, with courts enjoining them from enforcing them.

No mask required laws do not violate the Constitution nor do they violate the Supreme Court Ruling.

 

[meaner gene]

Should people have the right to chose the speed they drive at? Or whether or not to signal when they change lanes? That sort of freedom?

You mean the state should have speeding limits? I thought you want local authorities to set speeding limits or is that just mask mandates?

Local governments currently set speed limits.

Pursuant to Section 14-218a of the Connecticut General Statutes, speed limit certificates are issued by the Office of the State Traffic Administration to local municipalities desirous of establishing speed limits for town roads.

Speed Limit Certificates and Listings

portal.ct.gov

 

[meaner gene]

No mask required laws do not violate the Constitution nor do they violate the Supreme Court Ruling.

You are talking big government issuing that law, which is in conflict with those from the local government, who should be making that decision.

 

[WEATHER53]

Local governments currently set speed limits.

Pursuant to Section 14-218a of the Connecticut General Statutes, speed limit certificates are issued by the Office of the State Traffic Administration to local municipalities desirous of establishing speed limits for town roads.

Speed Limit Certificates and Listings

portal.ct.gov

Car speed limits is another absurd apples to coconuts by liberals. There was 40 years of experience with car speed abilities versus safety to come up with their methods. They did not experiment on us by putting us in front of cars and see what happens. That is Precisely how they are experimenting on us now

 

[meaner gene]

Car speed limits is another absurd apples to coconuts by liberals.

What's the difference. Abbot is telling the local government that big government should set speed limits, and not the local government.

 

[meaner gene]

There was 40 years of experience with car speed abilities versus safety to come up with their methods. They did not experiment on us by putting us in front of cars and see what happens. That is Precisely how they are experimenting on us now

Local governments set speed limits all the time without doing studies or doing analysis. They simply listen to their local people, who want increased safety, and act on it.

 

[WEATHER53]

What's the difference. Abbot is telling the local government that big government should set speed limits, and not the local government.

“What’s the difference” is no response snd demonstrates zero bullets in the rebuttal or proof gun

 

[meaner gene]

“What’s the difference” is no response snd demonstrates zero bullets in the rebuttal or proof gun

You equated masks with speed limits. And I showed that local government is in charge of speed limits.

So why not masks? Both are restrictive laws against individual freedoms.

 

[WEATHER53]

You equated masks with speed limits. And I showed that local government is in charge of speed limits.

So why not masks? Both are restrictive laws against individual freedoms.

Nope
Your brought up the speed limit apples to coconuts and I defeated the false comparative that you initiated
The statement that I brought up speed limit regulations is another libbie lie from another defeated libbie