Democrats, was the Holocaust caused by free speech?

[Votto]

JD Vance slams CBS host for claiming free speech was ‘weaponized’ in Germany to carry out Holocaust during argument with Marco Rubio

“No, I have — I have to disagree with you. Free speech was not used to conduct a genocide,” Rubio shot back.

nypost.com

CBS journalist Margaret Brennan was rebuked Sunday after she claimed that free speech was “weaponized” in Germany to carry out the Holocaust during a back-and-forth with Secretary of State Marco Rubio

“No, I have — I have to disagree with you. Free speech was not used to conduct a genocide,” the former US senator said.

“The genocide was conducted by an authoritarian Nazi regime that happened to also be genocidal because they hated Jews and they hated minorities and they hated those that they — they had a list of people they hated, but primarily the Jews.

“There was no free speech in Nazi Germany. There was none,” Rubio added.

Vance, 40, weighed in on the exchange later Sunday.

“This is a crazy exchange,” he tweeted. “Does the media really think the holocaust was caused by free speech?”

Well, what say you? Was the Holocaust caused by "free speech"? If so, how?

If the Nazi regime embraced free speech, why did they burn censor books by burning them?

I grow tired of bald-faced lies by the left and their legacy media.

Does any sane person still watch these fools?

But the most chilling thing for me is, I understand that at the heart of the left, they want to do exactly what Nazi Germany did, which was to oppress free speech and cancel anyone who opposed them, all while pretending to be the sole heirs of free speech and democracy themselves. In fact, about half of Americans now want limits on free speech, as if that would make society better. So, the question begs, better for who? I suppose it would be better for the powers that get to censor the speech, but not for those that are censored

I will never forget, for example, watching the Left force people all over the globe to get a vaccine in order to continue to work to support themselves or educate themselves to have a better future, but when the vaccine harmed them in some way, not only did they not have any legal recourse to be compensated, they were then censored on social media and canceled and made to feel like right wing lunatics who lie.

Sick.

 

[Votto]

JD Vance slams CBS host for claiming free speech was ‘weaponized’ in Germany to carry out Holocaust during argument with Marco Rubio

“No, I have — I have to disagree with you. Free speech was not used to conduct a genocide,” Rubio shot back.

nypost.com

CBS journalist Margaret Brennan was rebuked Sunday after she claimed that free speech was “weaponized” in Germany to carry out the Holocaust during a back-and-forth with Secretary of State Marco Rubio

“No, I have — I have to disagree with you. Free speech was not used to conduct a genocide,” the former US senator said.

“The genocide was conducted by an authoritarian Nazi regime that happened to also be genocidal because they hated Jews and they hated minorities and they hated those that they — they had a list of people they hated, but primarily the Jews.

“There was no free speech in Nazi Germany. There was none,” Rubio added.

Vance, 40, weighed in on the exchange later Sunday.

“This is a crazy exchange,” he tweeted. “Does the media really think the holocaust was caused by free speech?”

Well, what say you? Was the Holocaust caused by "free speech"? If so, how?

If the Nazi regime embraced free speech, why did they burn censor books by burning them?

View attachment 1083125

I grow tired of bald-faced lies by the left and their legacy media.

Does any sane person still watch these fools?

But the most chilling thing for me is, I understand that at the heart of the left, they want to do exactly what Nazi Germany did, which was to oppress free speech and cancel anyone who opposed them, all while pretending to be the sole heirs of free speech and democracy themselves. In fact, about half of Americans now want limits on free speech, as if that would make society better. So, the question begs, better for who? I suppose it would be better for the powers that get to censor the speech, but not for those that are censored

I will never forget, for example, watching the Left force people all over the globe to get a vaccine in order to continue to work to support themselves or educate themselves to have a better future, but when the vaccine harmed them in some way, not only did they not have any legal recourse to be compensated, they were then censored on social media and canceled and made to feel like right wing lunatics who lie.

Sick.

Any Lefties here want to defend your loon Legacy media by arguing that Nazi Germany embraced free speech?

Anyone?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

JD Vance slams CBS host for claiming free speech was ‘weaponized’ in Germany to carry out Holocaust during argument with Marco Rubio

“No, I have — I have to disagree with you. Free speech was not used to conduct a genocide,” Rubio shot back.

nypost.com

CBS journalist Margaret Brennan was rebuked Sunday after she claimed that free speech was “weaponized” in Germany to carry out the Holocaust during a back-and-forth with Secretary of State Marco Rubio

“No, I have — I have to disagree with you. Free speech was not used to conduct a genocide,” the former US senator said.

“The genocide was conducted by an authoritarian Nazi regime that happened to also be genocidal because they hated Jews and they hated minorities and they hated those that they — they had a list of people they hated, but primarily the Jews.

“There was no free speech in Nazi Germany. There was none,” Rubio added.

Vance, 40, weighed in on the exchange later Sunday.

“This is a crazy exchange,” he tweeted. “Does the media really think the holocaust was caused by free speech?”

Well, what say you? Was the Holocaust caused by "free speech"? If so, how?

If the Nazi regime embraced free speech, why did they burn censor books by burning them?

View attachment 1083125

I grow tired of bald-faced lies by the left and their legacy media.

Does any sane person still watch these fools?

But the most chilling thing for me is, I understand that at the heart of the left, they want to do exactly what Nazi Germany did, which was to oppress free speech and cancel anyone who opposed them, all while pretending to be the sole heirs of free speech and democracy themselves. In fact, about half of Americans now want limits on free speech, as if that would make society better. So, the question begs, better for who? I suppose it would be better for the powers that get to censor the speech, but not for those that are censored

I will never forget, for example, watching the Left force people all over the globe to get a vaccine in order to continue to work to support themselves or educate themselves to have a better future, but when the vaccine harmed them in some way, not only did they not have any legal recourse to be compensated, they were then censored on social media and canceled and made to feel like right wing lunatics who lie.

Sick.

Brennan was right, she should have pushed back hard on the ignoramus Rubio. Propaganda played a huge role in indoctrinating people and there was a lot of it directed at Jews. Just as we have trumpanzee propaganda here against immigrants and blacks and other minorities, the latest target of this now being "federal workers" who are now equated with lazy, useless, fakers and deceivers who do no good and never done anything good.

 

[Votto]

Brennan was right, she should have pushed back hard on the ignoramus Rubio. Propaganda played a huge role in indoctrinating people and there was a lot of it directed at Jews. Just as we have trumpanzee propaganda here against immigrants and blacks and other minorities, the latest target of this now being "federal workers" who are now equated with lazy, useless, fakers and deceivers who do no good and never done anything good.

Saying that the Nazis used propaganda is an entirely different thing that saying that they embraced free speech.

We all know what happened to those who spoke out against the Nazi regime, don't we.

Again, you are defending her lies.

 

[Scoutster]

Saying that the Nazis used propaganda is an entirely different thing that saying that they embraced free speech.

We all know what happened to those who spoke out against the Nazi regime, don't we.

Again, you are defending her lies.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Saying that the Nazis used propaganda is an entirely different thing that saying that they embraced free speech.

We all know what happened to those who spoke out against the Nazi regime, don't we.

Again, you are defending her lies.

Free speech was encouraged by the Nazis so long as it aligned with the Nazi ideology, there were countless radio programs, news reports, newspapers and so on that were unrestrained in what they said, in ways that never happened before, so long as it aligned.

 

[Votto]

Free speech was encouraged by the Nazis so long as it aligned with the Nazi ideology, there were countless radio programs, news reports, newspapers and so on that were unrestrained in what they said, in ways that never happened before, so long as it aligned.

Again, no one is arguing that the Nazis did not use propaganda, but that is not what Brennan was saying, was it.

She was arguing that without censoring "bad" speech, then you get Nazis.

That is mind numbingly false, and is nothing more than Left wing propaganda, much like what the Nazi regime spewed.

 

[NetJedi]

Brennan was right, she should have pushed back hard on the ignoramus Rubio. Propaganda played a huge role in indoctrinating people and there was a lot of it directed at Jews. Just as we have trumpanzee propaganda here against immigrants and blacks and other minorities, the latest target of this now being "federal workers" who are now equated with lazy, useless, fakers and deceivers who do no good and never done anything good.

Conflating government propaganda with free speech in NAZI GERMANY!

It's official, you're a retard.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Brennan was right, she should have pushed back hard on the ignoramus Rubio. Propaganda played a huge role in indoctrinating people and there was a lot of it directed at Jews. Just as we have trumpanzee propaganda here against immigrants and blacks and other minorities, the latest target of this now being "federal workers" who are now equated with lazy, useless, fakers and deceivers who do no good and never done anything good.

 

[martybegan]

Brennan was right, she should have pushed back hard on the ignoramus Rubio. Propaganda played a huge role in indoctrinating people and there was a lot of it directed at Jews. Just as we have trumpanzee propaganda here against immigrants and blacks and other minorities, the latest target of this now being "federal workers" who are now equated with lazy, useless, fakers and deceivers who do no good and never done anything good.

As usual not actually answering the question.

You are fucking useless.

 

[martybegan]

Free speech was encouraged by the Nazis so long as it aligned with the Nazi ideology, there were countless radio programs, news reports, newspapers and so on that were unrestrained in what they said, in ways that never happened before, so long as it aligned.

That, by definition isn't free speech, you mouth breathing airhead.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Again, no one is arguing that the Nazis did not use propaganda, but that is not what Brennan was saying, was it.

She was arguing that without censoring "bad" speech, then you get Nazis.

That is mind numbingly false, and is nothing more than Left wing propaganda, much like what the Nazi regime spewed.

Here's what she said about Vance.

“He was standing in a country where free speech was weaponized to conduct a genocide, and he met with the head of a political party that has far-right views and some historic ties to extreme groups”

The Nazis did weaponize free speech, they used it as a weapon, I really don't see anything wrong with the statement.

Free speech was enjoyed by Germans prior to the rise of fascism, it was then weaponized more and more by the Nazis. German press carried different political ideas, communism for example was a huge and popular movement in Germany and the press prior to the Nazis.

It was weaponized by encouraging Nazi propaganda and discouraging opposition.

This entire "news" is an attempt to distract from Vance's support for the reemergence of fascism in Germany, he wants to talk all day about her minor statement in order to draw attention away from the astonishing behavior of Vance.

This is non event, a minor thing, a petty dispute about how she chose to express herself.

 

[martybegan]

Here's what she said about Vance.



The Nazis did weaponize free speech, they used it as a weapon, I really don't see anything wrong with the statement.

Free speech was enjoyed by Germans prior to the rise of fascism, it was then weaponized more and more by the Nazis. German press carried different political ideas, communism for example was a huge and popular movement in German prior to the Nazis.

It was weaponized by encouraging Nazi propaganda and discouraging opposition.

This entire "news" is an attempt to distract from Vance's support for the reemergence of fascism in Germany, he wants to talk all day about her minor statement in order to draw attention away from the astonishing behavior of Vance.

This is non event, a minor thing, a petty dispute about how she chose to express herself.

They weaponized speech, not free speech. and the followed it up with government sanctioned actions.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

That, by definition isn't free speech, you mouth breathing airhead.

Germany had free speech UNTIL it was weaponized by the Nazis, read some books.

 

[TimFitz]

Brennan was right, she should have pushed back hard on the ignoramus Rubio. Propaganda played a huge role in indoctrinating people and there was a lot of it directed at Jews. Just as we have trumpanzee propaganda here against immigrants and blacks and other minorities, the latest target of this now being "federal workers" who are now equated with lazy, useless, fakers and deceivers who do no good and never done anything good.

Not to forget that the NY Post clearly disregarded what Brennan said.

It also ignored the fact that the Nazi’s waged a constant war against free speech by claiming that they were victims of the free press.
Just as Trump does,

 

[martybegan]

Germany had free speech UNTIL it was weaponized by the Nazis, read some books.

So what?

So ban free speech because maybe you could possibly sort of maybe might get Nazis?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

They weaponized speech, not free speech. and the followed it up with government sanctioned actions.

This is a non-story, the emphasis on it is in fact a good example of Trumpian propaganda.

 

[martybegan]

Not to forget that the NY Post clearly disregarded what Brennan said.

It also ignored the fact that the Nazi’s waged a constant war against free speech by claiming that they were victims of the free press.
Just as Trump does,

And the Press fed their bullshit by pretending they were being "impartial" when they clearly were not being impartial, and in the situation in 1930's Germany, rightly so not being impartial.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

So what?

So ban free speech because maybe you could possibly sort of maybe might get Nazis?

That's what Trump is doing you stupid bastard, thwarting a free press. Look at AP, if they don't say what Trump wants them to say, they get reduced access to to report on the White House. This is how it starts, I and others here have been pointing this out for years and you fuckers are so dumb you voted for him.

 

[martybegan]

This is a non-story, the emphasis on it is in fact a good example of Trumpian propaganda.

Your understanding of history is as retarded as your Jew Hate.