The right = most diversity of speech

The problem is, who gets to decide the rules?

Usually it's AI, and AI can be manipulated.

The people who the company hires to make the rules I guess, and even if they are AI, I’m sure they are reviewed.

Point is, I don’t see Elon censoring free speech, but enforcing their TOS of the platform
 
Stephen Crowder is often an ass, but occasionally he’s funny, but sometimes he does stories like this which hit right at the heart of the issue.
Despite a surprising amount of candidates for the position, Crowder is the right's favorite abusive husband
 
The people who the company hires to make the rules I guess, and even if they are AI, I’m sure they are reviewed.

Point is, I don’t see Elon censoring free speech, but enforcing their TOS of the platform
You're sure?

I'm sure they aren't.

I've seen how people get around AI, and I've seen how people get banned because AI just decides....

Facebook has a system where you just get hit, there's no individual to talk to, no explanation, nothing. Just one day "you're banned, **** off"
 
Despite a surprising amount of candidates for the position, Crowder is the right's favorite abusive husband
lol, crowder didn’t abuse his wife.. they argued, they had fights, VERBALLY, that kind of thing happens when you’re married
 
You're sure?

I'm sure they aren't.

I've seen how people get around AI, and I've seen how people get banned because AI just decides....

Facebook has a system where you just get hit, there's no individual to talk to, no explanation, nothing. Just one day "you're banned, **** off"

Ok, so if it their algorithm not working that’s one thing, if Elon is purposefully censoring, that’s another.
 
Ok, so if it their algorithm not working that’s one thing, if Elon is purposefully censoring, that’s another.

Is it?

The problem is that people are using the algorithms to get rid of people they don't like, who are saying things they don't like, and Facebook is enabling this.
 


Stephen Crowder is often an ass, but occasionally he’s funny, but sometimes he does stories like this which hit right at the heart of the issue.

In this video, he points out how when platforms like Twitter increase their free speech by allowing a wider diversity of opinions. The left backed off and started criticizing it as right wing echo chamber. The problem if it ever became an echo chamber is directly because of the fact that people on the left started abandoning it.

The left couldn’t handle that there was a platform that allowed everybody to share their opinions equally. Nobody ever said that Democrat couldn’t post there, in fact, the platform was made as a place for everybody could share their opinions no matter what. Instead, the left created platforms like bluesky where diversity of opinion is pretty much stifled. Try being a right winger on that platform and going there and posting something and you’ll be shouted down vigorously by the left, and very possibly booted from the platform.

The left can’t tolerate any space that it can’t control so rather than participating in an open platform they move themselves to their own special corner, where they don’t allow anybody else in that proves that it’s actually the right has more diversity of thought and speech


Diversity of speech is not what I would call what as allowed. Bullying, misogyny, hate speech, and conspiracy theories and lies would be an apt description of it.

When Musk’s AI was undressing digitally undressing photos of underage girls, Musk put it behind a paywall. He didn’t change the programming.

For the same reason I chose to stay away from criminal hangouts and dark alleys, because I choose not to associate with these people, I choose not to associate with the class of people posting on X, nor do I choose to read their vile posts.
 
I’m just looking for evidence of musk censoring people.


As far as the link you posted, what am I reading? A claim by someone who, as it appears, was talking about things that possibly happened before musk bought twitter.
 
Back
Top Bottom