The right = most diversity of speech

The problem is, who gets to decide the rules?

Usually it's AI, and AI can be manipulated.

The people who the company hires to make the rules I guess, and even if they are AI, I’m sure they are reviewed.

Point is, I don’t see Elon censoring free speech, but enforcing their TOS of the platform
 
Stephen Crowder is often an ass, but occasionally he’s funny, but sometimes he does stories like this which hit right at the heart of the issue.
Despite a surprising amount of candidates for the position, Crowder is the right's favorite abusive husband
 
The people who the company hires to make the rules I guess, and even if they are AI, I’m sure they are reviewed.

Point is, I don’t see Elon censoring free speech, but enforcing their TOS of the platform
You're sure?

I'm sure they aren't.

I've seen how people get around AI, and I've seen how people get banned because AI just decides....

Facebook has a system where you just get hit, there's no individual to talk to, no explanation, nothing. Just one day "you're banned, **** off"
 
Despite a surprising amount of candidates for the position, Crowder is the right's favorite abusive husband
lol, crowder didn’t abuse his wife.. they argued, they had fights, VERBALLY, that kind of thing happens when you’re married
 
You're sure?

I'm sure they aren't.

I've seen how people get around AI, and I've seen how people get banned because AI just decides....

Facebook has a system where you just get hit, there's no individual to talk to, no explanation, nothing. Just one day "you're banned, **** off"

Ok, so if it their algorithm not working that’s one thing, if Elon is purposefully censoring, that’s another.
 
Ok, so if it their algorithm not working that’s one thing, if Elon is purposefully censoring, that’s another.

Is it?

The problem is that people are using the algorithms to get rid of people they don't like, who are saying things they don't like, and Facebook is enabling this.
 


Stephen Crowder is often an ass, but occasionally he’s funny, but sometimes he does stories like this which hit right at the heart of the issue.

In this video, he points out how when platforms like Twitter increase their free speech by allowing a wider diversity of opinions. The left backed off and started criticizing it as right wing echo chamber. The problem if it ever became an echo chamber is directly because of the fact that people on the left started abandoning it.

The left couldn’t handle that there was a platform that allowed everybody to share their opinions equally. Nobody ever said that Democrat couldn’t post there, in fact, the platform was made as a place for everybody could share their opinions no matter what. Instead, the left created platforms like bluesky where diversity of opinion is pretty much stifled. Try being a right winger on that platform and going there and posting something and you’ll be shouted down vigorously by the left, and very possibly booted from the platform.

The left can’t tolerate any space that it can’t control so rather than participating in an open platform they move themselves to their own special corner, where they don’t allow anybody else in that proves that it’s actually the right has more diversity of thought and speech


Diversity of speech is not what I would call what as allowed. Bullying, misogyny, hate speech, and conspiracy theories and lies would be an apt description of it.

When Musk’s AI was undressing digitally undressing photos of underage girls, Musk put it behind a paywall. He didn’t change the programming.

For the same reason I chose to stay away from criminal hangouts and dark alleys, because I choose not to associate with these people, I choose not to associate with the class of people posting on X, nor do I choose to read their vile posts.
 
I’m just looking for evidence of musk censoring people.


As far as the link you posted, what am I reading? A claim by someone who, as it appears, was talking about things that possibly happened before musk bought twitter.
 
Is it?

The problem is that people are using the algorithms to get rid of people they don't like, who are saying things they don't like, and Facebook is enabling this.

I’m not talking about Facebook, I’m talking about X. Are you saying that they are intentionally working the algorithm to silence people?
 
Diversity of speech is not what I would call what as allowed. Bullying, misogyny, hate speech, and conspiracy theories and lies would be an apt description of it.

Show it. You all left X because you couldn’t handle that Elon was allowing people to speak freely, then you segregated yourselves to bluesky and claimed X was a right wing echo chamber. You then proceeded to turn bluesky into a left wing hate site where there is zero diversity of thought. At least X will allow people from both the left and the right, bluesky will likely boot you from the platform if you come with other opinions.


When Musk’s AI was undressing digitally undressing photos of underage girls, Musk put it behind a paywall. He didn’t change the programming.

Musk and xAI have said that they are taking action “against illegal content on X, including Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM), by removing it, permanently suspending accounts, and working with local governments and law enforcement as necessary.”


Looks like Elon is trying to figure it out. How easy do you think it is to edit the code for an AI?


For the same reason I chose to stay away from criminal hangouts and dark alleys, because I choose not to associate with these people, I choose not to associate with the class of people posting on X, nor do I choose to read their vile posts.


You can choose to remove yourself but don’t complain about the platform being too right wing if all the liberals leave.

By the way, from what I’ve heard, things said on bluesky are MUCH more hateful than anything said on X
 


Stephen Crowder is often an ass, but occasionally he’s funny, but sometimes he does stories like this which hit right at the heart of the issue.

In this video, he points out how when platforms like Twitter increase their free speech by allowing a wider diversity of opinions. The left backed off and started criticizing it as right wing echo chamber. The problem if it ever became an echo chamber is directly because of the fact that people on the left started abandoning it.

The left couldn’t handle that there was a platform that allowed everybody to share their opinions equally. Nobody ever said that Democrat couldn’t post there, in fact, the platform was made as a place for everybody could share their opinions no matter what. Instead, the left created platforms like bluesky where diversity of opinion is pretty much stifled. Try being a right winger on that platform and going there and posting something and you’ll be shouted down vigorously by the left, and very possibly booted from the platform.

The left can’t tolerate any space that it can’t control so rather than participating in an open platform they move themselves to their own special corner, where they don’t allow anybody else in that proves that it’s actually the right has more diversity of thought and speech

Can any MAGA poster here post an OP from a real news source and not some bullshit Twitter / podcast? What is wrong with you people?
 
Can any MAGA poster here post an OP from a real news source and not some bullshit Twitter / podcast? What is wrong with you people?
Did you actually watch the video? If you had, you’d know it’s true
 
I’m not talking about Facebook, I’m talking about X. Are you saying that they are intentionally working the algorithm to silence people?
No, I'm saying people are able to manipulate the algorithms to silence people.
 
Show it. You all left X because you couldn’t handle that Elon was allowing people to speak freely, then you segregated yourselves to bluesky and claimed X was a right wing echo chamber. You then proceeded to turn bluesky into a left wing hate site where there is zero diversity of thought. At least X will allow people from both the left and the right, bluesky will likely boot you from the platform if you come with other opinions.







Looks like Elon is trying to figure it out. How easy do you think it is to edit the code for an AI?





You can choose to remove yourself but don’t complain about the platform being too right wing if all the liberals leave.

By the way, from what I’ve heard, things said on bluesky are MUCH more hateful than anything said on X

I have no idea because I'm not on either platform. I was on X but only to run ads for my business. After Musk took over, I stopped my ads, and stopped participating. I've never been on BlueSky, and since I didn't like Twitter, I didn't bother with BlueSky.
 
? That’s not censorship lol. Some photographers were posting unflattering pictures of hegseth so they barred them from the briefing room.

I mean, if you are going to try and smear people, they don’t have to invite you to their meetings…but you’re not being censored,
Ever get tired of drinking Kool-Aid? It's not Pete's meeting, he has been appointed to run our defense department which by anybody with a lick of sense would realize is the place where a free press is the most important... Not the press that paints the most flattering portrait of Pete.
 
15th post
I have no idea because I'm not on either platform. I was on X but only to run ads for my business. After Musk took over, I stopped my ads, and stopped participating. I've never been on BlueSky, and since I didn't like Twitter, I didn't bother with BlueSky.

Why did you stop advertising on X? You’re going to punish your business for political spite?

I don’t know about you all, but if I owned a business, I’d want everyone’s money, left, right, center….
 
Back
Top Bottom