Democrats, was the Holocaust caused by free speech?

[Concerned American]

It's eroding, slowly getting less free, it's gradual.

MSM is still spewing their lies? What is not free?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

LOL, "the Third Reich was far right", so what? the NAZI's were national SOCIALISTS who had elements of the far right and far left. using your logic The Bolsheviks were far left , the Democrats are far left, therefore the Democrats are Bolsheviks.

The Nazis were far right, the AfD are far right and MAGA is far right.

Yes, although I must give you most of the credit, you actually proved the case for your ignorance, I just pointed out the obvious.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

MSM is still spewing their lies? What is not free?

MSNBC have recently dismissed lots of non-Caucasians and vocal Trump critics.

 

[martybegan]

The Nazis were far right, the AfD are far right and MAGA is far right.

The Democrats are far Left and the Bolsheviks were far left and the Maoist are far left and the Bolivarians are far left and the Trotskyists are far left and the Democratic Socialists are far left.

 

[Concerned American]

AP are being denied something BECAUSE they refuse to write what Trump wants them to write

AP is being denied access because they are disruptive. They can report the news from the WH. They just have to follow simple rules of conduct. You didn't complain when the NY Post was denied access to Biden. Better check your own house before throwing stones.

WH denies ‘blacklisting’ media but can’t explain lack of access to Biden events

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre on Thursday denied that President Biden’s press office is “blacklisting” reporters and news outlets when pressed by The Post on a my…

nypost.com

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Germany’s foremost expert on the subject, sociologist Wilhelm Heitmeyer, said the AfD now stands for an “authoritarian national radicalism,” namely, an ideology that propagates a hierarchically ordered, ethnically homogeneous society overseen by a strong-arm state. What’s particularly radical, he said, is the party’s communication with and mobilization of misanthropic groups that rain violence on select minorities. These protagonists encompass a wide array of hate groups, including neo-Nazis, which are largely responsible for the highest level of hate crimes in Germany in three decades. Its victims are refugees, foreign nationals, Jews, Muslims, and LGBTQ+ people.

Germany’s Far-Right Party Is Worse Than the Rest of Europe’s

The Alternative for Germany is more popular than ever—and more dangerous.

foreignpolicy.com

 

[NetJedi]

The Nazis were far right, the AfD are far right and MAGA is far right.

LOL

It's impossible to take someone seriously that is calling people fascists whose simplistic, kindergarten definition of fascism is limited to "far right".

Put down the video games and go read some books kid.

 

[martybegan]

Germany’s Far-Right Party Is Worse Than the Rest of Europe’s

The Alternative for Germany is more popular than ever—and more dangerous.

foreignpolicy.com

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

AP is being denied access because they are disruptive. They can report the news from the WH. They just have to follow simple rules of conduct. You didn't complain when the NY Post was denied access to Biden. Better check your own house before throwing stones.

WH denies ‘blacklisting’ media but can’t explain lack of access to Biden events

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre on Thursday denied that President Biden’s press office is “blacklisting” reporters and news outlets when pressed by The Post on a my…

nypost.com

Here's what Trump actually said, his words (in red)

“We’re going to keep them out until such time as they agree that it’s the Gulf of America” Trump said, speaking to reporters who witnessed the signing of an executive order at Mar-a-Lago, his Florida estate. “We’re very proud of this country, and we want it to be the Gulf of America.”

Do you defend him? do you think it's right to restrict access to a news agency unless they write what Trump wants them to write?

Your call, but if you support him you do not support a free press.

 

[Concerned American]

MSNBC have recently dismissed lots of non-Caucasians and vocal Trump critics.

MSNBC is going to be dismissing most, if not all of their employees as they disappear from the public eye. Next.

 

[Concerned American]

Here's what Trump actually said, his words (in red)



Do you defend him? do you think it's right to restrict access to a news agency unless they write what Trump wants them to write?

Your call, but if you support him you do not support a free press.

Yawn.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

LOL

It's impossible to take someone seriously that is calling people fascists whose simplistic, kindergarten definition of fascism is limited to "far right".

All three ideological groups are far right.

Put down the video games and go read some books kid.

Which books do you thing I should read?

Art of the Deal

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

And yet all the other press groups in there keep the spirit of the 1st amendment alive.

None of them are free to use "Gulf of Mexico" you fucking dingbat.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Yawn.

Yes, indeed AKA Check Mate.

 

[Concerned American]

Yes, indeed AKA Check Mate.

You're welcome to read your UK rags. You know from the country that jails people for what they post on social media. Where were your complaints when Biden refused access to the NY Post? Answer the question. AKA run along, you're a moron.

 

[MagicMike]

Any Lefties here want to defend your loon Legacy media by arguing that Nazi Germany embraced free speech?

Anyone?

First of all, your question is a straw man because it is misleading.
Free speech is a great thing except when it is used for hate speech, which is what Nazi Germany and MAGAts do.
Let someone suggest that your right to free speech should not include a right to hate speech and it's
"WHAAAAAH!
"We're being CENSORED!"

 

[martybegan]

None of them are free to use "Gulf of Mexico" you fucking dingbat.

AP made a point about being assholes about it.

 

[toobfreak]

Democrats, was the Holocaust caused by free speech?​

Absolupositively! Free speech is the bane of liberty! Totally free speech could lead to world annihilation.
That is how Joe Biden held the universe together--- he saved us by banning criticism of him, banning questions about Covid, and most of all, suppressed any doubts about his election.

As any democrat knows, complete censorship is the key to human liberty.

 

[Dante]

JD Vance slams CBS host for claiming free speech was ‘weaponized’ in Germany to carry out Holocaust during argument with Marco Rubio

“No, I have — I have to disagree with you. Free speech was not used to conduct a genocide,” Rubio shot back.

nypost.com

CBS journalist Margaret Brennan was rebuked Sunday after she claimed that free speech was “weaponized” in Germany to carry out the Holocaust during a back-and-forth with Secretary of State Marco Rubio

“No, I have — I have to disagree with you. Free speech was not used to conduct a genocide,” the former US senator said.

“The genocide was conducted by an authoritarian Nazi regime that happened to also be genocidal because they hated Jews and they hated minorities and they hated those that they — they had a list of people they hated, but primarily the Jews.

“There was no free speech in Nazi Germany. There was none,” Rubio added.

Vance, 40, weighed in on the exchange later Sunday.

“This is a crazy exchange,” he tweeted. “Does the media really think the holocaust was caused by free speech?”

Well, what say you? Was the Holocaust caused by "free speech"? If so, how?

If the Nazi regime embraced free speech, why did they burn censor books by burning them?

View attachment 1083125

I grow tired of bald-faced lies by the left and their legacy media.

Does any sane person still watch these fools?

But the most chilling thing for me is, I understand that at the heart of the left, they want to do exactly what Nazi Germany did, which was to oppress free speech and cancel anyone who opposed them, all while pretending to be the sole heirs of free speech and democracy themselves. In fact, about half of Americans now want limits on free speech, as if that would make society better. So, the question begs, better for who? I suppose it would be better for the powers that get to censor the speech, but not for those that are censored

I will never forget, for example, watching the Left force people all over the globe to get a vaccine in order to continue to work to support themselves or educate themselves to have a better future, but when the vaccine harmed them in some way, not only did they not have any legal recourse to be compensated, they were then censored on social media and canceled and made to feel like right wing lunatics who lie.

Sick.

If this isn't about bating Democrats, what is it about?

Come in. Open up. Confess.

 

[Modern Messiah]

Brennan was right, she should have pushed back hard on the ignoramus Rubio. Propaganda played a huge role in indoctrinating people and there was a lot of it directed at Jews. Just as we have trumpanzee propaganda here against immigrants and blacks and other minorities, the latest target of this now being "federal workers" who are now equated with lazy, useless, fakers and deceivers who do no good and never done anything good.

You mean like the propaganda the leftists utilized calling others nazis, hitler, white supremacists?
Is that the propaganda you were referring to.
By the way, those federal agencies actually earned their reputations.