Democrats praying for retaliation.

Iran doesn’t need nukes. All they have to do is close the Strait of Hormuz. Imagine missiles attacking oil tankers, instead of Haifa.
And cripple their own economy?
 
I don't think there is any doubt they were.
Wow.....Iraq and 2003, anyone???? Some people never learn.

There is plenty of doubt. Trump's own intel agencies don't think Iran was close to having a nuclear weapon. That's why the imbecile Trump said the other day that he doesn't agree with his own intel agencies.
 
Wow.....Iraq and 2003, anyone???? Some people never learn.

There is plenty of doubt. Trump's own intel agencies don't think Iran was close to having a nuclear weapon. That's why the imbecile Trump said the other day that he doesn't agree with his own intel agencies.
The IAEA DISAGREED with Bush on Iraq.

Not at all the same. Educate yourself.
 
Wow.....Iraq and 2003, anyone???? Some people never learn.

There is plenty of doubt. Trump's own intel agencies don't think Iran was close to having a nuclear weapon. That's why the imbecile Trump said the other day that he doesn't agree with his own intel agencies.
1000004475.webp


 
You are not one to talk. Everything you "think" comes straight from the imbecile Trump.

Total ******* cult member, you are.
Not at all

Trump is not perfect

But he agrees with me more than any other president since Reagan
 
uh-oh!

And where is the fifth fleet? which was the point...so the only problem was a misnomer, and so you thought you could/would parlay that into the appearance as an act of knowledge.

hence my use of the wrong name as I was being lazy and for which my divined punishment seems to be this interaction.

The comparison was between the two gulfs so no need to consult a map [as I am quite familiar with the planet in any case] and I also understand that the oil heading east to Asia would affect us/the west minimally if even at all as far as the conflict and the war effort is concerned than it would the oil heading through the Red Sea for/to the west would affect us... in fact let them sink the tankers heading east to Asia...btw what is the actual "not nearly as much" amount and difference in oil being sent eastward through the Red Sea as opposed to heading east to Asia? [out of curiosity]...you can fake it if ya like as it has no real bearing on any of this anyway.

But thank you for the name correction, embarrassing as it is to get something so simple and so common so wrong that a grade schooler would know it and I muffed it.
I merely corrected your bad information. Yes, Fifth Fleet is in Bahrain, that is why it was not highlighted as being incorrect.
 
Not at all

Trump is not perfect

But he agrees with me more than any other president since Reagan
You won't be agreeing with Trump much longer.....not after he eliminates or significantly reduces your disability benefits with this horrible "Big Beautiful Bill".
 
They’d have to worry about missiles too.
Navy task forces travel in convoys and are designed for just such a threat or threats, they have AWAC's, Satellites, submarines, destroyers, frigates, helicopters and their own missile systems to deal with it/them, they are also always on the move making them difficult to impossible to locate...but lets wait for the REAR Admiral to weigh in before we get ahead of ourselves.
 
I figure if you build a nuclear enrichment facility at 150 meter deep, you're not just doing it to store your potatoes.

Agreed. It may be safe to assume Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons.
But like the examples I pointed out above, are we absolutely certain of who the bad guy is here other than what we've been spoonfed by the MSM?

How many Iranians do you know PERSONALLY?
 
If sanity prevails, they will lay down their nuclear ambitions on their soil.
Why do you call them laying down being attacked sanity?

Would America do the same if in their situation?
 
Regardless, Iran would not be "close" right now if Trump had not stupidly torn up the previous agreement with Iran.
Yes, they would. As long as Iran has the ability to enrich uranium, they will always be just a few steps away from nuclear weapons.

That is why the original agreement was rubbish to begin with.

Again, educate yourself...

1000004477.webp

1000004478.webp

 
I saw Marco Rubio on Face the Nation today just schooling the "journalist" that runs that show now. Just making her liberal bias look overt and ridiculous. It was a thing of beauty.

Times they are a changin'.


What he did today on that show was the equivalent of "nuh uhhhh!"

A total disgrace.
 
What he did today on that show was the equivalent of "nuh uhhhh!"

A total disgrace.
Then why did she agree with him?

There is no civilian purpose for 60% enriched uranium. The IAEA and every international nuclear agency agrees.
 
15th post
Observation:

Most people here on the Right will argue endlessly with those they deem "crazy", but when one of their own tries to open their eyes to the possibility that they may not be seeing the entire picture clearly.......hardly a peep.

Anyone else not blinded by hyper partisan-ism seeing this?
 
There have been zero Leftists on these boards supporting Trump in any way regarding pretty much anything.

They just want him to die.

In fact, 1/3 of democrats polled wished he had died in the assassination attempt before he was elected,

And I can just hear all the Leftists cheer when Iran retaliates, which they will, as they tell the world how the US had it coming.

This is because the Left truly believes that the two most evil governments on earth is the US and Israel. They really believe that if those two countries were cast into the sea the world would have utopia.


My hunch is, they very much desire iran to attack US personnel in the region as a way of saying "see! Look what trump did"
 
Yes, they would. As long as Iran has the ability to enrich uranium, they will always be just a few steps away from nuclear weapons.

That is why the original agreement was rubbish to begin with.

Again, educate yourself...

View attachment 1127716
View attachment 1127717
Wrong again. The IAEA was ensuring that Iran could not make a nuclear weapon when Obama was President. And stupid Trump ended that.
 
But like the examples I pointed out above, are we absolutely certain of who the bad guy is here other than what we've been spoonfed by the MSM?
I'm going to say it's the guys chanting "Death to America" for the last 45 years.

I'm not one to trust the media or the government. But in this case, I think we're all safer when Iran's enrichment facility is buried under a 100 million tons of rubble.
 
Back
Top Bottom