Employers need to stay the fuck out of their employees lives.
Yet be required to provide them with health insurance? Fascinating.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Employers need to stay the fuck out of their employees lives.
[
Except they did, hence the guilty verdict.
which never would have stood up to an appeal and they knew it.
Keep in mind, Gosnell was already going down for killing Mrs. Mognar (The 43 year old Nepalese woman who couldn't get a legal abortion in Virginia because of religious nutters) and all the Happy Pills he was prescribing (Damned Gummit keeping guys like you from their happy Pills), so he was already going to jail for the rest of his life. (He is 72 years old)
So the only question about the Murder of Medical Waste was if he'd get the death penalty for not disposing of medical waste properly. So they got a dubious conviction on a couple of them, and then plead him down to the time he was already going to serve on other charges.
But you got a court to say somewhere that Medical Waste was people, and that was the important thing to Anti-Choice nutters.
Seriously?
Why did his lawyers advise him to waive the appeal then? C'mon, benefit us with your expertise on all things, even the shit you don't know about.
Employers need to stay the fuck out of their employees lives.
Yet be required to provide them with health insurance? Fascinating.
Employers need to stay the fuck out of their employees lives.
Yet be required to provide them with health insurance? Fascinating.
Health insurance is compensation.
Here's a simple enough solution. Ban employer health plans. Have them ...
Yet be required to provide them with health insurance? Fascinating.
Health insurance is compensation.
Here's a simple enough solution. Ban employer health plans. Have them ...
Here's an even simpler solution. Mind your own fucking business. Let people buy, or not buy, whatever kind of insurance they can afford. Let employers offer whatever kind of compensation attracts the employees they need.
Joe's argument is the perfect example of circular logic. It isn't the government's business, therefore it should be the governments business.
i never said it wasn't the government's business.
I WANT to government to make sure that my boss isn't cheating me. because I know that fucker would given the oppurtunity.
If every boss you have ever worked for has been an asshole...ever stop to think the problem might be you, not them?
Employers need to stay the fuck out of their employees lives.
Yet be required to provide them with health insurance? Fascinating.
A nice sentiment, but unfortunately, the bill will die regardless once the House's Wrongpublican majority gets their grubby fundamentalist paws on it.
The government is forcing one party to buy insurance for another party.
THAT IS AN INTRUSION INTO OUR LIVES, YOU STUPID FUCKS!!!!
Bullshit, prove it.
A nice sentiment, but unfortunately, the bill will die regardless once the House's Wrongpublican majority gets their grubby fundamentalist paws on it.
Um...fundamentalists? Libertarians and any fiscal conservative would oppose that. You should read your talking points before you hit enter and make sure they make sense at some level.
The government is forcing one party to buy insurance for another party.
THAT IS AN INTRUSION INTO OUR LIVES, YOU STUPID FUCKS!!!!
Bullshit, prove it.
Um...you don't know what the ACA is? Seriously?
A nice sentiment, but unfortunately, the bill will die regardless once the House's Wrongpublican majority gets their grubby fundamentalist paws on it.
Um...fundamentalists? Libertarians and any fiscal conservative would oppose that. You should read your talking points before you hit enter and make sure they make sense at some level.
The government is forcing one party to buy insurance for another party.
THAT IS AN INTRUSION INTO OUR LIVES, YOU STUPID FUCKS!!!!
Bullshit, prove it.
Um...you don't know what the ACA is? Seriously?
A nice sentiment, but unfortunately, the bill will die regardless once the House's Wrongpublican majority gets their grubby fundamentalist paws on it.
Um...fundamentalists? Libertarians and any fiscal conservative would oppose that. You should read your talking points before you hit enter and make sure they make sense at some level.
Bullshit, prove it.
Um...you don't know what the ACA is? Seriously?
Kaz, You're talking to a poster whose favorite letter in the alphabet is the letter 'y.'
For example, "Lyz Wyrryn." Seriously, who writes stuff like that? I suggest you place this person on ignore.
As I said, you're a loon.That's rich, coming from a guy who believes voting for people who support failed policies will somehow make things better.Actually, it will.
Do you really think a candidate as far left as Obama could have ever gotten elected 20 years ago?
You guys made this mess. You made this mess the day Reagan decided to fire the PATCO workers and told big business that government no longer had the working man's back.
You're a loon.
How do you defined "failed'.
Welfare does exactly what it's supposed to do. It keeps people from starving and rioting.
What the failure is that we found it more important to make the rich richer than to make sure everyone had good paying jobs.
That was the failure.
And that's all the GOP.
the insurance companies would GLADLY pay for contraception. It's cheaper than paying for births
Uh, yeah, actually he does if medical insurance was part of the deal he offered me.
Health INsurance is compensation. It is not your employer doing you a favor.
Hey, guy, I'm not worried about being above Mexico in quality of health care.
I'm worried we are behind Canada, and Germany, and Japan, and England, and France and Italy.
The fact we have an infant mortality rate that a third world country would be embarrassed by is nothing to be proud of.
Have any of you conservatives thought about the fact that if a woman has access to contraception (meaning she can decide when to have a child or not), abortions would decrease?
And.................if a woman has a right to get an abortion, maybe she would be able to better plan her life and care for a child when she has enough money, rather than go on welfare to provide for her child?
Conservatives only care about kids when they are at the level of zygote or embryo. When it comes into the world, it's the fault (and responsibility) of the mother.
And then................when the child comes out and becomes a baby, and the child cannot be cared for because the mother doesn't earn enough, that child (and mother) become known as "takers".
Let women have the choice of when they become parents. It's much cheaper to pay for birth control or abortions than it is to pay for welfare for the child for the next 18 years.
Have any of you conservatives thought about the fact that if a woman has access to contraception (meaning she can decide when to have a child or not), abortions would decrease?
Have any of you Communists considered the fact that ALL women in America have easy access to contraception, and employer supply of abortificants is utterly irrelevant to access to contraception?
And.................if a woman has a right to get an abortion, maybe she would be able to better plan her life and care for a child when she has enough money, rather than go on welfare to provide for her child?
Only if she keeps the child in formaldehyde.
Communists only care about a child when they can kill it - part of the blood lust of the left.
And then................when the child comes out and becomes a baby, and the child cannot be cared for because the mother doesn't earn enough, that child (and mother) become known as "takers".
Communists and their lies.
Say Comrade - WHO runs all the private adoption agencies- Planned Parenthood? See, it's not JUST that you're a liar, it's that the lies you tell are SO FUCKING STUPID.
Yes, I realize you're just repeating hating points that your handlers at ThinkProgress trained you to recite - even so....
Let women have the choice of when they become parents. It's much cheaper to pay for birth control or abortions than it is to pay for welfare for the child for the next 18 years.
They already have that choice, sporky. Conception is 100% a matter of choice. No woman conceives in the USA unless they choose to. There is no excuse for abortion.
Have any of you conservatives thought about the fact that if a woman has access to contraception (meaning she can decide when to have a child or not), abortions would decrease?
And.................if a woman has a right to get an abortion, maybe she would be able to better plan her life and care for a child when she has enough money, rather than go on welfare to provide for her child?
Conservatives only care about kids when they are at the level of zygote or embryo. When it comes into the world, it's the fault (and responsibility) of the mother.
And then................when the child comes out and becomes a baby, and the child cannot be cared for because the mother doesn't earn enough, that child (and mother) become known as "takers".
Let women have the choice of when they become parents. It's much cheaper to pay for birth control or abortions than it is to pay for welfare for the child for the next 18 years.
which never would have stood up to an appeal and they knew it.
Keep in mind, Gosnell was already going down for killing Mrs. Mognar (The 43 year old Nepalese woman who couldn't get a legal abortion in Virginia because of religious nutters) and all the Happy Pills he was prescribing (Damned Gummit keeping guys like you from their happy Pills), so he was already going to jail for the rest of his life. (He is 72 years old)
So the only question about the Murder of Medical Waste was if he'd get the death penalty for not disposing of medical waste properly. So they got a dubious conviction on a couple of them, and then plead him down to the time he was already going to serve on other charges.
But you got a court to say somewhere that Medical Waste was people, and that was the important thing to Anti-Choice nutters.
Seriously?
Why did his lawyers advise him to waive the appeal then? C'mon, benefit us with your expertise on all things, even the shit you don't know about.
Because they knew he was going to jail for the drugs and Mrs. Mognar anyway. He wasn't getting out of that one.
Come on, the only difference was between a death sentence that would never be carried out and life in prison for a guy who isn't going to live more than a few more years anyway. The last thing the prosecutors wanted was for the jury to whiffle on the death penalty and then have him challenge the dead fetus convictions.
So they save their dubious verdict and he saves money.
So why didn't they just plead him down in the first place?
Oh, yeah, because they were making a point about Abortion.
Employers need to stay the fuck out of their employees lives.
Yet be required to provide them with health insurance? Fascinating.
Health insurance is compensation.
Here's a simple enough solution. Ban employer health plans. Have them pay each and every employee the equivlent of their share of the plan. Everyone has to get on the ObamaCare Website and negotiate with the insurance companies for their own plans.
Private Insurance would collapse in about five years, and then we'd be insisting on Medicare for Everyone.
You see, a 26 year old could get a plan on her own for a lot less than the $5000 hobby lobby is paying for her that covers contraception. Shit, the insurance companies would GLADLY pay for contraception. It's cheaper than paying for births.
It's the older employees who would be fucked. Try getting an insurance plan at 52.