Democrats are insane. "Transgender" women, men who say they are women, are in women's prisons, and pose major threat to those women.

Because a man says he feels like a woman is now a thing.....something not to be treated but something to be celebrated by democrats.....we get insane problems like this....

Men, who say they are women, but who still have a functioning penis, are being put in women's prisons...with their still fully functional penis......

Anyone see a problem with this....oh, and as this article points out....they don't see themselves as homosexuals....they call themselves "lesbians," which means.....they still want to have sex with women....

And now democrats are putting them in all women prisons......

See the problem yet? If you voted for joe biden, you don't see the problem....let rational people explain...

Shrier explains that, in California, men who claim to be women must be treated as women – which means they get housed in the women’s rooms, regardless of their surgical or hormonal status. While the women Shrier spoke with were sympathetic to the plight of so-called “transgender” in men’s prisons and were amenable to sharing prison space with men who had been surgically emasculated, the problem arises with those men who come equipped with male parts and hormones – and male height and strength. Additionally, Shrier explains that, even if these men genuinely believe that they are women, the majority of them are not innately homosexual. Instead, they’re still heterosexual, although they class themselves as “lesbians.”

In California’s Chowchilla, women prisoners are all mixed together, regardless of the severity of their crime. Additionally, rather than two prisoners to a cell, eight women will share a room. There’ll be a sink and toilet inside the cell, separated from the room by a cowboy (or saloon) door.


7_210_9.gif

Tyrina Griffin, a woman who spent 20 years in the women’s prison at Chowchilla, described the problem:


“They’re getting a full erection,” she said. “So you’re locked in this room, 24/7, with a man and there’s nothing you can do about it. If you tell the police you don’t want to live with a man, or you’re afraid or whatever, you’ll get a disciplinary infraction. So you’re basically punished for being scared.”
[snip]
She added that women inside the prison are looking for ways to arm themselves. “They made it into a more of a war zone, to me, because I know women who are like, ‘I refuse to live with a man, and if I have to make me a prison knife to defend myself, then I’m going to do that.’ . . . I mean, you know how strong men are. Imagine one woman trying to defend herself against this big ol’ man, and the men coming in, they are like 6-foot-5, 6-foot-6, 300 pounds. These men look like Hercules compared to these little women. Can you fault the woman for actually trying to defend herself?”

The women aren’t the only ones who are scared. The female guards in Chowchilla are afraid, too, because men are more violent – and, unlike the guards in men’s prisons, the guards at Chowchilla have only batons and pepper spray. They also may be called upon to cavity search a “transgender” woman because prisoners are entitled to ask for a woman to conduct such a search.

What’s the threat?

Rape, beatings and murder....
And you think a trans woman poses more of a threat for that? Why?
Because those trans women beat and rape. Many have been convicted of raping and killing women. Now they almost have a license to create fearful harems.

Just a few years ago, a man that had killed several women suddenly decided he was a woman and wanted to be transferred to a woman's prison. It was astonishing that this killer of women was actually transferred to a woman's prison where he predictably attacked the prisoners and guards.
And therein lies the problem. Why wouldn't a male rapist declare he's a woman in order to get transferred and serve his sentence among women? It would certainly be easier for him than living in a male prison, and he has a "captive" audience.
The insanity is actually worse. A man who beat a female partner can track her to a battered woman's shelter claim he's a woman and get in.
This discussion is great… it’s like listening the dumb and dumber trying to find Santa’s house!
 
Because a man says he feels like a woman is now a thing.....something not to be treated but something to be celebrated by democrats.....we get insane problems like this....

Men, who say they are women, but who still have a functioning penis, are being put in women's prisons...with their still fully functional penis......

Anyone see a problem with this....oh, and as this article points out....they don't see themselves as homosexuals....they call themselves "lesbians," which means.....they still want to have sex with women....

And now democrats are putting them in all women prisons......

See the problem yet? If you voted for joe biden, you don't see the problem....let rational people explain...

Shrier explains that, in California, men who claim to be women must be treated as women – which means they get housed in the women’s rooms, regardless of their surgical or hormonal status. While the women Shrier spoke with were sympathetic to the plight of so-called “transgender” in men’s prisons and were amenable to sharing prison space with men who had been surgically emasculated, the problem arises with those men who come equipped with male parts and hormones – and male height and strength. Additionally, Shrier explains that, even if these men genuinely believe that they are women, the majority of them are not innately homosexual. Instead, they’re still heterosexual, although they class themselves as “lesbians.”

In California’s Chowchilla, women prisoners are all mixed together, regardless of the severity of their crime. Additionally, rather than two prisoners to a cell, eight women will share a room. There’ll be a sink and toilet inside the cell, separated from the room by a cowboy (or saloon) door.


7_210_9.gif

Tyrina Griffin, a woman who spent 20 years in the women’s prison at Chowchilla, described the problem:


“They’re getting a full erection,” she said. “So you’re locked in this room, 24/7, with a man and there’s nothing you can do about it. If you tell the police you don’t want to live with a man, or you’re afraid or whatever, you’ll get a disciplinary infraction. So you’re basically punished for being scared.”
[snip]
She added that women inside the prison are looking for ways to arm themselves. “They made it into a more of a war zone, to me, because I know women who are like, ‘I refuse to live with a man, and if I have to make me a prison knife to defend myself, then I’m going to do that.’ . . . I mean, you know how strong men are. Imagine one woman trying to defend herself against this big ol’ man, and the men coming in, they are like 6-foot-5, 6-foot-6, 300 pounds. These men look like Hercules compared to these little women. Can you fault the woman for actually trying to defend herself?”

The women aren’t the only ones who are scared. The female guards in Chowchilla are afraid, too, because men are more violent – and, unlike the guards in men’s prisons, the guards at Chowchilla have only batons and pepper spray. They also may be called upon to cavity search a “transgender” woman because prisoners are entitled to ask for a woman to conduct such a search.

Don't care much to read the nonsense posted above....considering the source...it's obviously all nonsense.

In the largest prison system in the nation, TDCJ, female guards work in every unit across the state and guard male prisoners all the time.

The pearl clutching by the OP is hilarious and comes from a place of extreme ignorance.



Their war on homosexuals has fizzled out. They spent years attacking homosexuals for wanting to be married and to have the same rights as straight people.

Now that the attacking of homosexuals no longer riles up the base, they have moved on to transexuals.

It's all a bunch of BS lies.
 
Men, who say they are women, but who still have a functioning penis
Oh, yeah, "real" ladies cross their legs so tight they don't have a clit and they don't ever have to take a piss either.

Too bad they just can't shut up.

For one thing, there's no functioning penis without a prostate gland.
 
I have mixed feelings about this kind of arrangement. Depending on why a natural born female gets put away to begin with, how much of a day at the swimming pool should such a punishment be? Do keep in mind that prison was never intended to be like a five star hotel and restaurant in the first place.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

P.S. Maybe the best place for the transgender guys is being in there with the natural born females who are in there for life with parole because of their decision to be murderers. I can't help but wonder how well things would go over with that kind of arrangement.

There's a big difference between "prison should be unpleasant" and "prison should include sexual abuse". That help clarify those mixed feelings at all? Civilized nations don't punish crime with rape.
 
^^^ The sad thing is that even if the males and females are separated, rape can still take place thanks to those who have never had any interest in the opposite gender to begin with.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
 
^^^ The sad thing is that even if the males and females are separated, rape can still take place thanks to those who have never had any interest in the opposite gender to begin with.

God bless you always!!!

Holly
While that is true, we don't want to exacerbate the situation and make it easier for a heterosexual male rapist to continue what he does.
 
If I had to go to prison I'd want to be in the female's prison...
That's my point. A violent male felon looking at a very long prison sentence can either:

1. Be identified as a man and sent to serve his sentence in a men's prison with other violent male felons.
2. Insist he is instead a woman and be sent to serve his sentence in a women's prison.

Oh, what would he choose?
 
If I had to go to prison I'd want to be in the female's prison...
That's my point. A violent male felon looking at a very long prison sentence can either:

1. Be identified as a man and sent to serve his sentence in a men's prison with other violent male felons.
2. Insist he is instead a woman and be sent to serve his sentence in a women's prison.

Oh, what would he choose?
Being transgender is not a crime.
Being a psychologist or a psychiatrist, on the other hand, is a serious WAR CRIME.

The pronoun "he" — in U.S. law — stands in equally for both genders, because the politically correct "he or she" would refer to either of two different persons, who may or may not have been mentioned in the text of the statute.
 
If I had to go to prison I'd want to be in the female's prison...
That's my point. A violent male felon looking at a very long prison sentence can either:

1. Be identified as a man and sent to serve his sentence in a men's prison with other violent male felons.
2. Insist he is instead a woman and be sent to serve his sentence in a women's prison.

Oh, what would he choose?
Being transgender is not a crime.
Being a psychologist or a psychiatrist, on the other hand, is a serious WAR CRIME.

The pronoun "he" — in U.S. law — stands in equally for both genders, because the politically correct "he or she" would refer to either of two different persons, who may or may not have been mentioned in the text of the statute.
Notice the words female and women both have male identifiers?
 
If I had to go to prison I'd want to be in the female's prison...
That's my point. A violent male felon looking at a very long prison sentence can either:

1. Be identified as a man and sent to serve his sentence in a men's prison with other violent male felons.
2. Insist he is instead a woman and be sent to serve his sentence in a women's prison.

Oh, what would he choose?
Being transgender is not a crime.
Being a psychologist or a psychiatrist, on the other hand, is a serious WAR CRIME.

The pronoun "he" — in U.S. law — stands in equally for both genders, because the politically correct "he or she" would refer to either of two different persons, who may or may not have been mentioned in the text of the statute.
No one says it is a crime. Prison populations, however, are separated for good reason, and it's obvious that a male felon, particularly a rapist, who sees an opportunity to serve a lengthy sentence surrounded by women instead of men, would be likely to identify as a woman so as to be put in with them.
 
Do you honestly not see any problems with housing a convicted heterosexual male in a female prison?
The sex assumptions will end your career and let your charge out of prison with a clean record.
Why do you think we put rapists in jail and make them go on a sex offenders registry in the first place? Is it not because we believe they will do it again? Would you allow a convicted sex offender free access to a vulnerable person in your charge? If not, you're making sex assumptions.

And, do not think for a moment that I didn't notice you didn't answer the question.
 
Why do you think we put rapists in jail and make them go on a sex offenders registry in the first place? Is it not because we believe they will do it again?
Actual forcible rape is extremely rare, on the level of premeditated murder, and has little if anything to do the type of "lovemaking" that gives people pleasure.

You're pushing Al Capone's trope that "all men are rapists." That's no go.
Would you allow a convicted sex offender free access to a vulnerable person in your charge? If not, you're making sex assumptions.
Certain privileged ladies of the district need to stop being "vulnerable" and playing victim. No woman with the rights to possess firearms should be screaming rape or sexual assault.
And, do not think for a moment that I didn't notice you didn't answer the question.
You keep twisting things around to play innocent and demonize your opponents as inhuman monsters in court. You simply don't leave any room for civil discourse.
 
Why do you think we put rapists in jail and make them go on a sex offenders registry in the first place? Is it not because we believe they will do it again?
Actual forcible rape is extremely rare, on the level of premeditated murder, and has little if anything to do the type of "lovemaking" that gives people pleasure.

You're pushing Al Capone's trope that "all men are rapists." That's no go.
Would you allow a convicted sex offender free access to a vulnerable person in your charge? If not, you're making sex assumptions.
Certain privileged ladies of the district need to stop being "vulnerable" and playing victim. No woman with the rights to possess firearms should be screaming rape or sexual assault.
And, do not think for a moment that I didn't notice you didn't answer the question.
You keep twisting things around to play innocent and demonize your opponents as inhuman monsters in court. You simply don't leave any room for civil discourse.
You have no idea what you're talking about, do you?
 

Forum List

Back
Top