Zone1 DEI Created Meritoracy in the Federal Workforce, The Very Thing That Trump & His Minions Claim Has Been Lost as a Result of DEI

Yes. DEI is "Hire anyone who is not Straight and White." Which disqualifies ALL the good workers.
And here we see the true definition of racism.

Straight white veterans are part of DEI. Straight white women are part of DEI. Stright white disabled people are part of DEI. So you really don't know what DEI is. You're repeating the white race hustle.
 
And here we see the true definition of racism.

Straight white veterans are part of DEI. Straight white women are part of DEI. Stright white disabled people are part of DEI. So you really don't know what DEI is. You're repeating the white race hustle.
So Straight White Women who are Pro Life are part of your Socialist Cabal? I doubt it. DEI is all about Race and perverted Sex.
 
It's always amazing how Marxists can create new meanings for words. Meritocracy is actually the opposite of DEI. You see, Marxists always use lies like there was pervasive racism in hiring before DEI. There is no data to prove that.
I agree with your general assertion. Nevertheless, I would use the word "anti racist" rather than "Marxist." Hardly anyone takes Marxism seriously anymore.

DEI means "affirmative action." They both mean "lowering objective standards of excellence for Negroes." In the United State the average IQ for blacks is 85. The average for white Gentiles is 100. The average for East Asians (AKA Orientals) is 106. The average for Ashkenazi Jews is 115. A company can have a work force that "looks like America," or it can have a work force with the native intelligence to perform adequately. It can't have both. I am a white Gentile, by the way.

The only kind of diversity that is beneficial is diversity of opinion. Anti racists try to suppress diversity of opinion by suppressing those of us who agree with Charles Murray, Jared Taylor, and Professors Arthur Jensen, Richard Herrnstein, and J. Philippe Rushton.

For example, on the U.S. Message Board, JoeB131 tries to suppress me with insults, name calling, obscene words, and occasional threats of violence. I continue to post facts he does not like. I will not complement JoeB131 by calling him a "Marxist." I have known members of the American Communist Party. When it still existed, I knew members of the Young Socialist Alliance, a Trotskyist organization. They disagreed with me, but they disagreed while being agreeable.

I doubt JoeB131 has read anything by Karl Marx, or much of anything else, for that matter.

Once I took a fascinating seminar on Das Kapital given by a brilliant member of the American Communist Party. He was a physicist. While working at his day job and leading the seminar, he was translating a book from Russian to Swedish for the Soviet government. I have always liked the members of the CPUSA I knew. JoeB131? Not so much.
 
Last edited:
Um, guy, here's the thing. I'd rather be street smart than book smart, any day of the week.

No wonder the homies pick you out as a mark.
You mean no wonder black ghetto thugs try to rob me? With a squirt of pepper spray I give them other ideas.
 
There never was an exit strategy to the war on poverty. It's working exactly as intended.

"These Negroes, they're getting pretty uppity these days and that's a problem for us since they've got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we've got to do something about this, we've got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference."

-- Lyndon B. Johnson, Democrat
Johnson's concessions to Negroes turned America's white working class into a Republican constituency. It was a bad trade.
 
I agree with your general assertion. Nevertheless, I would use the word "anti racist" rather than "Marxist." Hardly anyone takes Marxism seriously anymore.

DEI means "affirmative action." They both mean "lowering objective standards of excellence for Negroes." In the United State the average IQ for blacks is 85. The average for white Gentiles is 100. The average for East Asians (AKA Orientals) is 106. The average for Ashkenazi Jews is 115. A company can have a work force that "looks like America," or it can have a work force with the native intelligence to perform adequately. It can't have both. I am a white Gentile, by the way.

You keep moving that black IQ number around, from 75 to 80 to 85, so I thought I would find out what the real number is.


1740141848585.webp


Oh, wait, it's 89. Hispanics are 92, Whites are 103, and Asians are 106.

Again, this is AVERAGE, which means 50% are above that number, and 50% are BELOW that number.

Not that IQ score is a sign of virtue. Hermann Goering had an IQ of 138. Ted Bundy had an IQ of 136.



The only kind of diversity that is beneficial is diversity of opinion. Anti racists try to suppress diversity of opinion by suppressing those of us who agree with Charles Murray, Jared Taylor, and Professors Arthur Jensen, Richard Herrnstein, and J. Philippe Rushton.

Bullshit. Garbage science needs to be treated like garbage. It's why we don't teach Creationism, we don't adhere to a flat earth theory, we don't treat people who claim the moon landing was fake seriously. Garbage opinions are exactly that, garbage, and they have no place in discussions.

I used to have discussions with a poster who insisted the Sandy Hook shooting was a false flag and all the parents of the kids killed were "Crisis Actors". When I pointed out to him that even the NRA and Fox News conceded Sandy Hook really happened, he would go on and on about cold cuts and porta potties and other nonsense. Even after Remington settled with the families for $70MM, he still insisted they were crisis actors.

You just can't reason with nuts.

For example, on the U.S. Message Board, JoeB131 tries to suppress me with insults, name calling, obscene words, and occasional threats of violence. I continue to post facts he does not like. I will not complement JoeB131 by calling him a "Marxist." I have known members of the American Communist Party. When it still existed, I knew members of the Young Socialist Alliance, a Trotskyist organization. They disagreed with me, but they disagreed while being agreeable.

I'm glad I live in your head rent free, but the reality is, I kind of feel sorry for you. I doubt you are living a comfortable retirement or accomplished anything great in life. You seem to cling to your racial identity as validation, that because OTHER white people have accomplished great things, that makes you great. I doubt you have any IRL friends.

I doubt JoeB131 has read anything by Karl Marx, or much of anything else, for that matter.

Once I took a fascinating seminar on Das Kapital given by a brilliant member of the American Communist Party. He was a physicist. While working at his day job and leading the seminar, he was translating a book from Russian to Swedish for the Soviet government. I have always liked the members of the CPUSA I knew. JoeB131? Not so much.

Actually, reading Marx is kind of a requirement for a PolSci minor, but here's the reason why Marxism doesn't work. It ignores human nature. Human nature is to better one's self. Marx assumed we'd all be happy contributing to the collective.

When I was in college, we had members of the CPUSA who were getting their monthly stipend from the USSR. Back in the 2010, I did a return to UIC to meet with a client, and the CPUSA had a little table in the concourse with some old commies in fatigue jackets spewing mutilated Marxism. It was kind of sad.

I call pepper spray my "Negro Repellent."
So you aren't man enough to handle a gun?
 
You keep moving that black IQ number around, from 75 to 80 to 85, so I thought I would find out what the real number is.


View attachment 1081405

Oh, wait, it's 89. Hispanics are 92, Whites are 103, and Asians are 106.

Again, this is AVERAGE, which means 50% are above that number, and 50% are BELOW that number.
Whites still have averages better than Negroes. There is no mention of Jews here.
 
Bullshit. Garbage science needs to be treated like garbage. It's why we don't teach Creationism, we don't adhere to a flat earth theory, we don't treat people who claim the moon landing was fake seriously. Garbage opinions are exactly that, garbage, and they have no place in discussions...

You just can't reason with nuts.
Creationism is a failing effort to refute Darwinian evolution.

Race realism agrees with Darwinian evolution. Also, race realism agrees with the graph you posted about racial differences in average IQ. There are various estimates, but Negroes are always at the bottom. Ashkenazi Jews are always at the top.

------------

The races differ also in constitution, in acclimatisation and in liability to certain diseases. Their mental characteristics are likewise very distinct; chiefly as it would appear in their emotional, but partly in their intellectual faculties...

If a naturalist, who had never before seen a Negro, Hottentot, Australian, or Mongolian, were to compare them, he would at once perceive that they differed in a multitude of characters, some of slight and some of considerable importance. On enquiry he would find that they were adapted to live under widely different climates, and that they differed somewhat in bodily constitution and mental disposition...

When civilised nations come into contact with barbarians the struggle is short, except where a deadly climate gives its aid to the native race.

- Charles Darwin, from The Descent of Man, “Chapter 7: On the Races of Man”

JoeB131, Charles Darwin agrees with me. The graph you posted agrees with me too. It also agrees with Charles Murray, Jared Taylor, and Professors Arthur Jensen, Richard Herrnstein, and J. Philippe agree with me too. There is no evidence whatsoever of intrinsic racial equality in average characteristics necessary to create and maintain successful societies and civilization.

JoeB131, you're the nut who can't be reasoned with. You casually ignore facts that conflict with what you want to believe, even when, as in this case, you post these facts yourself.
 
You seem to cling to your racial identity as validation, that because OTHER white people have accomplished great things, that makes you great. I doubt you have any IRL friends.
If I clung to my racial identity as a source of validation, I would be a white nationalist. I am a race realist. Race realism asserts on the basis of facts that can be documented that Ashkenazi Jews, on the average, are the most intelligent racial group, followed by East Asians, followed by my race.

On the U.S. Message Board I have a higher percentage of up votes than you do.
 
I'm glad I live in your head rent free, but the reality is, I kind of feel sorry for you. I doubt you are living a comfortable retirement or accomplished anything great in life.

Even if what you say is true, yours is an ad hominem argument:

ad hominem, type of argument or attack that appeals to prejudice or feelings or irrelevantly impugns another person’s character instead of addressing the facts or claims made by the latter.

An ad hominem argument is the second lowest form of disagreement and does not indicate your claims of superiority to me.
1200px-Graham's_Hierarchy_of_Disagreement.svg 2.webp


 
JoeB131
So you aren't man enough to handle a gun?
I have done the paper work to get a permit to carry a concealed hand gun. I do not like guns. I would rather make a mistake with pepper spray than a gun. Just because a large black man has an angry expression on his face does not mean that he is thinking about robbing me. He might be angry because he was recently robbed by black man, or because a friend of his was killed by a black man. Blacks are more likely than whites to be victims of the high black crime rate.
 
Congratulations. You got 25 responses and 22 of them laughing at you. That might be a new record. The only merit system DEI contributed to is being born the right skin color, the only qualification it promoted was being born the right skin color, and the only ability DEI promoted was being born the right skin color.

It gave us a federal workforce of underqualified, incompetents whose only reason for being there was to fill a quota.

The Inequality Taboo, By Charles Murray, Commentary, September 01, 2005​


Consider an observation furtively voiced by many who interact with civil servants: that government is riddled with people who have been promoted to their level of incompetence because of pressure to have a staff with the correct sex and ethnicity in the correct proportions and positions. Are these just anecdotes? Or should we be worrying about the effects of affirmative action on the quality of government services?[77] It would be helpful to know the answers, but we will not so long as the taboo against talking about group difference prevails.

 
This is what a lack of critical thinkings skills does for you, but it's also a heightened form of gaslighting. Or to dumb it down a bit - you tell a lie, over and over and over again, never back down and people will eventually begin to remember that it's a lie.

DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) initiatives have contributed to creating a more meritocratic system in the federal workforce, particularly by ensuring that hiring and promotions are based on qualifications and abilities rather than bias or exclusionary practices.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------​

How DEI Created Meritocracy in the Federal Workforce

  1. Eliminating Exclusionary Practices
    • Before DEI efforts, certain racial, gender, and socioeconomic groups were systematically excluded from federal job opportunities, whether through explicit policies or implicit biases in hiring and promotion.
    • By removing barriers, DEI allowed a broader pool of qualified candidates to compete on merit rather than connections, race, or gender.
  2. Expanding Access to Opportunities
    • Affirmative action and DEI initiatives opened federal positions to historically underrepresented groups.
    • Veteran hiring preferences, disability inclusion programs, and outreach efforts brought highly qualified candidates into government roles based on skills and expertise rather than traditional networks.
  3. Objective Hiring Standards
    • The Merit System Principles (5 U.S.C. § 2301) ensure that federal hiring is based on ability, knowledge, and skills rather than personal favoritism.
    • DEI efforts reinforced structured hiring processes, like blind resume reviews and standardized evaluation criteria, reducing the impact of bias.
  4. Promoting Fair Advancement
    • Historically, informal networks often dictated who got promotions and leadership roles.
    • DEI programs helped create clearer promotion pathways where employees were evaluated based on performance, not just who they knew.

How Did This Become Controversial?

In recent years, critics have argued that some DEI efforts have gone beyond leveling the playing field and created new forms of exclusion, such as:​
  • Diversity-focused hiring goals that, in some cases, led to accusations of reverse discrimination.
  • Training programs that critics claim promote a specific ideological perspective rather than neutral professional development.
  • Legal challenges questioning whether certain DEI programs comply with existing anti-discrimination laws.

So, Did DEI Create a Meritocracy?

Yes, in the federal workforce, DEI helped build a more merit-based system by ensuring that hiring and advancement were based on ability rather than bias. However, the debate arises when policies perceived as ensuring diversity appear to conflict with strictly race-neutral or “colorblind” interpretations of merit.​
DEI is racism and against The Civil Rights Act.
 
Not at all. Hitler thought the problem with Jews was their race.

My problem with them is that they have a fucked up religion that gives them an unearned sense of entitlement.

Sure I rip on the Jews.
Oh look. The apologist for a race characterized by low average IQs and high rates of crime and welfare dependency is criticizing the most accomplished 0.2% of the human population. Jews are usually humble about their superiority. Because I am not Jewish, I draw attention to it.
 
Last edited:
I agree with your general assertion. Nevertheless, I would use the word "anti racist" rather than "Marxist." Hardly anyone takes Marxism seriously anymore.

DEI means "affirmative action." They both mean "lowering objective standards of excellence for Negroes." In the United State the average IQ for blacks is 85. The average for white Gentiles is 100. The average for East Asians (AKA Orientals) is 106. The average for Ashkenazi Jews is 115. A company can have a work force that "looks like America," or it can have a work force with the native intelligence to perform adequately. It can't have both. I am a white Gentile, by the way.

The only kind of diversity that is beneficial is diversity of opinion. Anti racists try to suppress diversity of opinion by suppressing those of us who agree with Charles Murray, Jared Taylor, and Professors Arthur Jensen, Richard Herrnstein, and J. Philippe Rushton.

For example, on the U.S. Message Board, JoeB131 tries to suppress me with insults, name calling, obscene words, and occasional threats of violence. I continue to post facts he does not like. I will not complement JoeB131 by calling him a "Marxist." I have known members of the American Communist Party. When it still existed, I knew members of the Young Socialist Alliance, a Trotskyist organization. They disagreed with me, but they disagreed while being agreeable.

I doubt JoeB131 has read anything by Karl Marx, or much of anything else, for that matter.

Once I took a fascinating seminar on Das Kapital given by a brilliant member of the American Communist Party. He was a physicist. While working at his day job and leading the seminar, he was translating a book from Russian to Swedish for the Soviet government. I have always liked the members of the CPUSA I knew. JoeB131? Not so much.
They are brainwashed tools of the Marxist cult infecting the left.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom