Zone1 DEI Created Meritoracy in the Federal Workforce, The Very Thing That Trump & His Minions Claim Has Been Lost as a Result of DEI

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

This is what a lack of critical thinkings skills does for you, but it's also a heightened form of gaslighting. Or to dumb it down a bit - you tell a lie, over and over and over again, never back down and people will eventually begin to remember that it's a lie.

DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) initiatives have contributed to creating a more meritocratic system in the federal workforce, particularly by ensuring that hiring and promotions are based on qualifications and abilities rather than bias or exclusionary practices.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------​

How DEI Created Meritocracy in the Federal Workforce​

1. Eliminating Exclusionary Practices
   • Before DEI efforts, certain racial, gender, and socioeconomic groups were systematically excluded from federal job opportunities, whether through explicit policies or implicit biases in hiring and promotion.
   • By removing barriers, DEI allowed a broader pool of qualified candidates to compete on merit rather than connections, race, or gender.
2. Expanding Access to Opportunities
   • Affirmative action and DEI initiatives opened federal positions to historically underrepresented groups.
   • Veteran hiring preferences, disability inclusion programs, and outreach efforts brought highly qualified candidates into government roles based on skills and expertise rather than traditional networks.
3. Objective Hiring Standards
   • The Merit System Principles (5 U.S.C. § 2301) ensure that federal hiring is based on ability, knowledge, and skills rather than personal favoritism.
   • DEI efforts reinforced structured hiring processes, like blind resume reviews and standardized evaluation criteria, reducing the impact of bias.
4. Promoting Fair Advancement
   • Historically, informal networks often dictated who got promotions and leadership roles.
   • DEI programs helped create clearer promotion pathways where employees were evaluated based on performance, not just who they knew.

How Did This Become Controversial?​

In recent years, critics have argued that some DEI efforts have gone beyond leveling the playing field and created new forms of exclusion, such as:​

• Diversity-focused hiring goals that, in some cases, led to accusations of reverse discrimination.
• Training programs that critics claim promote a specific ideological perspective rather than neutral professional development.
• Legal challenges questioning whether certain DEI programs comply with existing anti-discrimination laws.

So, Did DEI Create a Meritocracy?​

Yes, in the federal workforce, DEI helped build a more merit-based system by ensuring that hiring and advancement were based on ability rather than bias. However, the debate arises when policies perceived as ensuring diversity appear to conflict with strictly race-neutral or “colorblind” interpretations of merit.​

 

[elektra]

The air traffic controller scandal is the opposite of meritocracy.
DEI has nothing to do with meritocracy

 

[elektra]

This is what a lack of critical thinkings skills does for you, but it's also a heightened form of gaslighting. Or to dumb it down a bit - you tell a lie, over and over and over again, never back down and people will eventually begin to remember that it's a lie.

DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) initiatives have contributed to creating a more meritocratic system in the federal workforce, particularly by ensuring that hiring and promotions are based on qualifications and abilities rather than bias or exclusionary practices.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------​

How DEI Created Meritocracy in the Federal Workforce​

1. Eliminating Exclusionary Practices
   • Before DEI efforts, certain racial, gender, and socioeconomic groups were systematically excluded ...

That is a lie. Zero proof.

 

[elektra]

Sadly so many people feel good because they can claim the support minorities by espousing the virtues of what they read.

In reality, DEI and before that, affirmative action resulted in qualified people being refused jobs based on color and nothing more.

Affirmative action in practice resulted in quotas, a certain percentage had to be of minority groups regardless of merit.

But, democrats have no power if they are not here to "protect" minorities so they continue the lie that white people are racist.

Democrats do everything possible to keep racism alive. Where there is no racism, democrats lie and state there is racism.

 

[Hollie]

This is what a lack of critical thinkings skills does for you, but it's also a heightened form of gaslighting. Or to dumb it down a bit - you tell a lie, over and over and over again, never back down and people will eventually begin to remember that it's a lie.

DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) initiatives have contributed to creating a more meritocratic system in the federal workforce, particularly by ensuring that hiring and promotions are based on qualifications and abilities rather than bias or exclusionary practices.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------​

How DEI Created Meritocracy in the Federal Workforce​

1. Eliminating Exclusionary Practices
   • Before DEI efforts, certain racial, gender, and socioeconomic groups were systematically excluded from federal job opportunities, whether through explicit policies or implicit biases in hiring and promotion.
   • By removing barriers, DEI allowed a broader pool of qualified candidates to compete on merit rather than connections, race, or gender.
2. Expanding Access to Opportunities
   • Affirmative action and DEI initiatives opened federal positions to historically underrepresented groups.
   • Veteran hiring preferences, disability inclusion programs, and outreach efforts brought highly qualified candidates into government roles based on skills and expertise rather than traditional networks.
3. Objective Hiring Standards
   • The Merit System Principles (5 U.S.C. § 2301) ensure that federal hiring is based on ability, knowledge, and skills rather than personal favoritism.
   • DEI efforts reinforced structured hiring processes, like blind resume reviews and standardized evaluation criteria, reducing the impact of bias.
4. Promoting Fair Advancement
   • Historically, informal networks often dictated who got promotions and leadership roles.
   • DEI programs helped create clearer promotion pathways where employees were evaluated based on performance, not just who they knew.

How Did This Become Controversial?​

In recent years, critics have argued that some DEI efforts have gone beyond leveling the playing field and created new forms of exclusion, such as:​

• Diversity-focused hiring goals that, in some cases, led to accusations of reverse discrimination.
• Training programs that critics claim promote a specific ideological perspective rather than neutral professional development.
• Legal challenges questioning whether certain DEI programs comply with existing anti-discrimination laws.

So, Did DEI Create a Meritocracy?​

Yes, in the federal workforce, DEI helped build a more merit-based system by ensuring that hiring and advancement were based on ability rather than bias. However, the debate arises when policies perceived as ensuring diversity appear to conflict with strictly race-neutral or “colorblind” interpretations of merit.​

Such are the ravings of the diseased left.

During the nightmare of the Biden Clown Show, universities and businesses were confronted with the embarrassment of DIE and every sleazy vestige of woke that the left had pushed. Democrat's insistence that they force their 19th century politico-religious ideology of racial hatreds and gender ideology was a disaster.

Claudine Gay at Harvard, anyone?

The left conclusively proved that “diversity” based on quotas and discrimination isn’t anyone’s strength but a proscription for lies, cheating and fraud. Eliminating merit, while hiring and promotion being based on race, gender and gender identity guarantees mediocrity and worse. It violates the anti-discrimination progress of the US civil rights era and those Americans of all races who worked so hard to remove the race hatreds that sustained the democrat party, the “Party of Slavery”.:

 

[Godboy]

This is what a lack of critical thinkings skills does for you, but it's also a heightened form of gaslighting. Or to dumb it down a bit - you tell a lie, over and over and over again, never back down and people will eventually begin to remember that it's a lie.

DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) initiatives have contributed to creating a more meritocratic system in the federal workforce, particularly by ensuring that hiring and promotions are based on qualifications and abilities rather than bias or exclusionary practices.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------​

How DEI Created Meritocracy in the Federal Workforce​

1. Eliminating Exclusionary Practices
   • Before DEI efforts, certain racial, gender, and socioeconomic groups were systematically excluded from federal job opportunities, whether through explicit policies or implicit biases in hiring and promotion.
   • By removing barriers, DEI allowed a broader pool of qualified candidates to compete on merit rather than connections, race, or gender.
2. Expanding Access to Opportunities
   • Affirmative action and DEI initiatives opened federal positions to historically underrepresented groups.
   • Veteran hiring preferences, disability inclusion programs, and outreach efforts brought highly qualified candidates into government roles based on skills and expertise rather than traditional networks.
3. Objective Hiring Standards
   • The Merit System Principles (5 U.S.C. § 2301) ensure that federal hiring is based on ability, knowledge, and skills rather than personal favoritism.
   • DEI efforts reinforced structured hiring processes, like blind resume reviews and standardized evaluation criteria, reducing the impact of bias.
4. Promoting Fair Advancement
   • Historically, informal networks often dictated who got promotions and leadership roles.
   • DEI programs helped create clearer promotion pathways where employees were evaluated based on performance, not just who they knew.

How Did This Become Controversial?​

In recent years, critics have argued that some DEI efforts have gone beyond leveling the playing field and created new forms of exclusion, such as:​

• Diversity-focused hiring goals that, in some cases, led to accusations of reverse discrimination.
• Training programs that critics claim promote a specific ideological perspective rather than neutral professional development.
• Legal challenges questioning whether certain DEI programs comply with existing anti-discrimination laws.

So, Did DEI Create a Meritocracy?​

Yes, in the federal workforce, DEI helped build a more merit-based system by ensuring that hiring and advancement were based on ability rather than bias. However, the debate arises when policies perceived as ensuring diversity appear to conflict with strictly race-neutral or “colorblind” interpretations of merit.​

Dud, it isnt 2020 anymore. Your DEI pitch isnt going to work anymore, or ever again. DEI is dead and youre dumb for clinging onto it like an out of touch retard.

 

[justoffal]

This is what a lack of critical thinkings skills does for you, but it's also a heightened form of gaslighting. Or to dumb it down a bit - you tell a lie, over and over and over again, never back down and people will eventually begin to remember that it's a lie.

DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) initiatives have contributed to creating a more meritocratic system in the federal workforce, particularly by ensuring that hiring and promotions are based on qualifications and abilities rather than bias or exclusionary practices.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------​

How DEI Created Meritocracy in the Federal Workforce​

1. Eliminating Exclusionary Practices
   • Before DEI efforts, certain racial, gender, and socioeconomic groups were systematically excluded from federal job opportunities, whether through explicit policies or implicit biases in hiring and promotion.
   • By removing barriers, DEI allowed a broader pool of qualified candidates to compete on merit rather than connections, race, or gender.
2. Expanding Access to Opportunities
   • Affirmative action and DEI initiatives opened federal positions to historically underrepresented groups.
   • Veteran hiring preferences, disability inclusion programs, and outreach efforts brought highly qualified candidates into government roles based on skills and expertise rather than traditional networks.
3. Objective Hiring Standards
   • The Merit System Principles (5 U.S.C. § 2301) ensure that federal hiring is based on ability, knowledge, and skills rather than personal favoritism.
   • DEI efforts reinforced structured hiring processes, like blind resume reviews and standardized evaluation criteria, reducing the impact of bias.
4. Promoting Fair Advancement
   • Historically, informal networks often dictated who got promotions and leadership roles.
   • DEI programs helped create clearer promotion pathways where employees were evaluated based on performance, not just who they knew.

How Did This Become Controversial?​

In recent years, critics have argued that some DEI efforts have gone beyond leveling the playing field and created new forms of exclusion, such as:​

• Diversity-focused hiring goals that, in some cases, led to accusations of reverse discrimination.
• Training programs that critics claim promote a specific ideological perspective rather than neutral professional development.
• Legal challenges questioning whether certain DEI programs comply with existing anti-discrimination laws.

So, Did DEI Create a Meritocracy?​

Yes, in the federal workforce, DEI helped build a more merit-based system by ensuring that hiring and advancement were based on ability rather than bias. However, the debate arises when policies perceived as ensuring diversity appear to conflict with strictly race-neutral or “colorblind” interpretations of merit.​

MEH..... It may have had a marginal effect on looking the other way from strange sites like men with dresses or women with nose rings.
But by and large DEI is a societal rot that deemphasizes merit.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Using phrases ‘DEI as meritocracy’ and ‘critical thinking skills’ in the same preface demonstrates how far-gone the culture is.

 

[elektra]

Good luck with. You’ll probably end up with a black judge.

How? According to you they are DEI hires, hence Trump will get rid of everyone, right?

 

[Lisa558]

How? According to you they are DEI hires, hence Trump will get rid of everyone, right?

Not every black is a DEI hire…..just the dumber ones who wouldn’t have been hired if they weren’t white.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Not every black is a DEI hire…..just the dumber ones who wouldn’t have been hired if they weren’t white.

The unfortunate reality is that DEI logically brings into question the legitimacy of blacks who do truly qualify. Those are the ones who should be just as upset about this as those who are passed over because of race.

 

[daveman]

This is what a lack of critical thinkings skills does for you, but it's also a heightened form of gaslighting. Or to dumb it down a bit - you tell a lie, over and over and over again, never back down and people will eventually begin to remember that it's a lie.

DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) initiatives have contributed to creating a more meritocratic system in the federal workforce, particularly by ensuring that hiring and promotions are based on qualifications and abilities rather than bias or exclusionary practices.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------​

How DEI Created Meritocracy in the Federal Workforce​

1. Eliminating Exclusionary Practices
   • Before DEI efforts, certain racial, gender, and socioeconomic groups were systematically excluded from federal job opportunities, whether through explicit policies or implicit biases in hiring and promotion.
   • By removing barriers, DEI allowed a broader pool of qualified candidates to compete on merit rather than connections, race, or gender.
2. Expanding Access to Opportunities
   • Affirmative action and DEI initiatives opened federal positions to historically underrepresented groups.
   • Veteran hiring preferences, disability inclusion programs, and outreach efforts brought highly qualified candidates into government roles based on skills and expertise rather than traditional networks.
3. Objective Hiring Standards
   • The Merit System Principles (5 U.S.C. § 2301) ensure that federal hiring is based on ability, knowledge, and skills rather than personal favoritism.
   • DEI efforts reinforced structured hiring processes, like blind resume reviews and standardized evaluation criteria, reducing the impact of bias.
4. Promoting Fair Advancement
   • Historically, informal networks often dictated who got promotions and leadership roles.
   • DEI programs helped create clearer promotion pathways where employees were evaluated based on performance, not just who they knew.

How Did This Become Controversial?​

In recent years, critics have argued that some DEI efforts have gone beyond leveling the playing field and created new forms of exclusion, such as:​

• Diversity-focused hiring goals that, in some cases, led to accusations of reverse discrimination.
• Training programs that critics claim promote a specific ideological perspective rather than neutral professional development.
• Legal challenges questioning whether certain DEI programs comply with existing anti-discrimination laws.

So, Did DEI Create a Meritocracy?​

Yes, in the federal workforce, DEI helped build a more merit-based system by ensuring that hiring and advancement were based on ability rather than bias. However, the debate arises when policies perceived as ensuring diversity appear to conflict with strictly race-neutral or “colorblind” interpretations of merit.​

Opposite Day was January 25th.

 

[Lisa558]

The unfortunate reality is that DEI logically brings into question the legitimacy of blacks who do truly qualify. Those are the ones who should be just as upset about this as those who are passed over because of race.

As someone involved with college admissions, I know this all too well. Of the black student body, 1 out of 3 would have qualified even if he or she were white. The other two out of three had standards lowered for them. The ones who suffer for that are 1) the 1 out of three blacks who qualified on merit, and 2) the whites, of course, with better metrics who were rejected to allow in the 2 out of 3 blacks who got in due to skin color.

 

[Crepitus]

The air traffic controller scandal is the opposite of meritocracy.
DEI has nothing to do with meritocracy

There is not air traffic controller scandal other than the ridiculous "buyout" the tRump offered and the fact that his cuts and policies were so extremely bad that they led to fatal consequences in mere days.

 

[debbiedowner]

Technically the Veteran's Preference act signed in 1944 is DEI

Veterans' Preference Act - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

How many vets or disabled vets get preference over someone who didn't serve? How many 10 point vets just went in front of someone with a 95% score over someone with a 75% on an exam to be hired for the job?

I did and my wife reminds me every once in awhile, lol

 

[Lisa558]

Technically the Veteran's Preference act signed in 1944 is DEI

Veterans' Preference Act - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

How many vets or disabled vets get preference over someone who didn't serve? How many 10 point vets just went in front of someone with a 95% score over someone with a 75% on an exam to be hired for the job?

I did and my wife reminds me every once in awhile, lol

That’s fine, rewarding those who served our country.

That’s very different than rewarding blacks for not being white.

 

[debbiedowner]

That’s fine, rewarding those who served our country.

That’s very different than rewarding blacks for not being white.

You do know a good many vets are black and were and are just as qualified as a white person.

 

[Lisa558]

You do know a good many vets are black and were and are just as qualified as a white person.

You are very confused. I never said vets weren’t black. I said that we should reward vets for their service (race irrelevant) and not blacks simply for being black.

 

[daveman]

There is not air traffic controller scandal other than the ridiculous "buyout" the tRump offered and the fact that his cuts and policies were so extremely bad that they led to fatal consequences in mere days.

It's amazing. Trump's evil powers went back in time and have been causing close calls in DC airspace for decades.

Pilots have reported repeated close calls similar to fatal collision near DC airport​

But don't let reality get in the way of a good Trump-hategasm.

 

[Crepitus]

It's amazing. Trump's evil powers went back in time and have been causing close calls in DC airspace for decades.

Pilots have reported repeated close calls similar to fatal collision near DC airport​

But don't let reality get in the way of a good Trump-hategasm.

So where were those collisions before now?