JoeB131
Diamond Member
Whites still have averages better than Negroes. There is no mention of Jews here.
Obviously, you don't understand what an average is. So the AVERAGE difference is about 14 points. Which means will all the advantages of white privilege and 400 years of institutionalized racism, white people are only doing an average of 14 points better? That's nothing to brag about.
Creationism is a failing effort to refute Darwinian evolution.
Race Realism is a failing effort to refute the Civil Rights Movement.
Race realism agrees with Darwinian evolution. Also, race realism agrees with the graph you posted about racial differences in average IQ. There are various estimates, but Negroes are always at the bottom. Ashkenazi Jews are always at the top.
Yet the Ashkenazi Jews almost got completely exterminated. They probably get exterminated some more when Iran gets the bomb. That doesn't sound like an evolutionary advantage if people want to kill them wherever they go.
Here's the thing: even though Darwin was a racist POS (product of his time) , the thing is, the factors that apply to natural selection in nature really don't apply to humans. Humans have the ability to adapt their environment, they don't need to adapt to it through. They don't need to select the guy who can outrun the tiger surviving, they get together in a mob and they kill the tiger. We cure diseases that would normally weed out the weak.
JoeB131, Charles Darwin agrees with me. The graph you posted agrees with me too. It also agrees with Charles Murray, Jared Taylor, and Professors Arthur Jensen, Richard Herrnstein, and J. Philippe agree with me too. There is no evidence whatsoever of intrinsic racial equality in average characteristics necessary to create and maintain successful societies and civilization.
Darwin was a 19th century racist. Looking at tracks of population growth, it will probably be white folks who will vanish in the future, not blacks as Darwin predicted.
If I clung to my racial identity as a source of validation, I would be a white nationalist. I am a race realist. Race realism asserts on the basis of facts that can be documented that Ashkenazi Jews, on the average, are the most intelligent racial group, followed by East Asians, followed by my race.
A race realist is a white supremacist in a nice suit.
Jews are white people, they aren't a separate race. The fact you think they are is probably some of your racism bleeding through.
As for Asians, most of the world's Asians are still poor. The problem is you don't consider certain Asians to be "Asian enough". So when I point out how grindingly poor the Philippines are, you seem to ignore that.
I look for reasons. The Asian groups that have done the best, on average, are the ones who avoided Western exploitation. Japan was never truly dominated by the West (except for WWII) while the Philippines were a colony for hundreds of years. So it's not that a Japanese is somehow superior to a Filipino, it's that the circumstances they grew up in were different.
What, are you a 14 year old girl? "Oooh, look, I got more likes for my post!!!"On the U.S. Message Board I have a higher percentage of up votes than you do.
Oh look. The apologist for a race characterized by low average IQs and high rates of crime and welfare dependency is criticizing the most accomplished 0.2% of the human population. Jews are usually humble about their superiority. Because I am not Jewish, I draw attention to it.
The most obnoxious group of white people do well, so that's something to be proud of?