Debunking Panic Peddlers' Attacks on Sweden's Moderate COVID-19 Approach

mikegriffith1

Mike Griffith
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 23, 2012
6,261
3,383
1,085
Virginia
Lockdown defenders are trying to make Sweden’s moderate COVID-19 approach seem unsuccessful. They are doing this by making selective comparisons and by ignoring Sweden’s extremely low overall COVID-19 death rate.

As of this morning, Sweden’s overall COVID-19 death rate is 0.02321% (2,274 deaths out of 10.23 million people). 0.02321% is 43 times lower than 1%.

Sweden’s overall COVID-19 death rate compares very favorably with that of many other European nations:

Belgium------------ 0.06398%

Spain--------------- 0.05080%

Italy----------------- 0.04470%

France------------- 0.03558%

Netherlands------- 0.02615%

Sweden------------ 0.02321% <<<

Ireland-------------- 0.02250%

Switzerland-------- 0.01957%

Germany----------- 0.00738%

Norway------------- 0.00368%

Let us compare Sweden and Michigan’s COVID-19 numbers, since the two states are almost identical in population size but have used very different approaches in responding to the virus. While Sweden has taken a moderate approach to COVID-19, Michigan has imposed an extreme lockdown on its citizens. Yet, as of this morning, Michigan has had 38,000 cases and 3,407 deaths, while Sweden has had 18,926 cases and 2,274 deaths. In other words, Sweden has had over 19,000 fewer cases and over 1,100 fewer deaths than Michigan has had. Translated into percentages, this means Sweden has had 50% fewer cases and 33% fewer deaths than Michigan has had.

Or, let us compare Sweden and France’s COVID-19 numbers, since France has been under an extreme lockdown since mid-March. France’s population is 6.549 times larger than Sweden’s. So we will multiply Sweden’s population by 6.549 and adjust its COVID-19 numbers accordingly. When we do so, here is how Sweden’s COVID-19 numbers compare with France’s:

SWEDEN ------------------------- FRANCE

123,945 cases ------------------ 165,842 cases

14,892 deaths ------------------- 23,293 deaths

So, when we adjust for population size, Sweden has had over 40,000 fewer cases and over 8,000 fewer deaths than France has had.

If we applied Sweden’s overall COVID-19 death rate of 0.02321% to the U.S. population, that would equal 76,175 deaths, which would be within ballpark range of the number of deaths from a bad flu season and would not even rank among the top eight causes of death in the U.S. Here are the top 10 causes of death in the U.S.:

DEATHS PER YEAR --- CAUSE

640,000 ----- heart disease

590,000 ----- cancer

250,000 ----- medical errors

169,000 –--- accidents

160,000 ----- chronic lower respiratory diseases

146,000 ----- strokes/cerebrovascular diseases

121,000 ----- Alzheimer’s

83,000 ------- diabetes

61,000 ------- common flu (2017-2018 flu season)

50,000 ------- pneumonia, kidney disease (each kills 50K per year)

So if we had Sweden’s overall COVID-19 death rate of 0.02321%, COVID-19 would rank below diabetes and far below accidents, medical errors, cancer, and heart disease as a cause of death in the U.S. It would rank ninth out of 10. No rational country on Earth would shut down half of its economy and put millions of people out of work to guard against a virus that ranked ninth as a cause of death and that had an overall death rate 43 times lower than 1%.

Does this mean we should do nothing? No, of course not. It does mean we should adopt a much more targeted, data-based approach (1) that places restrictions on the elderly and the medically ill, since they account for at least 80% of our COVID-19 deaths, and (2) that allows everyone else to resume normal life.

Here is an article, published yesterday, that provides a detailed, balanced appraisal of Sweden’s approach:

 
"Despite reports to the contrary, Sweden is paying heavily for its decision not to lockdown. As of today, 2462 people have died there, a much higher number than the neighboring countries of Norway (207), Finland (206) or Denmark (443). The United States made the correct decision! " - President Trump
 
Lockdown defenders are trying to make Sweden’s moderate COVID-19 approach seem unsuccessful. They are doing this by making selective comparisons and by ignoring Sweden’s extremely low overall COVID-19 death rate.

As of this morning, Sweden’s overall COVID-19 death rate is 0.02321% (2,274 deaths out of 10.23 million people). 0.02321% is 43 times lower than 1%.

Sweden’s overall COVID-19 death rate compares very favorably with that of many other European nations:

Belgium------------ 0.06398%

Spain--------------- 0.05080%

Italy----------------- 0.04470%

France------------- 0.03558%

Netherlands------- 0.02615%

Sweden------------ 0.02321% <<<

Ireland-------------- 0.02250%

Switzerland-------- 0.01957%

Germany----------- 0.00738%

Norway------------- 0.00368%

Let us compare Sweden and Michigan’s COVID-19 numbers, since the two states are almost identical in population size but have used very different approaches in responding to the virus. While Sweden has taken a moderate approach to COVID-19, Michigan has imposed an extreme lockdown on its citizens. Yet, as of this morning, Michigan has had 38,000 cases and 3,407 deaths, while Sweden has had 18,926 cases and 2,274 deaths. In other words, Sweden has had over 19,000 fewer cases and over 1,100 fewer deaths than Michigan has had. Translated into percentages, this means Sweden has had 50% fewer cases and 33% fewer deaths than Michigan has had.

Or, let us compare Sweden and France’s COVID-19 numbers, since France has been under an extreme lockdown since mid-March. France’s population is 6.549 times larger than Sweden’s. So we will multiply Sweden’s population by 6.549 and adjust its COVID-19 numbers accordingly. When we do so, here is how Sweden’s COVID-19 numbers compare with France’s:

SWEDEN ------------------------- FRANCE

123,945 cases ------------------ 165,842 cases

14,892 deaths ------------------- 23,293 deaths

So, when we adjust for population size, Sweden has had over 40,000 fewer cases and over 8,000 fewer deaths than France has had.

If we applied Sweden’s overall COVID-19 death rate of 0.02321% to the U.S. population, that would equal 76,175 deaths, which would be within ballpark range of the number of deaths from a bad flu season and would not even rank among the top eight causes of death in the U.S. Here are the top 10 causes of death in the U.S.:

DEATHS PER YEAR --- CAUSE

640,000 ----- heart disease

590,000 ----- cancer

250,000 ----- medical errors

169,000 –--- accidents

160,000 ----- chronic lower respiratory diseases

146,000 ----- strokes/cerebrovascular diseases

121,000 ----- Alzheimer’s

83,000 ------- diabetes

61,000 ------- common flu (2017-2018 flu season)

50,000 ------- pneumonia, kidney disease (each kills 50K per year)

So if we had Sweden’s overall COVID-19 death rate of 0.02321%, COVID-19 would rank below diabetes and far below accidents, medical errors, cancer, and heart disease as a cause of death in the U.S. It would rank ninth out of 10. No rational country on Earth would shut down half of its economy and put millions of people out of work to guard against a virus that ranked ninth as a cause of death and that had an overall death rate 43 times lower than 1%.

Does this mean we should do nothing? No, of course not. It does mean we should adopt a much more targeted, data-based approach (1) that places restrictions on the elderly and the medically ill, since they account for at least 80% of our COVID-19 deaths, and (2) that allows everyone else to resume normal life.

Here is an article, published yesterday, that provides a detailed, balanced appraisal of Sweden’s approach:


Oops! You’ve lost Trump on this one.

How will you respond?
 

Forum List

Back
Top