I know, Lefties. It doesn’t count if you can’t remember saying it!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I know, Lefties. It doesn’t count if you can’t remember saying it!
I know, Lefties. It doesn’t count if you can’t remember saying it!
Would the WHO be considered experts?
“Travel bans to affected areas or denial of entry to passengers coming from affected areas are usually not effective in preventing the importation of cases but may have a significant economic and social impact. Since WHO declaration of a public health emergency of international concern in relation to COVID-19, and as of 27 February, 38 countries have reported to WHO additional health measures that significantly interfere with international traffic in relation to travel to and from China or other countries, ranging from denial of entry of passengers, visa restrictions or quarantine for returning travellers. Several countries that denied entry of travellers or who have suspended the flights to and from China or other affected countries, are now reporting cases of COVID-19.”
Updated WHO recommendations for international traffic in relation to COVID-19 outbreak
This document provides updated recommendations for international traffic in relation to the COVID-19 outbreak, in light of the rapidly evolving situation. It supersedes the advice published on 27 January 2020.On 30 January 2020, the Director-General of the World Health Organization, following...www.who.int
Im not taking a position, just pointing out that experts aren’t in complete agreement on this issue.
I know, Lefties. It doesn’t count if you can’t remember saying it!
Would the WHO be considered experts?
“Travel bans to affected areas or denial of entry to passengers coming from affected areas are usually not effective in preventing the importation of cases but may have a significant economic and social impact. Since WHO declaration of a public health emergency of international concern in relation to COVID-19, and as of 27 February, 38 countries have reported to WHO additional health measures that significantly interfere with international traffic in relation to travel to and from China or other countries, ranging from denial of entry of passengers, visa restrictions or quarantine for returning travellers. Several countries that denied entry of travellers or who have suspended the flights to and from China or other affected countries, are now reporting cases of COVID-19.”
Updated WHO recommendations for international traffic in relation to COVID-19 outbreak
This document provides updated recommendations for international traffic in relation to the COVID-19 outbreak, in light of the rapidly evolving situation. It supersedes the advice published on 27 January 2020.On 30 January 2020, the Director-General of the World Health Organization, following...www.who.int
Im not taking a position, just pointing out that experts aren’t in complete agreement on this issue.
I know, Lefties. It doesn’t count if you can’t remember saying it!
Would the WHO be considered experts?
“Travel bans to affected areas or denial of entry to passengers coming from affected areas are usually not effective in preventing the importation of cases but may have a significant economic and social impact. Since WHO declaration of a public health emergency of international concern in relation to COVID-19, and as of 27 February, 38 countries have reported to WHO additional health measures that significantly interfere with international traffic in relation to travel to and from China or other countries, ranging from denial of entry of passengers, visa restrictions or quarantine for returning travellers. Several countries that denied entry of travellers or who have suspended the flights to and from China or other affected countries, are now reporting cases of COVID-19.”
Updated WHO recommendations for international traffic in relation to COVID-19 outbreak
This document provides updated recommendations for international traffic in relation to the COVID-19 outbreak, in light of the rapidly evolving situation. It supersedes the advice published on 27 January 2020.On 30 January 2020, the Director-General of the World Health Organization, following...www.who.int
Im not taking a position, just pointing out that experts aren’t in complete agreement on this issue.
I agree with them. Time to end the charade of this flu bug and stop all this quarantine crap.
I know, Lefties. It doesn’t count if you can’t remember saying it!
Would the WHO be considered experts?
“Travel bans to affected areas or denial of entry to passengers coming from affected areas are usually not effective in preventing the importation of cases but may have a significant economic and social impact. Since WHO declaration of a public health emergency of international concern in relation to COVID-19, and as of 27 February, 38 countries have reported to WHO additional health measures that significantly interfere with international traffic in relation to travel to and from China or other countries, ranging from denial of entry of passengers, visa restrictions or quarantine for returning travellers. Several countries that denied entry of travellers or who have suspended the flights to and from China or other affected countries, are now reporting cases of COVID-19.”
Updated WHO recommendations for international traffic in relation to COVID-19 outbreak
This document provides updated recommendations for international traffic in relation to the COVID-19 outbreak, in light of the rapidly evolving situation. It supersedes the advice published on 27 January 2020.On 30 January 2020, the Director-General of the World Health Organization, following...www.who.int
Im not taking a position, just pointing out that experts aren’t in complete agreement on this issue.
I know, Lefties. It doesn’t count if you can’t remember saying it!
Would the WHO be considered experts?
“Travel bans to affected areas or denial of entry to passengers coming from affected areas are usually not effective in preventing the importation of cases but may have a significant economic and social impact. Since WHO declaration of a public health emergency of international concern in relation to COVID-19, and as of 27 February, 38 countries have reported to WHO additional health measures that significantly interfere with international traffic in relation to travel to and from China or other countries, ranging from denial of entry of passengers, visa restrictions or quarantine for returning travellers. Several countries that denied entry of travellers or who have suspended the flights to and from China or other affected countries, are now reporting cases of COVID-19.”
Updated WHO recommendations for international traffic in relation to COVID-19 outbreak
This document provides updated recommendations for international traffic in relation to the COVID-19 outbreak, in light of the rapidly evolving situation. It supersedes the advice published on 27 January 2020.On 30 January 2020, the Director-General of the World Health Organization, following...www.who.int
Im not taking a position, just pointing out that experts aren’t in complete agreement on this issue.
I agree with them. Time to end the charade of this flu bug and stop all this quarantine crap.
I didn’t realize this thread was about what you want.
I thought it was about Biden being considered senile for agreeing with the WHO.
Anyway, Dan Crenshaw is not being very honest.
I know, Lefties. It doesn’t count if you can’t remember saying it!
Would the WHO be considered experts?
“Travel bans to affected areas or denial of entry to passengers coming from affected areas are usually not effective in preventing the importation of cases but may have a significant economic and social impact. Since WHO declaration of a public health emergency of international concern in relation to COVID-19, and as of 27 February, 38 countries have reported to WHO additional health measures that significantly interfere with international traffic in relation to travel to and from China or other countries, ranging from denial of entry of passengers, visa restrictions or quarantine for returning travellers. Several countries that denied entry of travellers or who have suspended the flights to and from China or other affected countries, are now reporting cases of COVID-19.”
Updated WHO recommendations for international traffic in relation to COVID-19 outbreak
This document provides updated recommendations for international traffic in relation to the COVID-19 outbreak, in light of the rapidly evolving situation. It supersedes the advice published on 27 January 2020.On 30 January 2020, the Director-General of the World Health Organization, following...www.who.int
Im not taking a position, just pointing out that experts aren’t in complete agreement on this issue.
It is insane to think that infected people travelling is something that can't be stopped.
THat is politics messing with science.
I know, Lefties. It doesn’t count if you can’t remember saying it!
Would the WHO be considered experts?
“Travel bans to affected areas or denial of entry to passengers coming from affected areas are usually not effective in preventing the importation of cases but may have a significant economic and social impact. Since WHO declaration of a public health emergency of international concern in relation to COVID-19, and as of 27 February, 38 countries have reported to WHO additional health measures that significantly interfere with international traffic in relation to travel to and from China or other countries, ranging from denial of entry of passengers, visa restrictions or quarantine for returning travellers. Several countries that denied entry of travellers or who have suspended the flights to and from China or other affected countries, are now reporting cases of COVID-19.”
Updated WHO recommendations for international traffic in relation to COVID-19 outbreak
This document provides updated recommendations for international traffic in relation to the COVID-19 outbreak, in light of the rapidly evolving situation. It supersedes the advice published on 27 January 2020.On 30 January 2020, the Director-General of the World Health Organization, following...www.who.int
Im not taking a position, just pointing out that experts aren’t in complete agreement on this issue.
I agree with them. Time to end the charade of this flu bug and stop all this quarantine crap.
I didn’t realize this thread was about what you want.
I thought it was about Biden being considered senile for agreeing with the WHO.
Anyway, Dan Crenshaw is not being very honest.
WHO also reported that this virus was not transmittable human to human.
But the topic is the travel bans, which almost every nation on earth has implemented.
I know, Lefties. It doesn’t count if you can’t remember saying it!
Would the WHO be considered experts?
“Travel bans to affected areas or denial of entry to passengers coming from affected areas are usually not effective in preventing the importation of cases but may have a significant economic and social impact. Since WHO declaration of a public health emergency of international concern in relation to COVID-19, and as of 27 February, 38 countries have reported to WHO additional health measures that significantly interfere with international traffic in relation to travel to and from China or other countries, ranging from denial of entry of passengers, visa restrictions or quarantine for returning travellers. Several countries that denied entry of travellers or who have suspended the flights to and from China or other affected countries, are now reporting cases of COVID-19.”
Updated WHO recommendations for international traffic in relation to COVID-19 outbreak
This document provides updated recommendations for international traffic in relation to the COVID-19 outbreak, in light of the rapidly evolving situation. It supersedes the advice published on 27 January 2020.On 30 January 2020, the Director-General of the World Health Organization, following...www.who.int
Im not taking a position, just pointing out that experts aren’t in complete agreement on this issue.
It is insane to think that infected people travelling is something that can't be stopped.
THat is politics messing with science.
Because you don’t know who is infected. That’s why we have tens of thousands of cases here even though Trump institutes travel restrictions.
I know, Lefties. It doesn’t count if you can’t remember saying it!
Would the WHO be considered experts?
“Travel bans to affected areas or denial of entry to passengers coming from affected areas are usually not effective in preventing the importation of cases but may have a significant economic and social impact. Since WHO declaration of a public health emergency of international concern in relation to COVID-19, and as of 27 February, 38 countries have reported to WHO additional health measures that significantly interfere with international traffic in relation to travel to and from China or other countries, ranging from denial of entry of passengers, visa restrictions or quarantine for returning travellers. Several countries that denied entry of travellers or who have suspended the flights to and from China or other affected countries, are now reporting cases of COVID-19.”
Updated WHO recommendations for international traffic in relation to COVID-19 outbreak
This document provides updated recommendations for international traffic in relation to the COVID-19 outbreak, in light of the rapidly evolving situation. It supersedes the advice published on 27 January 2020.On 30 January 2020, the Director-General of the World Health Organization, following...www.who.int
Im not taking a position, just pointing out that experts aren’t in complete agreement on this issue.
I agree with them. Time to end the charade of this flu bug and stop all this quarantine crap.
I didn’t realize this thread was about what you want.
I thought it was about Biden being considered senile for agreeing with the WHO.
Anyway, Dan Crenshaw is not being very honest.
WHO also reported that this virus was not transmittable human to human.
But the topic is the travel bans, which almost every nation on earth has implemented.
Great. Then why don’t you stay on topic?
Crenshaw is acting like experts are unanimous. That’s not the case. Biden is sufficiently backed up by experts in making his claim.
I know, Lefties. It doesn’t count if you can’t remember saying it!
Would the WHO be considered experts?
“Travel bans to affected areas or denial of entry to passengers coming from affected areas are usually not effective in preventing the importation of cases but may have a significant economic and social impact. Since WHO declaration of a public health emergency of international concern in relation to COVID-19, and as of 27 February, 38 countries have reported to WHO additional health measures that significantly interfere with international traffic in relation to travel to and from China or other countries, ranging from denial of entry of passengers, visa restrictions or quarantine for returning travellers. Several countries that denied entry of travellers or who have suspended the flights to and from China or other affected countries, are now reporting cases of COVID-19.”
Updated WHO recommendations for international traffic in relation to COVID-19 outbreak
This document provides updated recommendations for international traffic in relation to the COVID-19 outbreak, in light of the rapidly evolving situation. It supersedes the advice published on 27 January 2020.On 30 January 2020, the Director-General of the World Health Organization, following...www.who.int
Im not taking a position, just pointing out that experts aren’t in complete agreement on this issue.
I agree with them. Time to end the charade of this flu bug and stop all this quarantine crap.
I didn’t realize this thread was about what you want.
I thought it was about Biden being considered senile for agreeing with the WHO.
Anyway, Dan Crenshaw is not being very honest.
WHO also reported that this virus was not transmittable human to human.
But the topic is the travel bans, which almost every nation on earth has implemented.
Great. Then why don’t you stay on topic?
Crenshaw is acting like experts are unanimous. That’s not the case. Biden is sufficiently backed up by experts in making his claim.
So you’re claiming every developed nation on earth is denying science.
You run with that, Sparky.
I know, Lefties. It doesn’t count if you can’t remember saying it!
Would the WHO be considered experts?
“Travel bans to affected areas or denial of entry to passengers coming from affected areas are usually not effective in preventing the importation of cases but may have a significant economic and social impact. Since WHO declaration of a public health emergency of international concern in relation to COVID-19, and as of 27 February, 38 countries have reported to WHO additional health measures that significantly interfere with international traffic in relation to travel to and from China or other countries, ranging from denial of entry of passengers, visa restrictions or quarantine for returning travellers. Several countries that denied entry of travellers or who have suspended the flights to and from China or other affected countries, are now reporting cases of COVID-19.”
Updated WHO recommendations for international traffic in relation to COVID-19 outbreak
This document provides updated recommendations for international traffic in relation to the COVID-19 outbreak, in light of the rapidly evolving situation. It supersedes the advice published on 27 January 2020.On 30 January 2020, the Director-General of the World Health Organization, following...www.who.int
Im not taking a position, just pointing out that experts aren’t in complete agreement on this issue.
I agree with them. Time to end the charade of this flu bug and stop all this quarantine crap.
I didn’t realize this thread was about what you want.
I thought it was about Biden being considered senile for agreeing with the WHO.
Anyway, Dan Crenshaw is not being very honest.
WHO also reported that this virus was not transmittable human to human.
But the topic is the travel bans, which almost every nation on earth has implemented.
Great. Then why don’t you stay on topic?
Crenshaw is acting like experts are unanimous. That’s not the case. Biden is sufficiently backed up by experts in making his claim.
So you’re claiming every developed nation on earth is denying science.
You run with that, Sparky.
You’re doing the same thing. Pretending like “science” is some monolithic enterprise with one voice.
I know, Lefties. It doesn’t count if you can’t remember saying it!
Would the WHO be considered experts?
“Travel bans to affected areas or denial of entry to passengers coming from affected areas are usually not effective in preventing the importation of cases but may have a significant economic and social impact. Since WHO declaration of a public health emergency of international concern in relation to COVID-19, and as of 27 February, 38 countries have reported to WHO additional health measures that significantly interfere with international traffic in relation to travel to and from China or other countries, ranging from denial of entry of passengers, visa restrictions or quarantine for returning travellers. Several countries that denied entry of travellers or who have suspended the flights to and from China or other affected countries, are now reporting cases of COVID-19.”
Updated WHO recommendations for international traffic in relation to COVID-19 outbreak
This document provides updated recommendations for international traffic in relation to the COVID-19 outbreak, in light of the rapidly evolving situation. It supersedes the advice published on 27 January 2020.On 30 January 2020, the Director-General of the World Health Organization, following...www.who.int
Im not taking a position, just pointing out that experts aren’t in complete agreement on this issue.
I agree with them. Time to end the charade of this flu bug and stop all this quarantine crap.
I didn’t realize this thread was about what you want.
I thought it was about Biden being considered senile for agreeing with the WHO.
Anyway, Dan Crenshaw is not being very honest.
WHO also reported that this virus was not transmittable human to human.
But the topic is the travel bans, which almost every nation on earth has implemented.
Great. Then why don’t you stay on topic?
Crenshaw is acting like experts are unanimous. That’s not the case. Biden is sufficiently backed up by experts in making his claim.
So you’re claiming every developed nation on earth is denying science.
You run with that, Sparky.
You’re doing the same thing. Pretending like “science” is some monolithic enterprise with one voice.
Bro, if exposure to more people causes the spread of disease, the WHO would be IGNORING science by saying that stopping or limiting exposure would have no effect.
Do you really believe otherwise?
.
I know, Lefties. It doesn’t count if you can’t remember saying it!
Would the WHO be considered experts?
“Travel bans to affected areas or denial of entry to passengers coming from affected areas are usually not effective in preventing the importation of cases but may have a significant economic and social impact. Since WHO declaration of a public health emergency of international concern in relation to COVID-19, and as of 27 February, 38 countries have reported to WHO additional health measures that significantly interfere with international traffic in relation to travel to and from China or other countries, ranging from denial of entry of passengers, visa restrictions or quarantine for returning travellers. Several countries that denied entry of travellers or who have suspended the flights to and from China or other affected countries, are now reporting cases of COVID-19.”
Updated WHO recommendations for international traffic in relation to COVID-19 outbreak
This document provides updated recommendations for international traffic in relation to the COVID-19 outbreak, in light of the rapidly evolving situation. It supersedes the advice published on 27 January 2020.On 30 January 2020, the Director-General of the World Health Organization, following...www.who.int
Im not taking a position, just pointing out that experts aren’t in complete agreement on this issue.
I agree with them. Time to end the charade of this flu bug and stop all this quarantine crap.
I didn’t realize this thread was about what you want.
I thought it was about Biden being considered senile for agreeing with the WHO.
Anyway, Dan Crenshaw is not being very honest.
WHO also reported that this virus was not transmittable human to human.
But the topic is the travel bans, which almost every nation on earth has implemented.
Great. Then why don’t you stay on topic?
Crenshaw is acting like experts are unanimous. That’s not the case. Biden is sufficiently backed up by experts in making his claim.
So you’re claiming every developed nation on earth is denying science.
You run with that, Sparky.
You’re doing the same thing. Pretending like “science” is some monolithic enterprise with one voice.
Bro, if exposure to more people causes the spread of disease, the WHO would be IGNORING science by saying that stopping or limiting exposure would have no effect.
Do you really believe otherwise?
.
Their positions is a bit more nuanced with that.
I know, Lefties. It doesn’t count if you can’t remember saying it!
Would the WHO be considered experts?
“Travel bans to affected areas or denial of entry to passengers coming from affected areas are usually not effective in preventing the importation of cases but may have a significant economic and social impact. Since WHO declaration of a public health emergency of international concern in relation to COVID-19, and as of 27 February, 38 countries have reported to WHO additional health measures that significantly interfere with international traffic in relation to travel to and from China or other countries, ranging from denial of entry of passengers, visa restrictions or quarantine for returning travellers. Several countries that denied entry of travellers or who have suspended the flights to and from China or other affected countries, are now reporting cases of COVID-19.”
Updated WHO recommendations for international traffic in relation to COVID-19 outbreak
This document provides updated recommendations for international traffic in relation to the COVID-19 outbreak, in light of the rapidly evolving situation. It supersedes the advice published on 27 January 2020.On 30 January 2020, the Director-General of the World Health Organization, following...www.who.int
Im not taking a position, just pointing out that experts aren’t in complete agreement on this issue.
I agree with them. Time to end the charade of this flu bug and stop all this quarantine crap.
I didn’t realize this thread was about what you want.
I thought it was about Biden being considered senile for agreeing with the WHO.
Anyway, Dan Crenshaw is not being very honest.
WHO also reported that this virus was not transmittable human to human.
But the topic is the travel bans, which almost every nation on earth has implemented.
Great. Then why don’t you stay on topic?
Crenshaw is acting like experts are unanimous. That’s not the case. Biden is sufficiently backed up by experts in making his claim.
So you’re claiming every developed nation on earth is denying science.
You run with that, Sparky.
You’re doing the same thing. Pretending like “science” is some monolithic enterprise with one voice.
Bro, if exposure to more people causes the spread of disease, the WHO would be IGNORING science by saying that stopping or limiting exposure would have no effect.
Do you really believe otherwise?
.
Their positions is a bit more nuanced with that.
So closing down stores is good or bad?
I know, Lefties. It doesn’t count if you can’t remember saying it!
That is such a bullshit cop out when you're wrong. "Nuanced" means "you're right but I am using this word to make you seem wrong."Their positions is a bit more nuanced with that.
Do you ever give a substantive response?Depends.