DACA Ruled Illegal

[Thinker101]

Federal Judge blocks approval of new DACA applications, but postponed the effect of his ruling on current program recipients

Judge’s ruling barred the Biden administration from approving new DACA applications, but the judge stayed the immediate effect of his ruling on current DACA recipients.

DACA Immigration Program Invalidated by Federal Judge

There is another ruling that states the government must accept new applicants.

"A federal judge ruled Friday the Trump administration must begin accepting new applications for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program benefiting hundreds of thousands of migrants brought illegally to the United States as minors.

U.S. District Judge Nicholas Garaufis found that a memo issued in July by acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf was invalid. The memo suspended new applications to the program that protects some young immigrants from deportation and reduced how long renewals were valid, from two years to one year."

Federal Judge Rules US Must Accept New DACA Applications

Judge rules that memo issued by acting homeland security secretary is invalid

www.voanews.com

Gee, guess that means Bidum won't need to try and appeal judges ruling.

 

[meaner gene]

The president isn't changing the naturalization laws. He's just using discretion over the executive power of deportation.

Oh STFU, & STOP!

Barry declared he could not do anything- so you are calling HIM a liar.

What part of 'ONLY CONGRESS CAN MAKE LAWS' do you NOT understand, snowflake?

The executive is who actually carries out deportations. Like proprietorial discretion, if Obama could be forced to deport people, they would have gotten a writ of mandamus.
But they didn't.

 

[easyt65]

The president isn't changing the naturalization laws. He's just using discretion over the executive power of deportation.

Oh STFU, & STOP!

Barry declared he could not do anything- so you are calling HIM a liar.

What part of 'ONLY CONGRESS CAN MAKE LAWS' do you NOT understand, snowflake?

The executive is who actually carries out deportations. Like proprietorial discretion, if Obama could be forced to deport people, they would have gotten a write of mandamus.
But they didn't.

Carries out the laws that have been passed, not CREATES his on laws, which Barry agreed with which he declared numerous times he could not do anything about it.

Barry declared he was tired of the slow pace of Congress to move on this issue...

TOO F*ING BAD! That's the way the process Constititionally works!

He violated the US Constitution, according to HIM!

 

[meaner gene]

The president isn't changing the naturalization laws. He's just using discretion over the executive power of deportation.

Carries out the laws that have been passed, not CREATES his on laws, which Barry agreed with which he declared numerous times he could not do anything about it.

Barry declared he was tired of the slow pace of Congress to move on this issue...

TOO F*ING BAD! That's the way the process Constititionally works!

He violated the US Constitution, according to HIM!

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.

The executive still his discretion over how he enforces the law. Including selective enforcement, or not enforcing it at all.

 

[easyt65]

The president isn't changing the naturalization laws. He's just using discretion over the executive power of deportation.

Carries out the laws that have been passed, not CREATES his on laws, which Barry agreed with which he declared numerous times he could not do anything about it.

Barry declared he was tired of the slow pace of Congress to move on this issue...

TOO F*ING BAD! That's the way the process Constititionally works!

He violated the US Constitution, according to HIM!

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.

The executive still his discretion over how he enforces the law. Including selective enforcement, or not enforcing it at all.

Thank you for your emotional ignorant OPINION, but your Constitutional Scholar & this judge both say you are wrong.

Barry violated the Constitution and even told YOU he did not have the authority to fo what he did...you were just too stupid to listen.

 

[meaner gene]

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.

The executive still his discretion over how he enforces the law. Including selective enforcement, or not enforcing it at all.

Thank you for your emotional ignorant OPINION, but your Constitutional Scholar & this judge both say you are wrong.

Barry violated the Constitution and even told YOU he did not have the authority to fo what he did...you were just too stupid to listen.

You don't listen to Obama, why should I, he's long gone. But I know the powers of the chief executive, and the Supreme Court says discretion is a political power they have no control over.

The judge may have overstepped. Let's see if it gets appealed.

 

[AMart]

Illegal to let illegals be legal with an EO.
If it’s so great, pass the laws, Democrats.

BREAKING: Federal Judge Rules DACA Illegal

pjmedia.com

Judge Andrew Hanen ruled what everybody already knows. daca is an illegal program for illegal aliens. the so called dreamers are nothing more then illegal aliens that need to be deported. once deported if they want to immigrate to the USA they need to apply to immigrate legally and go to the back of the line like everybody else. there are thousands of people from all over the world who have applied to immigrate legally to the USA and are waiting for their turn. these illegal aliens the so call dreamers are demanding not only legal status but they are demanding US citizenship. dementia joe and nancy pelosi and her democlowns want to reward these illegal border jumpers for violating US immigration laws. The US congress did not create Daca and the seating US president did not signed it into law. The US congress did not grant the funds to run daca

If it was "illegal" it wouldn't still be enforced on those already registered.

No more DACA migrants is a good thing.

It is not a good thing. It shows you are a racist.

You are the racist. DACA was created for non whites flooding the USA illegally. The entire purpose of Hart Cellar and allowing for mass illegal immigration was to makes whites a minority, bring in tens of millions of people who 1) Don't care about constitutional law, and 2) Are not Patriotic, so that The Dems and Globalists increase their power.

The USA was created by whites for whites like how dam near all countries are created for their own tribes.

 

[OKTexas]

OF COURSE DACA IS ILLEGAL...BECAUSE DACA IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL - EVEN BARAK OBAMA, THE SELF-PROCLAIMED CONSTIRUTIONSL SCHOLAR, DECLARED THIS TO BE A FACT ... BEFORE HE RAMMED IT INTO LAW THROUGH PERSONAL EDICT.

BARRY DECLARED PUBLICLY HE HAD NO AUTHORITY TO MAKE OR CHANGE US IMMIGRATION LAW...BUT THAT IS WHAT HE DID, BY-PASSING CONGRESS TO DO SO WITH HIS EDICT.

SNOWFLAKES WHO ATTEMPT TO SAY DIFFERENTLY OR DEFEND DACA AS LAW PROVE THEY ARE EITHER STUPID OR TROLLS, THAT THEY DO NOT KNOW WHAT THE CONSTITUTION SAYS.

BIDEN'S REFUSAL NOW TO ENFORCE US IMMIGRATION LAW IS JUST AS CRIMINAL AS BARRY RAMMING DACA INTO LAW BY HIMSELF!

DACA was never a law, it is an administrative procedure. A procedure that violates the law.

.

 

[Quasar44]

DJT for Life
The GOP will vote DACA ???

 

[easyt65]

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.

The executive still his discretion over how he enforces the law. Including selective enforcement, or not enforcing it at all.

Thank you for your emotional ignorant OPINION, but your Constitutional Scholar & this judge both say you are wrong.

Barry violated the Constitution and even told YOU he did not have the authority to fo what he did...you were just too stupid to listen.

You don't listen to Obama, why should I, he's long gone. But I know the powers of the chief executive, and the Supreme Court says discretion is a political power they have no control over.

The judge may have overstepped. Let's see if it gets appealed.

Again, thank you for the ignorant emotional response.

You're wrong - you're not only wrong, you're stupid.of course I do listen to Obama. I just told YOU, his apologist, what the man said / did, and while trying to defend him & DAXA you just admitted you DON'T listen to him and thus have no idea what you are talking about.

Why should you listen to him? So you don't destroy your credibility, which you just did.

Nice job, snowflake.

 

[meaner gene]

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.

The executive still his discretion over how he enforces the law. Including selective enforcement, or not enforcing it at all.

Again, thank you for the ignorant emotional response.

You're wrong - you're not only wrong, you're stupid.of course I do listen to Obama. I just told YOU, his apologist, what the man said / did, and while trying to defend him & DAXA you just admitted you DON'T listen to him and thus have no idea what you are talking about.

I'm going by the law, and not what anybody said. Even if you have a defendant on tape saying "what i'm doing is probably illegal." That is not proof of guilt.

 

[struth]

There was nothing illegal about what he did. He can state that his administration would not pursue deportation of those who were brought here as kids.

What was done wrong is extenuating that into the next administration. This fall in the lap of Obama. He promised the Hispanic community that if they supported him the first thing he would do is address immigration reform. He did not. He issued an EO on his way out.

the courts disagre with you on DACA.

DACA did more then simply decide who to prosecute for illegal crossing, it gave a new legal status, that’s the illegal act by obama

 

[pknopp]

There was nothing illegal about what he did. He can state that his administration would not pursue deportation of those who were brought here as kids.

What was done wrong is extenuating that into the next administration. This fall in the lap of Obama. He promised the Hispanic community that if they supported him the first thing he would do is address immigration reform. He did not. He issued an EO on his way out.

the courts disagre with you on DACA.

DACA did more then simply decide who to prosecute for illegal crossing, it gave a new legal status, that’s the illegal act by obama

If it was ruled illegal, those previously covered would no longer be.

 

[struth]

There was nothing illegal about what he did. He can state that his administration would not pursue deportation of those who were brought here as kids.

What was done wrong is extenuating that into the next administration. This fall in the lap of Obama. He promised the Hispanic community that if they supported him the first thing he would do is address immigration reform. He did not. He issued an EO on his way out.

the courts disagre with you on DACA.

DACA did more then simply decide who to prosecute for illegal crossing, it gave a new legal status, that’s the illegal act by obama

If it was ruled illegal, those previously covered would no longer be.

according to the article that is what the judge said in his ruling. Though, arguably that will only impact his district as other courts might disagree, and i’m sure the xiden admin will appeal

 

[meaner gene]

the courts disagre with you on DACA.

DACA did more then simply decide who to prosecute for illegal crossing, it gave a new legal status, that’s the illegal act by obama

The story refers to DACA as "temporary amnesty"

That's a power of the chief executive.

 

[pknopp]

There was nothing illegal about what he did. He can state that his administration would not pursue deportation of those who were brought here as kids.

What was done wrong is extenuating that into the next administration. This fall in the lap of Obama. He promised the Hispanic community that if they supported him the first thing he would do is address immigration reform. He did not. He issued an EO on his way out.

the courts disagre with you on DACA.

DACA did more then simply decide who to prosecute for illegal crossing, it gave a new legal status, that’s the illegal act by obama

If it was ruled illegal, those previously covered would no longer be.

according to the article that is what the judge said in his ruling. Though, arguably that will only impact his district as other courts might disagree, and i’m sure the xiden admin will appeal

How do you leave the actions of a rule in place if it's illegal?

 

[struth]

the courts disagre with you on DACA.

DACA did more then simply decide who to prosecute for illegal crossing, it gave a new legal status, that’s the illegal act by obama

The story refers to DACA as "temporary amnesty"

That's a power of the chief executive.

the story refers to the judge rulings it illegal. Read the ruling, read what DACA actually is snd what Obama did with his EO.

 

[struth]

There was nothing illegal about what he did. He can state that his administration would not pursue deportation of those who were brought here as kids.

What was done wrong is extenuating that into the next administration. This fall in the lap of Obama. He promised the Hispanic community that if they supported him the first thing he would do is address immigration reform. He did not. He issued an EO on his way out.

the courts disagre with you on DACA.

DACA did more then simply decide who to prosecute for illegal crossing, it gave a new legal status, that’s the illegal act by obama

If it was ruled illegal, those previously covered would no longer be.

according to the article that is what the judge said in his ruling. Though, arguably that will only impact his district as other courts might disagree, and i’m sure the xiden admin will appeal

How do you leave the actions of a rule in place if it's illegal?

you don’t…they would no longer have that new legal status and be deportable.

 

[pknopp]

There was nothing illegal about what he did. He can state that his administration would not pursue deportation of those who were brought here as kids.

What was done wrong is extenuating that into the next administration. This fall in the lap of Obama. He promised the Hispanic community that if they supported him the first thing he would do is address immigration reform. He did not. He issued an EO on his way out.

the courts disagre with you on DACA.

DACA did more then simply decide who to prosecute for illegal crossing, it gave a new legal status, that’s the illegal act by obama

If it was ruled illegal, those previously covered would no longer be.

according to the article that is what the judge said in his ruling. Though, arguably that will only impact his district as other courts might disagree, and i’m sure the xiden admin will appeal

How do you leave the actions of a rule in place if it's illegal?

you don’t…they would no longer have that new legal status and be deportable.

Current DACA recipients won’t have their temporary amnesty pulled, and won’t be deported as a result,

 

[meaner gene]

you don’t…they would no longer have that new legal status and be deportable.

Judge Hanen’s ruling barred the Biden administration from approving new DACA applications. But the judge stayed the immediate effect of his ruling on current DACA recipients, citing their longtime reliance on the program, meaning there won’t be upheaval right away for those people who are currently in good standing.

DACA Immigration Program Invalidated by Federal Judge

The Obama-era initiative provided deportation protections and work permits to some young immigrants.

www.wsj.com