More Tariff Refunds: Even 10% Tariff Ruled Illegal

citygator

There is a 25% Tariff to read my posts
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2019
Messages
33,603
Reaction score
27,475
Points
2,790
Location
Charlotte
So the punitive Tariffs were ruled illegal and Trump replaced them with a 10% Tariff across the board that courts just ruled illegal.

Nothing Trump does will last. It’s all illegal EO’s because he is a lazy and can’t rally anyone to do anything. His ideas are failing. We pay for it.



Trade Court Rules Against Trump

A panel of federal judges on Thursday found President Trump had violated the law when he imposed a 10 percent tariff on most U.S. imports, dealing yet another legal setback to the White House in its efforts to wage a trade war without the express permission of Congress.

In a split ruling, the Court of International Trade found that Mr. Trump had wrongly invoked a decades-old trade law when he applied those duties beginning in February. The president imposed the levies after his previous set of punishing tariffs was struck down by the Supreme Court.

The decision appeared to place, for now, strict new limits on Mr. Trump’s trade powers, which he has wielded aggressively in the hopes of resetting relationships with allies and adversaries, raising new revenue and encouraging more domestic manufacturing.

The next steps in the case are less clear, given that the administration always envisioned the across-the-board tariff as a temporary solution, one that would buy time for Mr. Trump to craft a perhaps more lasting set of higher rates using other legal authorities.
 
So the punitive Tariffs were ruled illegal and Trump replaced them with a 10% Tariff across the board that courts just ruled illegal.

Nothing Trump does will last. It’s all illegal EO’s because he is a lazy and can’t rally anyone to do anything. His ideas are failing. We pay for it.



Trade Court Rules Against Trump

A panel of federal judges on Thursday found President Trump had violated the law when he imposed a 10 percent tariff on most U.S. imports, dealing yet another legal setback to the White House in its efforts to wage a trade war without the express permission of Congress.

In a split ruling, the Court of International Trade found that Mr. Trump had wrongly invoked a decades-old trade law when he applied those duties beginning in February. The president imposed the levies after his previous set of punishing tariffs was struck down by the Supreme Court.

The decision appeared to place, for now, strict new limits on Mr. Trump’s trade powers, which he has wielded aggressively in the hopes of resetting relationships with allies and adversaries, raising new revenue and encouraging more domestic manufacturing.

The next steps in the case are less clear, given that the administration always envisioned the across-the-board tariff as a temporary solution, one that would buy time for Mr. Trump to craft a perhaps more lasting set of higher rates using other legal authorities.

He needs to make sure that if you win in 2028, he has thousands and thousands of EO's intertwining with other EO's and legislation that you will have to get thousands of lawyers to decipher everything to remove them with your new EO's.
 
All part of the cost of being an absolute moron picking Fox News Poster Child and Traitor Pam Bondi.

People who never went to law school could have won the case.


They say a tariff is a tax, and it is. But it is only half of the equation of half the FULL equation, and it involves FOREIGN POLICY which is strictly given to Executive Branch in the Constitution. So a US tariff is both a tax AND foreign policy. What a given country does with its tariff rate is 100% foreign policy, since the Congress has no say.

Donald Trump is 100% correct on all of this. The US tariff/the tariff the other country puts on our imports is ONE ISSUE, not two. A country with a 70% tariff on our products doesn't deserve a 10% on their products here, it deserves 70%, and the Constitution specifically empowers Executive Branch to carry out foreign policy.


SCOTUS is arguing that the "intent" of the Constitution, despite allocating foreign policy to Executive Branch, is to have 530 Secretaries of State in the Congress argue and debate each other country's tariff rate. Beyond absurd....


What is wrong with the "lawyers?" Why are so many completely incompetent morons promoted politically?

This issue is an embarrassment. We can't even interpret our own Constitution correctly anymore....
 
He needs to make sure that if you win in 2028, he has thousands and thousands of EO's intertwining with other EO's and legislation that you will have to get thousands of lawyers to decipher everything to remove them with your new EO's.
YOu're that desperate to **** over the country? Just because you lost?

That's like the most unAmerican thing ever.
 
He needs to make sure that if you win in 2028, he has thousands and thousands of EO's intertwining with other EO's and legislation that you will have to get thousands of lawyers to decipher everything to remove them with your new EO's.

YOu're that desperate to **** over the country? Just because you lost?

That's like the most unAmerican thing ever.

Over 90% of Trump EO’s were reversed on day 1 of Biden’s administration. All by end of first week.

 
All part of the cost of being an absolute moron picking Fox News Poster Child and Traitor Pam Bondi.

People who never went to law school could have won the case.


They say a tariff is a tax, and it is. But it is only half of the equation of half the FULL equation, and it involves FOREIGN POLICY which is strictly given to Executive Branch in the Constitution. So a US tariff is both a tax AND foreign policy. What a given country does with its tariff rate is 100% foreign policy, since the Congress has no say.

Donald Trump is 100% correct on all of this. The US tariff/the tariff the other country puts on our imports is ONE ISSUE, not two. A country with a 70% tariff on our products doesn't deserve a 10% on their products here, it deserves 70%, and the Constitution specifically empowers Executive Branch to carry out foreign policy.


SCOTUS is arguing that the "intent" of the Constitution, despite allocating foreign policy to Executive Branch, is to have 530 Secretaries of State in the Congress argue and debate each other country's tariff rate. Beyond absurd....


What is wrong with the "lawyers?" Why are so many completely incompetent morons promoted politically?

This issue is an embarrassment. We can't even interpret our own Constitution correctly anymore....
The conservative SCOTUS says you’re just butt hurt. Try a donut pillow.
 
All the moonbats whined about how the consumer was going to end up paying the tariffs.

But now they're cheering that the refunds go to.....BIG CORPORATIONS!... :laugh:
Who’s cheering that? Be specific. People are glad the tariffs are gone. Consumers were screwed by Trump not the courts or liberals genius.
 
Back
Top Bottom