Liminal
Gold Member
Almost as if there's an actual debate about climate change.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
“If we don’t act boldly, the bill that could come due will be mass migrations and cities submerged and nations displaced and food supplies decimated and conflicts born of despair,” said Obama.
“The Paris agreement gives us a framework to act but only if we scale up our ambition, and there must be a sense of urgency about bringing the agreement into force and helping poorer countries leapfrog destructive forms of energy,” he added. “So for the wealthiest countries, a green climate fund should only be the beginning,” Obama said.
“We need to invest in research and provide market incentives to develop new technologies and then make these technologies accessible and affordable for poorer countries and only then can we continue lifting all people up from poverty without condemning our children to a planet beyond their capacity to repair,” he said.
Obama Predicts Submerged Cities, Mass Migrations, Food Supplies Decimated ‘If We Don’t Act Boldly’ on Climate Change
Almost as if there's an actual debate about climate change.
There is no debate with climate change. It happens all the time. Has for billions of years.
DUH
Whether you think the empirical evidence supports the idea or no, show us why CO2 would NOT warm the planetYou say that and your evidence, as far as I can tell, is your contention that at some point in history Greenland was covered with ice while North America was not.
The "evidence" that CO2 warms the planet is a good deal more direct. CO2 absorption spectra has been measured in the lab with great precision. The spectra of downwelling IR radiation from the clear night sky has been recorded. It is a known FACT that CO2 absorbs and retransmits certain bands of light. The effect of that action is to slow the rate at which IR energy escapes the planet's atmosphere. Thus an increasing level of CO2 will invariably lead to an increasing equilibrium temperature.
How does your historical idea, thus far supported only by your unsubstantiated assertions, refute ANY of what I've just said? Whether you think the empirical evidence supports the idea or no, show us why CO2 would NOT warm the planet.
your contention that at some point in history Greenland was covered with ice while North America was not.