Poor Greta Thunberg, so disappointed. See why.

It's bad for the planet, you dumbass.

If the hot air from the equator isn't cooled off by shifting to the poles, then it just keeps getting hotter.

No, it isn't as you and many climate cultists never produce any.

You are a victim of propaganda that pushed this bullshit as CO2 isn't the driver at all as the CO2 Log effect is well known.

At the 430 ppm level warm forcing is negligible.

1779542438965.webp


LINK

============

What I’ve shown is the change that in theory would have occurred from the changes in CO2 from 1750 to the present, and the change that in theory will occur in the future when CO2 increases from its present value to twice the 1750 value. This is using the generally accepted (although not rigorously derived) claim that the downwelling radiation change from a doubling of CO2 is 3.7 watts per square metre (W/m2). The purpose is to show how small these CO2-caused changes are compared to total downwelling radiation.

1779542301557.webp

The changes in downwelling radiation from the increase in CO2 are trivially small, lost in the noise …

LINK
 
Remember Trump saying climate change fears are a hoax? Well, the IPCC came out and admitted it. Thunberg must have crapped her undies since she is so wrong. Take your warm jackets and get them out. Cooler days are ahead.


Major news that was never covered. Marxists not allowing this information to get out.
 

Beck/AFP via Getty

The past 11 years (2015–25) have been the hottest on record, with last year being the third-warmest year since observations began according to most data sets, finds a report released on 23 March by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO)<


I realize facts and math are beyond you simpletons. But the average temps went up a little which means the average temp went up, nothing earth shattering about that as the temp hasnt risen by much.
 
No, it isn't as you and many climate cultists never produce any.

You are a victim of propaganda that pushed this bullshit as CO2 isn't the driver at all as the CO2 Log effect is well known.

At the 430 ppm level warm forcing is negligible.

The problem is, the system is balanced, and the amount of CO2 we are throwing into the air is destroying that balance.

Again, I'll take the word of real scientists, 95% of whom say that global warming is real and people are causing it.

I realize facts and math are beyond you simpletons. But the average temps went up a little which means the average temp went up, nothing earth shattering about that as the temp hasnt risen by much.
Melting ice caps and dying coral reefs would say otherwise.
 
JoeB131 strikes out with this empty statement,

The problem is, the system is balanced, and the amount of CO2 we are throwing into the air is destroying that balance.

Again, I'll take the word of real scientists, 95% of whom say that global warming is real and people are causing it.

Another false narrative since I haven't disputed the warming trend.

You just make this crap up as there is no such balance in the first place and the planet is LOVING IT!

Once again bring this up based on Satellite Data, from NASA:

Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds​

Excerpt:

From a quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25.

An international team of 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries led the effort, which involved using satellite data from NASA’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer instruments to help determine the leaf area index, or amount of leaf cover, over the planet’s vegetated regions. The greening represents an increase in leaves on plants and trees equivalent in area to two times the continental United States.

LINK

As usual you show your lack of understanding of the issues as you ignored the well known Log of CO2 and its feeble effect on the heat balance.
 
Guy, again, 95% of scientists say otherwise.

But I'm sure you are so much smarter.
That is a myth joe. The approval you mention is not over all of climate change, but bits and pieces of it. Such as is it Warming slightly, sure. Is it record high? No
It can be demonstrated by checking the hottest place on the planet and you will note it was a record in 1913 but has been consistently cooler since. Also, the Coral reefs you mention, improving Joe.
 
Guy, again, 95% of scientists say otherwise.

But I'm sure you are so much smarter.

Now you are the bottom of the barrel, maybe it is time for you to stop as you have no rebuttal to the NASA Greening Earth article I posted, you have no rebuttal to the Sea Ice report by a large team of scientists who actually do this very area of research which you probably ignored.

From Greening Earth,

An international team of 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries led the effort, which involved using satellite data from NASA’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer instruments to help determine the leaf area index, or amount of leaf cover, over the planet’s vegetated regions. The greening represents an increase in leaves on plants and trees equivalent in area to two times the continental United States.

You continue to ignore Post #35 LINK Sea Ice Report that had 12 scientists involved who do this for a living.

Give it up Joe you are looking foolish here.
 
Last edited:
That is a myth joe. The approval you mention is not over all of climate change, but bits and pieces of it. Such as is it Warming slightly, sure. Is it record high? No
It can be demonstrated by checking the hottest place on the planet and you will note it was a record in 1913 but has been consistently cooler since. Also, the Coral reefs you mention, improving Joe.

He does the consensus angle because he is a science illiterate who parrots propaganda.
 
Now you are the bottom of the barrel, maybe it is time for you to stop as you have no rebuttal to the NASA Greening Earth article I posted, you have no rebuttal to the Sea Ice report by a large team of scientists who actually do this very area of research which you probably ignored.

There's no point wasting time on climate deniers.

That is a myth joe. The approval you mention is not over all of climate change, but bits and pieces of it. Such as is it Warming slightly, sure. Is it record high? No

We aren't talking about record highs we are talking about warming to the point where the last 11 years have been the hottest on record.
 
There's no point wasting time on climate deniers.



We aren't talking about record highs we are talking about warming to the point where the last 11 years have been the hottest on record.

You have nothing cogent to offer because you know nothing.

I posted official sources which has over 40 scientists involved and you ignore it all, that is a special kind of closeminded stupidity, it is why you are a proven science illiterate because you show no interest in honest discussion with those who clearly know much more about it than you do.

It is clear why leftists democrats are mentally ill people they can't do a simple honest discussion because their heads are full of mush infilled by their masters.
 
There's no point wasting time on climate deniers.



We aren't talking about record highs we are talking about warming to the point where the last 11 years have been the hottest on record.
look retard temps went up by a degree of course the average yearly temps will be higher, that has happened every year since the end of the last ice age. Nothing to worry about and no evidence it will get too high.
 
15th post
One day Alarmists will realise that computer models are not science.

Actually, computer models are just simulations based on everything we think we know put in a computer and run just to see how well they end up coming out predicting the things that actually happen. When they miss badly, that tells us we need to go back and keep working on them as we are missing something big.

That was the proof for quantum theory--- the theory kept predicting extremely accurately the outcome of everything we tested it against.
 
look retard temps went up by a degree of course the average yearly temps will be higher, that has happened every year since the end of the last ice age. Nothing to worry about and no evidence it will get too high.

He is too far gone into the Twilight Zone notice how he ignored the 2025 Arctic Sea Ice report and the chart I presented.

He is another leftist closeminded idiot.
 
Don't know where you live but here in New England it's already scorching....

Really? I live in the states and March was in the 40s and 50s, April was in the 50s and 60s, and so far, May has been in the 60s and 70s (not a whole lot of 70s), with just 2 days I think briefly breaking into the 80s.

It is actually in the mid-60s outside right now as we speak.
 
You have nothing cogent to offer because you know nothing.
No, it's just a waste of time to argue with flat-earthers.
I posted official sources which has over 40 scientists
40 Scientists out of hundreds of thousands? Wow, I guess that Oil COmpany money doesn't go as far as it used to.
look retard temps went up by a degree of course the average yearly temps will be higher, that has happened every year since the end of the last ice age. Nothing to worry about and no evidence it will get too high.

Um, no. Not really.

1779571353482.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom