Do you feel stupid? It could be catastrophic climate change

[Sunsettommy]

You were flat out lied toand mislead ..... made out to be a jerk off by those who took ya for a ride yet you still believe
Good for you short bus

The moron fell hard for the stooooopid 8.5 RCP scenario that were seen as implausible from day one by many scientists and people like me who actually read it then which is why it damages science research as post # 87 makes clear when so many researchers and climate cultists slurped it up uncritically.

Now they are in denial over it, the stench of their gullibility lingers.

 

[skye]

 

[ShahdagMountains]

Not a problem.
I've never felt stupid.
For one thing, I know what a complete fraud "climate change" is.

Have you heard of cloud seeding?

The sky was full of chemtrails three days ago. And it’s rained ever since.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Save the environment
Muh avocados

 

[EMH]

View attachment 1256265

Global Warming aka CO2 caused climate change is BS.


The Earth's climate does change in response to how much land is near the poles and hence how much ice is on the planet. Right now there are 9 million cubic miles of ice on Earth. During Jurassic there was little to none, which caused

1. warming
2. higher seas
3. bigger stronger canes
4. much higher surface air pressure


and it is indeed that #4 there the CO2 fraud is profoundly busted on, since if the planet was warming and ice was melting, surface air pressure would be going up, and it isn't, and that is a PLANETARY measure, not a local temp reading.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Climate Headbangers Crawl from the Wreckage of RCP8.5 ‘Implausible’ Finding Spinning Nothing-to-See-Here Claims
From THE DAILY SCEPTIC

by Chris Morrison

It has taken a few days for the climate headbangers to work out the best spin to counter the recent IPCC ruling that the RCP8.5 computer model pathway is “implausible”. Necessary work of course, since the shock ruling from the UN’s main climate science body about a set of impossible assumptions destroyed the validity of almost every mainstream Net Zero-supporting climate scare story published over the last 15 years. First out of the traps was Adam Vaughan of the Times, who said that the most apocalyptic worst-case scenario had been ruled out “thanks to the rapid rise in renewable energy”.

This is the feeble explanation given by the IPCC ‘s own ‘implausible’ authors but, alas, it is not borne out by the facts. In 2011 at the start of the RCP8.5 madness, wind and solar accounted for 0.8% of world energy production. According to the latest fully compiled figures for 2023 from The World in Data, the percentage rose to 4.5%. In other words, the percentage of total global wind and solar energy supply rose from negligible to almost negligible – this despite trillions of dollars being spent on an increasingly expensive source of unreliable and industry-destroying power.

Supporters were quick to run with this seemingly best explanation.

Climate Headbangers Crawl from the Wreckage of RCP8.5 'Implausible' Finding Spinning Nothing-to-See-Here Claims – The Daily Sceptic

It's taken a few days for the climate headbangers to work out the best spin to counter the recent IPCC ruling that the doomsday RCP8.5 model scenario is "implausible", but now they're pushing back, says Chris Morrison.

dailysceptic.org

 

[JohnDB]

Something weather related and completely not politically correct.

 

[Rumpole]

Activist climate scientists, journalists and Net Zero-obsessed politicians are in shock following an official admission from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that a set of key assumptions promoting a climate ‘crisis’ since 2011 are “implausible”. The notorious set of always-improbable RCP8.5 ‘pathway’ assumptions which fed into computer models trying to measure an unmeasurable climate are no more. Since around 2011, these ‘business as usual’ assumptions have produced outlandish claims of future climate catastrophe which have been lapped up by lap dog journalists and politicians. The influential writer Roger Pielke Jr. called RCP8.5’s demise, “the most significant development in climate research in decades”.

Others might observe that we have not heard the last of RCP8.5. Its gross misuse is likely to be given a starring, central role when the history of the Great Climate and Net Zero Scam comes to be written.

Pielke lays it out clearly what has happened:

Let's be precise about what you got right, and what you're trying to get away with.

Yes, RCP8.5 has been officially retired. The van Vuuren et al. 2026 paper declared it implausible -- citing falling renewable costs, emerging climate policy, and actual emissions trends. That's real. Nobody serious disputes it.

But you know what else is real? The criticism of RCP8.5 came from inside climate science, years before this retirement. Hausfather and Peters published exactly that argument in Nature in 2020. Scientists policing their own methodology. That's not a scam being exposed -- that's a scam narrative collapsing on contact with how science actually works.

And Roger Pielke Jr. -- your star witness -- accepts that warming is real, human-caused, and dangerous. He spent years attacking the misuse of RCP8.5, not climate science itself. Deploying him against the thing he doesn't actually oppose isn't argument. It's theft.

Here's what you're quietly hoping nobody notices: RCP8.5 was never the consensus prediction. It was a worst-case boundary condition -- around the 90th percentile of the scenario range. Misrepresenting it as "business as usual" was a failure of science communication, not a conspiracy.

The new scenarios that replaced it still project roughly 3°C of warming under current policies. At 3°C, large parts of South Asia and the Middle East become periodically uninhabitable. Coastlines commit to multi-meter sea level rise. Agriculture destabilizes across multiple continents simultaneously. That's what "less bad than RCP8.5" actually looks like.

Retiring a flawed scenario is what honest science looks like. You've mistaken the correction for the crime.

References:

The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project for CMIP7 (ScenarioMIP-CMIP7)

Emissions – the ‘business as usual’ story is misleading

On the death of RCP8.5

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Let's be precise about what you got right, and what you're trying to get away with.

Yes, RCP8.5 has been officially retired. The van Vuuren et al. 2026 paper declared it implausible -- citing falling renewable costs, emerging climate policy, and actual emissions trends. That's real. Nobody serious disputes it.

But you know what else is real? The criticism of RCP8.5 came from inside climate science, years before this retirement. Hausfather and Peters published exactly that argument in Nature in 2020. Scientists policing their own methodology. That's not a scam being exposed -- that's a scam narrative collapsing on contact with how science actually works.

And Roger Pielke Jr. -- your star witness -- accepts that warming is real, human-caused, and dangerous. He spent years attacking the misuse of RCP8.5, not climate science itself. Deploying him against the thing he doesn't actually oppose isn't argument. It's theft.

Here's what you're quietly hoping nobody notices: RCP8.5 was never the consensus prediction. It was a worst-case boundary condition -- around the 90th percentile of the scenario range. Misrepresenting it as "business as usual" was a failure of science communication, not a conspiracy.

The new scenarios that replaced it still project roughly 3°C of warming under current policies. At 3°C, large parts of South Asia and the Middle East become periodically uninhabitable. Coastlines commit to multi-meter sea level rise. Agriculture destabilizes across multiple continents simultaneously. That's what "less bad than RCP8.5" actually looks like.

Retiring a flawed scenario is what honest science looks like. You've mistaken the correction for the crime.

References:

The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project for CMIP7 (ScenarioMIP-CMIP7)

Emissions – the ‘business as usual’ story is misleading

On the death of RCP8.5

That's what science does it corrects itself
Are you f****** kidding me with that b*******?You f****** romper room retard
you sound like a f****** 8-year-old a child an idiot child


Your sources have no credibility Whatsoever
theyve been lying for decades

I would go back a page and look and read the article about the damage done.And the b******* spread on purpose.

So what you're saying is that we were right all along . That's what you're saying.

Since we believe in real science, objective science....

And since the left kept insisting that the science was settled, you can't unsettle settled science....But now you're saying it's not settled, was it settled?Or it's not settled, it wasn't settled.It was b*******
For decades, you've been screaming at the top of your f****** lungs.
Scaring children wasting billions upon billions upon billions
Just like that
Settled ....to not settled
You can't have it both ways you blowhard who you trying to convince ?yourself?
Rotflmao

Dance around it all you want.The settled science is unsettled, just like that

Do you have a college college degree ?piss on it...
Your daddy wasted his money

They're so ignorant
They're so stupid
You're probably a democratic socialist aren't you?
You believe you're smart enough to understand
You believe your credentialed experts will lead you to utopia
Like a green utopia

Socialists have the worst environmental records of all time
Just like their body counts that range into the hundreds of millions.
Hitler mao stalin pol pot Castro

When it comes to destroying the environment, nobody does it better than a backwards useful idiot socialist
History is my proof
The leftards are ignorant.They live in fantasy land
why you even on my thread? spewing complete and utter meaningless b*******

Was the science settled?The science was settled.Your experts said it was settled.You believed like a f****** moron that you are

They're pathetic,
Sad and pathetic
Is there any wonder why they're all antidepressant Swilling retards

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

The science was settled denier bigot nazis
Oh, wait, science sometimes corrects itself.That's what real science does
Derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrp

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

The Justification for Net Zero Has Vanished with the Demise of RCP8.5​

by Andrew Sibley

4 June 2026

Any justification for Ed Miliband’s Net Zero climate policy, whether real or imaginary, has vanished with the official abandonment by the IPCC of the scariest concentration scenario RCP8.5. Even Tony Blair can now perceive that the pursuit of Net Zero is unwarranted and harmful to Britain.

It’s now 20 years since the publication of the ‘Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change‘ in 2006: a review commissioned by Gordon Brown, then Chancellor of the Exchequer, in a Labour government led by Prime Minister Tony Blair. This review began the UK-drive towards the crazy carbon-phobic policies which are helping to impoverish the nation, aided by unrealistic scenarios. There is some irony that Blair is now calling for the abandonment of Net Zero: when the Review was published he warned about the disaster that would come from inaction. It was his government that helped to pave the way for the excessive climate policies we have today, and scaring people was a tool of risk management, as Lord Giddens noted in the Lords March 1st 2005.

The Stern Review claimed that the risk from global warming was such that there was imminent danger to international standards of living. But in reality, the review made totally unrealistic claims in its assessment of warming and economic impacts. It brazenly asserted that there was more than a 50% risk of global temperatures rising by 5°C by the end of the century. Given that scenario, the cost of inaction would be 5% of global GDP per annum. The review called for nations to spend between 1% and 2% of GDP as a matter of urgency to reduce carbon dioxide emission by 80%. It was effectively a call for economic self-flagellation. The scary scenario outlined by Stern’s review was based on the ‘Special Report on Emissions Scenarios’ (SRES) strong A2 pathway, which morphed into the RCP8.5 which is familiar to us. The Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) were first proposed in 2007 and adopted by the IPCC’s ‘Fifth Assessment Report’ (AR5) of 2014. While RCP8.5 was an extreme and unlikely scenario, like its forerunner SRES A2 it was widely treated as the ‘business as usual’ case by climate alarmists

The Justification for Net Zero Has Vanished with the Demise of RCP8.5 – The Daily Sceptic

With the demise of the IPCC's extreme RCP8.5 climate scenario, any remaining reason to pursue Net Zero has vanished – and even Tony Blair has started to notice, says meteorologist Andrew Sibley.

dailysceptic.org

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Climate Deniers Should Not Assume They Will Never Face Justice | Common Dreams

Time has a way of catching up with scientific falsehoods—and so too for those who peddle them.

www.commondreams.org

We must jail the deniers the science is settled..

But you know, sometimes science corrects itself.That's how science works

 

[luiza]

AN EASY 5 MINUTE VERSION
THE 6000 YEAR CYCLE WHICH IS READILY BACK TRACED .

AND COMING YOUR WAY SOON --- WITH SWEET F -ALL CONNECTION WITH CARBON DIOXIDE AS A PRIME CAUSE

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

I thought it was twelve thousand

I took this picture tonight

amongst many others, especially one of a guy who doesn't know how to set concrete correctly
As his f****** bridge falls apart



Sol Has more control over the climate than anything else thier ain't shit we can do about it
It could fart and wipe us all out tomorrow

Imagine having a carrington event today
Shit would go sideways real fast

 

[luiza]

I thought it was twelve thousand

I took this picture tonight


amongst many others, especially one of a guy who doesn't know how to set concrete correctly
As his f****** bridge falls apart



Sol Has more control over the climate than anything else thier ain't shit we can do about it
It could fart and wipe us all out tomorrow

Imagine having a carrington event today
Shit would go sideways real fast

From memory , every other event is of "Extra/Super Strength" which produces the 12000 year figure and of course matches the Biblical Flood story which is mirrored globally .
Currently we have this historical support evidence for an imminent event ( within 20 years I gather)
PLUS
the weakening of our electro magnetic shield and the rapidly moving magnetic poles which presage a total reversal and near extinction event .

No wonder the Munchers are manipulated to talk about secondary and relatively incidental matters .
It prevents hysteria and complete unmanageable Chaos .

 

[EMH]

Climate Deniers Should Not Assume They Will Never Face Justice | Common Dreams

Time has a way of catching up with scientific falsehoods—and so too for those who peddle them.

www.commondreams.org

We must jail the deniers the science is settled..

But you know, sometimes science corrects itself.That's how science works

Some group of folks needs to go to jail, or in front of a firing squad, and it isn't the "deniers."

 

[EMH]

sometimes science corrects itself

which first requires a US AG who isn't a traitor, and we've had traitors from 2007 through April...

 

[Rumpole]

That's what science does it corrects itself
Are you f****** kidding me with that b*******?You f****** romper room retard
you sound like a f****** 8-year-old a child an idiot child


Your sources have no credibility Whatsoever
theyve been lying for decades

I would go back a page and look and read the article about the damage done.And the b******* spread on purpose.

So what you're saying is that we were right all along . That's what you're saying.

Since we believe in real science, objective science....

And since the left kept insisting that the science was settled, you can't unsettle settled science....But now you're saying it's not settled, was it settled?Or it's not settled, it wasn't settled.It was b*******
For decades, you've been screaming at the top of your f****** lungs.
Scaring children wasting billions upon billions upon billions
Just like that
Settled ....to not settled
You can't have it both ways you blowhard who you trying to convince ?yourself?
Rotflmao

Dance around it all you want.The settled science is unsettled, just like that

Do you have a college college degree ?piss on it...
Your daddy wasted his money

They're so ignorant
They're so stupid
You're probably a democratic socialist aren't you?
You believe you're smart enough to understand
You believe your credentialed experts will lead you to utopia
Like a green utopia

Socialists have the worst environmental records of all time
Just like their body counts that range into the hundreds of millions.
Hitler mao stalin pol pot Castro

When it comes to destroying the environment, nobody does it better than a backwards useful idiot socialist
History is my proof
The leftards are ignorant.They live in fantasy land
why you even on my thread? spewing complete and utter meaningless b*******

Was the science settled?The science was settled.Your experts said it was settled.You believed like a f****** moron that you are

They're pathetic,
Sad and pathetic
Is there any wonder why they're all antidepressant Swilling retards

I'm sorry, as a general rule, I do not engage with soporific and sophomoric troll talk which doesn't rise about vacuous drivel.

 

[westwall]

I'm sorry, as a general rule, I do not engage with soporific and sophomoric troll talk which doesn't rise about vacuous drivel.

So stop doing it.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

I'm sorry, as a general rule, I do not engage with soporific and sophomoric troll talk which doesn't rise about vacuous drivel.

Look in the mirror

When the mirror speaks, the brainwashed reflection lies...
What would skinny bob say!?!.....tisk tisk tisk
Go over to the hissy fit superblowhard "adult" romper room thread

Another "credentialed " "adult " is having a panic attack over his shaken faith
Hes having a real hard time convincing himself overthere

I found it rather amusing.
And maybe you can bring him a support stuffed animal or something...?
You lifelong parasitic university types like that, don't you?
After you two yeast infections are done blowing each other.Maybe you could curl each other's hair before heading over to the kindergarten to scare the s*** out of them with tales of the co²ming rapture...

You'll be going to visit the kindergarten by sustainable enviro-feminist friendly means ?