Anything a climatologist says, is controversial. All of it. Too much of what they claim is couched in "weasel words" such as "could", "suggests", "may", "might" etc.
Failing to recognize globarming warmingism as a scam shows a lack of intelligent awareness.
It's the same group of people who were running around like complete maskholes during covid.
wattsupwiththat.com
The Scale of the Damage: By the Numbers
Here is what makes this moment so extraordinary — and so damning. According to data compiled by Roger Pielke Jr. using Google Scholar, between 2018 and 2021 alone, approximately 17,000 academic papers were published using RCP 8.5. Another 16,900 followed in the subsequent three-year period — meaning the usage of the scenario barely slowed even as its flaws became widely known inside the scientific community.
Those academic papers did not stay in journals. Science “journalism” amplified them. Each alarming study generated news articles, television segments, radio reports, social media posts, and classroom curricula. Conservative estimates suggest that the total number of media articles worldwide referencing RCP 8.5 projections — directly or through the studies that used it — runs into the hundreds of thousands, possibly approaching a million pieces of content over the scenario’s two-decade lifespan. Every one of them carried some version of the same message: this is where we are headed.
Pielke Jr. put it plainly: “Tens of thousands of research papers have been — and continue to be — published using these scenarios, a similar number of media headlines have amplified their findings, and governments and international organizations have built these implausible scenarios into policy and regulation. We now know that all of this is built on a foundation of sand.”
A foundation of sand. That is not a skeptic talking. That is one of the most widely cited climate researchers in the world — writing at The American Enterprise Institute — describing what happened on the scientific establishment’s watch.
The policy consequences of that foundation of sand cannot be overstated. RCP 8.5 provided the scientific cover for policies that, by any honest description, amount to government seizure of the energy economy — the kind of top-down control over production, consumption, and individual choice that previous generations would have recognized as socialism by another name. Mandated vehicle eliminations, forced retirement of power plants, prohibitions on gas appliances, trillion-dollar ‘transition’ spending programs — all of it justified, ultimately, by impact studies running a scenario the scientific community has now declared impossible.
A Generation of Kids Thinks They Have No Future. Science Just Admitted Why. - Watts Up With That?
The "most significant development in climate research in decades," has an ugly side.
Decades long brain ****
The left (and their neocon partners in crime) MUST give up the "climate change" narrative if they're to usher in their mega-data-centers which require lots of "fossil fuels" to run the generators required to power them. They also require lots of water to cool the heat-generating plants.
mepacademy.com
The left (and their neocon partners in crime) MUST give up the "climate change" narrative if they're to usher in their mega-data-centers which require lots of "fossil fuels" to run the generators required to power them. They also require lots of water to cool the heat-generating plants.
Bye, bye climate change -- hello heat generating, intrusive, Big Government data centers.
How Data Centers Work: Power, Cooling, and Infrastructure Explained - MEP Academy
Learn how data centers work, including power systems, cooling methods, redundancy design, and the infrastructure that keeps servers running.
Lordy, lordy. The fellow who says that almost all the scientists in the world are on the take from the people that make renewables who have maybe 1% as much capital as the fossil fuel capitalists says he supports the scientific method. What a laugh. What the satellites of many nations have observed in the last 47 years is not evidence according to Westwall. The temperatures recorded around the world is not evidence according to Westwall. The scientific experiments from the time of Tyndall is not evidence according to Westwall. What is evidence according to Westwall is the demented maundering for a senile President. LOL
Bullshit. Solar, wind, and storage can be built far quicker and at less cost than fossil fuel generators, and far, far faster than nukes, and at far less cost than nuked. And it looks like it is your MAGAt Epstein billionaires that are building these data centers.The left (and their neocon partners in crime) MUST give up the "climate change" narrative if they're to usher in their mega-data-centers which require lots of "fossil fuels" to run the generators required to power them. They also require lots of water to cool the heat-generating plants.
Bye, bye climate change -- hello heat generating, intrusive, Big Government data centers.
How Data Centers Work: Power, Cooling, and Infrastructure Explained - MEP Academy
Learn how data centers work, including power systems, cooling methods, redundancy design, and the infrastructure that keeps servers running.
Ah well, you caint fix stupid. DY is truly unfixable.
Here we are at 424 ppm in 2026, seems to be right on the 8.5 timeline. I certainly hope that the efforts made by nations that are investing heavily in renewables will take us off that line. However, even on a lower line, like that forecast by Dr. Hansen, we are seeing major climatic events as that much faster rate than we saw 20 years ago.The Scale of the Damage: By the Numbers
Here is what makes this moment so extraordinary — and so damning. According to data compiled by Roger Pielke Jr. using Google Scholar, between 2018 and 2021 alone, approximately 17,000 academic papers were published using RCP 8.5. Another 16,900 followed in the subsequent three-year period — meaning the usage of the scenario barely slowed even as its flaws became widely known inside the scientific community.
Those academic papers did not stay in journals. Science “journalism” amplified them. Each alarming study generated news articles, television segments, radio reports, social media posts, and classroom curricula. Conservative estimates suggest that the total number of media articles worldwide referencing RCP 8.5 projections — directly or through the studies that used it — runs into the hundreds of thousands, possibly approaching a million pieces of content over the scenario’s two-decade lifespan. Every one of them carried some version of the same message: this is where we are headed.
Pielke Jr. put it plainly: “Tens of thousands of research papers have been — and continue to be — published using these scenarios, a similar number of media headlines have amplified their findings, and governments and international organizations have built these implausible scenarios into policy and regulation. We now know that all of this is built on a foundation of sand.”
A foundation of sand. That is not a skeptic talking. That is one of the most widely cited climate researchers in the world — writing at The American Enterprise Institute — describing what happened on the scientific establishment’s watch.
The policy consequences of that foundation of sand cannot be overstated. RCP 8.5 provided the scientific cover for policies that, by any honest description, amount to government seizure of the energy economy — the kind of top-down control over production, consumption, and individual choice that previous generations would have recognized as socialism by another name. Mandated vehicle eliminations, forced retirement of power plants, prohibitions on gas appliances, trillion-dollar ‘transition’ spending programs — all of it justified, ultimately, by impact studies running a scenario the scientific community has now declared impossible.
A Generation of Kids Thinks They Have No Future. Science Just Admitted Why. - Watts Up With That?
The "most significant development in climate research in decades," has an ugly side.
Decades long brain ****
Yada yada yada, appeals to authority are logic fails, silly boy.
Nor will he ever.
You were flat out lied toand mislead ..... made out to be a jerk off by those who took ya for a ride yet you still believe
