The AGW cult next target : Outlaw meat

Wyatt earp

Diamond Member
Apr 21, 2012
69,975
16,412
2,180
So they are saying the earth can only hold 3 billion more people? Another retarded prediction...

How many people can the Earth actually hold?



Live Science notes:


One such scientist, the eminent Harvard University sociobiologist Edward O. Wilson, bases his estimate on calculations of the Earth's available resources. As Wilson pointed out in his book "The Future of Life", "The constraints of the biosphere are fixed."

Aside from the limited availability of freshwater, there are indeed constraints on the amount of food that Earth can produce, just as Malthus argued more than 200 years ago. Even in the case of maximum efficiency, in which all the grains grown are dedicated to feeding humans (instead of livestock, which is an inefficient way to convert plant energy into food energy), there's still a limit to how far the available quantities can stretch. "If everyone agreed to become vegetarian, leaving little or nothing for livestock, the present 1.4 billion hectares of arable land (3.5 billion acres) would support about 10 billion people," Wilson wrote.
 
I wonder what would come first, Steaks and ham from Mars or the Star trek replicator?




.
 
If the Nazis had have won, the non western countries wouldnt have had the population growth because we support their children.

we would also have colonized space. As things are, we are in for a crucible.
 
Bear, nothing in your OP talked about outlawing meat.

So, what's your excuse for this hysterical thread? Was it deliberate dishonesty on your part, or just stupidity?
 
Bear, nothing in your OP talked about outlawing meat.

So, what's your excuse for this hysterical thread? Was it deliberate dishonesty on your part, or just stupidity?


That is the M.O. do you or do you not disagree?

It has always been ulterior motives with the left , the ends justify the means always, Do you seriously think 10 billion people would suddenly decide to become vegetarians ?



.
 
Bear, nothing in your OP talked about outlawing meat.

So, what's your excuse for this hysterical thread? Was it deliberate dishonesty on your part, or just stupidity?

Besides mamooth you know If I wrote a boring headline no one would read it.

I still don't get why someone would say the earth could hold only 3 billion more people when anyone with a brain would understand their is yet to be technology to invent.


.
 
Eventually the wealthy elite will have all the guns, all the good food, the wine, the beer the soda, etc. We the peasants will be forced to eat gruel and drink water.....that is if we're even allowed to live that is. The wealthy elite really don't like people in general. A mass murder is their ultimate goal.
 
The op missed the most important thing that many people living that close together will have the same effect as too many rats in a cage.
 
Mamooth was correct. The OP's article made absolutely no mention of anyone banning meat. You people are going to become famous for your stupid. Although I loved Westwall's comment that the leftist elite will eventually have all the good soda.
 
So they are saying the earth can only hold 3 billion more people? Another retarded prediction...

How many people can the Earth actually hold?



Live Science notes:


One such scientist, the eminent Harvard University sociobiologist Edward O. Wilson, bases his estimate on calculations of the Earth's available resources. As Wilson pointed out in his book "The Future of Life", "The constraints of the biosphere are fixed."

Aside from the limited availability of freshwater, there are indeed constraints on the amount of food that Earth can produce, just as Malthus argued more than 200 years ago. Even in the case of maximum efficiency, in which all the grains grown are dedicated to feeding humans (instead of livestock, which is an inefficient way to convert plant energy into food energy), there's still a limit to how far the available quantities can stretch. "If everyone agreed to become vegetarian, leaving little or nothing for livestock, the present 1.4 billion hectares of arable land (3.5 billion acres) would support about 10 billion people," Wilson wrote.

They already have on a huge scale.. Just try getting permits to have a farm. Or to have cattle.. Regulations have made it all but impossible to operate a farm and have killed many farms here in the west the last five years. Why do you think beef has jumped to over $5.00 a pound the last three years.
 
Mamooth was correct. The OP's article made absolutely no mention of anyone banning meat. You people are going to become famous for your stupid. Although I loved Westwall's comment that the leftist elite will eventually have all the good soda.
Regulating them to death isn't banning...????. In a liberal fools mind that might be correct but in the real world the government inhibiting the production is....

What an ignorant fool you are..
 
Last edited:
Eventually the wealthy elite will have all the guns, all the good food, the wine, the beer the soda, etc. We the peasants will be forced to eat gruel and drink water.....that is if we're even allowed to live that is. The wealthy elite really don't like people in general. A mass murder is their ultimate goal.
Isn't the socialism and fascism of the left grand...

History proves this point over and over again but the useful idiots abound and hide the lies from those around them until its to late for them. those same useful idiots think they will be left untouched when the fascists kill off the populace. Those useful idiots will also meet the wall and bullets that they assisted the elites in doing, they just dont know it yet...

History repeating itself and fools believing they will be untouched helping out..
 
I'm curious as to how the good stuff (like soda) will be reserved for the leftist elite. Are conservatives going to be collected into ghettos and forced to wear red C armbands at all times? Will drivers licenses carry our political allegiance?

You people are just SO fucking stupid.
 

Forum List

Back
Top