Constitutional Rights Have Limits

You always were boring and evidently choose to remain forever boring. If you ever choose to admit that I proved you wrong at every turn, maybe I’ll agree to chat with you further. Or maybe not.
Yawn
 
If he would just stick to the debate that's fine but he loses and then makes it personal
I destroyed every argument you offered. As you know. And if you seek refuge in the arms of a loser like meager, that’s on you vegetable.
 
If he would just stick to the debate that's fine but he loses and then makes it personal

He doesn't want to actually debate, since most of the debates he has lost.
He's argued that the dictionary definitions of words are "WRONG". And that the definition he made up is the correct one.

The guy just likes to argue, but is short on the facts to win a debate.
 
He doesn't want to actually debate, since most of the debates he has lost.
He's argued that the dictionary definitions of words are "WRONG". And that the definition he made up is the correct one.

The guy just likes to argue, but is short on the facts to win a debate.
He argues like a baby. Lol
 
You always were boring and evidently choose to remain forever boring. If you ever choose to admit that I proved you wrong at every turn, maybe I’ll agree to chat with you further. Or maybe not.
You didn't prove him wrong, in fact, I proved you wrong. At least according to "google" finding zero results for fetus murder convictions.
 
Don't let facts stop you from continuing to claim victory.
 
You always were boring and evidently choose to remain forever boring. If you ever choose to admit that I proved you wrong at every turn, maybe I’ll agree to chat with you further. Or maybe not.



Don't bother. It's a full blown troll. Don't feed it.
 
You didn't prove him wrong, in fact, I proved you wrong. At least according to "google" finding zero results for fetus murder convictions.
As usual, you failed. But I already pointed out at least one example. Do some real homework.
 
The guarrantee of freedom of religion does not cover human sacrifice or multiple wives or use of dangerous drugs.

The right to bear arms does not cover bombs or machine guns or flame throwers or artillery. Private citizens may not own fighter jets or missiles.

The right of free speech does not protect Perjury, Obstruction of justice, extortion, obscenity or liable or slander.

These limits set forth in statutes or case law.

You were, like, pregnant and missed civics class...right?
 
Hint bitch. It’s in this thread. Damn, but you’re an asshole, meager.
That means you didn't cite it. So you have no idea if the citation is real or a parody.

Do us both a favor and cite / link to the post.
 
You were, like, pregnant and missed civics class...right?
The supreme court often said that rights are not unfettered. That any right is not unlimited, and that the government with a "compelling government interest" can place limits on them.
 
That means you didn't cite it. So you have no idea if the citation is real or a parody.

Do us both a favor and cite / link to the post.
Wrong. Try harder you dolt.

I’ll even give you one hint you lazy shit. He pled out.
 
Back
Top Bottom