Hi I join you and others on this goal. I believe both the liberal and conservative minds on this board can do well to represent the same issues and conflicts facing all other people and parties. This is a pretty good mix, and we need to assess honestly where we agree and where we cannot compromise and must separate beliefs and not impose.
1. organization by party, finding 2-3 participants per region, party or state,
such as one more liberal, one more conservative, and one able to mediate where there is conflict
2. picking key topics to write an example resolution to resolve. We can still focus overall on the Constitution in general, but instead of getting lost on theoretics or general rules,
why not show by direct application how to address key conflicts not being resolved:
A. gay marriage - how can we word laws to be neutral, or write resolutions where people agree to separate their views, quit imposing, seek mediation and local solutions that we understand can vary, and quit trying to mandate one solution for a whole state or nation
B. health care - right to life, right to choose, right to health care or singlepayer, right to free market, how can we preserve the equal integrity of all these ways and not deny any one.
C. legalization and immigration policies, restitution from crimes reinvested in building sustainable programs such as microlending to end poverty or reliance on govt welfare
D. death penalty, treatment of criminal illness and prison/restorative justice reform
E. crediting taxpayers or collecting back debts from corporate or other criminal abuse of government resources, possibly using the educational system or federal reserve system to track work-study credits or settlement of debts, damages, restitution owed to the public
F. shifting labor/production back to the US or US/mexican border; developing school, military, hospital or prison complexes to secure the border while creating jobs providing access to education, training and services. these developing areas can be used to prepare future leaders for office, providing on site training, where funding goes directly into developing, managing and leading solutions instead of spending millions on campaigns.
The work and leadership experience can be through a structured track for training any citizen to work at any level of public service or office, so it is equal opportunity; and this can be done as part of setting up tracks for citizenship for immigrants or convicts in recovery.
3. contacting leaders or candidates who want to run for office, and set up teams and programs around solutions they develop to demonstrate effective govt reforms, so they can use that to promote themselves careerwise for office. instead of competing candidates spending 2 to 3 times as much to run for the same offices, we can create dual positions so there are jobs for all leaders to gain experience and run for higher office based on their actual work and skills collaborating with different parties while enforcing Constutitional principles and process that are central to all of them. we would compete to be more effective leaders in collaboration and cost effective reforms instead of competing to bully each other in the media with propaganda that has nothing to do with solving the conflicts.
4. setting up a third level of laws and system of checks, balances and redressing grievances based on Constitutional grievances, and addressing these separately from the civil and criminal laws, in order to settle all conflicts of political beliefs by mediation and consensus.
there can be representation by party, and tracks for training people in mediation, and resolving conflicts and objections, so this becomes the norm in deciding public policy.
Fellow Conservatives, Constitutionalists, Freedom Lovers, and Free Market Advocates:
I'm interested in creating a dialogue concerning America's young minds and what common-sense Americans can do to reach our youth before it's too late. The progressive left has done a really good job reaching America's youth and convincing many of them that the Constitution is an outdated, irrelevant document written by a bunch of dead dudes.
Young Americans are starving for truth and direction. Most have no any idea what the Constitution is and why it was created in the first place. Today's "American History" professors and teachers go out of their way to point out what was wrong with the founders and totally gloss over why America was formed in the first place. Kids are little sponges waiting to soak up the truth.
The Libs have the mainstream media and Hollywood on their side but not all is lost. Social media does level the playing field to a degree. Better yet, Conservatives have truth on our side and truth has a tendency to shed light on the facts and kids aren't stupid. When they're presented with the truth they can see through the B.S. presented by the confused left.
I'm asking for ideas. What's the best way to reach America's young with the truth and how could we best implement your good ideas, collectively speaking? We need to be as aggressive as the enemy. Please share your thoughts.
we also have to have mechanisms in place to include and mediate with people of opposing views so we don't stay divided as political enemies. That is one thing in private but public policy should be based on equal representation and decisions that all sides agree are central. we cannot learn how to solve these conflicts if we keep demonizing each other as the enemy to avoid or cut out of the process. we need to face conflicts head on, and either ackonwledge they are beliefs that don't belong in public policy, or else resolve our issues.
training and assistance in conflict resolution mediation, consensus decision making
should be provided if people are going to participate fully and equally in democratic due process.
Ralph Nader wrote the OSHA legislation that sets up a grievance process, based on the OSHA standards; so citizens can model a similar system using the Constitution, Amendments and Code of Ethics as the principles to redress conflicts of interests or clashes in beliefs in order to reach a Constitutional solution that satisfied all the objections.
the liberal progressives have pushed for a cabinet level Peace department, but I suggested expanding the Justice Dept to be the Dept of Peace and Justice to include mediation and redressing grievances through the Senate judiciary committee concerning religious, political or corporate abuse of public resources, govt or collective authority.
the Greens have systems of consensus decision making, issuing independent currency and managing local business or health care coops, and proportional representation per party.
if we take the best ideas from different parties, we can create a network similar to the senate with reps from different parties instead of states, and address key issues that each party specializes in researching the problems and solutions. we can't cut out objections and expect to solve these problems. we must include all people in order to settle the conflicts.