CO2 Isn't Warming the Seas (It Can't)

[excalibur]

So, the *new* talking point for climate alarmists is warm water in the seas. But! CO2 cannot be responsible. So, after that WaPo accidently lurched into reality, watch the warming oceans/seas meme die.

 

[excalibur]

 

[WEATHER53]

We are finally looking into where the problem most likely comes from. Undersea volcanos and magma fissures frequently 3-5 miles deep

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

We are finally looking into where the problem most likely comes from. Undersea volcanos and magma fissures frequently 3-5 miles deep

That’s caused by racism and white supremacy.

 

[WEATHER53]

That’s caused by racism and white supremacy.

And Trump

 

[Votto]

So, the *new* talking point for climate alarmists is warm water in the seas. But! CO2 cannot be responsible. So, after that WaPo accidently lurched into reality, watch the warming oceans/seas meme die.

I think I found the culprit of the ocean warming thingy

And just after one swim.

 

[sealybobo]

So, the *new* talking point for climate alarmists is warm water in the seas. But! CO2 cannot be responsible. So, after that WaPo accidently lurched into reality, watch the warming oceans/seas meme die.

Delay as the New Denial: The Latest Republican Tactic to Block Climate Action​

The party has largely moved beyond denying the existence of climate change but continues to oppose dramatic action to halt it, worried about the short-term economic consequences.

One hundred million Americans from Arizona to Boston are under heat emergency warnings, and the drought in the West is nearing Dust Bowl proportions. Britain declared a national emergency as temperatures soared above 100 degrees Fahrenheit and parts of blistering Europe are ablaze.

But on Capitol Hill this week, Republicans were warning against rash action in response to the burning planet.

“I don’t want to be lectured about what we need to do to destroy our economy in the name of climate change,” said Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina.

Few Republicans in Congress now outwardly dismiss the scientific evidence that human activities — the burning of oil, gas and coal — have produced gases that are dangerously heating the Earth.

But for many, denial of the cause of global temperature rise has been replaced by an insistence that the solution — replacing fossil fuels over time with wind, solar and other nonpolluting energy sources — will hurt the economy.

In short, delay is the new denial.

Overwhelmingly, Republicans on Capitol Hill say that they believe that the United States should be drilling and burning more American oil, gas and coal, and that market forces would somehow develop solutions to the carbon dioxide that has been building in the atmosphere, trapping heat like a blanket around a sweltering Earth.

“I’m not in a position to tell you what the solution is, but for the president to shut down the production of oil and gas in the United States is not going to help,” said Senator Mike Crapo, Republican of Idaho.

President Biden is not proposing to shut down fossil fuel production. He wants to use tax credits and other incentives to speed up the development of wind, solar, and other low-carbon energy, and to make electric vehicles more affordable.

The fact that scientists say nations must quickly cut greenhouse gas emissions or global rising temperatures will reach catastrophic levels does not appear to faze many conservatives.

In many ways, elected Republicans mirror the views of their voters. A May poll commissioned by Pew Research Center found 63 percent of Democrats named climate change as a very big problem, while just 16 percent of Republicans felt the same.

Delay as the New Denial: The Latest Republican Tactic to Block Climate Action (Published 2022)

The party has largely moved beyond denying the existence of climate change but continues to oppose dramatic action to halt it, worried about the short-term economic consequences.

www.nytimes.com

 

[WEATHER53]

Delay as the New Denial: The Latest Republican Tactic to Block Climate Action​

The party has largely moved beyond denying the existence of climate change but continues to oppose dramatic action to halt it, worried about the short-term economic consequences.

One hundred million Americans from Arizona to Boston are under heat emergency warnings, and the drought in the West is nearing Dust Bowl proportions. Britain declared a national emergency as temperatures soared above 100 degrees Fahrenheit and parts of blistering Europe are ablaze.

But on Capitol Hill this week, Republicans were warning against rash action in response to the burning planet.

“I don’t want to be lectured about what we need to do to destroy our economy in the name of climate change,” said Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina.

Few Republicans in Congress now outwardly dismiss the scientific evidence that human activities — the burning of oil, gas and coal — have produced gases that are dangerously heating the Earth.

But for many, denial of the cause of global temperature rise has been replaced by an insistence that the solution — replacing fossil fuels over time with wind, solar and other nonpolluting energy sources — will hurt the economy.

In short, delay is the new denial.

Overwhelmingly, Republicans on Capitol Hill say that they believe that the United States should be drilling and burning more American oil, gas and coal, and that market forces would somehow develop solutions to the carbon dioxide that has been building in the atmosphere, trapping heat like a blanket around a sweltering Earth.

“I’m not in a position to tell you what the solution is, but for the president to shut down the production of oil and gas in the United States is not going to help,” said Senator Mike Crapo, Republican of Idaho.

President Biden is not proposing to shut down fossil fuel production. He wants to use tax credits and other incentives to speed up the development of wind, solar, and other low-carbon energy, and to make electric vehicles more affordable.

The fact that scientists say nations must quickly cut greenhouse gas emissions or global rising temperatures will reach catastrophic levels does not appear to faze many conservatives.

In many ways, elected Republicans mirror the views of their voters. A May poll commissioned by Pew Research Center found 63 percent of Democrats named climate change as a very big problem, while just 16 percent of Republicans felt the same.

Delay as the New Denial: The Latest Republican Tactic to Block Climate Action (Published 2022)

The party has largely moved beyond denying the existence of climate change but continues to oppose dramatic action to halt it, worried about the short-term economic consequences.

www.nytimes.com

We think and tell the truth thereof.
You have punitive ambitions that you feel need to be adopted by all. That’s your wish.

 

[BlindBoo]

You got it all wrong, the new breaking news in the Climate Change (or not) war is the dreaded AMOC and it's impending collapse. A new study say it may be sooner than they use to think, maybe!!! We can confirm that there is a chance it might happen.............most likely though it will be in the next century. But who's gonna click on that?

https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/25/world/gulf-stream-atlantic-current-collapse-climate-scn-intl/index.html

"Atlantic Meridional Overturning Current – of which the Gulf Stream is a part – could collapse around the middle of the century, or even as early as 2025."

 

[TheGreatSatan]

If democrats believed in global warming and rising sea levels, they would sell off their coastal properties.

If Obama believes the seas were rising, why would he buy property he knew would be gone in 10 years?

 

[WEATHER53]

You got it all wrong, the new breaking news in the Climate Change (or not) war is the dreaded AMOC and it's impending collapse. A new study say it may be sooner than they use to think, maybe!!! We can confirm that there is a chance it might happen.............most likely though it will be in the next century. But who's gonna click on that?

https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/25/world/gulf-stream-atlantic-current-collapse-climate-scn-intl/index.html

"Atlantic Meridional Overturning Current – of which the Gulf Stream is a part – could collapse around the middle of the century, or even as early as 2025."

The Gulf Stream being drastically altered has been discussed in the weather community for over 20 years. The oceans overwhelming the east coast has been proffered for 50 years by mostly media.
Neither has happened

 

[The Duke]

The Gulf Stream being drastically altered has been discussed in the weather community for over 20 years. The oceans overwhelming the east coast has been proffered for 50 years by mostly media.
Neither has happened

They were talking impending Ice Age in my day.

Ofc they didn't have a big megaphone then. TIME and NewsWeek magazine, though.

 

[BlindBoo]

The Gulf Stream being drastically altered has been discussed in the weather community for over 20 years. The oceans overwhelming the east coast has been proffered for 50 years by mostly media.
Neither has happened

Yeah we all saw The Day After Tomorrow. It hasn't stopped the flood of studies with at least a worst case scenario, like this one, which certain alarmist will surely latch onto. This one is not just about the Gulf Stream. It's all of the interconnected currents. Oh Great Noodles, help us!

 

[BlindBoo]

They were talking impending Ice Age in my day.

Ofc they didn't have a big megaphone then. TIME magazine, though.

Time and Newsweek used the headline to sell magazines after a few cold winters.

 

[excalibur]

Delay as the New Denial: The Latest Republican Tactic to Block Climate Action​

The party has largely moved beyond denying the existence of climate change but continues to oppose dramatic action to halt it, worried about the short-term economic consequences.

One hundred million Americans from Arizona to Boston are under heat emergency warnings, and the drought in the West is nearing Dust Bowl proportions. Britain declared a national emergency as temperatures soared above 100 degrees Fahrenheit and parts of blistering Europe are ablaze.

But on Capitol Hill this week, Republicans were warning against rash action in response to the burning planet.

“I don’t want to be lectured about what we need to do to destroy our economy in the name of climate change,” said Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina.

Few Republicans in Congress now outwardly dismiss the scientific evidence that human activities — the burning of oil, gas and coal — have produced gases that are dangerously heating the Earth.

But for many, denial of the cause of global temperature rise has been replaced by an insistence that the solution — replacing fossil fuels over time with wind, solar and other nonpolluting energy sources — will hurt the economy.

In short, delay is the new denial.

Overwhelmingly, Republicans on Capitol Hill say that they believe that the United States should be drilling and burning more American oil, gas and coal, and that market forces would somehow develop solutions to the carbon dioxide that has been building in the atmosphere, trapping heat like a blanket around a sweltering Earth.

“I’m not in a position to tell you what the solution is, but for the president to shut down the production of oil and gas in the United States is not going to help,” said Senator Mike Crapo, Republican of Idaho.

President Biden is not proposing to shut down fossil fuel production. He wants to use tax credits and other incentives to speed up the development of wind, solar, and other low-carbon energy, and to make electric vehicles more affordable.

The fact that scientists say nations must quickly cut greenhouse gas emissions or global rising temperatures will reach catastrophic levels does not appear to faze many conservatives.

In many ways, elected Republicans mirror the views of their voters. A May poll commissioned by Pew Research Center found 63 percent of Democrats named climate change as a very big problem, while just 16 percent of Republicans felt the same.

Delay as the New Denial: The Latest Republican Tactic to Block Climate Action (Published 2022)

The party has largely moved beyond denying the existence of climate change but continues to oppose dramatic action to halt it, worried about the short-term economic consequences.

www.nytimes.com

 

[excalibur]

If democrats believed in global warming and rising sea levels, they would sell off their coastal properties.

If Obama believes the seas were rising, why would he buy property he knew would be gone in 10 years?

Well, didn't his chef drown? Øbama can claim climate change did it!

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Well, didn't his chef drown? Øbama can claim climate change did it!

The sea level rose so fast, Obama couldn't rescue his chef.

 

[The Duke]

Well, didn't his chef drown? Øbama can claim climate change did it!

 

[sealybobo]

If democrats believed in global warming and rising sea levels, they would sell off their coastal properties.

If Obama believes the seas were rising, why would he buy property he knew would be gone in 10 years?

All those mansions are tornado proof with solar power.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

All those mansions are tornado proof with solar power.

If the sea level rises like democrats believe it will, Will the mansion survive underwater?