CNN: Ruth Bader Ginsburg Is The Face of The Trump Resistance

[Weatherman2020]

How Ruth Bader Ginsburg became the face of Trump resistance - CNNPolitics


RECUSAL REQUIRED: 28 U.S.C. 455: ” Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”

Toss her ass in prison if she doesn’t.

 

[OldLady]

How Ruth Bader Ginsburg became the face of Trump resistance - CNNPolitics


RECUSAL REQUIRED: 28 U.S.C. 455: ” Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”

Toss her ass in prison if she doesn’t.

I'm sorry she's been branded like this by CNN. It brings an intelligent, competent woman down into the political gutter. She is to be admired for what she has accomplished. She's no lightweight, her size notwithstanding.
Everyone should just leave her be.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

She keeps dozing off in the heat of battle

 

[toobfreak]

How Ruth Bader Ginsburg became the face of Trump resistance - CNNPolitics


RECUSAL REQUIRED: 28 U.S.C. 455: ” Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”

Toss her ass in prison if she doesn’t.

I'm sorry she's been branded like this by CNN. It brings an intelligent, competent woman down into the political gutter. She is to be admired for what she has accomplished. She's no lightweight, her size notwithstanding.
Everyone should just leave her be.

I'm sorry but RBG has already disqualified herself based on past statements SHE made. If she were a juror in a simple trial, she'd already be disqualified on the basis of preexisting prejudice.

 

[Manonthestreet]

A very leathered vet of hate...

 

[Weatherman2020]

How Ruth Bader Ginsburg became the face of Trump resistance - CNNPolitics


RECUSAL REQUIRED: 28 U.S.C. 455: ” Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”

Toss her ass in prison if she doesn’t.

I'm sorry she's been branded like this by CNN. It brings an intelligent, competent woman down into the political gutter. She is to be admired for what she has accomplished. She's no lightweight, her size notwithstanding.
Everyone should just leave her be.

“I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president. For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.”

- RUTH BADER GINSBERG

 

[OldLady]

How Ruth Bader Ginsburg became the face of Trump resistance - CNNPolitics


RECUSAL REQUIRED: 28 U.S.C. 455: ” Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”

Toss her ass in prison if she doesn’t.

I'm sorry she's been branded like this by CNN. It brings an intelligent, competent woman down into the political gutter. She is to be admired for what she has accomplished. She's no lightweight, her size notwithstanding.
Everyone should just leave her be.

“I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president. For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.”

- RUTH BADER GINSBERG

She is a liberal. She knows the court will be changed for a generation when Trump gives it a conservative majority. As a liberal, she does not relish that.
So what is your problem?

 

[Weatherman2020]

How Ruth Bader Ginsburg became the face of Trump resistance - CNNPolitics


RECUSAL REQUIRED: 28 U.S.C. 455: ” Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”

Toss her ass in prison if she doesn’t.

I'm sorry she's been branded like this by CNN. It brings an intelligent, competent woman down into the political gutter. She is to be admired for what she has accomplished. She's no lightweight, her size notwithstanding.
Everyone should just leave her be.

“I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president. For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.”

- RUTH BADER GINSBERG

She is a liberal. She knows the court will be changed for a generation when Trump gives it a conservative majority. As a liberal, she does not relish that.
So what is your problem?

She has taken a political position against Trump.

Completely unethical.

 

[OldLady]

How Ruth Bader Ginsburg became the face of Trump resistance - CNNPolitics


RECUSAL REQUIRED: 28 U.S.C. 455: ” Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”

Toss her ass in prison if she doesn’t.

I'm sorry she's been branded like this by CNN. It brings an intelligent, competent woman down into the political gutter. She is to be admired for what she has accomplished. She's no lightweight, her size notwithstanding.
Everyone should just leave her be.

“I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president. For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.”

- RUTH BADER GINSBERG

She is a liberal. She knows the court will be changed for a generation when Trump gives it a conservative majority. As a liberal, she does not relish that.
So what is your problem?

She has taken a political position against Trump.

Completely unethical.

I think you are being overly sensitive and grasping at any straw to keep a jurist from rendering an opinion. Good luck with that.

 

[Weatherman2020]

How Ruth Bader Ginsburg became the face of Trump resistance - CNNPolitics


RECUSAL REQUIRED: 28 U.S.C. 455: ” Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”

Toss her ass in prison if she doesn’t.

I'm sorry she's been branded like this by CNN. It brings an intelligent, competent woman down into the political gutter. She is to be admired for what she has accomplished. She's no lightweight, her size notwithstanding.
Everyone should just leave her be.

“I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president. For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.”

- RUTH BADER GINSBERG

She is a liberal. She knows the court will be changed for a generation when Trump gives it a conservative majority. As a liberal, she does not relish that.
So what is your problem?

She has taken a political position against Trump.

Completely unethical.

I think you are being overly sensitive and grasping at any straw to keep a jurist from rendering an opinion. Good luck with that.

Judges NEVER taken their politics to the public circle. Your support of unethical judges fits right into your leftist views.

 

[OldLady]

I'm sorry she's been branded like this by CNN. It brings an intelligent, competent woman down into the political gutter. She is to be admired for what she has accomplished. She's no lightweight, her size notwithstanding.
Everyone should just leave her be.

“I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president. For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.”

- RUTH BADER GINSBERG

She is a liberal. She knows the court will be changed for a generation when Trump gives it a conservative majority. As a liberal, she does not relish that.
So what is your problem?

She has taken a political position against Trump.

Completely unethical.

I think you are being overly sensitive and grasping at any straw to keep a jurist from rendering an opinion. Good luck with that.

Judges NEVER taken their politics to the public circle. Your support of unethical judges fits right into your leftist views.

Your support of throwing all "leftists" in prison fits right in with yours.

 

[toobfreak]

How Ruth Bader Ginsburg became the face of Trump resistance - CNNPolitics


RECUSAL REQUIRED: 28 U.S.C. 455: ” Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”

Toss her ass in prison if she doesn’t.

I'm sorry she's been branded like this by CNN. It brings an intelligent, competent woman down into the political gutter. She is to be admired for what she has accomplished. She's no lightweight, her size notwithstanding.
Everyone should just leave her be.

“I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president. For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.”

- RUTH BADER GINSBERG

She is a liberal. She knows the court will be changed for a generation when Trump gives it a conservative majority. As a liberal, she does not relish that.
So what is your problem?

Oh, nothing K-Lady, except when they vet a new Supreme judge, what do they ask them? Their IMPARTIALITY on every issue so that when they go into a case on any subject: abortion, trade, state's rights, guns, constitution, that they have the ability to look at the facts squarely and judge the case fairly based on the merits of the case! NOT their own personal opinions and preferences. That is the HALLMARK of a good judge. THAT'S ALL.

28 U.S. Code § 455 - Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge

The law requires: “That you are required to recuse yourself in cases in which your ‘impartiality might be reasonably questioned’ and where you have a ‘personal bias or prejudice concerning a party.'”

Other than that, the fact that SHE came forward on her own to basically say that Trump suckled the big one and that she opposed everything he stood for, pretty much tells you what kind of judge she is. If Gorsuch or anyone had said such a thing about Obama during his confirmation, they NEVER would have made it to the bench, and if Gorsuch or another had said such a thing against a democrat president, there would be riots, looting And burning in the streets.

Other than that, Lady, she's ACES.

 

[Weatherman2020]

“I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president. For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.”

- RUTH BADER GINSBERG

She is a liberal. She knows the court will be changed for a generation when Trump gives it a conservative majority. As a liberal, she does not relish that.
So what is your problem?

She has taken a political position against Trump.

Completely unethical.

I think you are being overly sensitive and grasping at any straw to keep a jurist from rendering an opinion. Good luck with that.

Judges NEVER taken their politics to the public circle. Your support of unethical judges fits right into your leftist views.

Your support of throwing all "leftists" in prison fits right in with yours.

The law I posted is there for a reason.

And yes, fascists are dangerous.

 

[OldLady]

She is a liberal. She knows the court will be changed for a generation when Trump gives it a conservative majority. As a liberal, she does not relish that.
So what is your problem?

She has taken a political position against Trump.

Completely unethical.

I think you are being overly sensitive and grasping at any straw to keep a jurist from rendering an opinion. Good luck with that.

Judges NEVER taken their politics to the public circle. Your support of unethical judges fits right into your leftist views.

Your support of throwing all "leftists" in prison fits right in with yours.

The law I posted is there for a reason.

And yes, fascists are dangerous.

Are you calling her a fascist? Because she dared comment on a Republican's potential, significant impact on the Court? A perfect example of fascist being used as a sloppy, inaccurate term for any who oppose you.

She apologized for making that comment. Perhaps she will recuse herself if such a situation occurs. But I don't actually see why she should.

 

[OldLady]

How Ruth Bader Ginsburg became the face of Trump resistance - CNNPolitics


RECUSAL REQUIRED: 28 U.S.C. 455: ” Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”

Toss her ass in prison if she doesn’t.

I'm sorry she's been branded like this by CNN. It brings an intelligent, competent woman down into the political gutter. She is to be admired for what she has accomplished. She's no lightweight, her size notwithstanding.
Everyone should just leave her be.

“I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president. For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.”

- RUTH BADER GINSBERG

She is a liberal. She knows the court will be changed for a generation when Trump gives it a conservative majority. As a liberal, she does not relish that.
So what is your problem?

Oh, nothing K-Lady, except when they vet a new Supreme judge, what do they ask them? Their IMPARTIALITY on every issue so that when they go into a case on any subject: abortion, trade, state's rights, guns, constitution, that they have the ability to look at the facts squarely and judge the case fairly based on the merits of the case! NOT their own personal opinions and preferences. That is the HALLMARK of a good judge. THAT'S ALL.

28 U.S. Code § 455 - Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge

The law requires: “That you are required to recuse yourself in cases in which your ‘impartiality might be reasonably questioned’ and where you have a ‘personal bias or prejudice concerning a party.'”

Other than that, the fact that SHE came forward on her own to basically say that Trump suckled the big one and that he opposed everything he stood for, pretty much tells you what kind of judge she is. If Gorsuch or anyone had said such a thing about Obama during his confirmation, they NEVER would have made it to the bench, and if Gorsuch or another had said such a thing against a democrat president, there would be riots, looting And burning in the streets.

Other than that, Lady, she's ACES.

SHE came forward on her own to basically say that Trump suckled the big one and that he opposed everything he stood for,
Stop putting words in your opponents' mouths. It is dishonest and doesn't further your arguments because it's based on lies.

 

[Weatherman2020]

She has taken a political position against Trump.

Completely unethical.

I think you are being overly sensitive and grasping at any straw to keep a jurist from rendering an opinion. Good luck with that.

Judges NEVER taken their politics to the public circle. Your support of unethical judges fits right into your leftist views.

Your support of throwing all "leftists" in prison fits right in with yours.

The law I posted is there for a reason.

And yes, fascists are dangerous.

Are you calling her a fascist? Because she dared comment on a Republican's potential, significant impact on the Court? A perfect example of fascist being used as a sloppy, inaccurate term for any who oppose you.

She apologized for making that comment. Perhaps she will recuse herself if such a situation occurs. But I don't actually see why she should.

No, you. And anyone who supports unethical judges.

 

[toobfreak]

How Ruth Bader Ginsburg became the face of Trump resistance - CNNPolitics


RECUSAL REQUIRED: 28 U.S.C. 455: ” Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”

Toss her ass in prison if she doesn’t.

I'm sorry she's been branded like this by CNN. It brings an intelligent, competent woman down into the political gutter. She is to be admired for what she has accomplished. She's no lightweight, her size notwithstanding.
Everyone should just leave her be.

“I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president. For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.”

- RUTH BADER GINSBERG

She is a liberal. She knows the court will be changed for a generation when Trump gives it a conservative majority. As a liberal, she does not relish that.
So what is your problem?

Oh, nothing K-Lady, except when they vet a new Supreme judge, what do they ask them? Their IMPARTIALITY on every issue so that when they go into a case on any subject: abortion, trade, state's rights, guns, constitution, that they have the ability to look at the facts squarely and judge the case fairly based on the merits of the case! NOT their own personal opinions and preferences. That is the HALLMARK of a good judge. THAT'S ALL.

28 U.S. Code § 455 - Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge

The law requires: “That you are required to recuse yourself in cases in which your ‘impartiality might be reasonably questioned’ and where you have a ‘personal bias or prejudice concerning a party.'”

Other than that, the fact that SHE came forward on her own to basically say that Trump suckled the big one and that he opposed everything he stood for, pretty much tells you what kind of judge she is. If Gorsuch or anyone had said such a thing about Obama during his confirmation, they NEVER would have made it to the bench, and if Gorsuch or another had said such a thing against a democrat president, there would be riots, looting And burning in the streets.

Other than that, Lady, she's ACES.

SHE came forward on her own to basically say that Trump suckled the big one and that he opposed everything he stood for,
Stop putting words in your opponents' mouths. It is dishonest and doesn't further your arguments because it's based on lies.

Look K-Lady, don't act dumb and waste more of my time. Maybe the words were different, but the MEANING was just the same.

Trump-Hater Ruth Bader Ginsburg Just Got Massive Bad News

The old prune needs to GO. A pine box next to McCant would suit me just fine.

 

[OldLady]

I think you are being overly sensitive and grasping at any straw to keep a jurist from rendering an opinion. Good luck with that.

Judges NEVER taken their politics to the public circle. Your support of unethical judges fits right into your leftist views.

Your support of throwing all "leftists" in prison fits right in with yours.

The law I posted is there for a reason.

And yes, fascists are dangerous.

Are you calling her a fascist? Because she dared comment on a Republican's potential, significant impact on the Court? A perfect example of fascist being used as a sloppy, inaccurate term for any who oppose you.

She apologized for making that comment. Perhaps she will recuse herself if such a situation occurs. But I don't actually see why she should.

No, you. And anyone who supports unethical judges.

Well, that's a relief.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Judges NEVER taken their politics to the public circle. Your support of unethical judges fits right into your leftist views.

Your support of throwing all "leftists" in prison fits right in with yours.

The law I posted is there for a reason.

And yes, fascists are dangerous.

Are you calling her a fascist? Because she dared comment on a Republican's potential, significant impact on the Court? A perfect example of fascist being used as a sloppy, inaccurate term for any who oppose you.

She apologized for making that comment. Perhaps she will recuse herself if such a situation occurs. But I don't actually see why she should.

No, you. And anyone who supports unethical judges.

Well, that's a relief.

So you’d have no issue with 6 Justices openly campaigning against Roe v Wade and not recuse themselves when it comes up?

 

[OldLady]

Your support of throwing all "leftists" in prison fits right in with yours.

The law I posted is there for a reason.

And yes, fascists are dangerous.

Are you calling her a fascist? Because she dared comment on a Republican's potential, significant impact on the Court? A perfect example of fascist being used as a sloppy, inaccurate term for any who oppose you.

She apologized for making that comment. Perhaps she will recuse herself if such a situation occurs. But I don't actually see why she should.

No, you. And anyone who supports unethical judges.

Well, that's a relief.

So you’d have no issue with 6 Justices openly campaigning against Roe v Wade and not recuse themselves when it comes up?

Trump is not a "case," though is he? RBG will do as she has always done and will render an opinion based on the law.