Climate Change Likely Caused Deadly 2016 Avalanche In Tibet

ScienceRocks

Democrat all the way!
Joined
Mar 16, 2010
Messages
59,455
Reaction score
6,830
Points
1,900
Location
The Good insane United states of America
“Glacial collapse is unprecedented in western Tibet, which for decades has resisted the effects of climate change while glaciers in southern and eastern Tibet have melted at an accelerating rate.”

Climate Change Likely Caused Deadly 2016 Avalanche In Tibet
Climate Change Likely Caused Deadly 2016 Avalanche In Tibet

Well, it is possible. What do you think?
 
“Glacial collapse is unprecedented in western Tibet, which for decades has resisted the effects of climate change while glaciers in southern and eastern Tibet have melted at an accelerating rate.”

Climate Change Likely Caused Deadly 2016 Avalanche In Tibet
Climate Change Likely Caused Deadly 2016 Avalanche In Tibet

Well, it is possible. What do you think?
I think it must be the first avalanche in the history of the world. :cuckoo:
 
I heard it caused Catfish Shack to go out of business in Pensacola.
 
“Glacial collapse is unprecedented in western Tibet, which for decades has resisted the effects of climate change while glaciers in southern and eastern Tibet have melted at an accelerating rate.”

Climate Change Likely Caused Deadly 2016 Avalanche In Tibet
Climate Change Likely Caused Deadly 2016 Avalanche In Tibet

Well, it is possible. What do you think?
You do realize that we are 1.4C to 2.4C below the peak temperature of three of the last four interglacials, right? Which means that we are still within the norm of what we can expect to see from our present interglacial cycle, which means that your fears of man made global warming are irrational and without merit.

upload_2016-12-11_8-54-54-png.101562
 
I blame climate change for this snowman' demise.....

Melting_Snowman_12-16-05.jpg
 
Solar minimum, solar maximum. Man has nothing to do with it. Your carbon footprint is to the sun as your spit is to the ocean. It has no impact. This warming trend was caused by a solar flare tsunami. It has settled down now. We're going to make it....


tycho, your sig meme is beautiful.
 
“Glacial collapse is unprecedented in western Tibet, which for decades has resisted the effects of climate change while glaciers in southern and eastern Tibet have melted at an accelerating rate.”

Climate Change Likely Caused Deadly 2016 Avalanche In Tibet
Climate Change Likely Caused Deadly 2016 Avalanche In Tibet

Well, it is possible. What do you think?

So what? It's tragic but there isn't anything we can do about it.
 
I think AGW Moonbats love using tragedy to further their cause
 
“Glacial collapse is unprecedented in western Tibet, which for decades has resisted the effects of climate change while glaciers in southern and eastern Tibet have melted at an accelerating rate.”

Climate Change Likely Caused Deadly 2016 Avalanche In Tibet
Climate Change Likely Caused Deadly 2016 Avalanche In Tibet

Well, it is possible. What do you think?




Sure it did. Did you know that climate change is responsible for EVERY single death in the whole wide world? Well. It is "possible". Can you think?
 
Climate Change = Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter.

Global warming = Nut cases.
 
Yep, posting the opinions of real scientist makes me a idiot...Insane backwards people.
The most important fact about the avalanche, said Thompson, is that it lasted only four or five minutes (according to witnesses), yet it managed to bury 3.7 square miles of the valley floor in that time. He said something–likely meltwater at the base of the glacier–must have lubricated the ice to speed its flow down the mountain.

“Given the rate at which the event occurred and the area covered, I think it could only happen in the presence of meltwater,” Thompson said. Other nearby glaciers may be vulnerable, he added, “but unfortunately as of today, we have no ability to predict such disasters.”
 
Last edited:
15th post
Yep, posting the opinions of real scientist makes me a idiot...Insane backwards people.
The most important fact about the avalanche, said Thompson, is that it lasted only four or five minutes (according to witnesses), yet it managed to bury 3.7 square miles of the valley floor in that time. He said something–likely meltwater at the base of the glacier–must have lubricated the ice to speed its flow down the mountain.

“Given the rate at which the event occurred and the area covered, I think it could only happen in the presence of meltwater,” Thompson said. Other nearby glaciers may be vulnerable, he added, “but unfortunately as of today, we have no ability to predict such disasters.”
I think you have something on your nose.

images
 
I think AGW Moonbats love using tragedy to further their cause


The real life effects show that it isn't far in the future. That is what I am attempting to convey.

Do you ever tire of the bullshit propaganda you post? Try to get an emotional response from a natural variation change in earths climate.
 
Yep, posting the opinions of real scientist makes me a idiot...Insane backwards people.
The most important fact about the avalanche, said Thompson, is that it lasted only four or five minutes (according to witnesses), yet it managed to bury 3.7 square miles of the valley floor in that time. He said something–likely meltwater at the base of the glacier–must have lubricated the ice to speed its flow down the mountain.

“Given the rate at which the event occurred and the area covered, I think it could only happen in the presence of meltwater,” Thompson said. Other nearby glaciers may be vulnerable, he added, “but unfortunately as of today, we have no ability to predict such disasters.”

Your an idiot because you can not think critically or cognitively before posting crap..
 
Yep, posting the opinions of real scientist makes me a idiot...Insane backwards people.
The most important fact about the avalanche, said Thompson, is that it lasted only four or five minutes (according to witnesses), yet it managed to bury 3.7 square miles of the valley floor in that time. He said something–likely meltwater at the base of the glacier–must have lubricated the ice to speed its flow down the mountain.

“Given the rate at which the event occurred and the area covered, I think it could only happen in the presence of meltwater,” Thompson said. Other nearby glaciers may be vulnerable, he added, “but unfortunately as of today, we have no ability to predict such disasters.”


But the backward people....................are winning!!:eusa_dance::eusa_dance::up:


Articles: Pruitt to Dismantle EPA Climate Agenda
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom