Who or what is the Democrat aim of causing chaos and mayhem, ordering their acolytes to defend, to go and riot in support of? Is it innocent Americans who have been singled out due to their race…..or is there something else going on?
1.There is a principle in law, “the clean hands doctrine…
n. a rule of law that a person coming to court with a lawsuit or petition for a court order must be free from unfair conduct (have "clean hands" or not have done anything wrong)…” Legal Dictionary - Law.com
In the last month or so, I have seen individuals who have suffered the consequences of behaving as no law abiding person would…..and watched the Democrat Party take the leashes off looters, rioters, anarchists, felons of every variety.
Somehow, the camp followers have been willing to pretend that police have singled out the “victims” base on skin color, and that burning down our cities is the correct response.
The primary explanation is that the Left is able to mobilize large segments of the population for any campaign they wish, even in support of felons. They need this because without the vote of a particular segment of the population, the Democrats would never win a national election.
2. The party has made clear that criminals are their constituents….they want the vote for jailed felons, they release criminals immediately without bail, they state that their judges and DAs will not prosecute theft up to $250, and they organize riots in opposition to the police.
Once excuses are made for even the smallest criminality, there is no way not to make exception for the most heinous.
3. Under Giuliani, in NYC, every crime was treated as a crime, and subject to policing. It was called 'the broken windows policy.'
“In 1969, Philip Zimbardo, a psychologist from Stanford University, ran an interesting field study. He abandoned two cars in two very different places: one in a mostly poor, crime-ridden section of New York City, and the other in a fairly affluent neighborhood of Palo Alto, Calif. Both cars were left without license plates and parked with their hoods up.
After just 10 minutes, passersby in New York City began vandalizing the car. First they stripped it for parts. Then the random destruction began. Windows were smashed. The car was destroyed. But in Palo Alto, the other car remained untouched for more than a week.
Finally, Zimbardo did something unusual: He took a sledgehammer and gave the California car a smash. After that, passersby quickly ripped it apart, just as they'd done in New York.
This field study was a simple demonstration of how something that is clearly neglected can quickly become a target for vandals. But it eventually morphed into something far more than that. It became the basis for one of the most influential theories of crime and policing in America: "broken windows." How A Theory Of Crime And Policing Was Born, And Went Terribly Wrong
November will tell if murder and mayhem is the new policy in America, or ‘broken windows’ policing is.
1.There is a principle in law, “the clean hands doctrine…
n. a rule of law that a person coming to court with a lawsuit or petition for a court order must be free from unfair conduct (have "clean hands" or not have done anything wrong)…” Legal Dictionary - Law.com
In the last month or so, I have seen individuals who have suffered the consequences of behaving as no law abiding person would…..and watched the Democrat Party take the leashes off looters, rioters, anarchists, felons of every variety.
Somehow, the camp followers have been willing to pretend that police have singled out the “victims” base on skin color, and that burning down our cities is the correct response.
The primary explanation is that the Left is able to mobilize large segments of the population for any campaign they wish, even in support of felons. They need this because without the vote of a particular segment of the population, the Democrats would never win a national election.
2. The party has made clear that criminals are their constituents….they want the vote for jailed felons, they release criminals immediately without bail, they state that their judges and DAs will not prosecute theft up to $250, and they organize riots in opposition to the police.
Once excuses are made for even the smallest criminality, there is no way not to make exception for the most heinous.
3. Under Giuliani, in NYC, every crime was treated as a crime, and subject to policing. It was called 'the broken windows policy.'
“In 1969, Philip Zimbardo, a psychologist from Stanford University, ran an interesting field study. He abandoned two cars in two very different places: one in a mostly poor, crime-ridden section of New York City, and the other in a fairly affluent neighborhood of Palo Alto, Calif. Both cars were left without license plates and parked with their hoods up.
After just 10 minutes, passersby in New York City began vandalizing the car. First they stripped it for parts. Then the random destruction began. Windows were smashed. The car was destroyed. But in Palo Alto, the other car remained untouched for more than a week.
Finally, Zimbardo did something unusual: He took a sledgehammer and gave the California car a smash. After that, passersby quickly ripped it apart, just as they'd done in New York.
This field study was a simple demonstration of how something that is clearly neglected can quickly become a target for vandals. But it eventually morphed into something far more than that. It became the basis for one of the most influential theories of crime and policing in America: "broken windows." How A Theory Of Crime And Policing Was Born, And Went Terribly Wrong
November will tell if murder and mayhem is the new policy in America, or ‘broken windows’ policing is.
