Calling Out Alang1216: The God of Abraham is a myth

[ding]

I can't because he wasn't. Just read Acts.

I know you can’t be honest because if you were honest you’d be arguing it was a conspiracy; a con.

 

[ding]

Hey alang1216 when are you going to get to the myth part?

 

[alang1216]

Walk me through how the NT was written if it isn’t true.

Great. Walk me through that. Show me.

Why when you refuse to listen to what I've said? The messiah was prophesied to be born in Bethlehem. How did Jesus of Nazareth get to be born in Bethlehem? Or reconcile all the various stories of the resurrection (include the ending of Mark too.) Once you can answer that you'll see how the NT was written.

 

[alang1216]

Hey alang1216 when are you going to get to the myth part?

Is Genesis literally true?

 

[ding]

Why when you refuse to listen to what I've said? The messiah was prophesied to be born in Bethlehem. How did Jesus of Nazareth get to be born in Bethlehem? Or reconcile all the various stories of the resurrection (include the ending of Mark too.) Once you can answer that you'll see how the NT was written.

Why don’t you pick a miracle Jesus performed and explain how that was embellishment.

 

[ding]

Is Genesis literally true?

Stick to Jesus. Because I’m trying to understand your logic for believing everything that was written was a lie.

 

[alang1216]

I know you can’t be honest because if you were honest you’d be arguing it was a conspiracy; a con.

If you were honest you'd address the sections of Acts I posted and that you've ignored.

 

[alang1216]

Why don’t you pick a miracle Jesus performed and explain how that was embellishment.

Address my post and then maybe...

 

[alang1216]

Stick to Jesus. Because I’m trying to understand your logic for believing everything that was written was a lie.

I thought you wanted myth.

 

[ding]

If you were honest you'd address the sections of Acts I posted and that you've ignored.

I am honest. My argument makes sense. You haven’t provided anything which explains how everything that could be written is a lie and people still worshipped Jesus as God anyway.

 

[ding]

I thought you wanted myth.

I do. But if Jesus isn’t a myth then the God of Abraham can’t be a myth.

 

[ding]

Address my post and then maybe...

Umm…. No. You need to make an argument that makes sense. I’ve tried to get you to argue conspiracy because that would make sense. Sort of. But instead you are choosing to argue embellishment. So walk me through a couple of miracles Jesus performed using embellishment as the basis for miracles.

 

[ding]

alang1216 could it be that you are just shooting from the hip and haven’t really thought through any of this because that would explain the lack of a cohesive argument.

 

[alang1216]

I am honest. My argument makes sense. You haven’t provided anything which explains how everything that could be written is a lie and people still worshipped Jesus as God anyway.

No you are not honest and your arguments are worthless. "If everyone believed something, it must have been true", is your argument but you fail to address that not everyone believed it or that Muslims believe God spoke to Muhammad but that is not true.

 

[alang1216]

I do. But if Jesus isn’t a myth then the God of Abraham can’t be a myth.

Well that isn't logical but whatever. Jesus lived and died, that is not a myth, but much of what he did IS myth. You have totally ignored his birth narratives since they demonstrate his mythology.

 

[alang1216]

Umm…. No. You need to make an argument that makes sense. I’ve tried to get you to argue conspiracy because that would make sense. Sort of. But instead you are choosing to argue embellishment. So walk me through a couple of miracles Jesus performed using embellishment as the basis for miracles.

We have faith healers today, if Jesus was a good one it is a small step from healing a comatose man to raising the dead.

 

[alang1216]

alang1216 could it be that you are just shooting from the hip and haven’t really thought through any of this because that would explain the lack of a cohesive argument.

Untrue. You only think you offer cohesive arguments because you repeat the same mantra over and over and ignore anything to the contrary. That is not cohesive, it is delusional.

 

[ding]

No you are not honest and your arguments are worthless. "If everyone believed something, it must have been true", is your argument but you fail to address that not everyone believed it or that Muslims believe God spoke to Muhammad but that is not true.

There’s nothing dishonest with my argument. Jesus was worshipped as God after he rose from the dead. That’s what history recorded. You have yet to explain when or why Jesus was worshipped as God. Your argument is not everyone did it. So what? Your argument was the apostles were confused. Yet you can’t explain the massive amount of texts that exist supporting that Jesus was worshipped as God because he performed miracles and rose from the dead.

 

[ding]

Well that isn't logical but whatever. Jesus lived and died, that is not a myth, but much of what he did IS myth. You have totally ignored his birth narratives since they demonstrate his mythology.

Of course it’s logical. Who do you think Jesus was referring to when he was accused of blasphemy.

The immaculate conception is a miracle just like the miracles performed by Jesus and his rising from the dead.

 

[ding]

We have faith healers today, if Jesus was a good one it is a small step from healing a comatose man to raising the dead.

Which ones are making the claims Jesus made?

He was put to death for performing miracles (sorcery) and for making himself equal to God (blasphemy).