But even if there were... the Left would axiomatically be engaged there, therefore, by extension, Islam would be engaged, as well.
I hope you realize that is not a logical position.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But even if there were... the Left would axiomatically be engaged there, therefore, by extension, Islam would be engaged, as well.
There's no such thing as the Korean War. ...
Of course there is.
No.. there's not. ...
Yes, there really is. Take time to educate yourself on the matter. It's not a secret.
But even if there were... the Left would axiomatically be engaged there, therefore, by extension, Islam would be engaged, as well.
I hope you realize that is not a logical position.
Divide and conquer. The best way to destroy a country is to get ALL sides at war with each other. Multiculteralism doesn't DO that.
Nonsense... that is PRECISELY what multiculturalism (Cultural Relativism) does... .
Multiculteralism is NOT cultural relativism. Multiculteralism is the acknowledgement that other cultures exist, here they are, here is what they do, and we can all live together so long as we all follow the laws of this land that we all live in.
Laws are culturally determined. One group has clitoral circumcision as a deeply ingrained cultural tradition and it is legal in their homeland, another group finds the practice abhorrent and makes it illegal. The latter group must now be tolerant to the former group, to respect their ways and traditions.
The law is not culturally neutral.
Multiculturalism is a nonsensical notion. It can't exist without government coercion. That's where your progressive Totalitarian measures come into play.
Cultures come into conflict because of differing behavior and beliefs of the members. THEY can't be just like YOU because THEY are from a different culture than YOU. Yellow can't be Purple because they're different.
There's tons of research on how corrosive diversity is to community values.
Well said... The principle that diversity is a strength, is the misnomer upon which the Cultural Relativist rests.
The problem they have is that in the analogy of steel, where dissimilar elements exist to form a stronger metal, the elements bond to one another.
Multiculturalism undermines cohesion... . Which is how we can know that Multiculturalism is a lie, just as are every other notions which come from the irrational species of reasoning OKA: Left-think.
There's no such thing as the Korean War. ...
Of course there is.
No.. there's not. ...
Yes, there really is. Take time to educate yourself on the matter. It's not a secret.
Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
But even if there were... the Left would axiomatically be engaged there, therefore, by extension, Islam would be engaged, as well.
I hope you realize that is not a logical position.
If you had the slightest understanding of logic and the elements of such, you wouldn't humiliate yourself through that sort of ignorant profession, as much.
Hope that helps.
Multiculturalism is a nonsensical notion. It can't exist without government coercion. That's where your progressive Totalitarian measures come into play.
Cultures come into conflict because of differing behavior and beliefs of the members. THEY can't be just like YOU because THEY are from a different culture than YOU. Yellow can't be Purple because they're different.
There's tons of research on how corrosive diversity is to community values.
Well said... The principle that diversity is a strength, is the misnomer upon which the Cultural Relativist rests.
The problem they have is that in the analogy of steel, where dissimilar elements exist to form a stronger metal, the elements bond to one another.
Multiculturalism undermines cohesion... . Which is how we can know that Multiculturalism is a lie, just as are every other notions which come from the irrational species of reasoning OKA: Left-think.
The analogy of steel actually supports the ideas of multiculturalism. The two most extensive empires the world has ever known (the Mongol and Victorian UK) allowed the cultures within them to exist so long as they did it peacefully. The capital of the Mongolian Empire was famous for its religious tolerance where Catholic, Islam, Animist, Confucianism, Buddhism, Hinduism et al co-existed peaceably for over 100 years. That period witnessed the greatest spread of technology and commerce the world had ever seen until the recent era.
I don't mean this as an insult, but it is very highly likely that I am more familiar with, and versed in, logic than yourself. Just so you understand before making your next comment.
It can happen just as long as there is a constitution that is in place that all would agree with and do agree upon to up-hold, and then there is an agreeing on standing by laws that are against immoral-ism or immoral acts and radical ways that tend to exist in all cultures, and then to define what being a Brit or American is within it all., Then there should be a standing by that no matter who you are as a citizen or person of another ethnicity or culture that is found within a nation. When you get people trying to destroy what the citizenry in a nation had built as a culture together, and is one that is over 200 years old, then to try and replace it with pockets of anti-cultures who hate the culture that had built a nation first, then Houston we have a HUGE PROBLEM.Can you become Japanese? Can a Muslim from Nigeria also become a Japanese person?
Are you really incapable of distinguishing citizenship from ethnicity?
Ethnicity:
British
![]()
Not British
![]()
This is a duplicate of what you posted elsewhere.
Of course you show the extremes which are hardly accurate are they?
The average Brit is hardly walking around in bowler hats and suits. The average Brit who is a Muslim is hardly going around screaming abuse. Nice bit of exageration that.
The first group was NEVER ASKED to share community with the second group. A silent coup IMPOSED the second group onto the first group.
Immigrants don't say "You know, those bowler hats and the bubbles and squeak, are sure attractive and I want to abandon my culture and faith and become British and Christian. I'm going to immigrate to Britain in order to become British because I so admire British culture." This formulation isn't so troublesome. This formulation though is almost never seen anymore.
What we see instead is the above - the keeping of native culture and religion and co-locating that religion and culture alongside British culture in the UK. This is a recipe for war. Different peoples, different faith, different cultures, different attitudes are far more abrasive than the same people, of the same faith, the same culture and same attitudes living alongside each other.
Divide and conquer. The best way to destroy a country is to get ALL sides at war with each other. Multiculteralism doesn't DO that.
Nonsense... that is PRECISELY what multiculturalism (Cultural Relativism) does... .
Multiculteralism is NOT cultural relativism. Multiculteralism is the acknowledgement that other cultures exist, here they are, here is what they do, and we can all live together so long as we all follow the laws of this land that we all live in.
Laws are culturally determined. One group has clitoral circumcision as a deeply ingrained cultural tradition and it is legal in their homeland, another group finds the practice abhorrent and makes it illegal. The latter group must now be tolerant to the former group, to respect their ways and traditions.
The law is not culturally neutral.
The only legitimate purpose of law is to serve justice. Islam has no such understanding of law... .
The joys of multiculturalism in Australia. Remember, all freedoms have to be jettisoned in order to make multiculturalism work.
Columnist found guilty of inciting racial hatred:
What was his crime?
HERALD Sun columnist Andrew Bolt has lost an action brought in the Federal Court in which the columnist was accused of breaching the Racial Discrimination Act.
Bolt was found to have contravened Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act.
Nine aboriginal applicants brought a class-action against Bolt and the Herald and Weekly Times claiming Bolt wrote they sought professional advantage from the colour of their skin.
![]()
AS you see, the two men above are from a tribe of people who face terrible racism just because of the colour of their skin.
So you’ll be thrilled that both have won a rare opportunity - one offered to their race alone to end such injustice.
The man to the right, Sydney arts academic Danie Mellor, this week won our richest prize for Aboriginal artists - the $40,000 Telstra Award.
And the man to the left, Sydney law academic Mark McMillan, has won one of our richest prizes for Aboriginal students - the Fulbright Indigenous Scholarship.
If, studying the faces of these two “Aboriginal” men you think this is surely the most amazing stretch of definition, you’re wrong.
There's no such thing as the Korean War. ...
Of course there is.
No.. there's not. ...
Yes, there really is. Take time to educate yourself on the matter. It's not a secret.
Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
A direct refutation is not a "concession" in the English language. Go ahead and look into the matter for yourself.
Divide and conquer. The best way to destroy a country is to get ALL sides at war with each other. Multiculteralism doesn't DO that.
Nonsense... that is PRECISELY what multiculturalism (Cultural Relativism) does... .
Multiculteralism is NOT cultural relativism. Multiculteralism is the acknowledgement that other cultures exist, here they are, here is what they do, and we can all live together so long as we all follow the laws of this land that we all live in.
Laws are culturally determined. One group has clitoral circumcision as a deeply ingrained cultural tradition and it is legal in their homeland, another group finds the practice abhorrent and makes it illegal. The latter group must now be tolerant to the former group, to respect their ways and traditions.
The law is not culturally neutral.
The only legitimate purpose of law is to serve justice. Islam has no such understanding of law... .
The purpose of laws is to maintain order. Simple "justice" can be meted out by well regulated vigilante groups.
Multiculturalism is a nonsensical notion. It can't exist without government coercion. That's where your progressive Totalitarian measures come into play.
Cultures come into conflict because of differing behavior and beliefs of the members. THEY can't be just like YOU because THEY are from a different culture than YOU. Yellow can't be Purple because they're different.
There's tons of research on how corrosive diversity is to community values.
Well said... The principle that diversity is a strength, is the misnomer upon which the Cultural Relativist rests.
The problem they have is that in the analogy of steel, where dissimilar elements exist to form a stronger metal, the elements bond to one another.
Multiculturalism undermines cohesion... . Which is how we can know that Multiculturalism is a lie, just as are every other notions which come from the irrational species of reasoning OKA: Left-think.
The analogy of steel actually supports the ideas of multiculturalism. The two most extensive empires the world has ever known (the Mongol and Victorian UK) allowed the cultures within them to exist so long as they did it peacefully. The capital of the Mongolian Empire was famous for its religious tolerance where Catholic, Islam, Animist, Confucianism, Buddhism, Hinduism et al co-existed peaceably for over 100 years. That period witnessed the greatest spread of technology and commerce the world had ever seen until the recent era.
LOL! The United States is or at least was known as "The Great melting Pot". The strength of which was the means of people to come from many cultures and make ONE CULTURE.
Did you see that?
The strength of Steel is that numerous otherwise dissimilar elements JOIN TOGETHER, to make a stronger metal.
Meaning that in Steel is NOT a pile of differing elements, it is a NEW and distinct metal... .
The steel analogy only serves to prove, in indisputable terms, that Multi-culturalism, which REJECTS the joining of differing cultures into ONE CULTURE.
To believe otherwise is to delude yourself... and no individual can be sustained through self-delusion.
The joys of multiculturalism in Australia. Remember, all freedoms have to be jettisoned in order to make multiculturalism work.
Columnist found guilty of inciting racial hatred:
What was his crime?
HERALD Sun columnist Andrew Bolt has lost an action brought in the Federal Court in which the columnist was accused of breaching the Racial Discrimination Act.
Bolt was found to have contravened Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act.
Nine aboriginal applicants brought a class-action against Bolt and the Herald and Weekly Times claiming Bolt wrote they sought professional advantage from the colour of their skin.
![]()
AS you see, the two men above are from a tribe of people who face terrible racism just because of the colour of their skin.
So you’ll be thrilled that both have won a rare opportunity - one offered to their race alone to end such injustice.
The man to the right, Sydney arts academic Danie Mellor, this week won our richest prize for Aboriginal artists - the $40,000 Telstra Award.
And the man to the left, Sydney law academic Mark McMillan, has won one of our richest prizes for Aboriginal students - the Fulbright Indigenous Scholarship.
If, studying the faces of these two “Aboriginal” men you think this is surely the most amazing stretch of definition, you’re wrong.
No, that is Political correctness run amok. The two are very, very different.
I see that your argument is a vacuous train-wreck. Multiculturalism equates all cultures, demanding that unsound cultures be accepted as sustainable. It's a deceitful rationalization, fraudulently advanced as a means to influence the ignorant.
The joys of multiculturalism in Australia. Remember, all freedoms have to be jettisoned in order to make multiculturalism work.
Columnist found guilty of inciting racial hatred:
What was his crime?
HERALD Sun columnist Andrew Bolt has lost an action brought in the Federal Court in which the columnist was accused of breaching the Racial Discrimination Act.
Bolt was found to have contravened Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act.
Nine aboriginal applicants brought a class-action against Bolt and the Herald and Weekly Times claiming Bolt wrote they sought professional advantage from the colour of their skin.
![]()
AS you see, the two men above are from a tribe of people who face terrible racism just because of the colour of their skin.
So you’ll be thrilled that both have won a rare opportunity - one offered to their race alone to end such injustice.
The man to the right, Sydney arts academic Danie Mellor, this week won our richest prize for Aboriginal artists - the $40,000 Telstra Award.
And the man to the left, Sydney law academic Mark McMillan, has won one of our richest prizes for Aboriginal students - the Fulbright Indigenous Scholarship.
If, studying the faces of these two “Aboriginal” men you think this is surely the most amazing stretch of definition, you’re wrong.
No, that is Political correctness run amok. The two are very, very different.
Multiculturalism is a nonsensical notion. It can't exist without government coercion. That's where your progressive Totalitarian measures come into play.
Cultures come into conflict because of differing behavior and beliefs of the members. THEY can't be just like YOU because THEY are from a different culture than YOU. Yellow can't be Purple because they're different.
There's tons of research on how corrosive diversity is to community values.
Well said... The principle that diversity is a strength, is the misnomer upon which the Cultural Relativist rests.
The problem they have is that in the analogy of steel, where dissimilar elements exist to form a stronger metal, the elements bond to one another.
Multiculturalism undermines cohesion... . Which is how we can know that Multiculturalism is a lie, just as are every other notions which come from the irrational species of reasoning OKA: Left-think.
The analogy of steel actually supports the ideas of multiculturalism. The two most extensive empires the world has ever known (the Mongol and Victorian UK) allowed the cultures within them to exist so long as they did it peacefully. The capital of the Mongolian Empire was famous for its religious tolerance where Catholic, Islam, Animist, Confucianism, Buddhism, Hinduism et al co-existed peaceably for over 100 years. That period witnessed the greatest spread of technology and commerce the world had ever seen until the recent era.
LOL! The United States is or at least was known as "The Great melting Pot". The strength of which was the means of people to come from many cultures and make ONE CULTURE.
Did you see that?
The strength of Steel is that numerous otherwise dissimilar elements JOIN TOGETHER, to make a stronger metal.
Meaning that in Steel is NOT a pile of differing elements, it is a NEW and distinct metal... .
The steel analogy only serves to prove, in indisputable terms, that Multi-culturalism, which REJECTS the joining of differing cultures into ONE CULTURE.
To believe otherwise is to delude yourself... and no individual can be sustained through self-delusion.
Steel takes iron (white people), chromium (black people), carbon (Asian people) and any of a whole host of other alloying materials (whatever other ethnic group there is) and by heating and tempering them you get a much stronger alloy. You can vary the amounts and the types to get a varity of steel types such as tool steel, stainless steel, chrome vanadium steel, rolled homogenous steel plate etc.
In other words the more additives you employ the differing types of steel you get. Multiculteralism at work on a microcosmic scale.