Bush II Suppressed the 09/11 Report in order to blame Saddam

[Contumacious]

The Saudis Did 9/11

That's what the 28 pages tell us

Why did our government cover up this shocking evidence for so long?

The reason is because they had no desire to retaliate against the real perpetrators of 9/11. Instead, as we now know, they were determined to pin the blame on Saddam Hussein: indeed, the Bush administration pressed this talking point relentlessly, until it was forced to backtrack. We attacked Iraq, in the words of neocon grise eminenceand top Bush administration official Paul Wolfowitz, because it was “doable.” A years long neoconservative campaign to target Iraq gained new impetus in the wake of 9/11, and the administration and its journalistic camarilla pushed the lie that Iraq was behind the attack. The evidence that the Saudis were involved had to be suppressed – because the Bush administration’s war plans depended on it."


.

 

[Contumacious]

Bush II wasn't going to penalize his bosom buddies


.

 

[Lakhota]

The Saudis Did 9/11

That's what the 28 pages tell us

Why did our government cover up this shocking evidence for so long?

The reason is because they had no desire to retaliate against the real perpetrators of 9/11. Instead, as we now know, they were determined to pin the blame on Saddam Hussein: indeed, the Bush administration pressed this talking point relentlessly, until it was forced to backtrack. We attacked Iraq, in the words of neocon grise eminenceand top Bush administration official Paul Wolfowitz, because it was “doable.” A years long neoconservative campaign to target Iraq gained new impetus in the wake of 9/11, and the administration and its journalistic camarilla pushed the lie that Iraq was behind the attack. The evidence that the Saudis were involved had to be suppressed – because the Bush administration’s war plans depended on it."


.

Yes, we all know bush lied. In fact, both Bushes lied.

Not only did Bush 43 lie us into Iraq - his daddy, Bush 41, lied us into the First Gulf War by suckering Saddam into invading Kuwait. The Bushes cost America much prestige, blood and treasure.

Bush 41 suckered Saddam into invading Kuwait by giving him the "green light" via April Glaspie.

It is now more than fifteen years since that fateful meeting on July 25, 1990 between then-US Ambassador to Iraq April Glaspie and President Saddam Hussein that the Iraqi leader interpreted as a "green light" from Washington for his invasion of Kuwait eight days later.

TRANSCRIPT: Is the US State Department still keeping April Glaspie under wraps?​

Bush 43 conjured up lies to invade Iraq a 2nd time. He was planning to invade Iraq before 9/11.

The Downing Street Memo​

 

[gipper]

Agreed.

Why did Obama withhold the 28 pages for so many years? Is he too kowtowing to the Saudi Royal family?

The 28 pages do not confirm the Saudi government was behind 9/11, but there is a great deal of smoke there. I would like to know why our huge unlimited all knowing central government has not been able to confirm or deny whether they were involved by now.

 

[Katzndogz]

Bush never blamed Saddam. Democrats made it up have been making it up ever since.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Bush never blamed Saddam. Democrats made it up have been making it up ever since.

Yeah, Democrats made up shock and awe and in fact Saddam is still in Iraq today stupid democrats and their lies!

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

Bush never blamed Saddam. Democrats made it up have been making it up ever since.

Yeah, Democrats made up shock and awe and in fact Saddam is still in Iraq today stupid democrats and their lies!

Shock and awe was a battle tactic, not a causation, moron.

 

[Contumacious]

Agreed.

Why did Obama withhold the 28 pages for so many years? Is he too kowtowing to the Saudi Royal family?

The 28 pages do not confirm the Saudi government was behind 9/11, but there is a great deal of smoke there. I would like to know why our huge unlimited all knowing central government has not been able to confirm or deny whether they were involved by now.

It's not a secret that the Saudi Royal family is very close to the Bushes.

In fact, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, former Saudi Ambassador to the U.S., whose role in 9/11 is highly questionable, is known to many as "Bandar Bush." Perhaps the Bush Administration blocked the release of the 28 pages to defend the KSA, whom they view as a close family friend, a business partner, and political ally. There may be some truth to that. Why then, has the Obama Administration continued the cover-up? While campaigning for president in 2008, Obama promised 9/11 family members that he would finally declassify the 28 pages that dealt with who sponsored the attacks. Then again, in February 2009, when a delegation of 9/11 families visited the White House, Obama made a promise to Bill Doyle, whose son died in the WTC, that he would personally see that the 28 pages be declassified. However, just three months later, on May 29, 2009, Obama ordered Solicitor General Elena Kagan, later an Obama appointee to the U.S. Supreme Court, to file a brief urging the courts to prevent the 911 families from suing Saudi government officials or members of the Saudi royal family on the grounds that they enjoyed sovereign immunity. To this day, Saudi Arabia, the world's leading financier of fundamentalist jihadi madrassases, is considered one of the United States' closest allies



"The connection is a direct one. Not only has Saudi Arabia been promoting this extreme form of religion, but it also has been the principal financier, first of Al Qaeda, then of the various Al Qaeda franchises around the world—specifically the ones in Somalia and Yemen— and now the support of ISIS...I believe that had the role of Saudi Arabia in 9/11 been disclosed by the release of the 28 pages, and by the declassification of other information as to the Saudi role and support of the 9/11 hijackers, that it would have made it much more difficult for Saudi Arabia to have continued that pattern of behavior, and I think [we] would have had a good chance of reining in the activity that today Canada, the United States and other countries either are or are considering going to war with."


.

 

[Lakhota]

Bush never blamed Saddam. Democrats made it up have been making it up ever since.

Oh, I watched Bush LIVE when he first made his laughable connection between 9/11 and Saddam Hussein. He most certainly did blame Saddam - directly and through various insinuations/innuendos.

 

[Contumacious]

The Saudis Did 9/11

That's what the 28 pages tell us

Why did our government cover up this shocking evidence for so long?

The reason is because they had no desire to retaliate against the real perpetrators of 9/11. Instead, as we now know, they were determined to pin the blame on Saddam Hussein: indeed, the Bush administration pressed this talking point relentlessly, until it was forced to backtrack. We attacked Iraq, in the words of neocon grise eminenceand top Bush administration official Paul Wolfowitz, because it was “doable.” A years long neoconservative campaign to target Iraq gained new impetus in the wake of 9/11, and the administration and its journalistic camarilla pushed the lie that Iraq was behind the attack. The evidence that the Saudis were involved had to be suppressed – because the Bush administration’s war plans depended on it."


.

Yes, we all know bush lied. In fact, both Bushes lied.

Not only did Bush 43 lie us into Iraq - his daddy, Bush 41, lied us into the First Gulf War by suckering Saddam into invading Kuwait. The Bushes cost America much prestige, blood and treasure.

Bush 41 suckered Saddam into invading Kuwait by giving him the "green light" via April Glaspie.

It is now more than fifteen years since that fateful meeting on July 25, 1990 between then-US Ambassador to Iraq April Glaspie and President Saddam Hussein that the Iraqi leader interpreted as a "green light" from Washington for his invasion of Kuwait eight days later.

TRANSCRIPT: Is the US State Department still keeping April Glaspie under wraps?​

Bush 43 conjured up lies to invade Iraq a 2nd time. He was planning to invade Iraq before 9/11.

The Downing Street Memo​

I agree that Bush I suckered Saddam into invading Kuwait

April Catherine Glaspie
US Diplomat


APRIL GLASPIE TRANSCRIPT


Journalist 1 - Are the transcripts (holding them up) correct, Madam Ambassador?(Ambassador Glaspie does not respond)

Journalist 2 - You knew Saddam was going to invade (Kuwait ) but you didn't warn him not to. You didn't tell him America would defend Kuwait. You told him the opposite - that America was not associated with Kuwait.

Journalist 1 - You encouraged this aggression - his invasion. What were you thinking?

U.S. Ambassador Glaspie - Obviously, I didn't think, and nobody else did, that the Iraqis were going to take all of Kuwait.

Journalist 1 - You thought he was just going to take some of it? But, how could you? Saddam told you that, if negotiations failed , he would give up his Iran (Shatt al Arab waterway) goal for the Whole of Iraq, in the shape we wish it to be. You know that includes Kuwait, which the Iraqis have always viewed as an historic part of their country!
Journalist 1 - American green-lighted the invasion. At a minimum, you admit signaling Saddam that some aggression was okay - that the U.S. would not oppose a grab of the al-Rumeilah oil field, the disputed border strip and the Gulf Islands (including Bubiyan) - the territories claimed by Iraq?

(Ambassador Glaspie says nothing as a limousine door closed behind her and the car drives off.)

.

 

[Contumacious]

First, we never accused Glaspie of diplomatic incompetence, and we certainly didn’t "pile on." Here’s what we actually said in our 2003 piece:

In a now famous interview with the Iraqi leader, U.S. Ambassador April Glaspie told Saddam, ‘[W]e have no opinion on the Arab-Arab conflicts, like your border disagreement with Kuwait.’ The U.S. State Department had earlier told Saddam that Washington had ‘no special defense or security commitments to Kuwait.’ The United States may not have intended to give Iraq a green light, but that is effectively what it did."


.

 

[pwjohn]

Bush never blamed Saddam. Democrats made it up have been making it up ever since.

Oh, I watched Bush LIVE when he first made his laughable connection between 9/11 and Saddam Hussein. He most certainly did blame Saddam - directly and through various insinuations/innuendos.

And when was that?

 

[Lakhota]

Bush never blamed Saddam. Democrats made it up have been making it up ever since.

Oh, I watched Bush LIVE when he first made his laughable connection between 9/11 and Saddam Hussein. He most certainly did blame Saddam - directly and through various insinuations/innuendos.

And when was that?

In early March 2003 as I recall. Here's the closest link I can find to it.

The impact of Bush linking 9/11 and Iraq

 

[easyt65]

So why did Obama suppress the report and threaten to veto any attempt to have the hidden pages opened / released?

 

[Contumacious]

Bush never blamed Saddam. Democrats made it up have been making it up ever since.

Bush: The "16 Words"


President Bush delivered his 2003 State of the Union address less than two months before the American invasion of Iraq. In this speech, he outlined his justifications for such a step and asserted that “the greatest danger facing America and the world is outlaw regimes that seek and possess nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons.” The worst offender, he said, was Saddam Hussein, Iraq's brutal dictator, who posed an imminent threat to the United States, Bush asserted. The president then claimed that “the British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."


.

 

[BlindBoo]

Bush never blamed Saddam. Democrats made it up have been making it up ever since.

Just like Clinton never blamed the video as the cause of the assault on the Consulate building in Benghazi, he never did. All he did was mention the two in the same sentence, not connecting them directly, but it is what 70% of Americans believed before President Bush Ordered the Invasion.

 

[Katzndogz]

Bush never blamed Saddam. Democrats made it up have been making it up ever since.

Oh, I watched Bush LIVE when he first made his laughable connection between 9/11 and Saddam Hussein. He most certainly did blame Saddam - directly and through various insinuations/innuendos.

He never did. If you remember it, your memory is faulty.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Bush never blamed Saddam. Democrats made it up have been making it up ever since.

Oh, I watched Bush LIVE when he first made his laughable connection between 9/11 and Saddam Hussein. He most certainly did blame Saddam - directly and through various insinuations/innuendos.

And when was that?

In early March 2003 as I recall. Here's the closest link I can find to it.

The impact of Bush linking 9/11 and Iraq

Your own link explicitly states that Bush never made a direct link between 9/11 & Saddam. Sounds like just a lot of dumb people heard that which was never said.

 

[Katzndogz]

Bush never blamed Saddam. Democrats made it up have been making it up ever since.

Bush: The "16 Words"


President Bush delivered his 2003 State of the Union address less than two months before the American invasion of Iraq. In this speech, he outlined his justifications for such a step and asserted that “the greatest danger facing America and the world is outlaw regimes that seek and possess nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons.” The worst offender, he said, was Saddam Hussein, Iraq's brutal dictator, who posed an imminent threat to the United States, Bush asserted. The president then claimed that “the British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."


.

Where does it say that Saddam had anything to do with 911?

 

[buckeye45_73]

Bush never blamed Saddam. Democrats made it up have been making it up ever since.

Yeah, Democrats made up shock and awe and in fact Saddam is still in Iraq today stupid democrats and their lies!

Show us where he blamed Hussein for 911?
Omg.......you need to listen and read....