Bush II Suppressed the 09/11 Report in order to blame Saddam

[ClosedCaption]

Two months after the 9/11 attacks, on December 9, 2001, Dick Cheney went on Meet the Press and, when asked by Tim Russert whether “Iraq was involved in September 11,” mentioned a “report that’s been pretty well confirmed, that [9/11 hijacker Mohammed Atta] did go to Prague and he did meet with a senior official of the Iraqi intelligence service in Czechoslovakia last April, several months before the attack.”


Never happened! Never happened!!

 

[ClosedCaption]

[

Yeah, Democrats made up shock and awe and in fact Saddam is still in Iraq today stupid democrats and their lies!

Feel free to post where BUSH ever, even once, blamed 9/11 on Saddam?

You can't - it is a lie the left and moron conspiracy hacks float that has no basis in fact.

Pretend this means something else. I'd love to see your spin cycle.

CNN.com - Transcript of Bush news conference on Iraq - Mar. 6, 2003

Bush said:

Saddam Hussein has a long history of reckless aggression and terrible crimes. He possess weapons of terror. He provides funding and training and safe haven to terrorists, terrorists who would willing use weapons of mass destruction against America and other peace-loving countries.

Saddam Hussein and his weapons are a direct threat to this country, to our people and to all free people.

If the world fails to confront the threat posed by the Iraqi regime, refusing to use force even as a last resort, free nations would assume the unacceptable risks.

The attacks of September the 11th, 2001, show what the enemies of America did with four airplanes. We will not wait to see what terrorists or terrorist states could do with weapons of mass destruction.


You can plainly see Bush attempting linkage between Hussein and 9/11.

If they never linked Saddam with 9/11 it's just like G5000 said you agree with Michael Moore who said the same thing and we bombed them for no reason....

As a response to 9/11.

I love to see this reversal!! Liberals were right again!

So you and G-Tard are deliberately lying, but since it's against Republicans we should discard the truth in favor of your lies?

I'm really honored when you simply reply that someone is lying without anything to show for it. That's your typical reply when you're in a corner.

 

[Lakhota]

Bush never blamed Saddam. Democrats made it up have been making it up ever since.

Oh, I watched Bush LIVE when he first made his laughable connection between 9/11 and Saddam Hussein. He most certainly did blame Saddam - directly and through various insinuations/innuendos.

Hillary insisted al Queda was in Bagdhad and Bill said Iraq had WMDs when Bush was POTUS.
Have a nice day!

Who invaded Iraq?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Two months after the 9/11 attacks, on December 9, 2001, Dick Cheney went on Meet the Press and, when asked by Tim Russert whether “Iraq was involved in September 11,” mentioned a “report that’s been pretty well confirmed, that [9/11 hijacker Mohammed Atta] did go to Prague and he did meet with a senior official of the Iraqi intelligence service in Czechoslovakia last April, several months before the attack.”


Never happened! Never happened!!

Bush - it's a simple concept.

So is honesty - I guess that's two you can't grasp.

 

[Tehon]

Saddam had the Achille Lauro terrorist under his protection, He funded Hamas to murder Jews in Israel,

Now we are getting at the truth of why we attacked Iraq.

We attacked Iraq because Saddam attempted to assassinate a sitting US President.

We attacked Iraq because BB promised we would find washing machine sized centrifuges in the Iraqi desert.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

Yeah, Democrats made up shock and awe and in fact Saddam is still in Iraq today stupid democrats and their lies!

Feel free to post where BUSH ever, even once, blamed 9/11 on Saddam?

You can't - it is a lie the left and moron conspiracy hacks float that has no basis in fact.

Pretend this means something else. I'd love to see your spin cycle.

CNN.com - Transcript of Bush news conference on Iraq - Mar. 6, 2003

Bush said:

Saddam Hussein has a long history of reckless aggression and terrible crimes. He possess weapons of terror. He provides funding and training and safe haven to terrorists, terrorists who would willing use weapons of mass destruction against America and other peace-loving countries.

Saddam Hussein and his weapons are a direct threat to this country, to our people and to all free people.

If the world fails to confront the threat posed by the Iraqi regime, refusing to use force even as a last resort, free nations would assume the unacceptable risks.

The attacks of September the 11th, 2001, show what the enemies of America did with four airplanes. We will not wait to see what terrorists or terrorist states could do with weapons of mass destruction.


You can plainly see Bush attempting linkage between Hussein and 9/11.

If they never linked Saddam with 9/11 it's just like G5000 said you agree with Michael Moore who said the same thing and we bombed them for no reason....

As a response to 9/11.

I love to see this reversal!! Liberals were right again!

So you and G-Tard are deliberately lying, but since it's against Republicans we should discard the truth in favor of your lies?

I'm really honored when you simply reply that someone is lying without anything to show for it. That's your typical reply when you're in a corner.

You post idiocy with no basis in reality

Simple fact, Bush never linked 9/11 and Saddam.

No matter how much you and other leftist fools like G-Tard lie, Bush simply never did it.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Two years later, on September 14, 2003, Cheneyappeared once again on Meet the Press. Russert asked him if he was “surprised” by the fact that “69 percent” of Americans believe Saddam “was involved in the September 11 attacks.”

“I think it’s not surprising that people make that connection,” Cheney said. “With respect to 9/11, of course, we’ve had the story that’s been public out there. The Czechs alleged that Mohamed Atta, the lead attacker, met in Prague with a senior Iraqi intelligence official five months before the attack, but we’ve never been able to develop anymore of that yet either in terms of confirming it or discrediting it.”




Never happened! Never happened!!!!


And Micheal Moore is a liar. A Truth Telling LIAR!

 

[Synthaholic]

Bush II Suppressed the 09/11 Report in order to blame Saddam

Of course. Which Liberals said over and over at the time.

Michael Moore even made the highest grossing documentary ever, saying it. And was crucified by the Right-Wing for it.

 

[Katzndogz]

[

Yeah, Democrats made up shock and awe and in fact Saddam is still in Iraq today stupid democrats and their lies!

Feel free to post where BUSH ever, even once, blamed 9/11 on Saddam?

You can't - it is a lie the left and moron conspiracy hacks float that has no basis in fact.

Pretend this means something else. I'd love to see your spin cycle.

CNN.com - Transcript of Bush news conference on Iraq - Mar. 6, 2003

Bush said:

Saddam Hussein has a long history of reckless aggression and terrible crimes. He possess weapons of terror. He provides funding and training and safe haven to terrorists, terrorists who would willing use weapons of mass destruction against America and other peace-loving countries.

Saddam Hussein and his weapons are a direct threat to this country, to our people and to all free people.

If the world fails to confront the threat posed by the Iraqi regime, refusing to use force even as a last resort, free nations would assume the unacceptable risks.

The attacks of September the 11th, 2001, show what the enemies of America did with four airplanes. We will not wait to see what terrorists or terrorist states could do with weapons of mass destruction.


You can plainly see Bush attempting linkage between Hussein and 9/11.

If they never linked Saddam with 9/11 it's just like G5000 said you agree with Michael Moore who said the same thing and we bombed them for no reason....

As a response to 9/11.

I love to see this reversal!! Liberals were right again!

So you and G-Tard are deliberately lying, but since it's against Republicans we should discard the truth in favor of your lies?

I'm really honored when you simply reply that someone is lying without anything to show for it. That's your typical reply when you're in a corner.

You post idiocy with no basis in reality

Simple fact, Bush never linked 9/11 and Saddam.

No matter how much you and other leftist fools like G-Tard lie, Bush simply never did it.

Democrats have told themselves that Bush linked Saddam and 911 so many times that they now believe it.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Who invaded Iraq?

The Sioux.

Ya drunken Indian...

 

[ClosedCaption]

Two months after the 9/11 attacks, on December 9, 2001, Dick Cheney went on Meet the Press and, when asked by Tim Russert whether “Iraq was involved in September 11,” mentioned a “report that’s been pretty well confirmed, that [9/11 hijacker Mohammed Atta] did go to Prague and he did meet with a senior official of the Iraqi intelligence service in Czechoslovakia last April, several months before the attack.”


Never happened! Never happened!!

Bush - it's a simple concept.

So is honesty - I guess that's two you can't grasp.

Where does the buck stop?

 

[whitehall]

Democrats fixed it so that a witness who should have been subpoenaed was on the freaking committee. The brains behind Bill Clinton's big dumb A.G. Janet Reno was Jamie Gorelick and it was Gorelick that issued an order threatening any FBI agent who shared information about domestic and international terrorism with the CIA with arrest. Nobody ever asked her what the hell she was doing because the liberal media didn't want to know and she was on the committee investigating the tragedy. The fix was in. You almost gotta laugh that the liberal media became deaf dumb and blind when Clinton's National Security Adviser, arguably the top post in the Intelligence field, became a freaking thief. The liberal media didn't want to know what documents Sandy Berger was shoving down his fruit of the looms and in his socks because it was obvious that the Clintons ordered the documents to be stolen and destroyed.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Of course. Which Liberals said over and over at the time.

Michael Moore even made the highest grossing documentary ever, saying it. And was crucified by the Right-Wing for it.

YEAH, and Republicans went all the way to the Supreme Court to block his movie!

Oh wait, that was you Communists when Conservatives did the same thing with "Hillary the Movie"

Well some animals ARE more equal, after all....

 

[ClosedCaption]

Number of Misleading Statements. The Iraq on the Record database contains
237 misleading statements about the threat posed by Iraq that were made by
President Bush, Vice President Cheney, Secretary Rumsfeld, Secretary Powell,
and National Security Advisor Rice. These statements were made in 125 separate
appearances, consisting of 40 speeches, 26 press conferences and briefings, 53
interviews, 4 written statements, and 2 congressional testimonies. Most of the
statements in the database were misleading because they expressed certainty
where none existed or failed to acknowledge the doubts of intelligence officials.
Ten of the statements were simply false.


Nope nope nope

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

Where does the buck stop?

So to recap, you cannot come up with Bush blaming Saddam for 9/11, and were indeed lying.

Hey, you're a democrat, lying is your nature.

 

[Siete]

[

Yeah, Democrats made up shock and awe and in fact Saddam is still in Iraq today stupid democrats and their lies!

Feel free to post where BUSH ever, even once, blamed 9/11 on Saddam?

You can't - it is a lie the left and moron conspiracy hacks float that has no basis in fact.

Pretend this means something else. I'd love to see your spin cycle.

CNN.com - Transcript of Bush news conference on Iraq - Mar. 6, 2003

Bush said:

Saddam Hussein has a long history of reckless aggression and terrible crimes. He possess weapons of terror. He provides funding and training and safe haven to terrorists, terrorists who would willing use weapons of mass destruction against America and other peace-loving countries.

Saddam Hussein and his weapons are a direct threat to this country, to our people and to all free people.

If the world fails to confront the threat posed by the Iraqi regime, refusing to use force even as a last resort, free nations would assume the unacceptable risks.

The attacks of September the 11th, 2001, show what the enemies of America did with four airplanes. We will not wait to see what terrorists or terrorist states could do with weapons of mass destruction.


You can plainly see Bush attempting linkage between Hussein and 9/11.

If they never linked Saddam with 9/11 it's just like G5000 said you agree with Michael Moore who said the same thing and we bombed them for no reason....

As a response to 9/11.

I love to see this reversal!! Liberals were right again!

So you and G-Tard are deliberately lying, but since it's against Republicans we should discard the truth in favor of your lies?

I'm really honored when you simply reply that someone is lying without anything to show for it. That's your typical reply when you're in a corner.

You post idiocy with no basis in reality

Simple fact, Bush never linked 9/11 and Saddam.

No matter how much you and other leftist fools like G-Tard lie, Bush simply never did it.

Never ..

Vice President Dick Cheney had told Meet the Press on December 9, 2001, that Iraq was harboring Abdul Rahman Yasin, a suspect in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing,[14] and repeated the statement in another appearance on September 14, 2003, saying "We learned more and more that there was a relationship between Iraq and al-Qaida that stretched back through most of the decade of the '90s, that it involved training, for example, on BW and CW, that al-Qaida sent personnel to Baghdad to get trained on the systems that are involved. The Iraqis providing bomb-making expertise and advice to the al-Qaida organization. We know, for example, in connection with the original World Trade Center bombing in '93 that one of the bombers was Iraqi, returned to Iraq after the attack of '93. And we’ve learned subsequent to that, since we went into Baghdad and got into the intelligence files, that this individual probably also received financing from the Iraqi government as well as safe haven."[15] and once again in an interview with National Public Radio in January, 2004, stating that there had been "overwhelming evidence" of a relationship between Saddam and al-Qaeda based on evidence including Iraq's purported harboring of Yasin.[16]

In the same Meet the Press interviews, Cheney implied a connection between Iraq and Mohamed Atta; "The Czech interior minister said today that an Iraqi intelligence officer met with Mohammed Atta, one of the ringleaders of the September 11 terrorists attacks on the United States, just five months before the synchronized hijackings and mass killings were carried out."[14] and "With respect to 9/11, of course, we’ve had the story that’s been public out there. The Czechs alleged that Mohamed Atta, the lead attacker, met in Prague with a senior Iraqi intelligence official five months before the attack, but we’ve never been able to develop any more of that yet either in terms of confirming it or discrediting it. We just don’t know."[15] Czech officials have since backed off of this claim, and even Cheney has since acknowledged that the notion "that the meeting ever took place" has been "pretty well knocked down now."[17] (See Mohamed Atta's alleged Prague connection.)

 

[Uncensored2008]

Number of Misleading Statements. The Iraq on the Record database contains
237 misleading statements about the threat posed by Iraq that were made by
President Bush, Vice President Cheney, Secretary Rumsfeld, Secretary Powell,
and National Security Advisor Rice. These statements were made in 125 separate
appearances, consisting of 40 speeches, 26 press conferences and briefings, 53
interviews, 4 written statements, and 2 congressional testimonies. Most of the
statements in the database were misleading because they expressed certainty
where none existed or failed to acknowledge the doubts of intelligence officials.
Ten of the statements were simply false.


Nope nope nope

Caught in a lie? No problem, just start flinging shit, like the Feral Baboon you are...

 

[ClosedCaption]

Topics of the Statements. The 237 misleading statements can be divided into
four categories. The five officials made 11 statements that claimed that Iraq
posed an urgent threat; 81 statements that exaggerated Iraq’s nuclear activities; 84
statements that overstated Iraq’s chemical and biological weapons capabilities;
and 61 statements that misrepresented Iraq’s ties to al Qaeda.

 

[Londoner]

Bush deliberately fostered the impression that Saddam was behind 9/11 without saying it directly.

Uh no he didnt....not a single person I know own thought that was because of 911......Bush even said it wasnt...

What 911 did....was make us look at Sadam and notice he never compiled with un resolutions. So then he made home an ultimatium....Sadam bluffed and lost...we did think he had wmds and didn't want a nut with those weapons....

So to recap
Remove Sadam
Remove wmds
Bring democracy
and kill any terrorists if any....which there were some...but not many

False.

You're citing one of the many after-the-fact reasons.

A neocon policy group called The Project For a New American Century (lead by Wolfy, Rummy, Pearl, Bolton and Chaney) convinced Clinton in 1998 that regime change in Iraq was absolutely central to our longterm interests in the region.

In 1998 Clinton made regime change in Iraq an official policy of the US Government but chose not to act because he, like pappy Bush, was too worried about the post-Saddam reconstruction.

Once Bush took office, his primary goal was to enact the neocon policy Clinton signed - this is why he and his administration gave so many reasons for why the invasion was necessary. This is why the Republican noise machine - not Bush, but his party's message system - produced such an endless cycle of bullshit trying to tie Saddam to 9/11.

But none of the official or unofficial reasons hold a candle to the policy paper delivered to Clinton called "Rebuilding America's Defenses".

Google it; read it and stop talking out your ass. The containment stuff coupled with the WMDs, peddled by Bush/Clinton, may have been true, but it was beside the fucking point. The reasons were created in the mid 90s by the neocons. Many of their reasons were persuasive, but they weren't easily packaged for public consumption. So they told a story - many stories through many channels, and they hoped the various idiot lemmings would repeat those stories in forums like this.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Number of Misleading Statements. The Iraq on the Record database contains
237 misleading statements about the threat posed by Iraq that were made by
President Bush, Vice President Cheney, Secretary Rumsfeld, Secretary Powell,
and National Security Advisor Rice. These statements were made in 125 separate
appearances, consisting of 40 speeches, 26 press conferences and briefings, 53
interviews, 4 written statements, and 2 congressional testimonies. Most of the
statements in the database were misleading because they expressed certainty
where none existed or failed to acknowledge the doubts of intelligence officials.
Ten of the statements were simply false.


Nope nope nope

Caught in a lie? No problem, just start flinging shit, like the Feral Baboon you are...

Where does the buck stop?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Never ..

Vice President Dick Cheney had told Meet the Press on December 9, 2001, that Iraq was harboring Abdul Rahman Yasin, a suspect in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing,[14]

Say Comrade, WAS Iraq indeed harboring this terrorist?

That would be a yes - as you know.

AND YET, this is not any sort of claim by Bush that Saddam was behind 9/11 - the Big Lie in question.