Again Bush is not responsible for the current situation in Iraq. If you want to lay everything that happened in Iraq from 2003 to January of 2009 when Obama was sworn in on Bush fine after nope. At the time Obama was sworn in ISIS did not control a single town in Iraq nor did they take any while U.S. troops were still stationed there that did not happen till all American troops were withdrawn a decision you support it seems you support the way Obama is fighting ISIS no ground troops limited air strikes. So again Obama has done everything you want in regards to Iraq and ISIS which makes a blame Bush thread irrelevant.
Not any more than an arsonist is responsible after he has lit the match
If the fire is put out and you let someone else start another one then it becomes your responsibility.
The "fire" was far from put out
It required a constant US police force to maintain order. Along with that mission came a monthly death toll
I am an American who is unwilling to pay that toll
How many towns did ISiS control in January of 2009 when Obama was sworn in? How large an area of Iraq were they in control of at that same time? The fire was out.
ISIS did not exist. They were waiting to fill the power void as soon as we vacated
That could have been one year.....could have been ten
Wouldn't have stopped them
If your answer is...then don't leave
it is the wrong answer