Bud Light: Clinic on how NOT to handle things

Well, they did a lot more than that...

Those advertisements were specifically aimed at kids, whether it be Fred Flintstone hawking Winstons or Joe Camel being a cute cartoon character.

Not quite the same as telling a kid who thinks they might be gay that there's nothing wrong with that.



Racism is wrong.
Homophobia is wrong.

This isn't complicated....

The thing is, those who used to preach against inter-racial marriages used the exact same arguments that the homophobes use today.

It's against' God's Will. Its against Nature.

Same shit, different assholes.

Discrimination based on immutable traits is always wrong and makes one a bigot.

Discrimination based on non immutable traits is up to the individual, but does not make one a bigot.

Follow me for more explanations of terms the left are desperately trying to change.
 
Is that the best you can do? 😄

Okay. What's a biological female?

If we're talking about mammals, including humans, then a biological female is defined by XX chromosomes, and a female reproductive system, which, if complete and functional, includes ovaries that produce egg cells.

Again, sane people have no trouble at all understanding this; only mentally-fucked-up freaks like yourself find it at all confusing.
 
On the other hand, you've expressed the desire to murder police officers and public officials enforcing laws you don't like…

It's not murder to kill a subhuman criminal piece of shit in self-defense, that is in the act of trying to commit a serious crime against you.

And acting under the false-color of authority only makes a criminal worse, and killing it even more justified.

Of course, one again, as you always do, you take the side of subhuman criminal shit against the side of human beings that are victimized thereby.

And once again, in crying against the rights of human beings to keep and bear arms, and to use those arms to defend themselves against subhuman criminal shit, you only end up making the case why it is so important to preserve and protect these rights.
 
If we're talking about mammals, including humans, then a biological female is defined by XX chromosomes, and a female reproductive system, which, if complete and functional, includes ovaries that produce egg cells.
So women who don't have a functioning reproductive system aren't real women? What sex are women who don't have complete or functioning reproductive systems?
Again, sane people have no trouble at all understanding this; only mentally-fucked-up freaks like yourself find it at all confusing.
I do find it confusing that your definition leaves out millions and millions of women who are infertile and leaves millions more with a biological sex that you struggle to label and define.
 
Discrimination based on immutable traits is always wrong and makes one a bigot.

Discrimination based on non immutable traits is up to the individual, but does not make one a bigot.

Follow me for more explanations of terms the left are desperately trying to change.

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity are immutable traits as much as race.

Religion is a choice, but discrimination based on religion is wrong. (Pointing out a religion's fucked up dogma or history, is okay, though.)

It's not murder to kill a subhuman criminal piece of shit in self-defense, that is in the act of trying to commit a serious crime against you.

If you are shooting someone over property, that's not self defense.

And acting under the false-color of authority only makes a criminal worse, and killing it even more justified.

So, um, by your logic, any black person who gets pulled over on a pretext is entitled to shoot the officer, right?

Of course, one again, as you always do, you take the side of subhuman criminal shit against the side of human beings that are victimized thereby.

Not at all... I don't value property above people. You clearly do, at least when it's people of color. When it's white people, you seem to think it's okay to shoot cops, apparently.

And once again, in crying against the rights of human beings to keep and bear arms, and to use those arms to defend themselves against subhuman criminal shit, you only end up making the case why it is so important to preserve and protect these rights.

A gun in the home is 43 times more likely to kill a household member than a criminal. you've been lied to. The lie has been pointed out to you, and you cling to it anyway. (Kind of like your fucked up religion, bob!) Even though I've been trained by the Army and am the kind of person the Founders had in mind when they talked about "Well-regulated militias", I wouldn't keep a gun in my home. It has no benefit.
 
Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity are immutable traits as much as race.

Religion is a choice, but discrimination based on religion is wrong. (Pointing out a religion's fucked up dogma or history, is okay, though.)



If you are shooting someone over property, that's not self defense.



So, um, by your logic, any black person who gets pulled over on a pretext is entitled to shoot the officer, right?



Not at all... I don't value property above people. You clearly do, at least when it's people of color. When it's white people, you seem to think it's okay to shoot cops, apparently.



A gun in the home is 43 times more likely to kill a household member than a criminal. you've been lied to. The lie has been pointed out to you, and you cling to it anyway. (Kind of like your fucked up religion, bob!) Even though I've been trained by the Army and am the kind of person the Founders had in mind when they talked about "Well-regulated militias", I wouldn't keep a gun in my home. It has no benefit.

So a dna test can determine sexual orientation? Sexuality?

Sorry Joe, not immutable traits.
 
Memo to Bud light staff:

Please consider the lightweight puzzy division of rightists when making ads for straight cis-gender males turns out they are like snowflakes from Hell.
Memo to Bud Light staff:

Please consider that 95% of your current and potential customer base are straight, working class adults - and market to them instead of trying to get “woke” points by featuring an abnormal, trans-dressing male in your ads.
 
Not at all... I don't value property above people. You clearly do, at least when it's people of color. When it's white people, you seem to think it's okay to shoot cops, apparently.

I guess that's a call to be made by the subhuman criminal piece of shit that is thinking of stealing or destroying someone else's property. If it values its life more than it values the chance to steal or destroy, then it can always choose not to do so.

It's notable that many subhuman criminal pieces of shit are willing to kill an actual human being over the property that they want to steal. Somehow, I don't recall you ever crying over that, the way you cry over a human being defending its own rightful property.

That couldn't possibly be because you are always on the side of subhuman criminals shit, and always against the side of human beings, could it?
 
Memo to Bud Light staff:

Please consider that 95% of your current and potential customer base are straight, working class adults - and market to them instead of trying to get “woke” points by featuring an abnormal, trans-dressing male in your ads.
Note to staff: Bigots suck. Jews hate but hate to be hated.
 
So a dna test can determine sexual orientation? Sexuality?

Sorry Joe, not immutable traits.




We have extended our analysis of the role of the long arm of the X chromosome (Xq28) in sexual orientation by DNA linkage analyses of two newly ascertained series of families that contained either two gay brothers or two lesbian sisters as well as heterosexual siblings. Linkage between the Xq28 markers and sexual orientation was detected for the gay male families but not for the lesbian families or for families that failed to meet defined inclusion criteria for the study of sex-linked sexual orientation. Our results corroborate the previously reported linkage between Xq28 and male homosexuality in selected kinships and suggest that this region contains a locus that influences individual variations in sexual orientation in men but not in women.


The 1993 study by Hamer et al. examined 114 families of gay men in the United States and found increased rates of homosexuality among maternal uncles and cousins, but not among paternal relatives. This pattern of inheritance suggested that there might be linked genes on the X chromosome, since males always inherit their copy of the X chromosome from their mothers. Polymorphisms of genetic markers of the X chromosome were analyzed for 40 families to see if a specific marker was shared by a disproportionate amount of brothers who were both gay. The results showed that among gay brothers, the concordance rate for markers from the Xq28 region were significantly greater than expected for random Mendelian segregation, indicating that a link did exist in that small sample. It was concluded that at least one form of male homosexuality is preferentially transmitted through the maternal side and is genetically linked to the Xq28 region.[3]

As for Gender Identity.


Brain activity and structure in transgender adolescents more closely resembles the typical activation patterns of their desired gender, according to findings to be presented in Barcelona, at the European Society of Endocrinology annual meeting, ECE 2018. These findings suggest that differences in brain function may occur early in development and that brain imaging may be a useful tool for earlier identification of transgenderism in young people.

In this study, Dr. Julie Bakker from the University of Liège, Belgium, and her colleagues from the Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria at the VU University Medical Center, the Netherlands, examined sex differences in the brain activation patterns of young transgender people. The study included both adolescent boys and girls with gender dysphoria and used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to assess brain activation patterns in response to a pheromone known to produce gender-specific activity. The pattern of brain activation in both transgender adolescent boys and girls more closely resembled that of non-transgender boys and girls of their desired gender. In addition, GD adolescent girls showed a male-typical brain activation pattern during a visual/spatial memory exercise. Finally, some brain structural changes were detected that were also more similar, but not identical, to those typical of the desired gender of GD boys and girls.
 
I guess that's a call to be made by the subhuman criminal piece of shit that is thinking of stealing or destroying someone else's property. If it values its life more than it values the chance to steal or destroy, then it can always choose not to do so.

Yes, we know, you are fine with murdering black people over property.

It's notable that many subhuman criminal pieces of shit are willing to kill an actual human being over the property that they want to steal. Somehow, I don't recall you ever crying over that, the way you cry over a human being defending its own rightful property.

Except I don't. If you look at all the cases of black people being shot I complain about, it's usually a thug cop or a racist nitwit.
 

We have extended our analysis of the role of the long arm of the X chromosome (Xq28) in sexual orientation by DNA linkage analyses of two newly ascertained series of families that contained either two gay brothers or two lesbian sisters as well as heterosexual siblings. Linkage between the Xq28 markers and sexual orientation was detected for the gay male families but not for the lesbian families or for families that failed to meet defined inclusion criteria for the study of sex-linked sexual orientation. Our results corroborate the previously reported linkage between Xq28 and male homosexuality in selected kinships and suggest that this region contains a locus that influences individual variations in sexual orientation in men but not in women.


The 1993 study by Hamer et al. examined 114 families of gay men in the United States and found increased rates of homosexuality among maternal uncles and cousins, but not among paternal relatives. This pattern of inheritance suggested that there might be linked genes on the X chromosome, since males always inherit their copy of the X chromosome from their mothers. Polymorphisms of genetic markers of the X chromosome were analyzed for 40 families to see if a specific marker was shared by a disproportionate amount of brothers who were both gay. The results showed that among gay brothers, the concordance rate for markers from the Xq28 region were significantly greater than expected for random Mendelian segregation, indicating that a link did exist in that small sample. It was concluded that at least one form of male homosexuality is preferentially transmitted through the maternal side and is genetically linked to the Xq28 region.[3]

As for Gender Identity.


Brain activity and structure in transgender adolescents more closely resembles the typical activation patterns of their desired gender, according to findings to be presented in Barcelona, at the European Society of Endocrinology annual meeting, ECE 2018. These findings suggest that differences in brain function may occur early in development and that brain imaging may be a useful tool for earlier identification of transgenderism in young people.

In this study, Dr. Julie Bakker from the University of Liège, Belgium, and her colleagues from the Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria at the VU University Medical Center, the Netherlands, examined sex differences in the brain activation patterns of young transgender people. The study included both adolescent boys and girls with gender dysphoria and used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to assess brain activation patterns in response to a pheromone known to produce gender-specific activity. The pattern of brain activation in both transgender adolescent boys and girls more closely resembled that of non-transgender boys and girls of their desired gender. In addition, GD adolescent girls showed a male-typical brain activation pattern during a visual/spatial memory exercise. Finally, some brain structural changes were detected that were also more similar, but not identical, to those typical of the desired gender of GD boys and girls.
Might be? Fascinating!

So then there “might be” the same patterns for pediphile behavior.

Neither though are immutable.

A dna test can determine immutable traits.

Get back to us when you find something definitive.
 
Note to staff: Bigots suck. Jews hate but hate to be hated.
1) How is marketing advice to target your largest potential customer base bigoted? It’s just smart business, as the Harvard MBA has learned.

2) And what does Judaism have to do with it? As usual, the leftist has to put down Jews while ironically condemning bigotry.

Translation: To Democrats, it’s wrong to be opposed to using an abnormal male in an ad but perfectly OK to take a swipe against Jews.
 

Forum List

Back
Top