Bud Light: Clinic on how NOT to handle things

Your personal pronoun is “closeted”.

Actually, scientific studies have shown that severely homophobic men are more likely to closeted gays.

 
Actually, decent people don't hate others because they are different. They know the younger generations are more tolerant of gay people, and pandering to old bigots is a losing strategy.


Oh, yeah, Bob's a big time Mormon...who apparently doesn't know the history of his own deranged cult.

When I pointed out to him Joseph Smith and Brigham Young (the founders of LDS) married multiple girls under the age of consent, he pretty much went up the flu.

Wait, so now that's "fucked up"? Is it not "fucked up" when a democrat does it?
 
Last edited:
Actually, scientific studies have shown that severely homophobic men are more likely to closeted gays.


The cult is strong in this one.
 
Wait, so now that's "fucked up"? Is it not "fucked up" when a democrat does it?

Nope, any adult having sex with a teenager is fucked up.

Glad we straightened that out.

It was just amusing watching Bob rant for pages about Roman Polanski (who did go to jail for what he did), and then try to deny Joseph Smith did far worse.

The cult is strong in this one.

Not at all. I don't worry about other people having kinds of sex I'm not particularly interested in.

The question is, why do you?
 
Nope, any adult having sex with a teenager is fucked up.

Glad we straightened that out.

It was just amusing watching Bob rant for pages about Roman Polanski (who did go to jail for what he did), and then try to deny Joseph Smith did far worse.



Not at all. I don't worry about other people having kinds of sex I'm not particularly interested in.

The question is, why do you?

Because people like you want to influence others to become gay.

Sick.
 
You can't make a straight person gay, or a gay person straight.

People simply have the sexual orientation that they have.

But you can make a non smoker smoke? That’s why we banned tobacco companies influence by advertising, right.

Cultists crack me up.
 
Dont forget about Targets staggering losses too. The corporate world is on notice now. None of them are going to get political in the future. Corporations all over the country are having board meetings to make sure that they dont share the same fate.

Wokeness is dying. Conservatives won this cultural war.
Sure thing, Bingo. 😄 You haven't even won a battle yet. You engaged in some friendly on Budweiser, Target got caught being indecisive and by the time we get to the Dodgers they stumbled but have no regrouped have decided they're going to turn to their partners in the LGTBQ community for responses for the next time you Bingos get uppity. That's probably going to be the standard going forward. You lost before the war even got started. Gays aren't going back into the closet, you bigots are.
 
Sure thing, Bingo. 😄 You haven't even won a battle yet. You engaged in some friendly on Budweiser, Target got caught being indecisive and by the time we get to the Dodgers they stumbled but have no regrouped have decided they're going to turn to their partners in the LGTBQ community for responses for the next time you Bingos get uppity. That's probably going to be the standard going forward. You lost before the war even got started. Gays aren't going back into the closet, you bigots are.
Thats great and all, but corporations are learning their lesson now and they wont be doing this stuff anymore. You lost this cultural war.
 
Thats great and all, but corporations are learning their lesson now and they wont be doing this stuff anymore. You lost this cultural war.
They aren't learning the lesson you think they're learning. The younger and younger we go, support for the LGTBQ community goes up and up. Businesses look to the future. We just saw this with BLM and protests against police shootings. They weren't on board at first. They wanted no part in that fight but eventually their backs got broken and they had to acquiesce. There were simply more people in this country who cared about sending a message to cops who would kneel on a black man's neck for 9 minutes than racists who wanted to excuse it. There are more people in this country who believe in supporting the LGTBQ community than bigots who want to try and accuse them of the worst crimes against children, simply for existing. The mainstream of America does not support that type of mutant bigotry and it only survives today when it remains small and goes unnoticed. When you clowns get loud and you fuck around you always end up finding out.
 
They aren't learning the lesson you think they're learning. The younger and younger we go, support for the LGTBQ community goes up and up. Businesses look to the future. We just saw this with BLM and protests against police shootings. They weren't on board at first. They wanted no part in that fight but eventually their backs got broken and they had to acquiesce. There were simply more people in this country who cared about sending a message to cops who would kneel on a black man's neck for 9 minutes than racists who wanted to excuse it. There are more people in this country who believe in supporting the LGTBQ community than bigots who want to try and accuse them of the worst crimes against children, simply for existing. The mainstream of America does not support that type of mutant bigotry and it only survives today when it remains small and goes unnoticed. When you clowns get loud and you fuck around you always end up finding out.
Youre dumb if you think coporations are going to continue doing the virtue signaling horseshit. Everyone is annoyed by it. :cuckoo:
 
They will, because they know you are on the wrong side of history.

Hey, remember when THIS happened on TV?

View attachment 790599

A lot of people protested at the time. They were truly upset about a white man kissing a black woman on TV.

But at the end of the day, the haters were on the wrong side of history... as are you.
You do realize, don't you, that this whole thing is being driven by a handful of very, very wealthy people and organizations that are using their wealth to force companies into this inanity on the threat of losing investment money? The companies then have a hard choice, either lose a lot of investment money that they may or may not be able to recoup elsewhere or face big drops in sales and loss of market share that they may or may not be able to recover from. Basically, you're cheering on billionaires bullying society.
 
You do realize, don't you, that this whole thing is being driven by a handful of very, very wealthy people and organizations that are using their wealth to force companies into this inanity on the threat of losing investment money? The companies then have a hard choice, either lose a lot of investment money that they may or may not be able to recoup elsewhere or face big drops in sales and loss of market share that they may or may not be able to recover from. Basically, you're cheering on billionaires bullying society.
Joe’s whole argument is based on a redefinition of “bigotry”.

Joe will point out, and rightfully so, that the denial of the right to marry interracially was bigoted. That bigotry was because of immutable characteristics of the couple. One cannot help that they were born with different colors than the one they wish to marry. It is demonstrably so. So that bigotry was wrong.

Bigotry is just that, hatred based on how you look.

Joe tries to change the meaning to include, bigotry based on actions or character. Which is not the meaning of the word at all.

If you do something that is offensive, it is not bigoted to believe the other is an idiot and to make such a statement.

If you take the word, as Joe redefined it, no one can object to anything because that would make you a bigot.

So now, according to Joe and his fellow cult members, bigotry actually has no meaning, as anything anyone does objectionable that you disagree with would garner you a bigot.
 
Joe’s whole argument is based on a redefinition of “bigotry”.

Joe will point out, and rightfully so, that the denial of the right to marry interracially was bigoted. That bigotry was because of immutable characteristics of the couple. One cannot help that they were born with different colors than the one they wish to marry. It is demonstrably so. So that bigotry was wrong.

Bigotry is just that, hatred based on how you look.

Joe tries to change the meaning to include, bigotry based on actions or character. Which is not the meaning of the word at all.

If you do something that is offensive, it is not bigoted to believe the other is an idiot and to make such a statement.

If you take the word, as Joe redefined it, no one can object to anything because that would make you a bigot.

So now, according to Joe and his fellow cult members, bigotry actually has no meaning, as anything anyone does objectionable that you disagree with would garner you a bigot.
That is the goal, to remove objective measures by which someone can be defined. That allows them then to set the terms of the debate, which is tantamount to the casino ensuring that it will ultimately always win.

The funny thing is, they have to use objective measures to accomplish this, ala, "You can't complain about a MAN being attracted to a MAN (who attracted to whom?)", or "You can't complain about a MAN who wants to be a WOMAN (a what wanting to be a what?)", which are objective measures, measures they then demand we give up.
 
Joe’s whole argument is based on a redefinition of “bigotry”.

Joe will point out, and rightfully so, that the denial of the right to marry interracially was bigoted. That bigotry was because of immutable characteristics of the couple. One cannot help that they were born with different colors than the one they wish to marry. It is demonstrably so. So that bigotry was wrong.

Bigotry is just that, hatred based on how you look.

Joe tries to change the meaning to include, bigotry based on actions or character. Which is not the meaning of the word at all.

If you do something that is offensive, it is not bigoted to believe the other is an idiot and to make such a statement.

If you take the word, as Joe redefined it, no one can object to anything because that would make you a bigot.

So now, according to Joe and his fellow cult members, bigotry actually has no meaning, as anything anyone does objectionable that you disagree with would garner you a bigot.
Bigotry was always that you stupid Bingo. 😄
 
That is the goal, to remove objective measures by which someone can be defined. That allows them then to set the terms of the debate, which is tantamount to the casino ensuring that it will ultimately always win.

The funny thing is, they have to use objective measures to accomplish this, ala, "You can't complain about a MAN being attracted to a MAN (who attracted to whom?)", or "You can't complain about a MAN who wants to be a WOMAN (a what wanting to be a what?)", which are objective measures, measures they then demand we give up.
What objective arguments do any of you ever present? 😄
 
What objective arguments do any of you ever present? 😄
A biological male has physical advantages over a biological female that give him superiority in sports and make competition with women unfair.
A biological male cannot become pregnant.
A biological female cannot impregnate anyone.
A biological male cannot truly think he feels like a woman because he has never been one.

I could go on.
 

Forum List

Back
Top