Bubba's Encore: I Did Not Have Sex With That Sex Slave

[Foxfyre]

He...voluntarily suspended his own license? You sure? The NY Times disagrees with you. Please note the date:

Clinton Disbarred From Practice Before Supreme Court
Published: October 1, 2001
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court ordered former President Clinton disbarred from practicing law before the high court on Monday and gave him 40 days to contest the order.

The court did not explain its reasons, but Supreme Court disbarment often follows disbarment in lower courts.

In April, Clinton's Arkansas law license was suspended for five years and he paid a $25,000 fine. The original disbarment lawsuit was brought by a committee of the Arkansas Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court followed its standard rules in the Clinton case, which include suspending Clinton from practice in the court and giving him 40 day to show why he should not be permanently disbarred.

The court order did not mention any vote by the justices.

"Whenever a member of the bar of this court has been disbarred or suspended from practice of any court of record, or has engaged in conduct unbecoming a member of the bar of this court, the court will enter an order suspending that member from practice before this court," Supreme Court rules say.

Julia Payne, a spokeswoman for Clinton, referred calls to his lawyer, David Kendall, in Washington. Kendall did not immediately return a call seeking comment.

Clinton Disbarred From Practice Before Supreme Court - NYTimes.com

Why don't you read your own post? He voluntarily suspended his own state license, and this is from your post

The Supreme Court followed its standard rules in the Clinton case, which include suspending Clinton from practice in the court and giving him 40 day to show why he should not be permanently disbarred.

The court order did not mention any vote by the justices.

"Whenever a member of the bar of this court has been disbarred or suspended from practice of any court of record, or has engaged in conduct unbecoming a member of the bar of this court, the court will enter an order suspending that member from practice before this court," Supreme Court rules say.

No. That is not what my source said. He asked to voluntarily relinquish his license rather than undergo all the penalties and other stuff that would have been involved had he been removed involuntarily which they had already decided to do.

That must be where the $25,000 fine comes in.

Working from memory, I believe the fine was to pay the attorneys who brought the disbarrment proceedings against Clinton in the first place. The payment of the fine and agreement to not challenge a five-year suspension/disbarrment, which I believe was a couple or three months after Clinton left office, ended once and for all the whole Whitewater investigation and then the Paul Jones/Lewinsky investigation that resulted in the obstruction of justice and perjury conviction and/or court rulings.

I don't believe Clinton has ever applied to renew his law license. Since he nets an average of several hundred thousand dollars per speech for public speaking, I'm pretty sure practicing law is not among his priorities right now, but so far as legal prosecution goes, he and Hillary are now in the clear, at least as the law is concerned, for anything they did before or while he was in office.

Like Boedicca said though, it's fascinating watching his supporters twist themselves into knots trying to make him look good or at least not as bad as his press.

I think he had to "admit wrongdoing" or something like that. Basically it was a plea bargain. Nobody wants to see an ex-President sitting in jail.

That was it. What Bill Clinton did was disgusting and there is nothing whatsoever to commend it or justify it. With his legal skills he knew that both perjury charge and obstruction of justice charge were absolutely on point. But he also knew that his base would forgive him and adore him as if it had never happpened. So he didn't challenge disbarrment by SCOTUS and he cut a deal with the prosecutor and the Arkansas court to accept a reasonable penalty and put it all to an end. He had already paid Paula Jones I think something like $850,000???? to shut her up and end that ugly scenario.

Would he have been able to cut a deal like that if he was a private citizen and not the outgoing POTUS? I don't know. But I'm pretty sure that did weigh heavily on the decisions that were made. His base had already made him into a poor, unjustly accused martyr and putting him in jail or prolonging the proceedings would certainly have exacerbated that. Look how they're defending him now.

As for any piccadillos involved on that island, I seriously doubt Hillary cares one way or the other other than what any backlash in negative publicity might do to her compaign.

 

[boedicca]

Why don't you read your own post? He voluntarily suspended his own state license, and this is from your post

No. That is not what my source said. He asked to voluntarily relinquish his license rather than undergo all the penalties and other stuff that would have been involved had he been removed involuntarily which they had already decided to do.

That must be where the $25,000 fine comes in.

Working from memory, I believe the fine was to pay the attorneys who brought the disbarrment proceedings against Clinton in the first place. The payment of the fine and agreement to not challenge a five-year suspension/disbarrment, which I believe was a couple or three months after Clinton left office, ended once and for all the whole Whitewater investigation and then the Paul Jones/Lewinsky investigation that resulted in the obstruction of justice and perjury conviction and/or court rulings.

I don't believe Clinton has ever applied to renew his law license. Since he nets an average of several hundred thousand dollars per speech for public speaking, I'm pretty sure practicing law is not among his priorities right now, but so far as legal prosecution goes, he and Hillary are now in the clear, at least as the law is concerned, for anything they did before or while he was in office.

Like Boedicca said though, it's fascinating watching his supporters twist themselves into knots trying to make him look good or at least not as bad as his press.

I think he had to "admit wrongdoing" or something like that. Basically it was a plea bargain. Nobody wants to see an ex-President sitting in jail.

That was it. What Bill Clinton did was disgusting and there is nothing whatsoever to commend it or justify it. With his legal skills he knew that both perjury charge and obstruction of justice charge were absolutely on point. But he also knew that his base would forgive him and adore him as if it had never happpened. So he didn't challenge disbarrment by SCOTUS and he cut a deal with the prosecutor and the Arkansas court to accept a reasonable penalty and put it all to an end. He had already paid Paula Jones I think something like $850,000???? to shut her up and end that ugly scenario.

Would he have been able to cut a deal like that if he was a private citizen and not the outgoing POTUS? I don't know. But I'm pretty sure that did weigh heavily on the decisions that were made. His base had already made him into a poor, unjustly accused martyr and putting him in jail or prolonging the proceedings would certainly have exacerbated that. Look how they're defending him now.

As for any piccadillos involved on that island, I seriously doubt Hillary cares one way or the other other than what any backlash in negative publicity might do to her compaign.

If Bubba had been a private citizen (as opposed to a trough feeding member of the DC Political "Elite"), he wouldn't have been able to afford to pay off Paul Jones to the tune of $850,000.

Just sayin'.

 

[Foxfyre]

No. That is not what my source said. He asked to voluntarily relinquish his license rather than undergo all the penalties and other stuff that would have been involved had he been removed involuntarily which they had already decided to do.

That must be where the $25,000 fine comes in.

Working from memory, I believe the fine was to pay the attorneys who brought the disbarrment proceedings against Clinton in the first place. The payment of the fine and agreement to not challenge a five-year suspension/disbarrment, which I believe was a couple or three months after Clinton left office, ended once and for all the whole Whitewater investigation and then the Paul Jones/Lewinsky investigation that resulted in the obstruction of justice and perjury conviction and/or court rulings.

I don't believe Clinton has ever applied to renew his law license. Since he nets an average of several hundred thousand dollars per speech for public speaking, I'm pretty sure practicing law is not among his priorities right now, but so far as legal prosecution goes, he and Hillary are now in the clear, at least as the law is concerned, for anything they did before or while he was in office.

Like Boedicca said though, it's fascinating watching his supporters twist themselves into knots trying to make him look good or at least not as bad as his press.

I think he had to "admit wrongdoing" or something like that. Basically it was a plea bargain. Nobody wants to see an ex-President sitting in jail.

That was it. What Bill Clinton did was disgusting and there is nothing whatsoever to commend it or justify it. With his legal skills he knew that both perjury charge and obstruction of justice charge were absolutely on point. But he also knew that his base would forgive him and adore him as if it had never happpened. So he didn't challenge disbarrment by SCOTUS and he cut a deal with the prosecutor and the Arkansas court to accept a reasonable penalty and put it all to an end. He had already paid Paula Jones I think something like $850,000???? to shut her up and end that ugly scenario.

Would he have been able to cut a deal like that if he was a private citizen and not the outgoing POTUS? I don't know. But I'm pretty sure that did weigh heavily on the decisions that were made. His base had already made him into a poor, unjustly accused martyr and putting him in jail or prolonging the proceedings would certainly have exacerbated that. Look how they're defending him now.

As for any piccadillos involved on that island, I seriously doubt Hillary cares one way or the other other than what any backlash in negative publicity might do to her compaign.

If Bubba had been a private citizen (as opposed to a trough feeding member of the DC Political "Elite"), he wouldn't have been able to afford to pay off Paul Jones to the tune of $850,000.

Just sayin'.

Well that is a point too. He wasn't yet out on the speech circuit at that time, but he had a lot of friends with really deep pockets. Of course he and Hillary had professed poverty the entire time they were in the White House, but again working from memory, even though they claimed to be heavily in debt when they were leaving the White House, Terry McAuliffe? fronted them most of the money to buy their New York home at a price of something in the neighborhood of $1.7 million. That doesn't sound like any poverty I've ever heard of.

According to Open Secrets, the Clintons together have made well over $150 million just in speaking engagements since that time plus Bill got the largest up front advance ever paid to a politician on his memoires (2004?) plus they have their retirement income, social security, and no doubt get some expense income from their foundation and income from other investments. At the very least, they certainly can't claim to be poor.

Their foundation takes in millions more including huge donations from foreign countries, but there is very little information available on exactly how that money is used and how much is actually going to the eradication of HIV/AIDs that it presumably is designed to do. There is lots of speculation though

 

[bripat9643]

He...voluntarily suspended his own license? You sure? The NY Times disagrees with you. Please note the date:

Clinton Disbarred From Practice Before Supreme Court
Published: October 1, 2001
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court ordered former President Clinton disbarred from practicing law before the high court on Monday and gave him 40 days to contest the order.

The court did not explain its reasons, but Supreme Court disbarment often follows disbarment in lower courts.

In April, Clinton's Arkansas law license was suspended for five years and he paid a $25,000 fine. The original disbarment lawsuit was brought by a committee of the Arkansas Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court followed its standard rules in the Clinton case, which include suspending Clinton from practice in the court and giving him 40 day to show why he should not be permanently disbarred.

The court order did not mention any vote by the justices.

"Whenever a member of the bar of this court has been disbarred or suspended from practice of any court of record, or has engaged in conduct unbecoming a member of the bar of this court, the court will enter an order suspending that member from practice before this court," Supreme Court rules say.

Julia Payne, a spokeswoman for Clinton, referred calls to his lawyer, David Kendall, in Washington. Kendall did not immediately return a call seeking comment.

Clinton Disbarred From Practice Before Supreme Court - NYTimes.com

Why don't you read your own post? He voluntarily suspended his own state license, and this is from your post

The Supreme Court followed its standard rules in the Clinton case, which include suspending Clinton from practice in the court and giving him 40 day to show why he should not be permanently disbarred.

The court order did not mention any vote by the justices.

"Whenever a member of the bar of this court has been disbarred or suspended from practice of any court of record, or has engaged in conduct unbecoming a member of the bar of this court, the court will enter an order suspending that member from practice before this court," Supreme Court rules say.

No. That is not what my source said. He asked to voluntarily relinquish his license rather than undergo all the penalties and other stuff that would have been involved had he been removed involuntarily which they had already decided to do.

That must be where the $25,000 fine comes in.

Working from memory, I believe the fine was to pay the attorneys who brought the disbarrment proceedings against Clinton in the first place. The payment of the fine and agreement to not challenge a five-year suspension/disbarrment, which I believe was a couple or three months after Clinton left office, ended once and for all the whole Whitewater investigation and then the Paul Jones/Lewinsky investigation that resulted in the obstruction of justice and perjury conviction and/or court rulings.

I don't believe Clinton has ever applied to renew his law license. Since he nets an average of several hundred thousand dollars per speech for public speaking, I'm pretty sure practicing law is not among his priorities right now, but so far as legal prosecution goes, he and Hillary are now in the clear, at least as the law is concerned, for anything they did before or while he was in office.

Like Boedicca said though, it's fascinating watching his supporters twist themselves into knots trying to make him look good or at least not as bad as his press.

I think he had to "admit wrongdoing" or something like that. Basically it was a plea bargain. Nobody wants to see an ex-President sitting in jail.

Sure they do. Democrats were howling for Nixon's skin when he stepped down.

 

[boedicca]

That must be where the $25,000 fine comes in.

Working from memory, I believe the fine was to pay the attorneys who brought the disbarrment proceedings against Clinton in the first place. The payment of the fine and agreement to not challenge a five-year suspension/disbarrment, which I believe was a couple or three months after Clinton left office, ended once and for all the whole Whitewater investigation and then the Paul Jones/Lewinsky investigation that resulted in the obstruction of justice and perjury conviction and/or court rulings.

I don't believe Clinton has ever applied to renew his law license. Since he nets an average of several hundred thousand dollars per speech for public speaking, I'm pretty sure practicing law is not among his priorities right now, but so far as legal prosecution goes, he and Hillary are now in the clear, at least as the law is concerned, for anything they did before or while he was in office.

Like Boedicca said though, it's fascinating watching his supporters twist themselves into knots trying to make him look good or at least not as bad as his press.

I think he had to "admit wrongdoing" or something like that. Basically it was a plea bargain. Nobody wants to see an ex-President sitting in jail.

That was it. What Bill Clinton did was disgusting and there is nothing whatsoever to commend it or justify it. With his legal skills he knew that both perjury charge and obstruction of justice charge were absolutely on point. But he also knew that his base would forgive him and adore him as if it had never happpened. So he didn't challenge disbarrment by SCOTUS and he cut a deal with the prosecutor and the Arkansas court to accept a reasonable penalty and put it all to an end. He had already paid Paula Jones I think something like $850,000???? to shut her up and end that ugly scenario.

Would he have been able to cut a deal like that if he was a private citizen and not the outgoing POTUS? I don't know. But I'm pretty sure that did weigh heavily on the decisions that were made. His base had already made him into a poor, unjustly accused martyr and putting him in jail or prolonging the proceedings would certainly have exacerbated that. Look how they're defending him now.

As for any piccadillos involved on that island, I seriously doubt Hillary cares one way or the other other than what any backlash in negative publicity might do to her compaign.

If Bubba had been a private citizen (as opposed to a trough feeding member of the DC Political "Elite"), he wouldn't have been able to afford to pay off Paul Jones to the tune of $850,000.

Just sayin'.

Well that is a point too. He wasn't yet out on the speech circuit at that time, but he had a lot of friends with really deep pockets. Of course he and Hillary had professed poverty the entire time they were in the White House, but again working from memory, even though they claimed to be heavily in debt when they were leaving the White House, Terry McAuliffe? fronted them most of the money to buy their New York home at a price of something in the neighborhood of $1.7 million. That doesn't sound like any poverty I've ever heard of.

According to Open Secrets, the Clintons together have made well over $150 million just in speaking engagements since that time plus Bill got the largest up front advance ever paid to a politician on his memoires (2004?) plus they have their retirement income, social security, and no doubt get some expense income from their foundation and income from other investments. At the very least, they certainly can't claim to be poor.

Their foundation takes in millions more including huge donations from foreign countries, but there is very little information available on exactly how that money is used and how much is actually going to the eradication of HIV/AIDs that it presumably is designed to do. There is lots of speculation though

It's really shameful how the Clintons live off of their tax exempt foundation funds. The foundation is just a lifestyle subsidy for them.

 

[Carib Gyal]

Why don't you read your own post? He voluntarily suspended his own state license, and this is from your post

No. That is not what my source said. He asked to voluntarily relinquish his license rather than undergo all the penalties and other stuff that would have been involved had he been removed involuntarily which they had already decided to do.

That must be where the $25,000 fine comes in.

Working from memory, I believe the fine was to pay the attorneys who brought the disbarrment proceedings against Clinton in the first place. The payment of the fine and agreement to not challenge a five-year suspension/disbarrment, which I believe was a couple or three months after Clinton left office, ended once and for all the whole Whitewater investigation and then the Paul Jones/Lewinsky investigation that resulted in the obstruction of justice and perjury conviction and/or court rulings.

I don't believe Clinton has ever applied to renew his law license. Since he nets an average of several hundred thousand dollars per speech for public speaking, I'm pretty sure practicing law is not among his priorities right now, but so far as legal prosecution goes, he and Hillary are now in the clear, at least as the law is concerned, for anything they did before or while he was in office.

Like Boedicca said though, it's fascinating watching his supporters twist themselves into knots trying to make him look good or at least not as bad as his press.

I think he had to "admit wrongdoing" or something like that. Basically it was a plea bargain. Nobody wants to see an ex-President sitting in jail.

Sure they do. Democrats were howling for Nixon's skin when he stepped down.

Really? Like, jail him? I thought they just wanted him to resign. Yikes.

 

[Dad2three]

There is proof he was good friends with this Billionaire pedophile and did visit the island several times. Why do you think he visited the island several times? Just stopping by to say 'hey?'

I went to school with a guy who ended up smoking crack and went to prison for armed robbery. Does that mean I'm guilty too? Guilt by association doesn't quite cut it. Come up with facts instead of innuendo, and you might have something.

If you had a record on file of drug violations and being a chronic user, your regular association with this person would definitely affect public perception and would have much more significance than your just going to the same school with that person. This would not be anywhere near the scandal that it has become if Bill Clinton was not already on very public record of all sorts of sexual misconduct, accusations, allegations, and documented incidences.

The frustrating thing to a lot of us is that a Republican candidate is required to be squeaky clean and above reproach or he is demonized to ridiculous lengths and is considered unelectable. The same standard does not seem to apply to a popular Democrat however, who will be forgiven for just about anything and anything that can be denied will be denied. Hillary of course was not implicated in any of that, but she continues to use Bill for whatever political hay she can make with him.

It is rather pathetic when we set the bar so low for what we expect from our national leaders.

Squeaky clean? You mean like Gingrich? Obviously, you give accusations and allegations the same credibility as you might facts. Just because the right wing goes all "Hair On Fire" crazy about something doesn't mean there is any thing to it. Your little reference to past history demonstrated the reason for common disbelief of all right wing claims

There goes Gingrich's wife's presidential run in 2016.

LOL. Indeed.

I have to agree with Boedicca that it is interesting to watch the leftwingers who love Clinton defend him so passionately and indignantly. They simply cannot bring themselves to acknowledge that his history puts him at a much higher degree of suspicion than the average citizen would be. But they are frantically dragging Republicans out of the woodwork along with their alleged 'crimes' presumably as proof that Clinton isn't so bad and shouldn't be suspect. (How lame is a defense when they have to resort to the 'the other guys are worse' mantra in order to make their own guy look better?)

As I said, it is unfortunate that any of us set the bar so low for what we expect from our elected leaders.

g5000 Wrote

"None of the girls has accused Clinton of having sex with them, much less accusing of being forced to have sex with Clinton.

They have accused many other leading political figures. Clinton's name is not on the list of accused.

So I would strongly suggest you sick little retards stop your mental masturbations"


Bubba s Encore I Did Not Have Sex With That Sex Slave Page 46 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

 

[007]

Keep in mind people, young girls were held captive and repeatedly raped on this island. That has been proven. And Bill Clinton was there. So you do the math. It's not about Republican vs. Democrat. These young girls still haven't received real justice.

... and what were you doing during your visits to the island, Bubba?

Damn, you ran out of steam pretty quick didn't you? You got nothing but slanderous photo shop pictures? Oh well, we knew that's all you had to start with.

Who's this "we" shit? You got a turd in your pocket?

And no one needs to point out for the HUNDREDTH time here that BUBBA visited this PEDOPHILE SEX SLAVE ISLAND on MANY OCCASIONS, just so you nipple headed jack offs can pretend he DIDN'T, or did but just sat around and played PATTY CAKE, PATTY CAKE, BAKERS MAN with all the little under aged sex slaves.

You're a moron, and no more proof of that is needed either.

Now go pound your pud like the nasty little pervert you are, you ignorant little scab picker.

The we shit you asked about are all the people laughing at you. There are lots. You don't think our only means of communication is on this board do you? As far as the rest of your post...........Bite me.

You're pretty much a lone dumbass act there, bubble head, so you better stick to speaking for yourself and not others.

I surely wouldn't want anyone as ******* stupid as you speaking for me, even if I was another retarded leftroid like yourself.

You're STUPID act here is an embarrassment to mankind. Why don't you go and stand on head again in that 55 gallon drum of BULL SHIT. Seems you have to be low with all of it you're spewing here.

 

[007]

Facts talk, bulldog walks.

More like BullDyke.

 

[Freewill]

But you know, Romney tied his dog's cage to the top of his car, and Sarah Palin posted a pic of Trig standing on the dog. Those are so much worse than Bubba sexually exploiting underage girls (and setting himself up for blackmail while his wife was Sec of State.)

We know as fact that Trig stepped on the dog, stood on it, and we know for a fact that Romney drove his car with his dog in a cage on the roof. We do not know for fact that any of these allegations about Clinton are true or that he had any involvement with underage women. Allegations are not fact.

Billowing smoke doesn't mean there is a fire.

 

[Ame®icano]

And her Teabagged Dem rivals will respond that it is similar to the Lewinsky thing. Of course they will be more eloquent than that, but that is what they will mean.

I don't put any politicians on a high moral scale, but I don't see something that sleazy coming from any legitimate Democrat. That's more of a republican thing.

lol. OK.

And I bet he gives himself more credit for being honest and fair than he does those evil 'teabaggers'.

But I guess anybody who really thinks Bill Clinton or any Democrats are incapable of sleazy behavior will probably believe anything so long as it makes a Democrat look good.

Clinton invented defending sleazy behavior.

But back to reality. The Clintons are ******* good, there's no denying. They have their tendrils on the pulse of America and you can bet that right now they're watching this, seeing if it festers. How much can be proved, the flight logs, who's talking, etc. They're coming up with a story of their own.

The sleazy behavior was Republicans elevating a blowjob into high crimes and misdemeanors

Not as sleazy as lying under oath.

 

[Ame®icano]

 

[Ame®icano]

 

[boedicca]

 

[BULLDOG]

It's absolutely disgusting that someone like this man exists. That he was connected to a man who was once the most powerful in the world is something we should all be ashamed about.

This world is covered in darkness. We need to invite light back into our lives and be the people our founders were expecting us to be.

Maybe we should determine if any of these allegations are like, you know, true?

Didn't Mrs. Cosby say the same thing?

Sure she did, and it was perfectly reasonable for her to say that at the time. There has been lots more evidence since she said that though.

Sure, please link to the filed police reports

Didn't say there were any police reports.

 

[Ame®icano]

View attachment 35643

 

[HUGGY]

Oh, this is getting good. And the Dems are DOOMED if they select Hillary as their 2016 candidate.

It's hard to decide who is the bigger sleazeball: Prince Andrew or Bubba, but I'm going to go with the latter.

A new lawsuit has revealed the extent of former President Clinton's friendship with a fundraiser who was later jailed for having sex with an underage prostitute.

Bill Clinton's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, who served time in 2008 for his illegal sexual partners, included up multiple trips to the onetime billionaire's private island in the Caribbean where underage girls were allegedly kept as sex slaves.

The National Enquirer has released new details about the two men's friendship, which seems to have ended abruptly around the time of Epstein's arrest.

Tales of orgies and young girls being shipped to the island, called Little St. James, have been revealed as part of an ongoing lawsuit between Epstein and his former lawyers Scott Rothstein and Bradley Edwards.

It is unclear what the basis of the suit is, but they go on to call witness testimony from some of the frequent guests at Epstein's island to talk about the wild parties that were held there in the early 2000s.

Flight logs pinpoint Clinton's trips on Epstein's jet between the years 2002 and 2005, while he was working on his philanthropic post-presidential career and while his wife Hillary was a Senator for their adopted state of New York.

(snip)

Clinton's connection to Epstein, who worked as a financier and education philanthropist before more than 40 women came forward with claims about him being a sexual predator, has been long-established, but The Enquirer also tells how the former president was also friends with some of Epstein's seedy acquaintances.

The lawsuit claims that Clinton was friends with an unnamed woman who 'kept images of naked underage children on her computer, helped to recruit underage children for Epstein... and photographed underage females in sexually explicit poses'.

While he cut off ties with Epstein, this woman's abuses apparently did not end their relationship as she was reportedly one of the 400 guests at Chelsea Clinton's 2010 wedding....

Bill Clinton identified in lawsuit against pedophile Jeffrey Epstein Daily Mail Online

Is Bill Clinton running for something?

This allegation is 10-13 years old.

Unless there is a capital crime involved isn't there a statute of limitations?

Is this an attempt to blame Hillary for any of this? What is there that connects her to the abuse of these children?

It seems a little desperate to bring this up now.

The GOP failed with the hysterical allegation surrounding Benghazi. Now it's on to Bill porking under age girls? OR is his crime just knowing this sleaseball Epstein? Are there manifests declaring Clinton was actually on planes that filed flight plans to this mysterious island? You do realize that any island with an airport on it also has a name. This post just has to many vague references.

Being a pilot I see many holes in this story involving flights with Clinton supposedly involved. The facts are just too easily checked. I see nothing here that includes facts.

What this thread is telling me that the GOP is going to try to pawn off another dog to run for prez.

Haven't you idiots learned that how you can win the White House is to admit that the last GOP president made horrible mistakes. Just be honest and own up to the wrongs. Your lying and sleazy methods may work to cripple congress but it won't get a bad candidate elected to the most powerful position on the planet.

We already know about Bill being a sexual predator. That really isn't Hillary's fault.

 

[NoNukes]

This thread is about Bubba potentially raping sex slaves. YOU introduced Viagra to the conversation, YOU should have been clearer.

I thought it was about Right Wing dreaming up shit....

Hey you know George Jr was a cheerleader in college...

He must be a potential gay.

Allegations in the form of a lawsuit alleging Bush Jr attended a private island where sex slaves were held would definitely harm his wife's potential presidential run.

Hang on this is a Daily Mail article. Lads no one believes what is in the Daily Mail, I have drank with Journalist in the newspaper and they admit they just dream shit up.

They are sued on regular basis.

Actually this shows the idiot right. This is a legitimate attack, they are that desperate that they are resorting to making stuff up. What's sad about this is we are just short of two years away from the vote.

We expected this type of panic in the last 3 months...

Well, that's a relief. So there is no lawsuit claiming Clinton flew to a private island where sex slaves were held?

The lawyer involved in the case said that it will come out that Clinton never set foot on that island. We will have to wait and see.

 

[Dad2three]

I don't put any politicians on a high moral scale, but I don't see something that sleazy coming from any legitimate Democrat. That's more of a republican thing.

lol. OK.

And I bet he gives himself more credit for being honest and fair than he does those evil 'teabaggers'.

But I guess anybody who really thinks Bill Clinton or any Democrats are incapable of sleazy behavior will probably believe anything so long as it makes a Democrat look good.

Clinton invented defending sleazy behavior.

But back to reality. The Clintons are ******* good, there's no denying. They have their tendrils on the pulse of America and you can bet that right now they're watching this, seeing if it festers. How much can be proved, the flight logs, who's talking, etc. They're coming up with a story of their own.

The sleazy behavior was Republicans elevating a blowjob into high crimes and misdemeanors

Not as sleazy as lying under oath.

UNDER OATH?

President Bush and Vice President Cheney insisted on testifying together and not under oath

9 11 Commission - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Reagan NEVER testified under oath as Prez for Iran/Contra


Reagan, testified "under oath" 130 times that "I don't remember" (IRAN/CONTRA) . AND


Ronald Reagan's amnesia before a federal grand jury

When President Ronald Reagan said that he had forgotten important details about the Iran-contra affair, there was ample precedent for his inability to recall key events. On February 5, 1962--the day before his 51st birthday--he appeared as a witness before a federal grand jury in Los Angeles.

"I don't want to appear as though I am trying deliberately to be vague," Reagan said, responding to questions about some of the most important events of his term as president of the Screen Actors Guild. ....


Ronald Reagan s testimony before a federal grand jury

 

[AgentSparky]

But you know, Romney tied his dog's cage to the top of his car, and Sarah Palin posted a pic of Trig standing on the dog. Those are so much worse than Bubba sexually exploiting underage girls (and setting himself up for blackmail while his wife was Sec of State.)

We know as fact that Trig stepped on the dog, stood on it, and we know for a fact that Romney drove his car with his dog in a cage on the roof. We do not know for fact that any of these allegations about Clinton are true or that he had any involvement with underage women. Allegations are not fact.

Allegations are not fact - if you are a Democrat.
Allegations are absolute fact - if you are Conservative.

Or a white cop shooting a black thug.