Bubba's Encore: I Did Not Have Sex With That Sex Slave

[Carib Gyal]

And her Teabagged Dem rivals will respond that it is similar to the Lewinsky thing. Of course they will be more eloquent than that, but that is what they will mean.

I don't put any politicians on a high moral scale, but I don't see something that sleazy coming from any legitimate Democrat. That's more of a republican thing.

lol. OK.

And I bet he gives himself more credit for being honest and fair than he does those evil 'teabaggers'.

But I guess anybody who really thinks Bill Clinton or any Democrats are incapable of sleazy behavior will probably believe anything so long as it makes a Democrat look good.

Clinton invented defending sleazy behavior.

But back to reality. The Clintons are ******* good, there's no denying. They have their tendrils on the pulse of America and you can bet that right now they're watching this, seeing if it festers. How much can be proved, the flight logs, who's talking, etc. They're coming up with a story of their own.

The sleazy behavior was Republicans elevating a blowjob into high crimes and misdemeanors

They never defended a married man cheating on his wife, or lying to a grand jury.

Nor sexing it up with underage slaves. Yeehaw! The Clintons are back with a vengeance!

 

[BULLDOG]

Of course it will be there. As long as there are teabaggers, there will be crap like this. I expect her, if she says anything at all, to say it's just more stupid manufactured crap, similar to the birther thing. Of course she will be more eloquent when she says it, but that's what she will mean.

And you will believe it without question......just as you fell for the "lower premiums, keep your policy, keep your doctor" crap.
You people are so enamored by your idols, they can say anything they want to you and you will believe it....no matter HOW insane it sounds.

I mean...."we will insure 40 million more people and your premiums wont go up and it will be deficit neutral and anyone who tells you otherwise is lying.

And you believed it....

I mean.....really?

So you have no facts about your Clinton claims, so you want to jump to healthcare now?

simply showing you what happens when someone opts to ignore circumstantial evidence and refer to it as "wild accusations".

When it comes to politicians, NEVER ignore circumstantial evidence....for that is all we have to work with.

Of course, you were likely the first to say that the Furgeson officer was in the wrong, the Boston police acted stupidly, Tawana Brawley was raped by the Sheriff of her hometown, the Duke lacrosee players were guilty of gang rape, and Romney did not pay taxes for 10 years.

Like I said, you have zero credibility with those you debate with.

You got something to back up your accusations against me, or is that just some more of your gut thinking?

your posts. Nothing else is needed.

And no, I will no show you where in you posts. For it is everywhere and I will not play a childish game folks like you prefer to engage in.

Now, at being said, anyone who defines an ideology as "crazy" as you do in you signature line, is, in my eyes, a selfish, egocentric uneducated individual who is not worthy of my time.

Cya pal.

I will certainly give your remarks the consideration they deserve.

 

[Carib Gyal]

lol. OK.

And I bet he gives himself more credit for being honest and fair than he does those evil 'teabaggers'.

But I guess anybody who really thinks Bill Clinton or any Democrats are incapable of sleazy behavior will probably believe anything so long as it makes a Democrat look good.

Clinton invented defending sleazy behavior.

But back to reality. The Clintons are ******* good, there's no denying. They have their tendrils on the pulse of America and you can bet that right now they're watching this, seeing if it festers. How much can be proved, the flight logs, who's talking, etc. They're coming up with a story of their own.

Is that any different than you would expect from anyone?

Nope. But let's not pretend that they are different than anyone. Especially anyone who had hopes of being president before all this went down.

I'm not sure what you mean by that.

Hillary Out in 2016. Who Will Dems Run US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

 

[BULLDOG]

I don't put any politicians on a high moral scale, but I don't see something that sleazy coming from any legitimate Democrat. That's more of a republican thing.

lol. OK.

And I bet he gives himself more credit for being honest and fair than he does those evil 'teabaggers'.

But I guess anybody who really thinks Bill Clinton or any Democrats are incapable of sleazy behavior will probably believe anything so long as it makes a Democrat look good.

Clinton invented defending sleazy behavior.

But back to reality. The Clintons are ******* good, there's no denying. They have their tendrils on the pulse of America and you can bet that right now they're watching this, seeing if it festers. How much can be proved, the flight logs, who's talking, etc. They're coming up with a story of their own.

The sleazy behavior was Republicans elevating a blowjob into high crimes and misdemeanors

They never defended a married man cheating on his wife, or lying to a grand jury.

Nor sexing it up with underage slaves. Yeehaw! The Clintons are back with a vengeance!

Oh my. He cheated on his wife........I'll bet he is the only one to ever do that .......Right?

 

[Carib Gyal]

lol. OK.

And I bet he gives himself more credit for being honest and fair than he does those evil 'teabaggers'.

But I guess anybody who really thinks Bill Clinton or any Democrats are incapable of sleazy behavior will probably believe anything so long as it makes a Democrat look good.

Clinton invented defending sleazy behavior.

But back to reality. The Clintons are ******* good, there's no denying. They have their tendrils on the pulse of America and you can bet that right now they're watching this, seeing if it festers. How much can be proved, the flight logs, who's talking, etc. They're coming up with a story of their own.

The sleazy behavior was Republicans elevating a blowjob into high crimes and misdemeanors

They never defended a married man cheating on his wife, or lying to a grand jury.

Nor sexing it up with underage slaves. Yeehaw! The Clintons are back with a vengeance!

Oh my. He cheated on his wife........I'll bet he is the only one to ever do that .......Right?

He's the only one whose wife is now trying to get votes for her own presidential run. Or she was before scandal upon scandal changed the course of previously predicted history.

 

[BULLDOG]

And I bet he gives himself more credit for being honest and fair than he does those evil 'teabaggers'.

But I guess anybody who really thinks Bill Clinton or any Democrats are incapable of sleazy behavior will probably believe anything so long as it makes a Democrat look good.

Clinton invented defending sleazy behavior.

But back to reality. The Clintons are ******* good, there's no denying. They have their tendrils on the pulse of America and you can bet that right now they're watching this, seeing if it festers. How much can be proved, the flight logs, who's talking, etc. They're coming up with a story of their own.

The sleazy behavior was Republicans elevating a blowjob into high crimes and misdemeanors

They never defended a married man cheating on his wife, or lying to a grand jury.

Nor sexing it up with underage slaves. Yeehaw! The Clintons are back with a vengeance!

Oh my. He cheated on his wife........I'll bet he is the only one to ever do that .......Right?

He's the only one whose wife is now trying to get votes for her own presidential run. Or she was before scandal upon scandal changed the course of previously predicted history.

You made my point. It doesn't matter if it was anyone else in the world, but you think you can use it to smear Hillary. How Pathetic.

 

[Carib Gyal]

Clinton invented defending sleazy behavior.

But back to reality. The Clintons are ******* good, there's no denying. They have their tendrils on the pulse of America and you can bet that right now they're watching this, seeing if it festers. How much can be proved, the flight logs, who's talking, etc. They're coming up with a story of their own.

The sleazy behavior was Republicans elevating a blowjob into high crimes and misdemeanors

They never defended a married man cheating on his wife, or lying to a grand jury.

Nor sexing it up with underage slaves. Yeehaw! The Clintons are back with a vengeance!

Oh my. He cheated on his wife........I'll bet he is the only one to ever do that .......Right?

He's the only one whose wife is now trying to get votes for her own presidential run. Or she was before scandal upon scandal changed the course of previously predicted history.

You made my point. It doesn't matter if it was anyone else in the world, but you think you can use it to smear Hillary. How Pathetic.

I didn't make the accusations. I won't be bringing it up in national debates, if not sooner. It matters because it will change the course of previously predicted history.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Oh, this is getting good. And the Dems are DOOMED if they select Hillary as their 2016 candidate.

It's hard to decide who is the bigger sleazeball: Prince Andrew or Bubba, but I'm going to go with the latter.

A new lawsuit has revealed the extent of former President Clinton's friendship with a fundraiser who was later jailed for having sex with an underage prostitute.

Bill Clinton's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, who served time in 2008 for his illegal sexual partners, included up multiple trips to the onetime billionaire's private island in the Caribbean where underage girls were allegedly kept as sex slaves.

The National Enquirer has released new details about the two men's friendship, which seems to have ended abruptly around the time of Epstein's arrest.

Tales of orgies and young girls being shipped to the island, called Little St. James, have been revealed as part of an ongoing lawsuit between Epstein and his former lawyers Scott Rothstein and Bradley Edwards.

It is unclear what the basis of the suit is, but they go on to call witness testimony from some of the frequent guests at Epstein's island to talk about the wild parties that were held there in the early 2000s.

Flight logs pinpoint Clinton's trips on Epstein's jet between the years 2002 and 2005, while he was working on his philanthropic post-presidential career and while his wife Hillary was a Senator for their adopted state of New York.

(snip)

Clinton's connection to Epstein, who worked as a financier and education philanthropist before more than 40 women came forward with claims about him being a sexual predator, has been long-established, but The Enquirer also tells how the former president was also friends with some of Epstein's seedy acquaintances.

The lawsuit claims that Clinton was friends with an unnamed woman who 'kept images of naked underage children on her computer, helped to recruit underage children for Epstein... and photographed underage females in sexually explicit poses'.

While he cut off ties with Epstein, this woman's abuses apparently did not end their relationship as she was reportedly one of the 400 guests at Chelsea Clinton's 2010 wedding....

Bill Clinton identified in lawsuit against pedophile Jeffrey Epstein Daily Mail Online

Democrats already know about Bill's sexcapades and don't care. It will have no affect on the election.

 

[Theowl32]

Oh, this is getting good. And the Dems are DOOMED if they select Hillary as their 2016 candidate.

It's hard to decide who is the bigger sleazeball: Prince Andrew or Bubba, but I'm going to go with the latter.

A new lawsuit has revealed the extent of former President Clinton's friendship with a fundraiser who was later jailed for having sex with an underage prostitute.

Bill Clinton's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, who served time in 2008 for his illegal sexual partners, included up multiple trips to the onetime billionaire's private island in the Caribbean where underage girls were allegedly kept as sex slaves.

The National Enquirer has released new details about the two men's friendship, which seems to have ended abruptly around the time of Epstein's arrest.

Tales of orgies and young girls being shipped to the island, called Little St. James, have been revealed as part of an ongoing lawsuit between Epstein and his former lawyers Scott Rothstein and Bradley Edwards.

It is unclear what the basis of the suit is, but they go on to call witness testimony from some of the frequent guests at Epstein's island to talk about the wild parties that were held there in the early 2000s.

Flight logs pinpoint Clinton's trips on Epstein's jet between the years 2002 and 2005, while he was working on his philanthropic post-presidential career and while his wife Hillary was a Senator for their adopted state of New York.

(snip)

Clinton's connection to Epstein, who worked as a financier and education philanthropist before more than 40 women came forward with claims about him being a sexual predator, has been long-established, but The Enquirer also tells how the former president was also friends with some of Epstein's seedy acquaintances.

The lawsuit claims that Clinton was friends with an unnamed woman who 'kept images of naked underage children on her computer, helped to recruit underage children for Epstein... and photographed underage females in sexually explicit poses'.

While he cut off ties with Epstein, this woman's abuses apparently did not end their relationship as she was reportedly one of the 400 guests at Chelsea Clinton's 2010 wedding....

Bill Clinton identified in lawsuit against pedophile Jeffrey Epstein Daily Mail Online

Democrats already know about Bill's sexcapades and don't care. It will have no affect on the election.

The question is, "Will lard ass Hillary blame the women like she did before?"

That is the ******* question.
Either way we know ******* liberals do not stand for shit. So it will not matter one bit if she did do it again. Liberals are double talking hypocritical gas bags. We all know that.

 

[Foxfyre]

As long as Hillary uses Bill for his fund raising ability and for other political clout, and as long as they are married which will give Bill access to the White House and the most innermost workings of government again, Bill's conduct is a issue. Or it certainly should be.

And before you try to make it an issue of "teabaggers', can you honestly say that if a Republican candidate's wife or husband was involved in sex crimes whether documented or alleged or really suspicious, that it would not matter to you? That you would not make an issue of it? That you would be looking for a way to dismiss suspicions against that spouse? That you would be trying to make it look like it did not matter to that candidate's qualifications and credibility to be POTUS?

Well, I guess that's the republican strategy, but they have long been nothing more than the little boy who cried wolf. What are they going to do, say "Yes we lied before, but it's true this time"? What am I thinking, they are crazy right wingers, of course they will say something similar to that. Yes it will be an issue for people who would never vote for her to start with, but I don't see it having much effect on anyone else.

Translation: deflection, nonsequitur, ad hominem. But I will give you props for not flat out lying that you would not be bashing a Republican in similar circumstances for all the mileage you could get out of it.

The point I am making is that NONE of us--Democrat or Republican--should be setting the bar so low for what we expect of our elected representatives. Just having a D or R after a name is NOT sufficient reason to believe he or she is qualified or well suited to be in high office.

And, the point I am making is that a person's track record and reputation is ALL we have to go on to evaluate whether a person is qualified and well suited to be in high office. All Americans should set the bar very high for those we put in power and authority over us all. Electing Hillary and, by association, Bill to high office is setting the bar very low indeed.

Of course, most of what you say is absolutely right, but has nothing to do with the manufactured, unfounded accusations being hurled over this. Come back when you have some legitimate evidence, because until then, it's nothing more than more birther shit.

The point is that the suspicions are not 'unfounded' as I have taken some time and made some effort to explain. But those who will justify ANYTHING done by a Democrat of course will not be impressed no matter how much 'evidence' is put out there.

How about I copy and save this post of yours to have at the ready the next time you decide to make a comment about a Republican who has been accused of something but for which there is no 'proof'. Will you demand as much from yourself in being objective and dismissing unfounded allegations as you seem to require of those of us who don't share your ideology?

Saving it sounds like a wonderful idea. I'm sorry, but your and your group saying he is a sleazbag with a history of being a sleazbag. just didn't hit me as founding for the claims. Perhaps you can remind me of what that foundation was, or point out which post you did that in. Accusations are not evidence. Accusations from a rabid group of mud slingers are not relevant. The fact that there is a loud echo chamber of those accusations isn't a foundation.

Oh for heavens sake. Google:
Gennifer Flowers
Monika Lewinsky
Paula Jones
Kathleen Willey
Juanita Brodderick
Elizabeth Ward Gracen
Dolly Kyle Browning
LD Browning, Arkansas state trooper's, deposition
among others

Look up why Clinton was held in contempt of court by a New York Judge, why he has been barred from arguing before the Supreme Court of the USA and why he was disbarred by the Arkansas State Bar. Did all of it hold up as uncontestable under closer scrutiny? Of course not, but a lot of it did. You simply cannot get around all those years of that kind of history without admitting there is a definite sleaze factor.

Even with a "D" after his name.

And that leaves room to at least raise eyebrows when it comes out that Epstein had at least 22 telephone numbers for Bill Clinton and/or his aides, some on speed dial, and that Bill Clinton was a frequent visitor to an island where it came out in court that sex orgies with young women, at least some underaged, were the norm. Epstein went to prison for it and remains on the sexual offender registry to this day.

 

[boedicca]

Just 1 little provable fact tying Clinton to anything bad that might have happened there is too much to ask for?

The provable fact is that he was on speed dial from Epstein's estate and had been for years, that he had made multiple trips to the island, that he had flown many many times on Epstein's jets. And his history strongly suggests that he would take advantage of sexual encounters with young women given opportunity to do so. Is there proof he did take such advantage on Epstein's island? No there is not at this time. But is there reason to believe he would have taken advantage given opportunity to do so? Absolutely. He broke off contact with Epstein only after Epstein was formally arrested for sex crimes making him a strong political liability.

Yes other powerful figures like Dershowitz and Trump have also been named as friends of Epstein, but their histories do not include multiple sexual improprieties as is the case with Clinton. Therefore there is far less reason to suspect them of sexual misconduct than there is to suspect Clinton who we KNOW has a history of that, both alleged and proven.

And no, it is not too much to ask that however much a person deserves to be hung, that we hang them for a crime they actually commit.

Can you say in all honesty say that if it was a prominent Republican with a history of improper womanizing who had been named as a frequent visitor to Epstein's island, that you would be demanding proof of wrong doing before you accused him? Or that it would not matter to you if a presidential candidate had a close association with such person?

Yes. I can say that. I might have a suspicion, but that is far from the crazy accusations made here. Bottom line, it isn't about him anyway. It's about the right desperately searching for anything they can think of to smear Hillary. Do you honestly think this will work? Of course the hard core teabaggers will tie it to her, they always do, but do you see that happening to anyone who is sane?

As long as Hillary uses Bill for his fund raising ability and for other political clout, and as long as they are married which will give Bill access to the White House and the most innermost workings of government again, Bill's conduct is a issue. Or it certainly should be.

And before you try to make it an issue of "teabaggers', can you honestly say that if a Republican candidate's wife or husband was involved in sex crimes whether documented or alleged or really suspicious, that it would not matter to you? That you would not make an issue of it? That you would be looking for a way to dismiss suspicions against that spouse? That you would be trying to make it look like it did not matter to that candidate's qualifications and credibility to be POTUS?

Well, I guess that's the republican strategy, but they have long been nothing more than the little boy who cried wolf. What are they going to do, say "Yes we lied before, but it's true this time"? What am I thinking, they are crazy right wingers, of course they will say something similar to that. Yes it will be an issue for people who would never vote for her to start with, but I don't see it having much effect on anyone else.

Translation: deflection, nonsequitur, ad hominem. But I will give you props for not flat out lying that you would not be bashing a Republican in similar circumstances for all the mileage you could get out of it.

The point I am making is that NONE of us--Democrat or Republican--should be setting the bar so low for what we expect of our elected representatives. Just having a D or R after a name is NOT sufficient reason to believe he or she is qualified or well suited to be in high office.

And, the point I am making is that a person's track record and reputation is ALL we have to go on to evaluate whether a person is qualified and well suited to be in high office. All Americans should set the bar very high for those we put in power and authority over us all. Electing Hillary and, by association, Bill to high office is setting the bar very low indeed.

Character matters. Bubba is a known liar and abuser of relatively powerless (and subordinate) women. It's a problem that such allegations are believable. If he weren't so corrupt, they wouldn't be taken seriously.

 

[Care4all]

Well, I guess that's the republican strategy, but they have long been nothing more than the little boy who cried wolf. What are they going to do, say "Yes we lied before, but it's true this time"? What am I thinking, they are crazy right wingers, of course they will say something similar to that. Yes it will be an issue for people who would never vote for her to start with, but I don't see it having much effect on anyone else.

Translation: deflection, nonsequitur, ad hominem. But I will give you props for not flat out lying that you would not be bashing a Republican in similar circumstances for all the mileage you could get out of it.

The point I am making is that NONE of us--Democrat or Republican--should be setting the bar so low for what we expect of our elected representatives. Just having a D or R after a name is NOT sufficient reason to believe he or she is qualified or well suited to be in high office.

And, the point I am making is that a person's track record and reputation is ALL we have to go on to evaluate whether a person is qualified and well suited to be in high office. All Americans should set the bar very high for those we put in power and authority over us all. Electing Hillary and, by association, Bill to high office is setting the bar very low indeed.

Of course, most of what you say is absolutely right, but has nothing to do with the manufactured, unfounded accusations being hurled over this. Come back when you have some legitimate evidence, because until then, it's nothing more than more birther shit.

The point is that the suspicions are not 'unfounded' as I have taken some time and made some effort to explain. But those who will justify ANYTHING done by a Democrat of course will not be impressed no matter how much 'evidence' is put out there.

How about I copy and save this post of yours to have at the ready the next time you decide to make a comment about a Republican who has been accused of something but for which there is no 'proof'. Will you demand as much from yourself in being objective and dismissing unfounded allegations as you seem to require of those of us who don't share your ideology?

Saving it sounds like a wonderful idea. I'm sorry, but your and your group saying he is a sleazbag with a history of being a sleazbag. just didn't hit me as founding for the claims. Perhaps you can remind me of what that foundation was, or point out which post you did that in. Accusations are not evidence. Accusations from a rabid group of mud slingers are not relevant. The fact that there is a loud echo chamber of those accusations isn't a foundation.

Oh for heavens sake. Google:
Gennifer Flowers
Monika Lewinsky
Paula Jones
Kathleen Willey
Juanita Brodderick
Elizabeth Ward Gracen
Dolly Kyle Browning
LD Browning, Arkansas state trooper's, deposition
among others

Look up why Clinton was held in contempt of court by a New York Judge, why he has been barred from arguing before the Supreme Court of the USA and why he was disbarred by the Arkansas State Bar. Did all of it hold up as uncontestable under closer scrutiny? Of course not, but a lot of it did. You simply cannot get around all those years of that kind of history without admitting there is a definite sleaze factor.

Even with a "D" after his name.

And that leaves room to at least raise eyebrows when it comes out that Epstein had at least 22 telephone numbers for Bill Clinton and/or his aides, some on speed dial, and that Bill Clinton was a frequent visitor to an island where it came out in court that sex orgies with young women, at least some underaged, were the norm. Epstein went to prison for it and remains on the sexual offender registry to this day.

oh jebus Foxy.... IF ANYTHING, the fact that Epstein had 22 phone numbers of Clinton and his PHILANTHROPY aides, it SHOWS that this Epstein's relationship involved Clinton's philanthropy.... unless you weirdly think all of Clinton's 10-20 aids are being paid merely to set up sex orgies with Epstein??? WHERE is your head in this.... where is your common sense?

AND you are WRONG on Clinton being disbarred..... he was NEVER disbarred, his license was SUSPENDED for 5 years....there IS a difference....

So maybe you should get your FACTS straight before you continue with this gossip....?

And fyi it made me sick when the Lewinsky crud came out, and I couldn't even stand to hear Clinton's voice...if he was on the news or had a press conference, I had to shut the tv off, just not to puke from hearing him...

But this tabloid speculating that you are doing, is simply wrong, and has no basis in any fact.

 

[paulitician]

Clinton is a degenerate sexual predator. He always has been. Shame on all those supposed 'Womens' Rights' activist groups who have consistently defended and supported him. He's a pervert who should be doing jail time.

And you are a circus geek with an oddly shaped glass eye that likes to club baby seals. See how easy it is to throw unfounded shit?

The accusations about Clinton are not "unfounded." There's actually quite a large foundation for them.

Ok. Lets hear that foundation. Unproved accusations don't count.

Would you really trust leaving your young daughter, sister, or other female family members with Bill Clinton? Think about that for a bit.

No problem

You're demented.

 

[paulitician]

It's about evidence. You got any?

Yup, and Ted Kennedy didn't kill that young girl and get away with it either. I hear ya.

You gave up on the Clinton thing huh?

Yeah, pretty much. I realize he's a NWO Globalist Elite bastard who will not be held accountable. I fully expect the Elite-controlled American Government/Corporate Media to quickly sweep this one under the carpet. They have to protect their own. These girls lives mean nothing to them. They're mere slaves to be used & abused. Sadly, it is what it is.

Of course it's tragic for young girls to have to suffer through that, but what has that got to do with your dumb ass claim that Clinton did it?

If you "owned" the place....would you invite someone like Bill Clinton if he did not know of what was going on there?

It was a private Globalist Elite pervert pedophile playground. It's sickening. To hell with Bill Clinton.

 

[paulitician]

Hopefully all of these perverts who tortured these young girls, will die very slow painful deaths. It's the best we can hope for. They're all very powerful Globalist Elites. So they won't be held accountable. That's the sad reality.

 

[jknowgood]

And her Teabagged Dem rivals will respond that it is similar to the Lewinsky thing. Of course they will be more eloquent than that, but that is what they will mean.

I don't put any politicians on a high moral scale, but I don't see something that sleazy coming from any legitimate Democrat. That's more of a republican thing.

lol. OK.

And I bet he gives himself more credit for being honest and fair than he does those evil 'teabaggers'.

But I guess anybody who really thinks Bill Clinton or any Democrats are incapable of sleazy behavior will probably believe anything so long as it makes a Democrat look good.

Clinton invented defending sleazy behavior.

But back to reality. The Clintons are ******* good, there's no denying. They have their tendrils on the pulse of America and you can bet that right now they're watching this, seeing if it festers. How much can be proved, the flight logs, who's talking, etc. They're coming up with a story of their own.

The sleazy behavior was Republicans elevating a blowjob into high crimes and misdemeanors

How cute, so Clinton being a sexual predator is the republicans fault? No, they just exposed him for being one.

 

[007]

Keep in mind people, young girls were held captive and repeatedly raped on this island. That has been proven. And Bill Clinton was there. So you do the math. It's not about Republican vs. Democrat. These young girls still haven't received real justice.

... and what were you doing during your visits to the island, Bubba?

Damn, you ran out of steam pretty quick didn't you? You got nothing but slanderous photo shop pictures? Oh well, we knew that's all you had to start with.

Who's this "we" shit? You got a turd in your pocket?

And no one needs to point out for the HUNDREDTH time here that BUBBA visited this PEDOPHILE SEX SLAVE ISLAND on MANY OCCASIONS, just so you nipple headed jack offs can pretend he DIDN'T, or did but just sat around and played PATTY CAKE, PATTY CAKE, BAKERS MAN with all the little under aged sex slaves.

You're a moron, and no more proof of that is needed either.

Now go pound your pud like the nasty little pervert you are, you ignorant little scab picker.

 

[Foxfyre]

Translation: deflection, nonsequitur, ad hominem. But I will give you props for not flat out lying that you would not be bashing a Republican in similar circumstances for all the mileage you could get out of it.

The point I am making is that NONE of us--Democrat or Republican--should be setting the bar so low for what we expect of our elected representatives. Just having a D or R after a name is NOT sufficient reason to believe he or she is qualified or well suited to be in high office.

And, the point I am making is that a person's track record and reputation is ALL we have to go on to evaluate whether a person is qualified and well suited to be in high office. All Americans should set the bar very high for those we put in power and authority over us all. Electing Hillary and, by association, Bill to high office is setting the bar very low indeed.

Of course, most of what you say is absolutely right, but has nothing to do with the manufactured, unfounded accusations being hurled over this. Come back when you have some legitimate evidence, because until then, it's nothing more than more birther shit.

The point is that the suspicions are not 'unfounded' as I have taken some time and made some effort to explain. But those who will justify ANYTHING done by a Democrat of course will not be impressed no matter how much 'evidence' is put out there.

How about I copy and save this post of yours to have at the ready the next time you decide to make a comment about a Republican who has been accused of something but for which there is no 'proof'. Will you demand as much from yourself in being objective and dismissing unfounded allegations as you seem to require of those of us who don't share your ideology?

Saving it sounds like a wonderful idea. I'm sorry, but your and your group saying he is a sleazbag with a history of being a sleazbag. just didn't hit me as founding for the claims. Perhaps you can remind me of what that foundation was, or point out which post you did that in. Accusations are not evidence. Accusations from a rabid group of mud slingers are not relevant. The fact that there is a loud echo chamber of those accusations isn't a foundation.

Oh for heavens sake. Google:
Gennifer Flowers
Monika Lewinsky
Paula Jones
Kathleen Willey
Juanita Brodderick
Elizabeth Ward Gracen
Dolly Kyle Browning
LD Browning, Arkansas state trooper's, deposition
among others

Look up why Clinton was held in contempt of court by a New York Judge, why he has been barred from arguing before the Supreme Court of the USA and why he was disbarred by the Arkansas State Bar. Did all of it hold up as uncontestable under closer scrutiny? Of course not, but a lot of it did. You simply cannot get around all those years of that kind of history without admitting there is a definite sleaze factor.

Even with a "D" after his name.

And that leaves room to at least raise eyebrows when it comes out that Epstein had at least 22 telephone numbers for Bill Clinton and/or his aides, some on speed dial, and that Bill Clinton was a frequent visitor to an island where it came out in court that sex orgies with young women, at least some underaged, were the norm. Epstein went to prison for it and remains on the sexual offender registry to this day.

oh jebus Foxy.... IF ANYTHING, the fact that Epstein had 22 phone numbers of Clinton and his PHILANTHROPY aides, it SHOWS that this Epstein's relationship involved Clinton's philanthropy.... unless you weirdly think all of Clinton's 10-20 aids are being paid merely to set up sex orgies with Epstein??? WHERE is your head in this.... where is your common sense?

AND you are WRONG on Clinton being disbarred..... he was NEVER disbarred, his license was SUSPENDED for 5 years....there IS a difference....

So maybe you should get your FACTS straight before you continue with this gossip....?

And fyi it made me sick when the Lewinsky crud came out, and I couldn't even stand to hear Clinton's voice...if he was on the news or had a press conference, I had to shut the tv off, just not to puke from hearing him...

But this tabloid speculating that you are doing, is simply wrong, and has no basis in any fact.

You are drawing assumptions about what I said that I did not make. I suggest you read my posts more carefully and you will be less likely to mischaracterize what I have argued.

Disbarrment can be permanent or a suspension, but it is disbarrment regardless.
disbarred legal definition of disbarred

Do you have an authoritative link, i.e. one that is not a rabid leftwing Clinton apologist type site?, that those aides were philanthropic aides engaged in philanthropic activities? I have seen nothing like that in either the domestic or foreign mainstream coverage of this story. It does seem to be a fact that, much to his chagrin, Epstein's very private life was made much more public because he WAS flying Bill Clinton and Kevin Spacey around, and they did make at least one trip to Africa presumably as a philanthropic investigation. But that still does not explain why Epstein would have Clinton on speed dial or why Epstein had so many more ways to contact Clinton than presumably anybody else, or why Clinton made so many trips both on Epstein's planes or to Epstein's island.

I have not done one bit of speculation on any post I have made on this thread. Your assumption that I am speculating is, well, speculation.

But to think that there is no reason to raise eyebrows given Bill Clinton's history and the relationship between him and Epstein, is naivete to the extreme.

 

[R.D.]

And you are a circus geek with an oddly shaped glass eye that likes to club baby seals. See how easy it is to throw unfounded shit?

The accusations about Clinton are not "unfounded." There's actually quite a large foundation for them.

Ok. Lets hear that foundation. Unproved accusations don't count.

Would you really trust leaving your young daughter, sister, or other female family members with Bill Clinton? Think about that for a bit.

No problem

You're demented.

Oh darn...the no family rule stops me from addressing this further

 

[Iceweasel]

Everybody knew the GOP would make gains last November. That's the historical pattern that has been shown for a long time.

They made history and that's a historical given? lol

History was made when I ate breakfast this morning. So what.

What the hell did you eat?

Iceweasels

Oh, I thought you meant literally eat. You were using a colloquialism for sucking someone's nads and pretending it was me.