So what do you think he was doing on that island with all the other Millionaire sex predators? Just stopping by to say hey?
You mean there were ALLEGATIONS? Shocking. I guess knowing people that commit crimes MIGHT be bad? How you Klowns stand behind torture yet get upset at BJ's in the oval office is shocking to the credible people!
Uh huh, a known degenerate pervert showed up several times on a sex slave island to just say 'hello.' Yeah sure, we believe that. The man is a serial sex predator. He should be doing jail time. Shame on all who are still defending him.
first start with showing the records that Clinton visited the Island and the PROOF for that...
Then start with they were both involved in Philanthropy...and go from there....who else involved with philanthropy visited the man? did Bush 1 as well?
And if Clinton made these visits around his heart surgery and immediately after his heart surgery, do you REALLY THINK this very very sickly man went there for the sex parties that he could NOT participate in?
Referring to a subsequent post of yours, do you have PROOF that Romney sheltered his income offshore? Or do you depend on the media to inform you of that? Do you have PROOF that there was any improper avoidance of taxes? Can you name ANY other millionaire or billionaire who does not take advantage of tax shelters when they can including the Clintons?
I have posted several authoritative sources now, none of which are the National Enquiror, and have conferred with media considered to be more leftwing and Democrat supportive such as the Sydney Herald, Huffington Post, and NBC, all of which confirm that COURT RECORDS show that Clinton was a frequent guest to Epstein's island and he frequently flew on Epstein's plane right up to the time of Epstein's arrest on sex offenses.
The point is that most Clinton supporters will absolutely refuse to believe he did anything wrong unless they actually see it or unless the evidence is so overwhelming they feel like idiots denying it.
Those same people will invariably point to Republicans as far more criticizable or worse and will believe and repeat again and again anything bad said about them however dubious the source.
They frequently say that whatever Clinton did in the past is now old news and no longer relevent while anything a Republican did since puberty is a disqualifying black mark.
And that is what makes this an interesting topic. I honestly don't CARE whether Clinton got some jollies on that island because I have little respect for the man or the wife who knows who and what he is and uses him for her own political purposes. But it is fascinating how much Hillary supporters twist themselves into contortions to try to make Bill look better or at least not worst lest he somehow taint her next run for office.
They don't CARE and refuse to discuss and/or deny that she is guilty of any wrong doing or that there is anything shady in her past. Any uncomplimentary blip in the history of any opponent of hers though is blown up to huge proportions.
They don't CARE and refuse to discuss or deny her incompetence or lack of any notable achievements in her entire work and political history, but dismiss as irrelevent any achievements of her opponents while emphasizing any missteps or less than successful ventures.
And they don't care that she has always needed Bill to make her politically viable at all. And they don't care what sort of character he has if he is returned to the White House as 'first gentleman' or whatever they will call him.
It is simply a fascinating things to watch, and it does illustrate to me and many others what an enormous double standard exists in leftwing ideology, and how low the Democrats set the bar for those they admire and exalt to high office.