Brunson VS. Adams.

[Lastamender]

Then man up and take the bet, you pussy.
It's going to get dismissed straight up with no explanation.
Just as it should be.

You know nothing about men. I doubt if you ever will.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Could Be Big

Could be ‘explosive.’

 

[Lastamender]

Could be ‘explosive.’

You never know. In your case that applies to everything.

 

[JustAGuy1]

We are on the same page.

 

[Brick Layer]

This is something I would just roll my eyes at these days except for...

CRYPTO CRASH...


DEADMAN MOCKING
Dialed in by John David McAfee
"it's finally playing out" ~ Ghost

 

[JustAGuy1]

CRYPTO CRASH...


DEADMAN MOCKING
Dialed in by John David McAfee
"it's finally playing out" ~ Ghost

Our numbers are growing.

 

[johngaltshrugged]

CRYPTO CRASH...


DEADMAN MOCKING
Dialed in by John David McAfee
"it's finally playing out" ~ Ghost

Third Crypto Boss Dies in Helicopter Crash | The Gateway Pundit | by Margaret Flavin

What is going on in the crypto world?

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[Care4all]

Good luck! You're gonna need it!

They did investigate the bogus claims of fraud, which were still bogus after investigating, and they did wait out for the court case decisions with alleged fraud claims, and did hand recounts and signature audits....then they followed the law, and certified their election results....

 

[Brick Layer]

2) SCOTUS accepted it.
The defendants own counsel, the Solicitor General of the US DOJ, waived their right to respond by Nov 23 so it is moving forward.

Get this- The defendants counsel have tried to hide their clients at every level...

Watch the docket for an order by the court requesting a response from the defendants.
US Supreme Court docket No. 22-380 Docket Files:

Search

"A Respondent may choose to waive the right to oppose a Petition that seems clearly without merit. This will save time and money without any substantial risk if the Respondent feels certain that Certiorari will be denied."

Should I Skip the Brief in Opposition? - Cockle Legal Briefs

If your opponent files a Petition for Writ of Certiorari, the best practice is to submit a high-quality Brief in Opposition to explain why the Court should not hear the case.

www.cocklelegalbriefs.com

[does this petition seems clearly without merit]

The court agreed to take up the case... [I agree] this speaks volumes!

PERSPECTIVES AND EVENTS!!!!
Certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court

"The Supreme Court denies the vast majority of requests for review: 1,945 of the 2,130 so called paid (i.e., nonindigent) certiorari petitions or appeals acted on during the Court's 1995 term were turned down. An even higher proportion of the nearly 4,500 in forma pauperis (IFP) cases were unsuccessful. 61 U.S.L.W. 3100 (Aug. 6, 1996). In fact, during the tenure of Chief Justice Rehnquist, as the number of lower court decisions has increased, the number of cases set for argument in the Supreme Court has declined. The drop has not been trivial: down from 167 in the 1987 term to 116 in the 1992 term and 90 in the 1995 term. Many of the cases accepted for argument, moreover, are those in which the federal government has sought or supported review; or they involve constitutional, civil rights, or criminal matters. Few are civil business cases..."

Opposing Certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court
ABA Litigation Manual, 3d ed.

Opposing Certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court | Perspectives & Events | Mayer Brown

www.mayerbrown.com

"The doctrines of equitable maxim and the object principle of justice" [Judicial Economy] Brunson herein incorporates the argument found therein...
[Deron G Brunson]
In The Supreme Court of the United States
Docket No. 18-1147
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-1147/90751/20190305155047706_00000001.pdf


What Michael Richard Pence did will go down as the biggest betrayal...

 

[Brick Layer]

Third Crypto Boss Dies in Helicopter Crash | The Gateway Pundit | by Margaret Flavin

What is going on in the crypto world?

www.thegatewaypundit.com

These crypto guys seem to have lots of controversy over their [faked] deaths...

'Anything is possible' — John McAfee's former wife responds to faked death claims

Janice McAfee is not taking the claims made about her former husband in a documentary seriously as she doubts he would have hidden in the U.S.

cointelegraph.com

Did a crypto CEO fake his own death to abscond with $190 million?

One clear takeaway from the unfolding story: it's yet another cautionary tale about the regulatory vacuum in the cryptocurrency industry.

futurism.com

 

[Brick Layer]

The relief they petition is a little ever-zealous.

The treason to the constitution is a little ever-zealous... Lol

Hint, there's a reason why the government waived its right to file a response.

A Respondent may choose to waive the right to oppose a Petition that seems clearly without merit. This will save time and money without any substantial risk if the Respondent feels certain that Certiorari will be denied.

Should I Skip the Brief in Opposition? - Cockle Legal Briefs

If your opponent files a Petition for Writ of Certiorari, the best practice is to submit a high-quality Brief in Opposition to explain why the Court should not hear the case.

www.cocklelegalbriefs.com

Nonetheless the petition is real and it deserves an answer. Deal with it. You claim to value the rule of law.

US Supreme Court docket No. 22-380
Docket Files:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html



Exactly I agree with Lastamender, thus far this case [request for review] has not been denied, the case has been excepted [filed on the docket]; the court may order a response from the ever-zealous respondents! Or rule in favor of the Petitioner ~ eh?
The petition as drafted has been factually docketed [case excepted] [case numbered] [excepted for review], overcoming 'outlined oppositions' as illustrated within litigation manual criteria ~ eh?

"The Supreme Court denies the vast majority of requests for review: 1,945 of the 2,130 so-called paid (i.e., nonindigent) certiorari petitions or appeals acted on during the Court's 1995 term were turned down. An even higher proportion of the nearly 4,500 in forma pauperis (IFP) cases were unsuccessful. 61 U.S.L.W. 3100 (Aug. 6, 1996). In fact, during the tenure of Chief Justice Rehnquist, as the number of lower court decisions has increased, the number of cases set for argument in the Supreme Court has declined. The drop has not been trivial: down from 167 in the 1987 term to 116 in the 1992 term and 90 in the 1995 term. Many of the cases accepted for argument, moreover, are those in which the federal government has sought or supported review; or they involve constitutional, civil rights, or criminal matters. Few are civil business cases..." ABA Litigation Manual, 3d ed.

Opposing Certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court | Insights | Mayer Brown

www.mayerbrown.com

Regardless this suit is supplementary; the military is in control!

"We have a 'Pretendency'." ~ Clif
1:00:48

 

[Moonglow]

The treason to the constitution is a little ever-zealous... Lol

A Respondent may choose to waive the right to oppose a Petition that seems clearly without merit. This will save time and money without any substantial risk if the Respondent feels certain that Certiorari will be denied.

Should I Skip the Brief in Opposition? - Cockle Legal Briefs

If your opponent files a Petition for Writ of Certiorari, the best practice is to submit a high-quality Brief in Opposition to explain why the Court should not hear the case.

www.cocklelegalbriefs.com

US Supreme Court docket No. 22-380
Docket Files:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html



The case has been excepted [filed on the docket] the court may order a response from the ever-zealous respondents...
The petition as drafted has been factually docketed [case excepted] [case numbered] [excepted for review], overcoming 'outlined oppositions' as illustrated within litigation manual criteria ~ eh?

"The Supreme Court denies the vast majority of requests for review: 1,945 of the 2,130 so-called paid (i.e., nonindigent) certiorari petitions or appeals acted on during the Court's 1995 term were turned down. An even higher proportion of the nearly 4,500 in forma pauperis (IFP) cases were unsuccessful. 61 U.S.L.W. 3100 (Aug. 6, 1996). In fact, during the tenure of Chief Justice Rehnquist, as the number of lower court decisions has increased, the number of cases set for argument in the Supreme Court has declined. The drop has not been trivial: down from 167 in the 1987 term to 116 in the 1992 term and 90 in the 1995 term. Many of the cases accepted for argument, moreover, are those in which the federal government has sought or supported review; or they involve constitutional, civil rights, or criminal matters. Few are civil business cases..." ABA Litigation Manual, 3d ed.

Opposing Certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court | Insights | Mayer Brown

www.mayerbrown.com

What part of the Constitution have they committed treason against?

 

[Moonglow]

The treason to the constitution is a little ever-zealous... Lol

A Respondent may choose to waive the right to oppose a Petition that seems clearly without merit. This will save time and money without any substantial risk if the Respondent feels certain that Certiorari will be denied.

Should I Skip the Brief in Opposition? - Cockle Legal Briefs

If your opponent files a Petition for Writ of Certiorari, the best practice is to submit a high-quality Brief in Opposition to explain why the Court should not hear the case.

www.cocklelegalbriefs.com

US Supreme Court docket No. 22-380
Docket Files:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html



The case has been excepted [filed on the docket] the court may order a response from the ever-zealous respondents...
The petition as drafted has been factually docketed [case excepted] [case numbered] [excepted for review], overcoming 'outlined oppositions' as illustrated within litigation manual criteria ~ eh?

"The Supreme Court denies the vast majority of requests for review: 1,945 of the 2,130 so-called paid (i.e., nonindigent) certiorari petitions or appeals acted on during the Court's 1995 term were turned down. An even higher proportion of the nearly 4,500 in forma pauperis (IFP) cases were unsuccessful. 61 U.S.L.W. 3100 (Aug. 6, 1996). In fact, during the tenure of Chief Justice Rehnquist, as the number of lower court decisions has increased, the number of cases set for argument in the Supreme Court has declined. The drop has not been trivial: down from 167 in the 1987 term to 116 in the 1992 term and 90 in the 1995 term. Many of the cases accepted for argument, moreover, are those in which the federal government has sought or supported review; or they involve constitutional, civil rights, or criminal matters. Few are civil business cases..." ABA Litigation Manual, 3d ed.

Opposing Certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court | Insights | Mayer Brown

www.mayerbrown.com

excepted-not included in the category or group specified.

 

[Brick Layer]

What part of the Constitution have they committed treason against?

That little part of jurat where each named defendant agreed to defend and support the constitution and anything contrary to that is treason; [re]read the petition entirely.

Regardless this suit is supplementary; the military is in control!

DEREK JOHNSON DECODES FROM TRUMPS SPEECH

Ep. 2935b - Evidence Already In, The [DS] Got Caught, It’s Perfectly Documented For All To See

Get The Same Tactical Flashlight I Use For Self-Defense Here: Click Here --> http://www.fighterflare.com Get 20% OFF By Using Promo Code "Black20" The [DS] is panicking, they are not in the drivers seat, they are now reacting to everything the patr…

www.bitchute.com

 

[Lastamender]

That little part of jurat where each named defendant agreed to defend and support the constitution and anything contrary to that is treason; [re]read the petition entirely.

DEREK JOHNSON DECODES FROM TRUMPS SPEECH

Ep. 2935b - Evidence Already In, The [DS] Got Caught, It’s Perfectly Documented For All To See

Get The Same Tactical Flashlight I Use For Self-Defense Here: Click Here --> http://www.fighterflare.com Get 20% OFF By Using Promo Code "Black20" The [DS] is panicking, they are not in the drivers seat, they are now reacting to everything the patr…

www.bitchute.com

He did not read it.

 

[Brick Layer]

Nonetheless the petition is real and it deserves an answer. Deal with it...

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.

 

[Brick Layer]

SCOTUS accepted it.

Progs need to realize that SCOTUS didn't have to take this case.

The court agreed to take up the case... [I agree] this speaks volumes!

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.

 

[Brick Layer]

The Supreme Court’s case distribution schedule identifies the dates on which petitions for writs of certiorari, along with corresponding briefs in opposition, amicus briefs and reply briefs, will be distributed (sent upstairs to chambers) to the justices.

What does it mean to relist a case?

Most of the Supreme Court’s docket is discretionary, meaning that the justices get to pick the cases they want to hear. Any justice, for any reason at any stage, can have a case “relisted,” or held over until the Court’s next private conference. In recent years, the relist has become the most publicly-available signal that the Court is interested in hearing a case. Recall that it takes four justices to grant a petition.

In 2014, the court appears to have adopted a general practice of granting review only after it has relisted a case at least once; although we don’t know for sure, presumably the court uses the extra time resulting from a relist to make sure that the case is a suitable one for its review. FAQs: Announcements of orders and opinions - SCOTUSblog

A relist is noted on the Court’s docket by the words “DISTRIBUTED for Conference of [DATE].”

A few things could be happening over the weeks a case is spent relisted:

One justice could be trying to pick up a fourth vote to grant review, one or more justices may want to look more closely at the case, a justice could be writing an opinion about the court’s decision to deny review, or the court could be writing an opinion to summarily reverse (that is, without briefing or oral argument on the merits) the decision below.

Supreme Court Distribution: Lists and Relists, Explained - Cockle Legal Briefs

The Supreme Court’s case distribution schedule identifies the dates on which petitions for writs of certiorari, along with corresponding briefs in opposition, amicus briefs and reply briefs, will be distributed (sent upstairs to chambers) to the justices. It also identifies the dates on which...

www.cocklelegalbriefs.com

When a case is relisted, the justices do not grant or deny review, but instead will reconsider the case at their next conference. This will be reflected on the case’s electronic docket once the docket has been updated: You will see the words “DISTRIBUTED for Conference of [fill in date],” and then the next entry in the docket will usually say “DISTRIBUTED for Conference of [next conference after the previous entry, whenever that is].” It is almost impossible to know exactly what is happening when a particular case is relisted, but a few different things could be going on. One justice could be trying to pick up a fourth vote to grant review, one or more justices may want to look more closely at the case, a justice could be writing an opinion about the court’s decision to deny review, or the court could be writing an opinion to summarily reverse (that is, without briefing or oral argument on the merits) the decision below. In 2014, the court appears to have adopted a general practice of granting review only after it has relisted a case at least once; although we don’t know for sure, presumably the court uses the extra time resulting from a relist to make sure that the case is a suitable one for its review.

FAQs: Announcements of orders and opinions - SCOTUSblog

FAQs: Announcements of orders and opinions - SCOTUSblog

www.scotusblog.com

 

[Brick Layer]

 

[Brick Layer]

What part of the Constitution have they committed treason against?

See Hammer Time VIDEO starting at 9:34 through 12:30.