Brunson VS. Adams.

[Brick Layer]

 

[Lastamender]

The Supreme Court Case That Could Drain The Swamp? | The Liberty Beacon

The Question: How can you support, and defend, the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic? Answer: You investigate ...

www.thelibertybeacon.com

 

[Lastamender]

The Supreme Court Case That Could Drain The Swamp? | The Liberty Beacon

The Question: How can you support, and defend, the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic? Answer: You investigate ...

www.thelibertybeacon.com

Kind of an open a shut case. We all know fraud was not investigated because fraud would have been proven. But even if it was not what they did is inexcusable. They got to go. Patriots will remain in Congress. I have been saying that since it happened.

 

[Lastamender]

Loy, Raland, Deron and Gaynor Brunson (the brothers) witnessed the 2020 election along with claims from members of congress that the election was rigged. What got their attention was when the proposition to investigate those claims was presented to Congress and put to a vote. What came as a shock to the four brothers is when they discovered that 387 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence actually voted against the proposed investigation, thus thwarting the investigation. Whether the election was rigged or not was no longer their main concern. What now became the concern was when those members of Congress violated their sworn oath by voting to thwart the investigation.

If you are an American, you agree. Period.

Brunson Bros. drain the swamp

Supreme Court Lawsuit Docket #22-380 Brunson fires Biden, Harris, and Members of Congress

ralandbrunson.com

 

[Lastamender]

THE LAWSUIT
Both lawsuits include defendants Pres. Biden, Harris, former V.P. Pence and 385 members of congress for breaking their oath of office by voting AGAINST the proposition (that came from members of congress) to investigate the claims that there were enemies of the constitution who successfully rigged the election.

 

[Brick Layer]

Kind of an open a shut case. They got to go.

Big, MSM Where Are YOU?

 

[Brick Layer]

This is a civil procedure, once this civil action takes place and the traitors are removed [FIRED]; consequential criminal and or military actions may ensue!

And still, the media remains silent.

 

[Brick Layer]

The weapon that has now been put into the Supreme Court's hands, this Loaded GUN with a round in the chamber, the trigger cocked, aimed at the head and the heart of the administration and Congress. If they so much as pass gas that they're going to do something to clip the power of the court they don't have to wait til January 6th!

At any instant, the court could call a national emergency conclave; the court does not have to wait til January 6th to rule on this matter [nonlinear case].

 

[Brick Layer]

 

[Brick Layer]

 

[Lastamender]

A video over 2 minutes is longer than most attention spans of the enemies of our Constitution. So good luck with over two hours. What amazes me is that the legal heavyweights like Dershowitz or fat boy William Barr have not commented on this case and the MSM's silence on this case. What is their reason for not giving an opinion on a case that could empty 3/4 of our Congress?

They must not want people to know exactly much shit our Constitution is under.

 

[Brick Layer]

 

[Lastamender]

They all deserve the presidential Medal of Freedom. When we get a real president maybe they will get those medals.

Being a lot of Congress people will be looking for jobs maybe they, the Brunsons, could use some roadies.

 

[Lastamender]

 

[Brick Layer]

Lastamender, I like the way you titled this thread the topic gets more exposure [more views] than the Bunson vs. Adams-SCOTUS... thread with fewer views, good idea!

​

Kind of an open-in-shut case.

This case is about (legislated immunity and) constitutional accountability after jurat, presented as a national emergency (national security issue); it is very cut and dry.

A Respondent may choose to waive the right to oppose a Petition that seems clearly without merit. This will save time and money without any substantial risk if the Respondent feels certain that Certiorari will be denied.



Exactly I agree with Lastamender, thus far this case [request for review] has not been denied...

The respondents may have chosen to waive the right to oppose a Petition when their [opposing] counsel could not come up with a response in defense without [digging the whole deeper] adding more incriminating statements onto the record; because the case is so open-in-shut, in the way it was presented.

The Supreme Court is under attack [for overturning Roe vs. Wade]!!!

This case [request for review] has not been denied, in fact, it was sought out by the Supreme Court as a weapon!!!
And it's being pointed at the head of this [Biden's] administration and the heart of [the deep state within] Congress.

No lame-duck shenanigans!

[If congress so much as farts!]

That means no sneaky bills [like how 1913's Federal Reserve bill passed (rammed through without opposition) during the Holidays], that means no court packing - no judicial term limits - etc., any attempt to diminish the power of the judiciary against the powers of legislative and executive branches the Supreme Court can fire this weapon at any time (because of the emergency and because of the signed waiver of record).
LOCKED AND LOADED, queued for docket & ready for action!
This case was sought out by the court in such a way the clerk called up the Petitioner to instruct him to include the [proposed] waiver to be signed and to also add the respondents' defense [from the lower court] to the Petition before it is submitted.

NOW, If the court waits till Congress recesses to move [rule on this], it will be as simple as when Congress reconvenes-those treasonous actors cannot get back in the door.... security pulled, and all perks gone, FIRED!!!!
This is a civil procedure (all they do is lose their jobs, and stop any of them from holding office anywhere in the United States of America ever again) as huge as it is, this is simply fitting, but once this civil action takes place and the traitors are removed [FIRED] consequential criminal and or military actions may ensue [prosecutions] [executions] supported by the anticipated up and coming supreme court decision!

 

[Brick Layer]

Brunson vs Adams-SCOTUS Takes Case on 2020 Election Treason, Defense Fumbles, Violations Would Remove Most of Congress

it's all about the failure of elected officials to do their sworn duty

This case is about (legislated immunity and) constitutional accountability after jurat, presented as a national emergency (national security issue); it is very cut and dry.

Truth / ReTruth - hyperlink

 

[Slade3200]

Progs need to realize that SCOTUS didn't have to take this case.

I’m glad they did… now when the laugh it out of court the crazy Right can’t claim that the corrupt court blocked the case from being heard.

 

[johngaltshrugged]

Brunson vs Adams-SCOTUS Takes Case on 2020 Election Treason, Defense Fumbles, Violations Would Remove Most of Congress

This case is about (legislated immunity and) constitutional accountability after jurat, presented as a national emergency (national security issue); it is very cut and dry.

Truth / ReTruth - hyperlink

The left refuses to acknowledge how serious a threat this is for the corrupted UNiparty.
This has the potential to remove all the UNiparty & leave only America First officials who recognized & called out the fraud in the election.
They would be in charge of the govt until the remedies were certain.
Congress had a duty to investigate, even if it was perfunctory with a predetermined outcome

 

[Slade3200]

The left refuses to acknowledge how serious a threat this is for the corrupted UNiparty.
This has the potential to remove all the UNiparty & leave only America First officials who recognized & called out the fraud in the election.
They would be in charge of the govt until the remedies were certain.
Congress had a duty to investigate, even if it was perfunctory with a predetermined outcome

after it gets laughed out of SCOTUS what will you say. SCOTUS is corrupt?

 

[johngaltshrugged]

So instead of just denying it completely & removing the slightest hint of any legitimacy, SCOTUS accepted it specifically just to laugh at it?
Interesting take.

You need to monitor what your monkey is posting, it's making you sound stupid...er