Brunson VS. Adams.

[Lastamender]

I have been talking about this kind of unequal justice for quite awhile. And what the law says we should do about it. It is a shame the law no longer means shit.

Total. Media. Blackout. This should come as little surprise for mainstream media outlets not covering the potentially seismic, landmark petition set in front of the nine Justices on the Supreme Court of the United States (“SCOTUS”). But with “national emergency” language added to the second submission of the petition it begs the question relating to the alternative news outlets, such as Zero Hedge, Unz.com, Breitbart, and The Gateway Pundit failing to cover this story—as of this writing Monday at 12 noon—that resides in the public domain

That right there is very strange.

“This case uncovers a serious national security breach that is unique and is of first impression, and due to the serious nature of this case it involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with members of the United States Congress, while deeming them unfit from ever holding office under Federal, State, County or local Governments found within the United States of America, and at the same time the trial court also has the authority, to be validated by this Court, to authorize the swearing in of the legal and rightful heirs for President and Vice President of the United States.

The Supreme Court Petition Set to Rock America – American Media Periscope

americanmediaperiscope.com

 

[Lastamender]

“This petition is set forth in the interest of justice in protecting Brunson’s right to petition for a redress of grievances against the Respondents, and ensuring his right of due process against the encroachment of the doctrine of equitable maxim, and charging the Respondents who failed to investigate the allegations of a rigged election by having them removed from office without further delay.”

Well look at that. It gets better. Same link as OP.

 

[Lastamender]

“In addition there are two doctrines that conflict with each other found in this case affecting every court in this country. These doctrines are known as the doctrine of equitable maxim and the doctrine of the object principle of justice. Equitable maxim created by this court, which the lower court used to dismiss this case, sets in direct violation of the object principle of justice also partially created by this Court and supported by other appeal courts and constitutional provisions.


“These conflicts call for the supervisory power of this Court to resolve these conflicts, which has not, but should be, settled by this Court without delay.”

I have talked about evidentiary hearings being denied. Looks like that is basically against the law by totally objective standards and average intelligence so everyone hear will not understand. Same link.

 

[Lastamender]

There are lots of questions to be answered. But since its now being heard before the Supreme Court as a “national security” issue, we expect the answers to and the which way the petition breaks—in favor of or against—to reach a conclusion swiftly.

The answers will be interesting if we are allowed to see them.

 

[DudleySmith]

Allowing foreign money to 'invest' in American lawsuits is another big hole used for technology theft that needs to be closed, but good luck with that.

 

[Moonglow]

They aren't asking too much? I bet the end result will be a NO-GO..

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

American Media Periscope??? Seriously??
Ok, the GWP and ZH aren't covering this "story"...must be a reason why...oh yeah, it's nonsense.

Hint, there's a reason why the government waived its right to file a response. Cause they know it will be dismissed faster than the spread of a venereal disease at an RNC convention.

 

[Toro]

IOW it's too crazy even for the loon alt-right media

LOL

 

[Lastamender]

They aren't asking too much? I bet the end result will be a NO-GO..

They are following the law. I know that is far to radical for you.

 

[Moonglow]

They are following the law. I know that is far to radical for you.

The relief they petition is a little ever-zealous.

 

[Lastamender]

American Media Periscope??? Seriously??
Ok, the GWP and ZH aren't covering this "story"...must be a reason why...oh yeah, it's nonsense.

Hint, there's a reason why the government waived its right to file a response. Cause they know it will be dismissed faster than the spread of a venereal disease at an RNC convention.

Nonetheless the petition is real and it deserves an answer. Deal with it. You claim to value the rule of law.

 

[Lastamender]

The relief they petition is a little ever-zealous.

That is up to the court. I want to see their answers, don't you?

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Nonetheless the petition is real and it deserves an answer. Deal with it. You claim to value the rule of law.

It gets dismissed. In a hurry.
Wanna take bets? I'm in.

 

[Lastamender]

It gets dismissed. In a hurry.
Wanna take bets? I'm in.

As long as we hear the reasons it is dismissed, right?

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

As long as we hear the reasons it is dismissed, right?

They won't give a reason. They will just dismiss it.

 

[okfine]

American Media Periscope??? Seriously??
Ok, the GWP and ZH aren't covering this "story"...must be a reason why...oh yeah, it's nonsense.

Hint, there's a reason why the government waived its right to file a response. Cause they know it will be dismissed faster than the spread of a venereal disease at an RNC convention.

I didn't open that link. Probably has cooties.

 

[Lastamender]

They won't give a reason. They will just dismiss it.

They have to give a reason. That is actually what this about.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

They have to give a reason. That is actually what this about.

No, they don't. They can dismiss on the basis of lack of evidence without even giving you a reason. Same way all the "voting fraud" cases were.
If your evidence is bullshit, they can show you the door. 63+ former lawsuits agree.

 

[Lastamender]

No, they don't. They can dismiss on the basis of lack of evidence without even giving you a reason. Same way all the "voting fraud" cases were.
If your evidence is bullshit, they can show you the door. 63+ former lawsuits agree.

The evidence is reality. I think this is over you head.

 

[MarathonMike]

I have been talking about this kind of unequal justice for quite awhile. And what the law says we should do about it. It is a shame the law no longer means shit.

Total. Media. Blackout. This should come as little surprise for mainstream media outlets not covering the potentially seismic, landmark petition set in front of the nine Justices on the Supreme Court of the United States (“SCOTUS”). But with “national emergency” language added to the second submission of the petition it begs the question relating to the alternative news outlets, such as Zero Hedge, Unz.com, Breitbart, and The Gateway Pundit failing to cover this story—as of this writing Monday at 12 noon—that resides in the public domain

That right there is very strange.

“This case uncovers a serious national security breach that is unique and is of first impression, and due to the serious nature of this case it involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with members of the United States Congress, while deeming them unfit from ever holding office under Federal, State, County or local Governments found within the United States of America, and at the same time the trial court also has the authority, to be validated by this Court, to authorize the swearing in of the legal and rightful heirs for President and Vice President of the United States.

The Supreme Court Petition Set to Rock America – American Media Periscope

americanmediaperiscope.com

We barely had a media before Trump won in 2016. That drove them over the edge, we have no media in America anymore.