Brunson VS. Adams.

Its not a thing. Munson paid for the USSC to put the case on their docket. Anyone with about $300 and an internet connection can do the same.

It was predictably rejected, being unworthy of their time.

The End.
Yes, defending the US Constitution and its principles is unworthy of their time. Welcome to reality of the SCOTUS.
 
HOW TO TAKE THE COURTS BACK
:whipg:

video at 1:08:42



MIKE GILL FOR VICE PRESIDENT
Trump and Gill Presidential Ticket
😁






[TRANSPARENCY]
THIS IS THE BIGGEST SMOKING GUN OF THE STOLEN 2020 ELECTION,
🤩


🎬
🎥
"Something out of a Movie!"
📽
🎞

  • Stolen 2020 election CIA operation,
  • Sophisticated Voter-Fraud-Manufacturing,
  • Reported by Michigan’s state police to the FBI,
  • FBI buried all the Evidence,
    (video footage and documents of the fraud).





Genesee County, Michigan


 
Last edited:
Yes, defending the US Constitution and its principles is unworthy of their time. Welcome to reality of the SCOTUS.

Or.....Brunson just had a dogshit case that no court would bother hearing unless he paid them. I loved listening to Bruson try to spin the Supreme Courts routine appraisal of ANY case that someone paid to put before them like it was some legal landmark, the one the Supreme Court had been waiting for to overturn Biden's election.

And instead, added yet another Big Lie failure to the veritable mountain of pseudo-legal horseshit that Trump and his cronies tried to peddle.

Another perfect, predictable, obvious failure.

Just like I told you it would be.
 
Or.....Brunson just had a dogshit case that no court would bother hearing unless he paid them. I loved listening to Bruson try to spin the Supreme Courts routine appraisal of ANY case that someone paid to put before them like it was some legal landmark, the one the Supreme Court had been waiting for to overturn Biden's election.

And instead, added yet another Big Lie failure to the veritable mountain of pseudo-legal horseshit that Trump and his cronies tried to peddle.

Another perfect, predictable, obvious failure.

Just like I told you it would be.
OR, the heart of the Brunson case threatened the status quo of corrupt government. SCOTUS' job is to protect the status quo, not the Constitution.
 
OR, the heart of the Brunson case threatened the status quo of corrupt government. SCOTUS' job is to protect the status quo, not the Constitution.

As Brunson's case being laughed out of every court to ever hear it.....it wasn't much of a threat to anything but Brunson's checking account.

Which went down by $300 every time he paid to have it reviewed.
 
As Brunson's case being laughed out of every court to ever hear it.....it wasn't much of a threat to anything but Brunson's checking account.

Which went down by $300 every time he paid to have it reviewed.
It was a threat to the criminal status quo. If you had bothered to read it and are being honest with yourself, we both know that.
 
It is not nonsense. That election should have been investigated by Congress. !47 members wanted it. They were representing Trump voters. There is no excuse except they knew the fraud would be exposed if they did. For that they should pay.

It will not end well for the cheaters
 

Forum List

Back
Top