Brunson VS. Adams.

[PeterPilot]

Its not a thing. Munson paid for the USSC to put the case on their docket. Anyone with about $300 and an internet connection can do the same.

It was predictably rejected, being unworthy of their time.

The End.

Yes, defending the US Constitution and its principles is unworthy of their time. Welcome to reality of the SCOTUS.

 

[Brick Layer]

HOW TO TAKE THE COURTS BACK

video at 1:08:42



MIKE GILL FOR VICE PRESIDENT
Trump and Gill Presidential Ticket







[TRANSPARENCY]
THIS IS THE BIGGEST SMOKING GUN OF THE STOLEN 2020 ELECTION,

"Something out of a Movie!"

• Stolen 2020 election CIA operation,
• Sophisticated Voter-Fraud-Manufacturing,
• Reported by Michigan’s state police to the FBI,
• FBI buried all the Evidence,
  (video footage and documents of the fraud).

Genesee County, Michigan

Darren Edward

WOW! Brave Flint, MI. Residents Cite Examples of Voter Fraud and Multiple Unbalanced Precincts in Nov. Election… Ask MI Board of Canvassers Why They Would Certify Election When Flint Election...

www.facebook.com

HUNTERS BECAME the HUNTED - SOON THE PEOPLE WILL KNOW, WAR FOR YOUR MIND, Episode 500 with HonestWalterWhite

SaveOurChildren #GitmoTV #DUMBSandUNDERGROUND #FreedomFighter #ExlusiveTruth #ToyandLokiShow #TexasSarcasticBrett #CollectiveConsciousness #CrazyButTrueNews #EXPOSEthePEDOSendOfTheCABAL #TruthSeekers

rumble.com

THIS SEEMS VERY BAD, WAR FOR YOUR MIND,Episode 499 with HonestWalterWhite

SaveOurChildren #GitmoTV #DUMBSandUNDERGROUND #FreedomFighter #ExlusiveTruth #ToyandLokiShow #TexasSarcasticBrett #CollectiveConsciousness #CrazyButTrueNews #EXPOSEthePEDOSendOfTheCABAL #TruthSeekers

rumble.com

 

[Skylar]

Yes, defending the US Constitution and its principles is unworthy of their time. Welcome to reality of the SCOTUS.

Or.....Brunson just had a dogshit case that no court would bother hearing unless he paid them. I loved listening to Bruson try to spin the Supreme Courts routine appraisal of ANY case that someone paid to put before them like it was some legal landmark, the one the Supreme Court had been waiting for to overturn Biden's election.

And instead, added yet another Big Lie failure to the veritable mountain of pseudo-legal horseshit that Trump and his cronies tried to peddle.

Another perfect, predictable, obvious failure.

Just like I told you it would be.

 

[PeterPilot]

Or.....Brunson just had a dogshit case that no court would bother hearing unless he paid them. I loved listening to Bruson try to spin the Supreme Courts routine appraisal of ANY case that someone paid to put before them like it was some legal landmark, the one the Supreme Court had been waiting for to overturn Biden's election.

And instead, added yet another Big Lie failure to the veritable mountain of pseudo-legal horseshit that Trump and his cronies tried to peddle.

Another perfect, predictable, obvious failure.

Just like I told you it would be.

OR, the heart of the Brunson case threatened the status quo of corrupt government. SCOTUS' job is to protect the status quo, not the Constitution.

 

[Skylar]

OR, the heart of the Brunson case threatened the status quo of corrupt government. SCOTUS' job is to protect the status quo, not the Constitution.

As Brunson's case being laughed out of every court to ever hear it.....it wasn't much of a threat to anything but Brunson's checking account.

Which went down by $300 every time he paid to have it reviewed.

 

[PeterPilot]

As Brunson's case being laughed out of every court to ever hear it.....it wasn't much of a threat to anything but Brunson's checking account.

Which went down by $300 every time he paid to have it reviewed.

It was a threat to the criminal status quo. If you had bothered to read it and are being honest with yourself, we both know that.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It is not nonsense. That election should have been investigated by Congress. !47 members wanted it. They were representing Trump voters. There is no excuse except they knew the fraud would be exposed if they did. For that they should pay.

It will not end well for the cheaters

 

[PeterPilot]

It will not end well for the cheaters

I'm sure hoping you're right Frank. Not much to be happy about right now.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I'm sure hoping you're right Frank. Not much to be happy about right now.

We're past the point of no return; they will cheat again this year, launch another bioweapon or something nasty

 

[Brick Layer]

Contagion, Flynn is the Fed.
Flynn was involved in the January 6th, 2020 setup against Trump and the Patriots.
Flynn running for president - backstabbing Trump and the American People.

QUESTION: WHAT DO WE DO WITH THE COURT? [EXPOSURE]
WE HAVE TO TAKE THE [evil] COURTS BACK
PUNISH THESE JUDGES!!! Loyalty agreements, with We the People...

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

The 2020 election fight was over on 1/20/2021.

Wait...The Patriots were involved in January 6th? I did see a lot of people tackled that day, but no one was wearing a helmet.

 

[Lastamender]

All Three Liberal Supreme Court Justices Recuse Themselves in Lawsuit Over 2020 Election Fraud Case​

In the unorthodox lawsuit, Mr. Brunson argued that avoiding an investigation “of how Biden won the election, is an act of treason and an act of levying war against the U.S. Constitution which violated Brunson’s unfettered right to vote in an honest and fair election and as such it wrongfully invalidated his vote.”


In that appeal, the Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorari, or review, in an unsigned order on Jan. 9, 2023. No justices dissented. No reason was provided for the decision. At least four of the nine justices have to vote to approve a petition for certiorari for it to advance to the oral argument stage.


The court denied a petition for rehearing on Feb. 21, 2023, in an unsigned order without providing a reason. No justices dissented.


This week, the Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorari in Brunson v. Sotomayor in an unsigned order without providing a reason. No justices dissented, but Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson did not participate in the ruling.
The petition had been docketed with the high court on March 29, with Mr. Brunson serving as his own counsel.

All Three Liberal Supreme Court Justices Recuse Themselves in Lawsuit Over 2020 Election Fraud Case - 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. (The Epoch Times)—In a rare move, all three liberal Supreme Court justices recused themselves on May 28 from a case involving a lawsuit filed against them for rejecting a previous lawsuit that sought to overturn the results of the...

thelibertydaily.com

Another one who will get the Presidential Medal of Freedom from Trump. Remember Congress voted not to investigate the election and that makes them traitors. And don't the American people deserve a reason this case was denied?

 

[Lastamender]

He urged the Supreme Court to grant his petition, alleging the justices were guilty of “fraud, violations of the Oath of Office and … treason.”


“These serious offenses need to be addressed immediately with the least amount of technical nuances of the law and legal procedures because these offenses are flowing continually against Brunson’s liberties and life and consequently is [sic] a continual national security breach.


“Seeking a redress of grievances, as Brunson has done herein, is a great power one retains to protect himself from the encroachment of a tyrannical government. Brunson’s personal voice and the way he can protect his personal constitutional protected rights and the U.S. Constitution,” the petition stated.

 

[Slade3200]

All Three Liberal Supreme Court Justices Recuse Themselves in Lawsuit Over 2020 Election Fraud Case​

In the unorthodox lawsuit, Mr. Brunson argued that avoiding an investigation “of how Biden won the election, is an act of treason and an act of levying war against the U.S. Constitution which violated Brunson’s unfettered right to vote in an honest and fair election and as such it wrongfully invalidated his vote.”


In that appeal, the Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorari, or review, in an unsigned order on Jan. 9, 2023. No justices dissented. No reason was provided for the decision. At least four of the nine justices have to vote to approve a petition for certiorari for it to advance to the oral argument stage.


The court denied a petition for rehearing on Feb. 21, 2023, in an unsigned order without providing a reason. No justices dissented.


This week, the Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorari in Brunson v. Sotomayor in an unsigned order without providing a reason. No justices dissented, but Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson did not participate in the ruling.
The petition had been docketed with the high court on March 29, with Mr. Brunson serving as his own counsel.

All Three Liberal Supreme Court Justices Recuse Themselves in Lawsuit Over 2020 Election Fraud Case - 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. (The Epoch Times)—In a rare move, all three liberal Supreme Court justices recused themselves on May 28 from a case involving a lawsuit filed against them for rejecting a previous lawsuit that sought to overturn the results of the...

thelibertydaily.com

Another one who will get the Presidential Medal of Freedom from Trump. Remember Congress voted not to investigate the election and that makes them traitors. And don't the American people deserve a reason this case was denied?

Haha, your article says the liberal justices responsibly recused themselves and the Trump appointed and conservative justices made the rulings to deny review of this case…

So what point are you trying to make here?

 

[Lastamender]

Haha, your article says the liberal justices responsibly recused themselves and the Trump appointed and conservative justices made the rulings to deny review of this case…

So what point are you trying to make here?

To you, no point.

 

[Slade3200]

To you, no point.

How about to the thread. Cause it sounds like you’re saying the liberal justices were being responsible and the conservative and Trump appointed justices are now part of the cover up. Was that your point?

 

[PeterPilot]

The Brunson case makes it perfectly clear--the federal government is above the law.

 

[Brick Layer]

THIS IS A GOOD "LOY BRUNSON" DISCUSSION!

WE CAN NOT TRUST OR CERTIFY THE 2024 ELECTION BECAUSE WE NEVER ADDRESSED THE OATH PROBLEM CONGRESSIONAL PEOPLE NEED TO OBEY THEIR OATH!!!

THIS LAWSUIT IS NOT ABOUT THE OUTCOME OF THE 2020 ELECTION INSTEAD THIS LAWSUIT IS ABOUT A SECURITY BREACH THE 2020 ELECTORAL VOTES WERE COUNTED WHEN THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN COUNTE BECAUSE THE ELECTORS DIDN'T TAKE A 10-DAY PAUSE BEFORE COUNTING THE ELECTORAL VOTES AND CERTIFYING THE 2020 ELECTION A PAUSE THAT WOULD HAVE GIVEN CONGRESS (TED CRUZ, JOSH HAWLEY, AND ONE-HUNDRED-FORTY-THREE OTHERS) THE TIME A SIMPLE 10 DAY INVESTIGATION TO REVIEW KNOWN PROBLEMS WITH THE ELECTION TO TAKE A LOOK INTO THE MOUNTAIN OF EVIDENCE THEY HAD / HAVE.

The Supreme Court allowed this case to bypass the lower courts because they agreed that an urgency of a serious national interest was at stake here. Loy Brunson's case was tabled and shelved (denied a hearing) it did not get dismissed so this case is still live. The court can pull it off the shelf at any moment. Bronson's IMPERATIVE PUBLIC IMPORTANCE RULE 11 PETITION is an Exposea on the Constitution. Article 6 requires that they be bound by oath which is, contradictory to absolute total immunity. You can not have absolute immunity simultaneously with a binding bonded oath that is a big contradiction.

 

[Skylar]

The Brunson case makes it perfectly clear--the federal government is above the law.

The Brunson case makes it perfectly clear that any dipshit willing to pay the $325 filing fee for a review by the Supreme Court can get the Supreme Court to look at their claims.

 

[Skylar]

THIS IS A GOOD "LOY BRUNSON" DISCUSSION!

WE CAN NOT TRUST OR CERTIFY THE 2024 ELECTION BECAUSE WE NEVER ADDRESSED THE OATH PROBLEM CONGRESSIONAL PEOPLE NEED TO OBEY THEIR OATH!!!

THIS LAWSUIT IS NOT ABOUT THE OUTCOME OF THE 2020 ELECTION INSTEAD THIS LAWSUIT IS ABOUT A SECURITY BREACH THE 2020 ELECTORAL VOTES WERE COUNTED WHEN THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN COUNTE BECAUSE THE ELECTORS DIDN'T TAKE A 10-DAY PAUSE BEFORE COUNTING THE ELECTORAL VOTES AND CERTIFYING THE 2020 ELECTION A PAUSE THAT WOULD HAVE GIVEN CONGRESS (TED CRUZ, JOSH HAWLEY, AND ONE-HUNDRED-FORTY-THREE OTHERS) THE TIME A SIMPLE 10 DAY INVESTIGATION TO REVIEW KNOWN PROBLEMS WITH THE ELECTION TO TAKE A LOOK INTO THE MOUNTAIN OF EVIDENCE THEY HAD / HAVE.

The Supreme Court allowed this case to bypass the lower courts because they agreed that an urgency of a serious national interest was at stake here. Loy Brunson's case was tabled and shelved (denied a hearing) it did not get dismissed so this case is still live. The court can pull it off the shelf at any moment. Bronson's IMPERATIVE PUBLIC IMPORTANCE RULE 11 PETITION is an Exposea on the Constitution. Article 6 requires that they be bound by oath which is, contradictory to absolute total immunity. You can not have absolute immunity simultaneously with a binding bonded oath that is a big contradiction.

The Supreme Court didn't 'allow the Brunson case to bypass the lower courts'. This was a petition for a writ of certiorari that those submitting it paid for. They paid the filing fee with the court and petitioned the SCOTUS themselves.

Any asshole with $325 can do the same. Your legal brief could be nothing more than an the ingredients for a Duncan Hines red velvet cake mix. And if you pay your $325, it will show up on the SCOTUS docket.