Breaking: Woman shot while trying to kill ICE agents in Minnesota

Have you admitted, yet (ever?), that he shot her twice after she was driving away from him? That she was killed with a shot from the side of her head?? Will you admit anything critical of your party's agenda? Will you admit to any of their flaws or mistakes?

Of course not, you're a true believer!
he fired in self-defense and it does not matter that he continued to fire after the car had hit him and he was to the side.
 
Two shots in the head at a moving target, it's called proper shot placement and follow-through, can be most effective when you are concerned about the welfare of others in the area when eliminating what you perceive to be a threat, and not being so self-consumed your safety is the only concern.
Sure, sure.

How about you? Will you admit anything critical of your party's agenda? Will you admit to any of their flaws or mistakes?

Of course not, you're a true believer!
 
he fired in self-defense and it does not matter that he continued to fire after the car had hit him and he was to the side.
Have you admitted, yet (ever?), that he shot her twice after she was driving away from him? That she was killed with a shot from the side of her head?? Will you admit anything critical of your party's agenda? Will you admit to any of their flaws or mistakes?

Of course not, you're a true believer!
 
Sure, sure.

How about you? Will you admit anything critical of your party's agenda? Will you admit to any of their flaws or mistakes?

Of course not, you're a true believer!

What party are you imagining I am part of?
It's kind of hard to answer your questions when they don't make much sense, because they are completely based in political bullshit, and your desire to support it.

Which really just makes you an utterly useless and pathetic asshat.
 
What party are you imagining I am part of?
It's kind of hard to answer your questions when they don't make much sense, because they are completely based in political bullshit, and your desire to support it.
I'll take that as a "no".
 
Have you admitted, yet (ever?), that he shot her twice after she was driving away from him? That she was killed with a shot from the side of her head?? Will you admit anything critical of your party's agenda? Will you admit to any of their flaws or mistakes?

Of course not, you're a true believer!
he was justified to shoot plain and simple she hit him and he fired in self defense.
 
I'll take that as a "no".

You can take it for whatever the **** you want, and I am fully aware that you are incapable of accepting anything your imagination or political bullshit can provide. However, you really didn't need to tell me, again.
 
That's just not how it works or has ever worked....dream on!

Probable cause is needed for an arrest and cops must tell the person they are under arrest, and for what crime...and they must read them their Miranda rights, respect their silence, let them contact a lawyer etc. etc. etc.

Why would you argue against citizen's constitutional protections?
Failure to comply with a lawful order IS probable cause of interference with law enforcement officers and is an arrestable offense regardless of circumstances, prior conduct or reasons for the traffic stop. Fleeing and evading (which is what she was doing) is a crime in every state.
 
That's just not how it works or has ever worked....dream on!

Probable cause is needed for an arrest and cops must tell the person they are under arrest, and for what crime...and they must read them their Miranda rights, respect their silence, let them contact a lawyer etc. etc. etc.

Why would you argue against citizen's constitutional protections?
You are ignorant. Miranda warnings are only necessary before any questioning is conducted. They are often given at the time of arrest so the suspect can't later complain they weren't Mirandized.
 
Have you admitted, yet (ever?), that he shot her twice after she was driving away from him? That she was killed with a shot from the side of her head?? Will you admit anything critical of your party's agenda? Will you admit to any of their flaws or mistakes?

Of course not, you're a true believer!
What does this have to do with the Republican Party or its agenda?
 
15th post
Nonsense

A 4,000 lb car is a deadly weapon

I think what you mean to say is that she did not intentionally aim to kill the ICE agent

To that I agree

But she put his life in danger by her own recklessness
.

Give it up, Mac. They've got a distraction more precious than diamonds, that they are going to hold onto forever, especially now that the vicious "protesters" that love attacking innocent Christians during their church services are starting to fall like dominoes.

It's fun to watch them grasp it and shake it like a German Shepherd grasps and shakes a squirrel.

.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom