So you flip off God and openly desecrate the teachings of Jesus while standing up? Awesome! I am impressed.
BTW, how many of you are there?
Zone1 Breaking News: The Earth is Older than 6,000 years old
- Thread starter ding
- Start date
BTW, how many of you are there?
- Thread starter
- #182
RetiredGySgt
Diamond Member
the sacrament is part of Jesus teachings by his apostales after he rose from the dead.
Hmmm. I say that God was never a man and isn't edible. You claim God is not only edible but also was a man.
You think my position is hateful (however true) and your position is the absolute truth (even if false). I can accept that. I wonder how it will turn out, who will be vindicated and who will be condemned, by their own words.
I can hardly stand the suspense!
Well goodie for you! Im sure that God is very impressed.The weather is great. Got in 9 holes this morning.
- Thread starter
- #185
Shouldn't you be arguing with people who DO believe the earth is 6,000 years old instead of arguing with Christians who DON'T believe the earth is 6,000 years old?
The Key to the Age of the Earth
Most of these Christians ignore the account of Noah’s Flood in Genesis 6–9 and its implications for understanding the geological history of the earth.answersingenesis.org
Who told you that? Didn't you ever check the Bible to see if what you were being told was true? No? Like I said,
sucker.
You might not realize this but to Jesus, his apostales, lol, his followers and the unknown authors of the gospels who witness the destruction of Judea, the temple, their way of life, and the enslavement, exile and slaughter of hundreds of thousands of Jewish men women and children, "the nations", YOU, were the enemy.
"From his mouth there went a sharp sword with which to smite "the nations".
"Take from my hand this cup of fiery wine and make all the nations to whom I send you drink it. When they have drunk it they will vomit and go mad; such is the sword that I am sending among them"
"Take this cup of wine and drink it, all of you. This is a cup of my blood, the blood of the covenant."
"Just art thou, in these thy judgements, thou Holy One who art and wast; for they shed the blood of thy people and of thy prophets and thou hast given them blood to drink."
Last edited:
- Thread starter
- #187
See post # 185
- Thread starter
- #188
He's believes like you. He denies the big bang too.
- Thread starter
- #189
This isn't going well for you. You might want to cut your line. This one is too big for you.
- Thread starter
- #190
And you don't believe this sounds like religious nutjob talk.Yes, all believers have that amazing almost godlike ability to turn the finest wine the world has ever known into pure urine. They can even do the same when drinking Jesus blood. Obviously they failed "the test". Fascinating!
Whats your pleasure? Putin is saving the Ukraine from Nazis by invading and murdering Ukrainians? What a guy!
Bottoms up!
Sure, as soon as they stop pretending to be moral authorities over 'unbelievers' in the ridiculous, legislating laws and customs that reflect their perverted views of everything from scripture, to human sexuality, to reality itself.
Until then, Hanta yo; wakanya hibu welo. Maka kin le mitawa, ca hibu welo.
This might come as a surprise to you but I really couldn't give two shits about anything you say or what I might sound like to anyone who is an unrepentant idolator obviously drowning in the cacophony of a fiery hell.
- Thread starter
- #192
And I say you have no evidence to support those beliefs while I do.Hmmm. I say that God was never a man and isn't edible. You claim God is not only edible but also was a man. You think my position is hateful (however true) and your position is the absolute truth (even if false). I can accept that. I wonder how it will turn out, who will be vindicated and who will be condemned, by their own words. I can hardly stand the suspense!
The first Christians who witnessed the supernatural acts performed by Jesus - which included controlling matter, controlling nature, healing physical deformities, healing diseases, raising the dead and resurrecting himself from death - worshiped Jesus as God because they witnessed those miracles. Non-Christian historians recorded that the first Christians worshiped Jesus as God because he performed supernatural feats. 24,000 written manuscripts documented the supernatural feats Jesus performed and the first Christians witnessed. The Babylonian Talmud confirms Jewish religious leaders put Jesus to death for sorcery and for leading Israel into apostasy. There are no opposing accounts that document that Jesus did not perform any supernatural acts. There are no opposing accounts that argue Jesus wasn't put to death for performing sorcery and inciting Israel to apostasy. There are no opposing accounts which document Jesus wasn't resurrected. There are no opposing accounts that the first Christians didn't witness Jesus performing supernatural acts. There are no opposing accounts that document the first Christians didn't worship Jesus as God.
You aren't the first person to be shocked by Jesus' command to eat his flesh and drink his blood. He lost a lot of disciples over that command.
- Jesus said he was the bread of life and whoever ate this bread would have eternal life. John 6:48-51
- The Jews quarreled and said how can this man give us his flesh to eat. John 6:52
- So rather than softening his stance he doubled down and said very clearly, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life within you. John 6:53
- Afterwards his disciples said, this is hard to take. John 6:60
- Jesus asked them, does this shock you. John 6:61
- Then Jesus explained that it is the spirit that gives life. The flesh is of no avail. John 6:62-63
- But they didn't believe in Jesus and they couldn't accept what he was saying because it shocked them like it is shocking you. As a result of this, many [of] his disciples returned to their former way of life and no longer accompanied him. John 6:64-65
- Thread starter
- #193
You act just like a spoiled child when people disagree with you.
No, he let those who couldn't stomach his saying "unless you eat my flesh you can have no life in you." leave him but explained the metaphor to the disciples who remained in John 6:63 saying it is his words that are what give life, flesh a metaphor for words that are both Spirit and life and the disciples confirmed their belief in what Jesus said in John 6:68 after Jesus asked if they would leave him too to which Simon Peter replied,"Lord, to whom shall we go? Your WORDS are WORDS of eternal life, we have faith and know that you are the Holy One of God."
LIAR.
Jesus took the metaphor right out of the book of Isaiah, chapter 55:
Come, all you who are thirsty, come to the waters;
and you who have no money,
come, buy and eat!
Come, buy wine and milk
without money and without cost.
Why spend money on what is not bread,
and your labor on what does not satisfy?
Listen, listen to me, and eat what is good,
and you will delight in the richest of fare.
Give ear and come to me;
listen, that you may live.
Last edited:
- Thread starter
- #195
Incorrect. He did no such thing. You are shocked by his command so you are making up stories. He was very clear in his explanation. When he was asked to make it symbolic, he doubled down and very explicitly told them that unless they ate his flesh and drank his blood they have no life WITHIN them.
You do know that anyone can pick up a bible and check to see that what I said is the indisputable TRUTH.
Dummy
Right. Unless they ate his flesh, accepted his words, his teaching, on the figurative nature of the words and hidden subjects of the law, and acted on it, drank his blood, they could not have the life promised for compliance with the Law WITHIN them.
Just like there is no life WITHIN you, only the strange delusional irrational nightmares of the walking dead.
Come, all you who are thirsty, come to the waters;
and you who have no money,
come, buy and eat!
Come, buy wine and milk
without money and without cost.
Why spend money on what is not bread,
and your labor on what does not satisfy?
Listen, listen to me, and eat what is good,
and you will delight in the richest of fare.
Give ear and come to me;
listen, that you may live.
All who have ears to hear, hear.
Last edited:
If I've missed something important in your other messages to me, would you let me know?
Natural selection and Adam and Eve can't both be true. Are you throwing Adam and Eve out too now?
Did you know that the 6 days of creation were really 6 billion years? Each?
zaangalewa
Gold Member
- Jan 24, 2015
- 26,892
- 2,892
- 140
This may come as a shock to some but there is an overwhelming amount of geologic evidence that the earth is not 6,000 years old and that this in no way contradicts the existence of God.
6000 years - 600 million years - What's the difference? A twinkle in God's eye?
Similar threads
Latest Discussions
-
-
Keeping ICE away from polling places a top priority for Democrats- Latest: Admiral Rockwell Tory
-
-
