Brave Patriot Mitch McConnell Announces He Will Block Biden Supreme Court Picks

[marvin martian]

It's the racism, hate, violence, and human rights abuses you people

Give it a rest Marvin.
The Southerners are the True Racists.
What happens in Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia, etc is where you see this happen.

But, go again and tell me, again, that the (D) started the KKK.
I never disagreed with that.
What you are ignoring is the FACT that those Southern D, are now current R.

Say hi to your governor for me!

 

[Winco]

It's the racism, hate, violence, and human rights abuses you people

Give it a rest Marvin.
The Southerners are the True Racists.
What happens in Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia, etc is where you see this happen.

But, go again and tell me, again, that the (D) started the KKK.
I never disagreed with that.
What you are ignoring is the FACT that those Southern D, are now current R.

Say hi to your governor for me!

You keep sending this. Why?
Are you that stupid Marvin?

Do you even know which State this guy represents?
or even his name?
Which State is my State Marvin?

 

[Winston]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

That's been a normal practice. When the opposing party controls the senate, presidential picks have very rarely been approved unless they are acceptable to both parties and that hasn't happened for a couple of decades.

The whole system is fubared at this point. The elimination of the filibuster, McConnell's opposition strategy which has been his calling card since Obama, and the polarization of both parties where extremists rule the primaries and the middle gets shit on. I mean it is really messed up. There is no middle anymore.

So here is what we need. At least 15 judges, and I am all for a clean slate. Send the current ones packing, call it fruit from a poisonous tree, and let Democrats pick 8 and Republicans pick seven. Then assign cases on a blind random procedure with seven judges per case.

 

[Dana7360]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

The wording of your topic heading screams...I'M A RUSSIAN TROLL.

I think you are confusing a russian troll with satire.

The OP does a lot of satire.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

Un-American coward and rightwing partisan hack Mitch McConnell.

 

[struth]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

sounds like he’s simply willing to enforce Xiden’s own rule..the Xiden Rule

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

He means 2023, also. And 2022, since hey, they might win back the Senate in 2022.

 

[justoffal]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

Because a Dem wouldn’t do the same thing?

But aren't you "better" and more "constitutional" than the Dems??

You know you are losing when your only retort is "but Dems would have done it too"

Well “Constitutionality” the Senate has to confirm. They are not obligated to confirm if they don’t want.

If you don’t want Mitch involved then win more elections.

Ever since Dems want to play politics with nominees and accuse them of rape, you’re mad Republicans are going to not play nice?
Are you going to cry now?

Notice how Schumer has stopped talking about packing the court? How much you wanna bet he didn't get a call from Roberts " Keep that shit up and we will no choice but to reopen the 2020 election ".......... I'll bet my hat on it.

JO

 

[justoffal]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

sounds like he’s simply willing to enforce Xiden’s own rule..the Xiden Rule

The numbers look good for the GOP coming up in 2020 and McConnell knows that.

JO

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The numbers look good for the GOP coming up in 2020 and McConnell knows that.

What numbers are those? Only about 26% of Americans aren't too embarrassed to admit they are republicans, and that's when they are talking to anonymous pollsters. The polling on Trump in the House swing districts is so bad right now the the GOP hid them from their politicians.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

I hope so. Its almost guaranteed that anyone that senile perv nominates, will be a circus freak.
Look at his admin. Look at his AG, a guy he wanted on SC. Thinks trying to kill federal agents in a federal building over political reasons isnt terrorism because its at night
Fuckin clowns man. Clowns.

That is basically what the Constitution says too...

A sitting president can't nominate anyone if Conservatives don't like him and thinks he is senile...

You do understand, nobody is required to bow down and kiss the ass of a senile old man

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

So why do you folks keep claiming that is what's happening??

Despite the fact you goofy muthafuckas ACTUALLY now bow down to an orange moron..... according to you, it's the senile old man who has all the power....even when your cult leader was president..

Why is Trump so weak?

Why does Biden keep making Trump his bitch??

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So why do you folks keep claiming that is what's happening??

Despite the fact you goofy muthafuckas ACTUALLY now bow down to an orange moron..... according to you, it's the senile old man who has all the power....even when your cult leader was president..

Why is Trump so weak?

Why does Biden keep making Trump his bitch??

This touches on one of the reasons why recent exPresidents generally keep their mouths shut. Especially this early in the new presidency.

"Well you had the last 4 (or 8) years to do something about it. "

The criticism the exP levies then applies more to themselves and the party backing them than to the current occupant. But that ship has sailed. That level of rationality has left the building.

 

[hunarcy]

Nobody gives a fuck about bipartisanship. We just want you all gone.

And we want y'all gone. That's bipartisan in a weird way.

I just want them and their families to have affordable healthcare, expanded social security benefits and forward thinking infrastructure....

Seems Conservatives only support a policy if they believe its "hurting" a specific group of people they don't like....

If you want people to have affordable healthcare, get the government out of paying for health care and let the free market take over again. Until the Government got involved, people could afford insurance and costs were less.

 

[hunarcy]

It's the racism, hate, violence, and human rights abuses you people

Give it a rest Marvin.
The Southerners are the True Racists.
What happens in Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia, etc is where you see this happen.

But, go again and tell me, again, that the (D) started the KKK.
I never disagreed with that.
What you are ignoring is the FACT that those Southern D, are now current R.

When are you going to realize that the Southern States you mention have far less racial strife than Missouri, Minnesota, Illinois and New York?

 

[Polishprince]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

I don't know how "brave" the Turtle is, but Biden is President and obeying the Biden Rule has to be paramount here. No confirmations during election years.

McConnell still stings from the literal crucifixion the libs subjected him to in 2020 with the Barrett nomination. He disobeyed the Biden Rule and was taken to the woodshed. He learned his lesson.

 

[Polishprince]

It's the racism, hate, violence, and human rights abuses you people

Give it a rest Marvin.
The Southerners are the True Racists.
What happens in Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia, etc is where you see this happen.

But, go again and tell me, again, that the (D) started the KKK.
I never disagreed with that.
What you are ignoring is the FACT that those Southern D, are now current R.

When are you going to realize that the Southern States you mention have far less racial strife than Missouri, Minnesota, Illinois and New York?

I was down south last week, in the great state of West Virginia. Saw virtually no racial strife during my whole trip there.

Very unlike what happens up north here.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

It's the racism, hate, violence, and human rights abuses you people

Give it a rest Marvin.
The Southerners are the True Racists.
What happens in Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia, etc is where you see this happen.

But, go again and tell me, again, that the (D) started the KKK.
I never disagreed with that.
What you are ignoring is the FACT that those Southern D, are now current R.

When are you going to realize that the Southern States you mention have far less racial strife than Missouri, Minnesota, Illinois and New York?

The second Klan in the early 20th century was centered mostly in Ohio, Indiana and Illinois.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

Like the commie Dems wouldn't do the same?

 

[Resnic]

This fucking guy is allover the place. One minute he does or says some shit I disapprove of, then he turns around and does something I approve of.

Well I like him saying that, so now I'm expecting the next thing for him to say to be bad.