Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You're very ill.Freaks? Sounds like this asshole!I hope so. Its almost guaranteed that anyone that senile perv nominates, will be a circus freak.
Look at his admin. Look at his AG, a guy he wanted on SC. Thinks trying to kill federal agents in a federal building over political reasons isnt terrorism because its at night
Fuckin freaks man. Freaks.
View attachment 501299
I imagine that if you support this logic then you are also in support of the Dems ditching the filibuster and just running things by majority rule from now on. Is that right?
McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…thehill.com
"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.
McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."
Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....
In other words...I like all of the policies they came up with; I just don't like Dems because they are poopyheads...cool...Too late bro.....As long as you admit bipartisanship is just shit Republicans demand when they aren't in power....McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…
"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.
McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."
Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....
That's his job. Anything less would be a problem. EVERYTHING Harris/Biden try to do needs to be opposed, and they need to be harassed, obstructed, and insulted every moment of the day.
And as long as you don't whine like a bitch when Dems decide to play that same game....like if they decide to pass that infrastructure bill on their own...because they can...
Nobody gives a fuck about bipartisanship. We just want you all gone.
Democratic socialism is here to stay....
Social Security, Medicare, FDIC, Overtime Pay, Labor Protections, etc will still be the most popular policies in the US long after your fragile ass is dead and in the dirt
I can live with most of that. It's the racism, hate, violence, and human rights abuses you people bring to the table that we need to get rid of.
He was an innocent man who was slandered and libel to the point that his whole career and reputation were looking to be destroyed--------his reactions, ahole, were normal for an innocent person. Hint for you---someone who engages in bad behavior and lies regularly themselves would have looked more composed. Watching an innocent man dragged thru the mud is not a pretty sight.Freaks? Sounds like this asshole!I hope so. Its almost guaranteed that anyone that senile perv nominates, will be a circus freak.
Look at his admin. Look at his AG, a guy he wanted on SC. Thinks trying to kill federal agents in a federal building over political reasons isnt terrorism because its at night
Fuckin freaks man. Freaks.
View attachment 501299
Google self awareness.....He was an innocent man who was slandered and libel to the point that his whole career and reputation were looking to be destroyed--------his reactions, ahole, were normal for an innocent person. Hint for you---someone who engages in bad behavior and lies regularly themselves would have looked more composed. Watching an innocent man dragged thru the mud is not a pretty sight.Freaks? Sounds like this asshole!I hope so. Its almost guaranteed that anyone that senile perv nominates, will be a circus freak.
Look at his admin. Look at his AG, a guy he wanted on SC. Thinks trying to kill federal agents in a federal building over political reasons isnt terrorism because its at night
Fuckin freaks man. Freaks.
View attachment 501299
Its not gonna happen fat boy.As long as you admit bipartisanship is just shit Republicans demand when they aren't in power....McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…
"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.
McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."
Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....
That's his job. Anything less would be a problem. EVERYTHING Harris/Biden try to do needs to be opposed, and they need to be harassed, obstructed, and insulted every moment of the day.
And as long as you don't whine like a bitch when Dems decide to play that same game....like if they decide to pass that infrastructure bill on their own...because they can...
Nobody gives a fuck about bipartisanship. We just want you all gone.
So you support CRT and men using the girl's bathroom?In other words...I like all of the policies they came up with; I just don't like Dems because they are poopyheads...cool...Too late bro.....As long as you admit bipartisanship is just shit Republicans demand when they aren't in power....McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…
"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.
McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."
Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....
That's his job. Anything less would be a problem. EVERYTHING Harris/Biden try to do needs to be opposed, and they need to be harassed, obstructed, and insulted every moment of the day.
And as long as you don't whine like a bitch when Dems decide to play that same game....like if they decide to pass that infrastructure bill on their own...because they can...
Nobody gives a fuck about bipartisanship. We just want you all gone.
Democratic socialism is here to stay....
Social Security, Medicare, FDIC, Overtime Pay, Labor Protections, etc will still be the most popular policies in the US long after your fragile ass is dead and in the dirt
I can live with most of that. It's the racism, hate, violence, and human rights abuses you people bring to the table that we need to get rid of.
I oppose Conservatives based on their policies.....
If Conservatives had popular policies that had popular support - you folks wouldn't have to resort to hyperbole and culture war BS so much.........
They don't care. They're gonna destroy whoever gets in their way. Their version of "democracy" is kill your political opponents.He was an innocent man who was slandered and libel to the point that his whole career and reputation were looking to be destroyed--------his reactions, ahole, were normal for an innocent person. Hint for you---someone who engages in bad behavior and lies regularly themselves would have looked more composed. Watching an innocent man dragged thru the mud is not a pretty sight.Freaks? Sounds like this asshole!I hope so. Its almost guaranteed that anyone that senile perv nominates, will be a circus freak.
Look at his admin. Look at his AG, a guy he wanted on SC. Thinks trying to kill federal agents in a federal building over political reasons isnt terrorism because its at night
Fuckin freaks man. Freaks.
View attachment 501299
^ was probably completely satisfied by the display of the previous circus. lolI hope so. Its almost guaranteed that anyone that senile perv nominates, will be a circus freak.
Look at his admin. Look at his AG, a guy he wanted on SC. Thinks trying to kill federal agents in a federal building over political reasons isnt terrorism because its at night
Fuckin freaks man. Freaks.
In other words...I like all of the policies they came up with; I just don't like Dems because they are poopyheads...cool...Too late bro.....As long as you admit bipartisanship is just shit Republicans demand when they aren't in power....McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…
"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.
McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."
Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....
That's his job. Anything less would be a problem. EVERYTHING Harris/Biden try to do needs to be opposed, and they need to be harassed, obstructed, and insulted every moment of the day.
And as long as you don't whine like a bitch when Dems decide to play that same game....like if they decide to pass that infrastructure bill on their own...because they can...
Nobody gives a fuck about bipartisanship. We just want you all gone.
Democratic socialism is here to stay....
Social Security, Medicare, FDIC, Overtime Pay, Labor Protections, etc will still be the most popular policies in the US long after your fragile ass is dead and in the dirt
I can live with most of that. It's the racism, hate, violence, and human rights abuses you people bring to the table that we need to get rid of.
I oppose Conservatives based on their policies.....
If Conservatives had popular policies that had popular support - you folks wouldn't have to resort to hyperbole and culture war BS so much.........
^ probably wrong as usual. lol^ was probably completely satisfied by the display of the previous circus. lolI hope so. Its almost guaranteed that anyone that senile perv nominates, will be a circus freak.
Look at his admin. Look at his AG, a guy he wanted on SC. Thinks trying to kill federal agents in a federal building over political reasons isnt terrorism because its at night
Fuckin freaks man. Freaks.
McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…
"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.
McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."
Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....
Moscow Mitch is a Traitor....just like January 6 trump....McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…
"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.
McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."
Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....
Let us grill Progs that way. Anyway....nuclear, biological and chemical attacks on our homeland is welcomed now.Freaks? Sounds like this asshole!I hope so. Its almost guaranteed that anyone that senile perv nominates, will be a circus freak.
Look at his admin. Look at his AG, a guy he wanted on SC. Thinks trying to kill federal agents in a federal building over political reasons isnt terrorism because its at night
Fuckin freaks man. Freaks.
View attachment 501299
Bawahahahahahahahahhahaha....McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…
"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.
McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."
Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....
Sen. McConnell learned his lesson. The last time there was an opening during a Presidential campaign, he pushed it forward and took a HUGE amount of grief from the libs.
If it happens again, he will reverse course and slow it down.
Cool, maybe you could do that if McTurtle stopped cock-blocking D appointees eh?Let us grill Progs that way. Anyway....nuclear, biological and chemical attacks on our homeland is welcomed now.Freaks? Sounds like this asshole!I hope so. Its almost guaranteed that anyone that senile perv nominates, will be a circus freak.
Look at his admin. Look at his AG, a guy he wanted on SC. Thinks trying to kill federal agents in a federal building over political reasons isnt terrorism because its at night
Fuckin freaks man. Freaks.
View attachment 501299
The wording of your topic heading screams...I'M A RUSSIAN TROLL.McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…
"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.
McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."
Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....
Refute the article then....The wording of your topic heading screams...I'M A RUSSIAN TROLL.McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…
"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.
McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."
Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....
The wording of your topic heading screams...I'M A RUSSIAN TROLL.McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…
"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.
McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."
Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....
