Hillary paid a law firm to buy a fake Russian dossier to help her chances of getting elected.

[Nostra]

So why isn't' she on trial just like Trump? It's the same scenario, and all she and the DNC got were fines.

Definitely a two tiered justice system.

FEC fines Clinton and DNC for misreporting Steele dossier funding

Both were fined for misreporting the dossier funding as legal services instead of opposition research, according to the FEC.

www.axios.com

 

[WEATHER53]

Yes she paid for that to impune Trump and help her chances and it was all a Lie
However she is a Democrat which avails her an endless string of but…but…but..buts

 

[ColonelAngus]

Every single campaign ad is election interference.

I SAW A ANTI DESANTIS AD TALKING ABOUT A “DONT SAY GAY” BILL.

Total lie. Total disinformation. There is no such thing as a “DONT SAY GAY“ bill.

This is electon interference. Jail? Sure.

 

[Marener]

It's always fascinating when MAGAs make it so incredibly clear they have absolutely no idea what's going on.

 

[WEATHER53]

It's always fascinating when MAGAs make it so incredibly clear they have absolutely no idea what's going on.

Let me know when you feel or wish we have done that

 

[Yarddog]

Right, and Democrats are now trying to find Trump guilty of Influencing an election. Because she had some other firm do the dirty work, its called legal. Go out, look for a crime. If there is no crime, just embellish something, make something up and feed it to the news outlets. repeat it a thousand times and it takes on a reality of its own and becomes another investigation.

 

[OldFlame]

Yes she paid for that to impune Trump and help her chances and it was all a Lie
However she is a Democrat which avails her an endless string of but…but…but..buts

Not only that, it cost the tax payer millions for a fake investigation and hearings and lies on US 'media' about it for years.

 

[progressive hunter]

It's always fascinating when MAGAs make it so incredibly clear they have absolutely no idea what's going on.

and yet you cant explain it,,

almost like youre trolling because you know its true,,,,

 

[OldFlame]

It's always fascinating when MAGAs make it so incredibly clear they have absolutely no idea what's going on.

So you have no intelligent rebuttal? Why don't you just say so, altho I guess in a way you just did.

 

[Nostra]

It's always fascinating when MAGAs make it so incredibly clear they have absolutely no idea what's going on.

Feel free to explain the differences instead of just whining, Simp.

Here is one difference: The FEC investigated both. Fined Hitlery and the DNC, said there was nothing there with Trump.

Hmmmmm....................

 

[Nostra]

So you have no intelligent rebuttal?

Moroner? Good one!

 

[bendog]

The fine was for categorizing it "legal expenses" rather then "opposition research."

FEC fines Clinton and DNC for misreporting Steele dossier funding

Both were fined for misreporting the dossier funding as legal services instead of opposition research, according to the FEC.

www.axios.com

Trump's problem is whether the money got tangled up in his campaign. And both Cohen and Pecker pled out on that being the case.

 

[Marener]

Let me know when you feel or wish we have done that

Uh, everything you guys are saying in this thread.

Not sure why you think the Steele Dossier was illegal, but its not.

 

[Marener]

and yet you cant explain it,,

almost like youre trolling because you know its true,,,,

What’s to explain? Theres nothing illegal about paying people to do opposition research.

Explain how this has any relation to Trump’s court case

 

[bendog]

What’s to explain? Theres nothing illegal about paying people to do opposition research.

And to be honest, I thought opposition research was ok being characterized as legal advice. I mean .... what else are lawyers for but to pay off witnesses (-:

 

[progressive hunter]

What’s to explain? Theres nothing illegal about paying people to do opposition research.

Explain how this has any relation to Trump’s court case

so having a russian spy create a dossier filled with lies and releasing it as fact on a political opponent is OK with you??

trump is being accuse of election interference because he didnt want a hooker to talk about him fucking her,,
what hilary did is far worse than that,,

so I guess youre right,,
there is no relationship in the two,,

 

[Lastamender]

So why isn't' she on trial just like Trump? It's the same scenario, and all she and the DNC got were fines.

Definitely a two tiered justice system.

FEC fines Clinton and DNC for misreporting Steele dossier funding

Both were fined for misreporting the dossier funding as legal services instead of opposition research, according to the FEC.

www.axios.com

Any trial date yet? Has a grand jury been convened? Has her house been raided?

 

[Marener]

so having a russian spy create a dossier filled with lies and releasing it as fact on a political opponent is OK with you??

trump is being accuse of election interference because he didnt want a hooker to talk about him fucking her,,
what hilary did is far worse than that,,

so I guess youre right,,
there is no relationship in the two,,

The dossier wasn't even known to the public until after the election, so it's not as if Clinton even attempted to capitalize on it. Whether it's full of lies or not is completely irrelevant. As we all know, it's not against the law to tell lies.

Trump is accused of falsifying business records to cover up campaign finance violations. How is anything Clinton did "worse" than that?

 

[bendog]

so having a russian spy create a dossier filled with lies and releasing it as fact on a political opponent is OK with you??

trump is being accuse of election interference because he didnt want a hooker to talk about him fucking her,,
what hilary did is far worse than that,,

so I guess youre right,,
there is no relationship in the two,,

Hillary had the grace to retire. Trump had that opportunity.

Both are crooks and either sexual predators or enablers thereof.

 

[Lastamender]

The dossier wasn't even known to the public until after the election, so it's not as if Clinton even attempted to capitalize on it. Whether it's full of lies or not is completely irrelevant. As we all know, it's not against the law to tell lies.

Trump is accused of falsifying business records to cover up campaign finance violations. How is anything Clinton did "worse" than that?

Ask the Haitians.