Brave Patriot Mitch McConnell Announces He Will Block Biden Supreme Court Picks

[Biff_Poindexter]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

 

[TNHarley]

I hope so. Its almost guaranteed that anyone that senile perv nominates, will be a circus freak.
Look at his admin. Look at his AG, a guy he wanted on SC. Thinks trying to kill federal agents in a federal building over political reasons isnt terrorism because its at night
Fuckin freaks man. Freaks.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

I hope so. Its almost guaranteed that anyone that senile perv nominates, will be a circus freak.
Look at his admin. Look at his AG, a guy he wanted on SC. Thinks trying to kill federal agents in a federal building over political reasons isnt terrorism because its at night
Fuckin clowns man. Clowns.

That is basically what the Constitution says too...

A sitting president can't nominate anyone if Conservatives don't like him and thinks he is senile...

 

[whitehall]

What Supreme Court picks? Don't lefties have enough on their plate without fantasizing about an untimely death of a conservative Justice?

 

[TNHarley]

I hope so. Its almost guaranteed that anyone that senile perv nominates, will be a circus freak.
Look at his admin. Look at his AG, a guy he wanted on SC. Thinks trying to kill federal agents in a federal building over political reasons isnt terrorism because its at night
Fuckin clowns man. Clowns.

That is basically what the Constitution says too...

A sitting president can't nominate anyone if Conservatives don't like him and thinks he is senile...

I didnt even come close to implying he cant, or shouldnt, nominate them. I said turtle should block them.
Please work on your literacy, dumbfuck. TIA

 

[whitehall]

Is there a stealthy plan by democrats to stack the Court with additional Justices? What is the Pravda media hiding?

 

[DrLove]

I hope so. Its almost guaranteed that anyone that senile perv nominates, will be a circus freak.
Look at his admin. Look at his AG, a guy he wanted on SC. Thinks trying to kill federal agents in a federal building over political reasons isnt terrorism because its at night
Fuckin freaks man. Freaks.

Freaks? Sounds like this asshole!

 

[TNHarley]

I hope so. Its almost guaranteed that anyone that senile perv nominates, will be a circus freak.
Look at his admin. Look at his AG, a guy he wanted on SC. Thinks trying to kill federal agents in a federal building over political reasons isnt terrorism because its at night
Fuckin freaks man. Freaks.

Freaks? Sounds like this asshole!

View attachment 501299

Oh please. If he had purple eyeliner on, you would be salivating at the mouth.

 

[marvin martian]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

That's his job. Anything less would be a problem. EVERYTHING Harris/Biden try to do needs to be opposed, and they need to be harassed, obstructed, and insulted every moment of the day.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

I hope so. Its almost guaranteed that anyone that senile perv nominates, will be a circus freak.
Look at his admin. Look at his AG, a guy he wanted on SC. Thinks trying to kill federal agents in a federal building over political reasons isnt terrorism because its at night
Fuckin clowns man. Clowns.

That is basically what the Constitution says too...

A sitting president can't nominate anyone if Conservatives don't like him and thinks he is senile...

I didnt even come close to implying he cant, or shouldnt, nominate them. I said turtle should block them.
Please work on your literacy, dumbfuck. TIA

Yea, I know you will cheerlead for the same shit you will cry foul about depending on what letter is by their name...

Hacks are like that.......all of that constitutional principles talk is just that...talk

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

That's his job. Anything less would be a problem. EVERYTHING Harris/Biden try to do needs to be opposed, and they need to be harassed, obstructed, and insulted every moment of the day.

As long as you admit bipartisanship is just shit Republicans demand when they aren't in power....

And as long as you don't whine like a bitch when Dems decide to play that same game....like if they decide to pass that infrastructure bill on their own...because they can...

 

[TNHarley]

I hope so. Its almost guaranteed that anyone that senile perv nominates, will be a circus freak.
Look at his admin. Look at his AG, a guy he wanted on SC. Thinks trying to kill federal agents in a federal building over political reasons isnt terrorism because its at night
Fuckin clowns man. Clowns.

That is basically what the Constitution says too...

A sitting president can't nominate anyone if Conservatives don't like him and thinks he is senile...

I didnt even come close to implying he cant, or shouldnt, nominate them. I said turtle should block them.
Please work on your literacy, dumbfuck. TIA

Yea, I know you will cheerlead for the same shit you will cry foul about depending on what letter is by their name...

Hacks are like that.......all of that constitutional principles talk is just that...talk

wow

 

[rightwinger]

Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

 

[marvin martian]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

That's his job. Anything less would be a problem. EVERYTHING Harris/Biden try to do needs to be opposed, and they need to be harassed, obstructed, and insulted every moment of the day.

As long as you admit bipartisanship is just shit Republicans demand when they aren't in power....

And as long as you don't whine like a bitch when Dems decide to play that same game....like if they decide to pass that infrastructure bill on their own...because they can...

Nobody gives a fuck about bipartisanship. We just want you all gone.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

That's his job. Anything less would be a problem. EVERYTHING Harris/Biden try to do needs to be opposed, and they need to be harassed, obstructed, and insulted every moment of the day.

As long as you admit bipartisanship is just shit Republicans demand when they aren't in power....

And as long as you don't whine like a bitch when Dems decide to play that same game....like if they decide to pass that infrastructure bill on their own...because they can...

Nobody gives a fuck about bipartisanship. We just want you all gone.

Too late bro.....

Democratic socialism is here to stay....

Social Security, Medicare, FDIC, Overtime Pay, Labor Protections, etc will still be the most popular policies in the US long after your fragile ass is dead and in the dirt

 

[theHawk]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

Because a Dem wouldn’t do the same thing?

 

[TNHarley]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

That's his job. Anything less would be a problem. EVERYTHING Harris/Biden try to do needs to be opposed, and they need to be harassed, obstructed, and insulted every moment of the day.

As long as you admit bipartisanship is just shit Republicans demand when they aren't in power....

And as long as you don't whine like a bitch when Dems decide to play that same game....like if they decide to pass that infrastructure bill on their own...because they can...

Nobody gives a fuck about bipartisanship. We just want you all gone.

Too late bro.....

Democratic socialism is here to stay....

Social Security, Medicare, FDIC, Overtime Pay, Labor Protections, etc will still be the most popular policies in the US long after your fragile ass is dead and in the dirt

You federal supremacists are the stupidest mother fuckers on the planet.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

Because a Dem wouldn’t do the same thing?

But aren't you "better" and more "constitutional" than the Dems??

You know you are losing when your only retort is "but Dems would have done it too"

 

[marvin martian]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

That's his job. Anything less would be a problem. EVERYTHING Harris/Biden try to do needs to be opposed, and they need to be harassed, obstructed, and insulted every moment of the day.

As long as you admit bipartisanship is just shit Republicans demand when they aren't in power....

And as long as you don't whine like a bitch when Dems decide to play that same game....like if they decide to pass that infrastructure bill on their own...because they can...

Nobody gives a fuck about bipartisanship. We just want you all gone.

Too late bro.....

Democratic socialism is here to stay....

Social Security, Medicare, FDIC, Overtime Pay, Labor Protections, etc will still be the most popular policies in the US long after your fragile ass is dead and in the dirt

I can live with most of that. It's the racism, hate, violence, and human rights abuses you people bring to the table that we need to get rid of.

 

[theHawk]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

Because a Dem wouldn’t do the same thing?

But aren't you "better" and more "constitutional" than the Dems??

You know you are losing when your only retort is "but Dems would have done it too"

Well “Constitutionality” the Senate has to confirm. They are not obligated to confirm if they don’t want.

If you don’t want Mitch involved then win more elections.

Ever since Dems want to play politics with nominees and accuse them of rape, you’re mad Republicans are going to not play nice?
Are you going to cry now?