Brave Patriot Mitch McConnell Announces He Will Block Biden Supreme Court Picks

[DrLove]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

The wording of your topic heading screams...I'M A RUSSIAN TROLL.

Ben - Biff writes satire. He’s on our team

 

[Winston]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

Where the hell do you people come up with this shit. There was nothing bipartisan about the nomination of Barrett. Damn but you guys must reside in some alternate reality.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

The wording of your topic heading screams...I'M A RUSSIAN TROLL.

That's because he's a Russian troll.

I thought you guys loved Russian trolls

 

[d0gbreath]

Nobody gives a fuck about bipartisanship. We just want you all gone.

And we want y'all gone. That's bipartisan in a weird way.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Nobody gives a fuck about bipartisanship. We just want you all gone.

And we want y'all gone. That's bipartisan in a weird way.

I just want them and their families to have affordable healthcare, expanded social security benefits and forward thinking infrastructure....

Seems Conservatives only support a policy if they believe its "hurting" a specific group of people they don't like....

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

That's his job. Anything less would be a problem. EVERYTHING Harris/Biden try to do needs to be opposed, and they need to be harassed, obstructed, and insulted every moment of the day.

As long as you admit bipartisanship is just shit Republicans demand when they aren't in power....

And as long as you don't whine like a bitch when Dems decide to play that same game....like if they decide to pass that infrastructure bill on their own...because they can...

Why haven't they?

 

[Ben Thomson]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

The wording of your topic heading screams...I'M A RUSSIAN TROLL.

Refute the article then.

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

The wording of your topic heading screams...I'M A RUSSIAN TROLL.

That's because he's a Russian troll.

I thought you guys loved Russian trolls

Nope..that would be Trump's cult..they love the hell out of them. The Russians reciprocate the love by calling them 'useful idiots'

 

[Ben Thomson]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

The wording of your topic heading screams...I'M A RUSSIAN TROLL.

Ben - Biff writes satire. He’s on our team

Oh..that explains it..sorry about the misunderstanding.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

Sen. McConnell learned his lesson. The last time there was an opening during a Presidential campaign, he pushed it forward and took a HUGE amount of grief from the libs.

If it happens again, he will reverse course and slow it down.

Why do you think he would do that? It worked, and thus got the desired result. Can you imagine who Biden would have nominated?

 

[marvin martian]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

The wording of your topic heading screams...I'M A RUSSIAN TROLL.

That's because he's a Russian troll.

I thought you guys loved Russian trolls

Wrong group. This is who you're thinking of:

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

The wording of your topic heading screams...I'M A RUSSIAN TROLL.

Ben - Biff writes satire. He’s on our team

Oh..that explains it..sorry about the misunderstanding.

No, Biff writes stupidity. He cannot even get conservative ideas right.

 

[Winco]

It's the racism, hate, violence, and human rights abuses you people

Give it a rest Marvin.
The Southerners are the True Racists.
What happens in Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia, etc is where you see this happen.

But, go again and tell me, again, that the (D) started the KKK.
I never disagreed with that.
What you are ignoring is the FACT that those Southern D, are now current R.

 

[Synthaholic]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

Because a Dem wouldn’t do the same thing?

When have they ever?

 

[Synthaholic]

I'm glad Moscow Mitch said this. It should wake Joseph Biden (God's choice) up to the fact that Republicans are anti-American. He can't negotiate with these terrorists and should just expand the court and convince Breyer to step down after this term.

 

[theHawk]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

Because a Dem wouldn’t do the same thing?

When have they ever?

When have the Dems voted to nominate any GOP appointee?

All the left does is obstruct. They accuse GOP nominees of sexual assault with zero proof, have protesters storm the Capitol to disrupt the hearings,….”but but but” you can’t recall.

 

[Synthaholic]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

Because a Dem wouldn’t do the same thing?

When have they ever?

When have the Dems voted to nominate any GOP appointee?

All the left does is obstruct. They accuse GOP nominees of sexual assault with zero proof, have protesters storm the Capitol to disrupt the hearings,….”but but but” you can’t recall.

They voted for Gorsuch and Beer Boy. And Thomas. And Alito. And Scalia. And Roberts.

 

[theHawk]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

Because a Dem wouldn’t do the same thing?

When have they ever?

When have the Dems voted to nominate any GOP appointee?

All the left does is obstruct. They accuse GOP nominees of sexual assault with zero proof, have protesters storm the Capitol to disrupt the hearings,….”but but but” you can’t recall.

They voted for Gorsuch and Beer Boy. And Thomas. And Alito. And Scalia. And Roberts.

Haha, yea. Three Dems voted for Gorsuch.

You’re welcome to find some GOP to vote for Biden’s picks.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

Because a Dem wouldn’t do the same thing?

When have they ever?

When have the Dems voted to nominate any GOP appointee?

All the left does is obstruct. They accuse GOP nominees of sexual assault with zero proof, have protesters storm the Capitol to disrupt the hearings,….”but but but” you can’t recall.

Again.....I thought you God-fearing Christian conservatives were better than the left....

Why do you keep defending everything by saying "but but but the Left does it too"

And even getting that part wrong...

 

[Synthaholic]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

Because a Dem wouldn’t do the same thing?

When have they ever?

When have the Dems voted to nominate any GOP appointee?

All the left does is obstruct. They accuse GOP nominees of sexual assault with zero proof, have protesters storm the Capitol to disrupt the hearings,….”but but but” you can’t recall.

They voted for Gorsuch and Beer Boy. And Thomas. And Alito. And Scalia. And Roberts.

Haha, yea. Three Dems voted for Gorsuch.

You’re welcome to find some GOP to vote for Biden’s picks.

Stop day drinking. You make no sense.

 

[AZrailwhale]

McConnell signals GOP would block Biden Supreme Court pick in ’24

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn’t advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occu…

thehill.com

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) signaled Monday that Republicans, if they win back control of the upper chamber, wouldn't advance a Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy occurred in 2024, the year of the next presidential election.

McConnell was asked if a GOP-controlled Senate would take the same tack in 2024 that it did in 2016, when they refused to give former President Obama's final Supreme Court pick, a hearing or a vote. McConnell declined to say what Republicans would do if a justice stepped down in mid-2023 and Republicans controlled the Senate. "We'll have to wait and see what happens," McConnell said, asked by Hewitt if the nominee would get a fair shot."

Mitch is exactly spot on here...and the reason this is being discussed is because of the strong chance that Breyer may step down soon..so if the Dems don't nominate the SC pick that Republicans tell them to (a Conservative) -- then that pick shouldn't ever get a hearing because that isn't bipartisanship....For example, when the GOP nominated Amy Barrett just mere weeks after the death of Ginsburg and then she was appointed just a week before the election -- that was done in a bipartisan way....Mitch basically asked the Dems whom they think should be nominated and they all said Amy...he wouldn't have just rammed thru a nominee like this just a month before the election if he didn't ok it with the Dems first....

That's been a normal practice. When the opposing party controls the senate, presidential picks have very rarely been approved unless they are acceptable to both parties and that hasn't happened for a couple of decades.